fbpx
Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Carney would ditch carbon tax in favour of green “incentives”

Source: X

Liberal leadership candidate Mark Carney announced that, if elected, he would cancel the party’s contentious carbon tax in favour of green “incentives” for Canadians and businesses.

“The consumer carbon tax isn’t working; it’s become too divisive. That’s why I’ll cancel it and replace it with incentives to reward people for greener choices” Carney said  in a statement Friday.

According to Carney, he would implement a green incentive program that would reward Canadians for purchasing energy efficient appliances and electric vehicles.

On a global scale, Carney said his replacement program would partner with other countries on trade that are also “engaged in the fight against climate change” in a way that would “ensure fairness for Canadian industries.”

He also announced plans to invest in energy-efficient buildings and electrified transportation, and would impose taxes on big polluters. 

Carney claims his new suite of green incentive measures would enable Canadian businesses to “leapfrog the United States in international markets.”

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has been calling for an end to the carbon tax since March 2022. 

“Pierre Poilievre pretends we have to choose between fighting climate change and growing our economy,” reads Carney’s statement. “His simplistic and misleading Axe the Tax inaction won’t work and would cost families more.”

Poilievre responded to Carney’s latest announcement by saying that he “simply can’t be trusted.”

“Whatever he tries to tell Canadians now, Carbon Tax Carney has been Justin Trudeau’s Economic Growth Advisor, who has been saying for years not only that he supports consumer carbon taxes but that they need to be even higher,” said Poilievre in a statement released Friday. 

“He has spoken about his plans before, saying that Canada ‘needs to use effectively a shadow carbon price, meaning that you map into a representative carbon price the impact of, for example, an emissions regulation.’ 

The majority of Canadians remain unconvinced that any Liberal leader would eliminate the consumer carbon tax.

According to a Leger poll released Wednesday, 51% of Canadians are not confident that Liberal candidates will live up to their word and eliminate the carbon tax. Only 36% believe they will.

The carbon tax was first implemented in April 2019 at the cost of $20 per tonne with the goal of it being subsequently increased $10 annually to $50 in 2022.

Then the carbon tax began increasing by $15 a year, bringing it to $80 per tonne last year with the target of climbing to $170 a tonne by 2030.

It’s been a highly contested policy, with a recent poll revealing that 64% of Canadians across all party lines want to see it suspended immediately. 

Among those polled who were decided on the issue, 77% were in support of the government immediately suspending the carbon tax across all demographics, such as age, gender and region. 

“The poll results are crystal clear: the vast majority of Canadians want the government to immediately suspend the carbon tax,” said Canadian Taxpayers Federation federal director Franco Terrazzano. “Canadians shouldn’t have to pay the carbon tax on one more home heating bill or one more trip to the gas station.” 

When it comes to respondents’ political stripes, Conservatives were the most likely to support suspending the carbon tax at 89%, followed by Liberals at 67%.

Liberal leadership hopeful Chrystia Freeland also said she would end the consumer portion of the carbon tax if elected, despite increasing it several times during her tenure as Minister of Finance and boasting about such policies in the House of Commons as recently as last fall.

Trump confirms 25% tariffs are coming on Saturday for Canada and Mexico

Source: Facebook

American President Donald Trump has confirmed he will impose a 25% tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico on Saturday, citing concerns over border security, drug smuggling, and trade deficits.

Trump made the announcement on Thursday. While he said oil “has nothing to do with it,” it’s unclear whether that means oil will be exempt or whether it means it does not hold sway over the incoming tariffs.

He outlined three key reasons for the inbound tariffs.

“Number one is the people that have poured into our country so horribly and so much; Number two are the drugs, fentanyl, and everything else that have come into the country; and, number three are the massive subsidies that we’re giving to Canada and to Mexico in the form of deficits,” said Trump.

Trump confirmed that the tariffs will be 25% on Canada and also 25% on Mexico, though they are separate tariffs. And he warned that the tariffs could rise with time.

The Trump administration previously hinted that the 25% tariffs on Canadian imports would be part of a two-phase plan. 

The first phase on Feb. 1 is aimed at addressing the fentanyl crisis, whereas the second phase is set to begin in April after Trump receives a study he commissioned to be completed by Apr. 1 focusing on the administration’s America First Trade Policy.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford, Chair of Canada’s Premiers, continued his call for retaliatory measures.

“President Trump is hellbent on undermining Canada,” Ford wrote on X following the tariff confirmation. “The federal government needs to be ready to immediately implement a strong and forceful response. Dollar for dollar. Tariff for tariff.”

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith called for Ottawa to appoint a border czar to work with their U.S. counterpart to avoid the upcoming tariffs. The request was made the day before Trump’s most recent tariff announcement.

The Liberals have yet to respond to Trump’s most recent confirmation of the tariffs, but Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has previously advocated for retaliation. For retaliation to occur, it means the tariffs are in place. Smith previously said that she wished to avoid the tariffs altogether by emphasizing collaboration.

Despite standing alone initially, some premiers have shifted sides and aligned with Smith’s approach, such as those in Quebec and Saskatchewan. 

Minister of Transport and International Trade Anita Anand previously said that Canadians will have to “bear the sacrifice” of the retaliatory measures to the tariffs.

The Liberals have also hinted at issuing pandemic-style payouts to businesses harmed by the tariffs.

This is a developing story and will be updated as necessary

64% of Canadians across political affiliation want carbon tax suspended immediately

Source: X

There’s a mounting consensus among a growing majority of Canadians, regardless of political affiliations, that the carbon tax should be suspended right away. 

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation commissioned the polling firm Leger to conduct a survey asking Canadians if they would like to see the federal government suspend the carbon tax immediately. Pollsters discovered that 64% of Canadians agreed that it was time for the carbon tax to be suspended.

The survey inquired whether those polled supported, opposed or were unsure about suspending the carbon tax. 

While the bulk of respondents would support a, 19% said they would oppose and another cohort of 19% answered that they were unsure. 

Among those who were decided on the issue, 77% of Canadians were in support of the government immediately suspending the carbon tax across all demographics, such as age, gender and region. 

“The poll results are crystal clear: the vast majority of Canadians want the government to immediately suspend the carbon tax,” said CTF federal director Franco Terrazzano. “Canadians shouldn’t have to pay the carbon tax on one more home heating bill or one more trip to the gas station.” 

When it comes to respondent’s political stripes, Conservatives were the most likely to support suspending the carbon tax at 89%, followed by Liberals at 67%.

The majority of NDP, Bloc Quebecois and Green Party voters all supported the tax being suspended as well at 65%, 64% and 68%, respectively.

“Axing” the carbon tax outright has been a longstanding party slogan for the Conservatives for the past several years, but their pledge has been echoed by Liberal leadership candidates as of late. 

“The Conservatives say they will scrap the carbon tax and even Liberals are talking about scrapping the carbon tax, so if the next prime minister is getting rid of it, there’s no reason for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to punish Canadians with one more carbon tax bill,” Terrazzano said. “The government must do the right thing and scrap the carbon tax now.”

Leadership hopeful Chrystia Freeland said she would end the consumer portion of the carbon tax if elected, despite increasing it several times during her tenure as Minister of Finance and boasting about such policies in the House of Commons as recently as last fall. 

As for Liberal leadership candidate Mark Carney, he has yet to publicly say where he stands on the matter. However, the Toronto Star reported that Carney “has been telling Liberal MPs in private conversations that he will repeal the consumer price.”

However, despite the change in tune from the Liberal side of the political aisle, the majority of Canadians remain unconvinced that a new Liberal leader will eliminate the consumer carbon tax.

According to a separate Leger poll released Wednesday, 51% of Canadians are not confident that Liberal candidates will live up to their word and eliminate the carbon tax. Meanwhile, only 36% believe they will.

Civil liberties groups warn about inquiry’s recommendation for “foreign disinfo” monitor

Source: Unsplash

Some civil liberties organizations in Canada are concerned about the Foreign Interference Commission’s recommendation to establish a new government agency to monitor “foreign disinformation” online.

The Canadian Constitution Foundation and Open Media have raised concerns over Commissioner Mary-Josee Hogue’s final report on foreign interference.

They say that Hogue’s 11th recommendation to establish a “government entity” to monitor social media for disinformation and misinformation could be used as a “back door” to target Canadians with government censorship and privacy violations.

The recommendation, one of 51 recommendations to bolster Canada’s defence against foreign interference in its elections, suggests that the “entity” has the authority to “give and receive intelligence and information.” 

It also says the government should consider giving the new government agency the authority to “interact” with social media platforms, though it does not define what the term “interact” would entail.

The recommendation is prefaced by saying that the entity should be structured “to comply with applicable law,” should work with national security and intelligence agencies and “international partners, civil society groups and private organizations,” and be privy to intelligence on foreign interference.

“I stress that I am not recommending that the government monitor all social media activity or private or semi-private communications of Canadians,” Hogue states in the preamble to the call to action. “Canadians can have the right to freely associate and express themselves online, and the right to privacy extends to online spaces.”

However, Open Media and the CCF have doubts about how the Canadian government could choose to interpret the suggestions.

Matt Hatfield, the executive director of the online civil liberties group Open Media told True North that the recommendations are just vague enough that they could be used to justify “both bad and good ideas.”

“How the next government picks up these recommendations and acts on them is going to be very important,” said Hatfield. “Fundamentally, politics in Canada should be debated and decided by Canadians.”

Both groups acknowledged that foreign entities are attempting to influence politics and conversations in Canada to be favourable to their interests and that it is certainly a problem worth addressing with full transparency to the Canadian public.

“That said, you can easily imagine the authority to issue orders to social media being distorted or abused to squelch the legitimate expression of people in Canada,” Hatfield said. “Some allegations were made of foreign influence during the convoy, for example, that were not born out by the facts at the time or after.”

He said it is “critical” that any power to compel data from social media platforms be “very carefully” described so it can’t easily be abused to surveil or silence Canadians. 

Christine van Geyn, the litigation director of the CCF, laid out her concerns on the most recent episode of the CCF’s civil liberties podcast, “Not Reserving Judgement,” on Wednesday.

“There is an issue with defining what disinformation or misinformation is, and this is actually an issue that’s been created by the government,” she said. “No one trusts these terms anymore, and it’s because of the way the government conducted it has conducted itself in large part during the pandemic.”

She noted that the government had claimed many subjects were disinformation, only for those topics to be later revealed by the government or journalists to be founded in truth or a matter of opinion.

She had concerns about the “civil society groups” mentioned in the recommendation being only those chosen by the state, the vague meaning behind the term “interact” when describing what the entity should be able to do and the potential for “mission creep.”

“Giving authority to a new agency to monitor online behaviour and develop intelligence information, I think, is a gateway to collecting information about citizens posting things online that the government doesn’t like or disagrees with,” Van Geyn said. 

She said there are still people who claim the freedom convoy was a foreign-funded disinformation campaign, naming Liberal leadership candidate Mark Carney as one such offender.

Van Geyn noted an Op-Ed the central banker wrote in the Globe and Mail where he said anyone donating to the Freedom Convoy “should be in no doubt: You are funding sedition” and that foreign funders of “the insurrection” interfered “from the start.”

“This just wasn’t true. You know, 88% of the donations on GoFundMe were from Canadians, both Give-Send-Go and GoFundMe said there were zero donations from Russia or China,” Van Geyn said.

She said even the CBC repeated the narrative that the Kremlin was behind the protest, and she worries that the state will wield the new government entity to crack down on similarly unfounded concerns.

“I think that there are real issues with foreign interference and spreading disinformation, but I have very, very little faith that a new agency to make these determinations will do so in a way that doesn’t chill the speech of Canadians and end up surveilling our own domestic protest movements.”

Descendants, historians blast TDSB for renaming Macdonald, Dundas, Ryerson schools

Source: TDSB

As the Toronto District School Board moves to rename three schools dedicated to Sir John A. Macdonald, Henry Dundas, and Egerton Ryerson, critics of the plan say that the school board’s decision is wrongminded and based on a distortion of historical facts.

Earlier this week, the TDSB’s special committee dedicated to purging “offensive” school names sent a recommendation to trustees urging the board to strip three schools of their names – Dundas Junior Public School, Ryerson Community School, and the Sir John A Macdonald Collegiate Institute.

The committee rationalized the decision by claiming the three figures reinforce Canada’s “systems of oppression,” “legacy of colonialism,” and “histories of discrimination.”

“This recommendation is based on the potential impact that these names may have on students and staff based on colonial history, anti-indigenous racism and their connection to systems of oppression,” reads the committee’s recommendation.

However, descendants of the figures in question and historians number among the critics of the TDSB’s decision. They say that the board is making a vacuous decision based on a misunderstanding of the legacies of Macdonald, Ryerson, and Dundas.

Jennifer Dundas, a retired Crown prosecutor, told True North that she is frustrated with the renaming of Dundas Junior Public School and the way Henry has been portrayed by the school board. According to Jennifer Dundas, Henry Dundas is a forebear of hers and was a third cousin of one of her ancestors.

“I am pretty fed up with highly educated administrators ignoring the scholarly literature on Henry Dundas, and perpetuating the lie that he delayed abolition,” said Jennifer Dundas.

Henry Dundas was a prominent minister for British Prime Minister William Pitt who worked with abolitionist William Wilberforce to abolish hereditary slavery immediately and gradually abolish the slave trade overall within the British empire. 

Jennifer Dundas says that the academic literature does not support the argument that her ancestor was pro-slavery, despite what the TDSB may say.

“Three recently published peer-reviewed articles have exonerated Henry Dundas, and Scotland’s most eminent historian has denounced the accusations against him as ‘bad history.’ The most recent peer-reviewed article reveals new evidence that he was an abolitionist.”

Jennifer Dundas is referring to a 2023 article in Scottish Affairs by Angela McCarthy, a professor in Scottish and Irish history who argues that, contrary to the claims of progressive activists who misrepresent his views, Henry Dundas was an abolitionist.

Jennifer Dundas says that people who get offended by the Dundas name are misinformed and that her ancestor should be remembered as a staunch abolitionist.

“If children and staff are offended as a result of misinformation, that’s no basis for renaming a school,” Jennifer Dundas told True North.

“TDSB has a duty to provide reliable and accurate information so that children and staff are not emotionally harmed. They have a duty to educate. Their failure accurately to inform their students is a dereliction of duty.”

Toronto Metropolitan University professor and author of the latest biography “Sir John A. Macdonald & the Apocalyptic Year 1885” Patrice Dutil denounced the TDSB renaming Sir John A Macdonald Collegiate Institute.

Macdonald was the primary architect of Confederation, serving as Canada’s first and third prime minister for a total of 19 years.

Dutil told True North that the renaming of the Sir John A Macdonald Collegiate Institute is a “terrible idea” and a “slap in the face of Canada.”

“It is a terrible idea. Macdonald’s record is as clear as it could be: he was a champion of all minorities and his legacy has always been honoured until now,” said Dutil.

“To remove the name Macdonald from that school is a slap in the face of Canada.”

Dutil contends that Macdonald treated Indigenous Canadians fairly and that he should be remembered as a “champion.”

“When he was in power, Macdonald saved indigenous lives by providing them with medicines and food. Nobody else did that. To pretend otherwise is simply to be ignorant of history,” said Dutil.

“He remains to this day Canada’s most important individual: he never stopped believing in it and in the potential of its people. He defended it and did everything in his power to keep it united. He was its undying champion.”

Lynn McDonald, a 1980s NDP MP and professor emerita of sociology told True North that the former Ryerson University was renamed to Toronto Metropolitan University for the same faulty logic that the TDSB is using.

“There is no good reason for renaming. Ryerson University was renamed on the basis of false accusations, which have been detailed since,” said McDonald.

In 2022, Ryerson University’s board of directors voted to change the institution’s name after the legacy of the university’s namesake began receiving blowback from progressive activists for allegedly being the architect of Canada’s residential school system.

Ryerson was an early Canadian educator who was an advocate for universal, free public education and is credited for the creation of Ontario’s public education system.

“Ryerson was a friend of Indigenous people, a missionary at first, and he helped them with farming and carpentry. He supported their land and fisheries claims. That is why an Ojibwe chief named him a ‘brother,’ and gave him an Ojibwe name. All of this is well documented. People in education should be able to read!”

When asked how Ryerson should be remembered, McDonald noted Ryerson’s contribution to pioneering Ontario’s public education system and his work supporting Indigenous Canadians.

“For his pioneering work in getting free schools for all, when few children went to school, no teachers were trained and all schools charged fees. This is hard to understand now, when we take free schools for granted. He should be remembered no less for his support of Indigenous people.”

New CBC CEO says defunding CBC would “cripple” state broadcaster

Source: pbi2024.ca

CBC/Radio-Canada’s new CEO, Marie-Philippe Bouchard, is warning that Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s pledge to defund the state broadcaster is an “existential threat” to its survival that could “cripple” its programming in both official languages.

Bouchard said that if Poilievre were to slash $1 billion of the organization’s $1.4 billion annual government subsidy, the French services of CBC might not survive even if the English service was eliminated.

“The math just doesn’t work. There’s a serious risk that it would cripple not only the English service but also the French service,” said Bouchard. “So I’m just having difficulty reconciling all of that.”

Bouchard made the comments in an interview on CBC’s The Current. She said she hasn’t spoken to Poilievre yet but welcomes the opportunity.She added that CBC/Radio-Canada could make preparations to be defunded but that such a mandate change would require a parliamentary debate. However, she did say that defunding is an “existential threat” that would fundamentally change the corporation.

“Honestly, at this time, I wish I could reassure or give more detail, but it’s really not in my hands. So we can prepare all sorts of ways, but in the end, it depends on what the decision is,” said Bouchard.

The CBC previously dished out $18.4 million in bonuses for the 2023-24 fiscal year for “performance pay,” following hundreds of employees being laid off and eliminating vacant positions. The bonuses were given to 1,194 CBC/Radio-Canada employees, and $3.3 million of the total pot went to 45 executives, who received an average bonus of $73,000.

Following the bonuses scandal, Poilievre said he “can’t wait to defund the CBC and sell off the headquarters for housing.”

Regarding whether Bouchard plans to take a taxpayer-funded bonus, she said that her compensation results from government rules and her salary conditions are public.

“I’ve just started this job, so the issue of whether or not a bonus is available or should be awarded is not even an issue,” she said. 

Former CBC CEO Catherine Tait gave up the reins after being appointed to a five-year term in 2018 that was renewed until Jan. 3, 2025.

Tait left the state broadcaster in a woeful state, given its massive viewership drop-off, major advertisers departing, significant layoffs of its staff, and decline in the public’s support for the CBC. She also faced an ethics violation for violating the Conflict of Interest Act. 

Bouchard has worked for the CBC since 1987, when she began as a legal adviser. She has also served as the president and CEO of TV5 Quebec Canada since 2016 and has worked in various management positions at the CBC.

She is the first francophone woman to head CBC/Radio-Canada. Her five-year term began on Jan. 3, 2025.

Bouchard said the chance to work on the expert panel that Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge put together reignited her passion for the state broadcaster. 

“I felt that there were a lot of lights going on in my head, that it was too soon for me to walk away,” she said.

Unlike her predecessor Catherine Tait who lives in New York, Bouchard actually lives in Canada, in Quebec. 

Surrey shooting leads to charges, including attempted murder

Source: Facebook

A 21-year-old man from Squamish, B.C. has been charged following a shooting incident in the Surrey neighbourhood of Newton that injured two people on Dec. 16.

Surrey RCMP responded to reports of gunfire at approximately 6 p.m. on that date in the 12600 block of 67B Avenue. 

A woman reported to the police that she and her husband had been shot while walking outside their vehicle. The two victims were taken to the hospital to be treated for their wounds. Officers also discovered that their young child was in a nearby vehicle, who was found unharmed.

“Two suspects, described as adult South Asian men, were last seen driving away in a dark-coloured sedan,” said Surrey Police Services on the incident in a December news release, sent out shortly after the incident. Police have not provided information on the second suspect.

On Wednesday, Jan. 29, Surrey Police announced that Gagandeep Singh Bakshi was in custody as a suspect. Bakshi was arrested two weeks earlier on Jan. 15, nearly a month after the shooting. He was charged on Jan. 16 with one count each of attempted murder, discharging a firearm with intent, and aggravated assault, along with two counts of assault with a weapon.

According to the release, a collaborative Serious Crime Unit between the newly formed Surrey Police Service and the RCMP led the investigation into the shooting, conducting police searches of homes in Squamish, Delta, and Surrey between Jan. 16 and 17.

These charges represent some of the first and highest-profile criminal charges laid by the newly formed Surrey Police Service. Since last November, they have been overseeing one of the largest policing transition projects in Canadian history, as noted in another True North article on a different shooting in the Newton neighbourhood.

Bakshi will stay behind bars until his next hearing set for Feb. 10 in Surrey Provincial Court.

The Candice Malcolm Show | Danielle Smith calls for a Canadian BORDER CZAR

Source: Facebook

We are facing a border crisis in Canada. This has been years in the making, and the Trudeau Liberal’s disastrous immigration and national security policies are blowing up in our faces.

The Trump administration continues to make it very clear: fix your border, stop sending terrorists, stop allowing deadly drugs to cross into the United States, or you will face monstrous tariffs. Trudeau has ignored these warnings, and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is the only political leader calling him out.

On today’s episode of the Candice Malcolm show, Candice is joined by Blendr News podcasters Jonathan Harvey and Liam DeBoer to break down all the news and latest headlines. They discuss a new ‘social contract’ bill in Quebec to better integrate immigrants, more details on the American plan for tariffs against Canada, the Liberal leadership race, and a lawsuit against the CRA to stop new taxes.

The Daily Brief | Would you take U.S. citizenship if Trump offered?

Source: Facebook

An exclusive True North poll reveals nearly half of young Canadian men would take U.S. citizenship from Trump if offered.

Plus, the Trump Administration hinted at implementing its proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports in two phases that could begin within days, with another round of tariffs coming in April.

And Jagmeet Singh may prop up the Liberals again, hinting that he might support the Liberals’ work relief program in response to U.S. tariffs.

Tune into The Daily Brief with Isaac Lamoureux and Clayton DeMaine!

Hitman who killed Air India bombing suspect sentenced to life in prison

Source: Wikipedia

A 21-year-old hitman who admitted to the 2022 murder of Air India bombing suspect Ripudaman Singh Malik has been sentenced to life in prison. The B.C. Supreme Court handed down the sentence Tuesday.

Tanner Fox was told by the New Westminster court he has no chance of parole for 25 years.

Fox, who entered the guilty plea last year in connection to the July 2022 murder of Malik, appeared in court alongside his defence team on Tuesday where he apologized for his actions.

“I know nothing I say will bring him back and I’m sorry for the role I played in this crime. Not a day goes by that I don’t feel remorse for my actions,” said Fox. “I’ve grown to see the error of my ways, and I’m sorry for all the hurt and pain I’ve caused.”

The victim, Malik, was a well-known figure in Surrey and the larger Sikh diaspora community.

Acquitted for his suspected involvement in the 1985 Air India bombings that killed 331, Malik long maintained his innocence in connection to the tragic event before being shot and killed on July 14, 2022 in the parking lot of a Surrey business complex.

Fox and another man convicted in the murder shot Malik seven times outside his clothing business at 8236 128th St. before parking a stolen Honda CRV into a laneway and lighting it on fire.

According to at least one source, Malik was set to meet with representatives with the government of India just moments before his murder.

In a statement made after Fox’s sentencing, Malik’s son, Jaspreet Singh Malik, pleaded with Fox and his alleged co-conspirator to “do the right thing (and) tell the RCMP who hired you.”

Neither Fox nor his alleged co-conspirator have provided any information on who might have hired them, although Fox and his alleged co-conspirator in the murder had a now infamous brawl in the prisoners’ box of a New Westminster courtroom in October.

Authorities have not revealed the full details of the motive behind the murder, but speculation has persisted regarding possible involvement of the government of India.

Related stories