fbpx
Monday, July 7, 2025

Jagmeet Singh faces growing calls for his resignation from progressives

Source: Facebook

After nearly seven years at the helm of the federal NDP, Jagmeet Singh increasingly faces criticism of his party’s leadership from Canadians normally supportive of the NDP.

Some NDP supporters feel that Singh does not have a clear vision for the party and is not positioning itself to claim political wins and make electoral gains.

In an op-ed published in the Walrus, David Moscrop, a left-wing columnist argued that if the NDP performs similarly in the 2025 election as they have in the 2019 and 2021 elections, the party should dump Singh and search for a new party leader.

Moscrop argued that while the NDP have forced the governing Liberal party to act on some priorities that are important to the social democratic party, the NDP has not been able to take credit for any of those achievements and has instead been blamed for supporting an unpopular government. 

“The Liberals will try to claim the bulk of the credit for the good-news stories, marginalizing their (supply and confidence agreement) partner, leaving the NDP stuck, potentially, in the worst spot of all: blamed for the government’s failures and without credit for its successes,” writes Moscrop. 

Moscrop also refers to a handful of provincial NDP leaders who have flirted with separating their parties from the federal NDP, as the NDP administers joint membership between the provincial and the federal wings of the party. 

Most notably, the newly minted leader of the Alberta NDP Naheed Nenshi campaigned during the leadership race that he would move to separate the provincial party from the federal NDP. 

“I think the membership has to have a very serious conversation about its links with the federal NDP,” said Nenshi during the NDP leadership race.

“I believe that our ties to the federal NDP are remnants of a party that wasn’t confident, a party that wasn’t grown up yet, that relied on big brother to look after us. Now this party is confident and a modern force and I don’t think we need that anymore.” 

Singh has condemned the idea of separation, arguing that unity between the parties helps the NDP combat conservative parties across the country.

The Saskatchewan NDP has also flirted with uncoupling the federal and provincial parties and suggested renaming the party. A Research Co. poll found that a majority of Saskatchewaners think that the provincial NDP should consider a rebrand before the next provincial election.

Moscrop cites a former NDP staffer who has become disillusioned with Singh’s leadership, as the party has not seen any significant progress in boosting their national support. 

The NDP staffer said that the party suffers an array of problems, whether they’re ideological, strategic, or material.

“No one would think to invent the NDP if it didn’t exist right now as it currently exists,” said the staffer quoted in Moscrop’s column.

He says that the NDP lacks a plan for the future and that the party is mostly concerned with sustaining what it currently has.

“I think that comes down to a question of leadership, of never really reckoning with that strategic calculus of what it is that a small party should be doing in that position,” said the staffer. 

Moscrop concluded that a new vision for the NDP requires a new leader at the party’s helm who has the chance to reset the party and return the party to its roots.

In October 2023, the NDP held a review of Singh’s leadership in which one-fifth of party members voted against Singh, a nearly 10% drop in support from the party’s 2021 review.

Canadians prefer Carney as new Liberal leader over Trudeau: poll

Source: X

Canadians have a more positive view of former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney than they do of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as Liberal party leader.

However, Carney’s addition to the Liberal cabinet may not be enough to regain support from voters.

A new poll by Nanos Research asked Canadians how much Carney’s potential addition to the Liberal cabinet would have on their decision in the next election and the results revealed that while it may help their image, it won’t be enough to sway voters.

Political pundits have floated the idea of Carney replacing Trudeau as the Liberal party leader for some time, however, thus far he’s only being asked to join the cabinet by the prime minister. 

Carney himself has remained quiet on such speculations.

The Nanos poll asked Canadians how their view of the Liberal party would change if Carney was appointed to become the new finance minister and 39% said while it would help, it wouldn’t dramatically change their opinion of the party. 

Another 29% said that it would help give the Liberals a more competitive edge for the upcoming election and 8% said it would make them less competitive. 

The remaining 24% said they were unsure.

The poll also revealed that current Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland held a more positive image for Canadians than Trudeau. 

Over a third of respondents, 35%, said that they had a positive or somewhat positive image of Freeland while 17% said they were neutral about her.

However, nearly half of respondents, 44%, said they had a negative opinion of Freeland and the remaining 4% said they were unsure. 

As for Trudeau, only 34% said they had a positive or somewhat positive view of him, while 63% said they held a negative or somewhat negative view of the prime minister.

“If the Liberals want to improve their fortunes, they should be looking at the person that has the weakest brand and right now it’s Justin Trudeau,” Nanos Research’s chief data scientist Nik Nanos told the Globe and Mail, who commissioned the poll.

“We have a federal party leader and a Prime Minister, that’s unpopular, trying to patch up the political fortunes of his party, when the reality is that he is fundamentally the biggest negative draw right now for the Liberals.”

Despite having a much lower public profile than both Trudeau and Freeland, Canadians held the least negative opinion of Carney, with 33% of respondents saying they had a high opinion of him.

According to Nanos, his firm has seen little change in national polling since August of last year regarding Canadians’ political views, with the Conservative party holding a strong lead over the Liberals for the past year. 

“The rising cost of living and people’s issues with housing affordability doesn’t lend itself to people feeling positive about any incumbent government,” said Nanos, who thinks the best chance the Liberals have for the next election is to change leadership. 

Nanos said while that wouldn’t guarantee reelection, it would at least place the Liberals “back in the game.”

If the party were to change leadership, the poll shows Carney to be the most popular option, with 29% of respondents showing interest in him, compared to the 9% who would like to see Trudeau run as leader again. 

OP-ED: B.C.’s sorry plunge from fiscal leader to financial train wreck

Source: Instagram

Last month the Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation took its “Debt Clock” on a tour of British Columbia to draw attention to the province’s mounting debt. The debt is currently $112 billion and rising by $53 million per week – faster than any other provincial government’s. That’s $20,000 for every British Columbian. The NDP-run province’s credit rating is “plummeting,” according to outside experts, driving up the interest rate it pays on new debt. It is spending $4 billion a year on interest and will soon pay more.

This is remarkable – and remarkably bad – for a province that for many decades prided itself on fiscal responsibility. Mid-20th-century Social Credit governments ran balanced budgets for 20 consecutive years. Gordon Campbell’s Liberal government then outlawed operating deficits in 2001 – and made cabinet members personally accountable for the results – going on to all-but eliminate the province’s operating debt. True, the capital debt and debt of Crown corporations were allowed to increase, raising direct government debt to $43.3 billion and total government debt to $69.8 billion at the end of the Campbell era. High, but still quite manageable for a nearly $400-billion-per-year economy.

When the NDP gained office in 2017 under John Horgan, the new government initially did not deviate greatly from Liberal practice. Horgan’s first two budgets continued to promise balanced operating budgets and minimal increases in total government debt.

All of that changed with the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Revenues plunged while expenditures zoomed. As B.C. emerged from the pandemic, the economy improved and government revenues increased, but spending increased even faster. The 2023-2024 budget projected an operating deficit of $4.2 billion and total government debt rising to $107.9 billion.

When David Eby replaced John Horgan as premier and NDP leader in late 2022, things changed even more. The 2024-2025 budget announced in February called for an operating deficit of $7.9 billion and an increase in the province’s total debt to $123.3 billion. It forecast similar deficits the next two years, bringing total debt to $165 billion by the 2027 fiscal year-end.

Especially disturbing is that these deficits have no major upheavals to justify them. In 2020, the Horgan government suspended the balanced-budget law for three years to deal with the pandemic. A decade earlier the Liberal government had authorized deficit spending for two years to deal with the 2008 global financial crisis. The NDP permanently removed the balanced-budget requirement in 2022, so Eby’s government is free to ignore it. The projected 2024-2025 deficit of $7.9 billion – incurred in “normal times” – dwarfs any deficit during the previous two crises.

The NDP’s uncontrolled spending is a big part of the problem. In 2002, Campbell’s Liberal government forecast operational spending of $25.6 billion. Horgan’s first budget forecast spending of $53.6 billion. Eby’s government forecasts spending of $92.7 billion in 2026-2027, a 73 percent increase in only a decade. The NDP will have nearly tripled B.C.’s debt in only a decade – from $45.2 billion in Horgan’s first budget to a projected $126.5 billion in 2026-2027. Including Crown corporations, total provincial debt will have more than doubled from $69.4 billion to $165 billion.

Even more worrisome is B.C.’s weakening ability to repay the debt. By 2017, Liberal governments had reduced direct debt to 15.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) and total government debt to 25.6% of GDP. Under Eby, direct debt is expected to rise to 27.5% of GDP in 2027 and total government debt to 35.8%. Direct government debt will rise from 95.1 percent of annual government revenue at the end of fiscal 2024 to 151.2 percent by the end of fiscal 2027.

B.C.’s voters will head to the polls on October 19. They’ll have a lot to think about.

In spite of the looming debt crisis, the pre-election election campaign has focused on housing unaffordability, the drug crisis, rampant crime and health care. Neither in its budget nor on its policy website does the NDP even mention the need for balanced budgets. Nor does the Green Party. The B.C. United Party recently posted a video of leader Kevin Falcon in front of the CTF’s Debt Clock claiming it’s the only party promising to “balance the budget in our first term.” That seems to be a new promise, because the party’s website previously did not mention that goal.

Only the Conservative Party of B.C. has shown direct interest in the topic. “It is immoral (and financially hazardous) to continue living beyond our means and leaving our children with the bill,” the party’s website states. “While not immediate, we will plan on balancing the budget.” That commitment to restoring B.C.’s longstanding but recently abandoned fiscal integrity might be one reason why the Conservative Party has gone from no MLAs and about 5 percent popular support to five MLAs and around 37 percent in the polls.

Conservative leader John Rustad was the only politician to agree to be interviewed on this topic. Rustad said the widespread indifference to public debt is unfortunate because the debt “is at the core of everything else, all the other issues that we face.” Unless whoever wins the coming election works hard to get B.C.’s financial house back in order, no government will have the means to tackle the other pressing issues.

The original, full-length version of this article was recently published in C2C Journal.

James R. Coggins (www.coggins.ca) is a writer, editor, and historian based in Chilliwack, B.C.

DeSantis mocks Trudeau’s Stanley Cup record: “Who’s winning that battle?”

Source: Facebook/Facebook

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has dropped the gloves with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau by comparing Stanley Cup records during their respective tenures in a recent interview. 

Despite only becoming governor in 2019, four years after Trudeau first took office, Florida already has three Stanley Cup victories during DeSantis’ time as state governor. 

DeSantis was governor during the Tampa Bay Lightning’s 2020 and 2021 Stanley Cup victories, along with the recent 2024 Florida Panthers Stanley Cup win, where they narrowly beat the Edmonton Oilers in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals.

In comparison, Trudeau became Prime Minister in 2015. Meanwhile, a Canadian team has not won the Stanley Cup since 1993.

Conservative commentator Erick Woods Erickson hosted a gathering last week which featured conservative governors, senators, congressmen, and candidates to discuss primarily American politics.

However, someone from Canada sent an email asking their favourite American governor to comment on their least favourite Canadian, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

“Justin Trudeau, since he has been Prime Minister of Canada, number of Stanley Cups for Canada? Zero. Governor Ron DeSantis, number of Stanley Cups for the state of Florida since I’ve been governor? Three. Who’s winning that battle?” asked DeSantis.

As of Jan. 2024, DeSantis’ approval rating sat around 40% nationwide, with his favourability among Republicans eclipsing 60% and even 70%, based on the type of poll, according to FiveThirtyEight.

Conversely, Trudeau’s approval rating sat at a mere 28% as of June 2024, according to the Angus Reid Institute’s Trudeau tracker. 

This isn’t the first time that DeSantis has shown his willingness to compete with Canadian political figures. During the Stanley Cup Finals, he made a bet with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on the outcome of the games.

Smith told DeSantis that if the Oilers won, he’d have to send her some of Florida’s finest rum. If the Oilers lost, which they did, she’d send Alberta-made whiskey to Florida.

Florida’s governor ended Smith’s hot streak after she had won bets with British Columbia Premier David Eby and Texas Governor Greg Abbott following the Oilers defeating the Vancouver Canucks and Dallas Stars.

Smith paid in full, sending a bottle of maple whiskey and another bottle of rye whiskey, both made in Alberta. 

“Florida may be the most tropical state in the United States, yet we have held the Stanley Cup for 3 of the last 5 years between the Lightning and Panthers. Florida has become a hockey state!” said DeSantis. “Cheers to conservative leadership in the U.S.A. and Canada!”

The Daily Brief | Another venue cancels women’s rights event

Source: Flickr

The downtown Victoria, B.C. event venue Ambrosia Banquet has cancelled a panel discussion titled “Vancouver Island Speaks! Detransing Canada,” which was scheduled for September 14, 2024.

Plus, a Port Coquitlam imam is under investigation for alleged hate speech against Jews and Christians in a sermon.

And Canada is on track to surpass 500,000 new permanent residents this year.

Tune into The Daily Brief with Lindsay Shepherd and Isaac Lamoureux!

Supreme Court shut down of Jordan Peterson re-education appeal

Source: jordanbpeterson.com

The Supreme Court of Canada has denied an appeal from psychologist and author Dr. Jordan Peterson against an order to have him undergo social media training by the College of Psychologists of Ontario as a punitive measure for controversial social media posts.

Peterson’s initial appeal was denied by a panel of three judges with the Ontario Court of Appeal, who dismissed his motion for leave to appeal as part of a previous decision by the Ontario Divisional Court in January.  

“The court has rejected my appeal regarding the decision of the Ontario College of Psychologists to subject me to indefinite re-education,” wrote Peterson in a post to X on Thursday.

“Primarily for publicly opposing the butchers and liars subjecting children to sterilization and mutilation. I am also required to pay whatever court costs the College accrued in relation to my appeal. I am now bereft of options on the legal front in Canada. I guess it’s On with the show.”

The College claimed it received several complaints regarding Peterson’s online presence on social media in 2022. 

Among those complaints were his comments about a plus-size Sports Illustrated model which he said was “not beautiful” and the gender transition of actor Elliot Page. 

The College threatened to revoke Peterson’s psychology licence if he refused to undergo social media training.

“It is a tragic loss both for the 25% of Canadians who are members of professional and trade regulated vocations and for Canadians generally,” employment lawyer Howard Levitt, who is representing Peterson, told True North. 

“It is an invitation to extortion and to levying personal vendettas by threatening people with loss of their professional licenses if a complaint is made against them that something they said or wrote might offend the sensibilities of their regulatory bodies.”

While the renowned author and former University of Toronto professor has not had an active clinical practice since 2017, he remains a member of the College, which alleges that his social media presence poses a risk to the public. 

The professional governing body ordered Peterson to participate in a social media coaching program that would reeducate him on how to approach his public commentary and he was told that failure to comply would result in him being found guilty of professional misconduct. 

“It will chill both debate and speech as regulated Canadians will not risk being offside the sensibilities of their regulators,” said Levitt.

“And the idea that Jordan Peterson, one of the masters of social media, requires social media training by comparative incompetents, is risible and ludicrous.”

Some will pay more in tax than for gas itself by 2030: CTF 2024 Gas Tax Honesty Report

Source: Unsplash

Canadian drivers are facing an uphill battle at the pumps, with nearly half of the price of gasoline set to be paid in taxes by 2030, according to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s 2024 Gas Tax Honesty Report. 

By 2030, some provinces’ residents will pay more tax than they do for the gas itself.

As of the third week of July 2024, Canadians paid $38.11 in taxes and $68.22 for the pre-tax fuel to fill up a 64-litre tank, totalling $106.33. Currently, the average Canadian pays almost 36% in taxes to fuel their vehicle.

The total tax consists of four components. Provincial tax is about 38%; federal tax is around 30%; carbon tax is just over 32%; and tax-on-tax is about 7.6% of the total tax paid.

Tax-on-tax occurs when some governments calculate sales tax after adding all the per-litre taxes, resulting in taxes being paid on top of existing taxes. In 2024, Canadians paid an average of 4.5 cents per litre in tax-on-tax costs.

Statistics Canada’s June inflation data highlighted that the two provinces that had removed their carbon and fuel tax remained on one end of the inflation spectrum, with the rest of the country on the other end. Saskatchewan and Manitoba’s inflation remained at 1.4% each, with the next lowest province being Quebec at 2.2% and the highest inflation rate seen in Nova Scotia at 3.5%. 

Manitobans currently pay the least to fill up their 64-litre tank as the only province with no provincial taxes. They pay $90.78, followed by the second-lowest province, Alberta, at $98.04. 

The Liberals have raised the price of the carbon tax every year since 2019. The carbon tax reached $80 per tonne on Apr. 1, 2024. The Liberals plan to raise the tax by $15 per year until it reaches $170 per tonne in 2030.

By 2030, the average Canadian will pay $62.63 in total taxes for a 64-litre fill-up. They will pay $68.22 for the pre-tax fuel, for a total cost of $130.85 to fill up their car. Canadians will pay almost 47.9% in taxes and 52.1% for the gas itself.

Carson Binda, British Columbia’s director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, said the taxes to fill up a minivan cost more than a home-cooked dinner for a family of four. 

“Politicians from all political parties need to commit to making life more affordable by cutting taxes on gas during the upcoming provincial election,” said Binda. 

Residents of Nova Scotia will pay $69.51 in total tax and $67.81 for the pre-taxed fuel by 2030, for a total cost of $137.32. Therefore, residents of Nova Scotia will pay 50.61% in taxes and 49.38% for the fuel itself to fill up 64 litres in 2030. 

While other provinces pay only slightly more for the gas itself than they do in taxes, those in Vancouver will pay more in taxes than for the pre-taxed fuel, $64.63 versus $64.16, for a total of $128.79.

Binda highlighted that those in Vancouver pay an average of 81 cents per litre in taxes. In comparison, Victoria pays 74 cents per litre in taxes. In the rest of the province, 68 cents per litre are paid in taxes. 

“Carbon taxes cause a lot of pocket-book pain for ordinary families, without any meaningful environmental gain,” said Binda. “Taxing British Columbians for heating their homes or driving to work won’t solve a global problem like climate change.”

The average Canadian spent more on taxes in 2023 than they did on basic amenities like shelter, groceries, and clothing combined, according to a previous report.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation previously calculated that the carbon tax would cost the Canadian economy $12 billion in 2024 and rise to $30 billion annually by 2030.

A non-binding motion for the premiers to discuss the carbon tax with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was previously passed by the Conservatives, following unexpected support by the NDP and Bloc Québecois.

The motion passed following 70% of Canadians and 70% of provincial premiers asking Trudeau to “spike the hike.” 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre previously called on Trudeau to give Canadians a “summer break” from inflation by removing federal taxes on gas.

Federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Franco Terrazzano, echoed Poilievre’s call. 

“Canadians need a holiday from Trudeau’s high gas taxes,” said Terrazzano. “If politicians were serious about making life more affordable, then they would cut gas taxes now.”

Canada on track to surpass 500K new permanent residents this year

Source: X

Following two months of immigration growth, Canada saw its number of new permanent residents soften by 4.9% in June, according to data from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.

A total of 34,870 new permanent residents came to Canada in March and 42,595 foreign nationals were granted permanent residency in April. 

Permanent residents grew by another 46,835 in May before June saw monthly immigration dip slightly, with the total number of new permanent residents dropping to 44,540. 

According to the IRCC data, the total number of new permanent residents in Canada could reach 511,410 by 2024, should the trend continue until the end of this year. 

That would mean an 8.4% increase in new permanent residents than last year, which saw Canada bring in 471,815, a record-breaking year for the country’s immigration levels. 

The projections would also indicate that Canada will receive 5.4% more than what the Trudeau government has said it would, exceeding its target of 485,000 under the Liberals’ 2024-26 Immigration Levels Plan. 

The total number could even surpass the previous 500,000 targets for next year and 2026. 

However, monthly immigration levels tend to fluctuate and the second half of 2024 may result in fewer new arrivals. 

For example, the number of temporary new residents to arrive in Canada in the first half of this year was 2.9% lower compared to the same period last year, going from 263,420 in 2023 to 255,600 in 2024. 

Provincially, Ontario has been the most popular destination for newcomers this year, with 106,500 of all new permanent residents choosing to reside there. 

Already the province with the highest population, Ontario took in 41.6% of all immigrants from January to June of this year. 

This is likely in part due to the province’s wide array of economic and social programs for newcomers, like the Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program and Temporary Resident to Permanent Resident Pathway.

Government programs accounted for 52.7% of all new permanent residents going to Ontario in the first six months of 2024. 

British Columbia saw the second most monthly immigration gains, with 34,535 new people, followed closely by Alberta with 34,375. 

Quebec saw an additional 30,315 new permanent residents.

However, Canadians are becoming increasingly divided on the federal government’s current immigration targets, with over a third now saying we’re taking in “too many” people from other countries.

The Department of Immigration requested that the polling agency Ipsos conduct a national survey on its current immigration quotas. 

“Many participants felt that the targets set for the next three years, which were presented to them, were too high,” reads the survey. “They could not fathom how cities, that are already receiving high volumes of immigrants and where infrastructure is already under great strain, could accommodate the proposed targets.”

In addition to legal immigration being a divisive issue, Immigration Minister Marc Miller confirmed last week that the government would be walking back plans to give residential status to any illegal immigrants in Canada. 

The Trudeau government had initially planned to “explore ways of regularizing status for undocumented workers who are contributing to Canadian communities” in 2021 but is now acknowledging that it’s not a desire for most citizens. 

“As frustrating as that is to hear for people that are in a precarious position of being undocumented in Canada and are contributing to the economy — and perhaps kids that are Canadian — I think we have to be quite clear with Canadians and quite realistic about what’s achievable,” Miller told CBC News.

“Despite the economic imperative, despite the very humanitarian imperative that a broad regularization program presents, it is clear to me that Canadians are not there and that’s just reality.”

The Immigration Department estimates that there are approximately 300,000 to 600,000 illegal immigrants currently residing in Canada.

Police kick out anti-Israel sit-in protesters from U of T’s asset management offices

The same group of anti-Israel protesters who occupied the University of Toronto for months were kicked out of an office building after staging a “sit-in” protest against U of T’s apparent investments in Israel.

Protesters from “Occupy UofT” helped stage a “sit-in” style protest at 777 Bay St. at College Park in Toronto, an office building which houses the university’s Asset Management Corporation’s offices, to “raise awareness” of the university’s alleged financial backing of the Israeli military.

The protest group shared on Instagram that they were involved in the sit-in, which began at 12:30 a.m. on Thursday in the lobby outside the elevators of the UofT offices. Within 20 minutes, “dozens” of police assembled inside the building, according to the protesters.

“The Toronto Police Service, acting on behalf of the building’s property managers, served us a trespass notice which they were eager to violently enforce,” the group posted on Instagram.

The protesters are claiming unfair treatment by the police in response to the group’s “peaceful” shouting and drumming of slogans such as “no justice ? no peace!” and “There is only one solution, Intifada revolution” in the workspace. 

“Repeatedly, we are seeing private property rights be leveraged as a way to repress pro-Palestine protests,” claimed the group.

In their statement, the protest group decided to put the concept of private property in quotation marks.

“Just like UofT did last May, ‘private property’ managers threatened us with a trespass notice,” the group wrote. 

The group claimed that “countless” office workers spoke to security and sent emails, though police and the property owners ignored their appeals.

Police moved in and pushed the protesters out of the building. One man in a red keffiyeh appears to push back against police. Chants of “There is only one solution” turned against the police.

Some protesters alledged incidents of groping and excessive force, though police denied the allegation in an email to True North.

Protesters chanted the familiar refrain, “TPS, KKK, IOS, you’re all the same,” as police expelled them from the office building.

According to police no arrests were made the protesters at the College Park building were “trespassed and escorted out.”

Other Palestinian protesters blocked Dundas Street at the Yonge and Dundas Square earlier this week.

The protest group’s Muslim members prayed across the street car rails. At the same time, a dozen police officers could be seen holding a line, presumably preventing them from moving into the square once they were finished praying.

“In Canada, no permit is required to hold a demonstration as peaceful assembly and expression, including prayers, are protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” police told True North when asked if protesters had a permit to block traffic.

Some on X criticize the group prayer as a political demonstration rather than an expression of faith.

Several protesters prayed on Palestinian flags instead of prayer mats, which are traditionally used.

According to a directory of mosques, there are over 165 Masjids and Musallah, or places dedicated to spaces for the Muslim time of prayer in Toronto and the GTA. Some online are questioning the likelihood that the protesters could not find one.

Victoria venue cancels women’s rights event 

Credit: Ted Eytan

The downtown Victoria, B.C. event venue Ambrosia Banquet has cancelled a panel discussion titled “Vancouver Island Speaks! Detransing Canada,” which was scheduled for September 14, 2024.

The volunteer-organized event was set to explore the “danger gender identity ideology poses for kids.”

“So-called ‘gender medicine’ has been revealed to be experimental, dangerous, and rushed — given to minors who don’t understand the consequences and can’t consent to the destruction of their bodies and futures,” the event description reads. “Why is the Canadian government still refusing to limit puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and related surgeries for minors?” 

Featured speakers included writer and podcaster Meghan Murphy and women’s sports advocate Dr. Linda Blade. 

According to Murphy, Vancouver Island Speaks held a successful event at Ambrosia Banquet in May 2024 on the topic of women’s spaces, parental rights, and protecting kids. For that May event, the location was kept secret and revealed only to ticketholders. 

“We re-booked the venue for our next event, called ‘Detransing Canada,’ scheduled for September 14. Ambrosia Banquet was fully aware of the event and its aims and again was supportive, and swore up and down they wouldn’t cancel no matter what, so this time we decided to be open about our venue,” Murphy posted to X.

“The harassment started immediately. Trans activists called and emailed Ambrosia incessantly, showed up at the venue, harassed staff, causing one young female to have what she described as a ‘mental breakdown.’ The owner told us he had been ‘abused’ by these people. They vandalized the building,” Murphy recounted.

The owner of Ambrosia ultimately cancelled the “Detransing Canada” booking.

On Instagram, Ambrosia said the event did not align with their values and posted a picture where they placed a red “X” on the Vancouver Island Speaks event poster to indicate they would not host the event.

“They are willing to throw women under the bus to save themselves,” Murphy wrote. “They don’t yet know that catering to these bullies will only result in more bullying, and will learn the hard way.” 

“We are small business owners trying to make a life here… we are not against any community in the universe,” the owner of Ambrosia, who would not provide his name, said to True North. 

“We are not against women’s rights. We just cancelled the booking, and that’s all, simple,” the owner said. “Now I’m the result of the crossfire from both sides.”

According to a local activist, immediately upon canceling the September 14th women’s rights panel discussion, the owner of Ambrosia accepted a booking for that same evening to host a “Queer Family Values All-ages Dance Party.” 

The all-ages queer dance party will feature a “binder exchange,” where trans-identified and non-binary participants can trade chest binders that wrap around the breasts to give the appearance of a flat chest.

The organizers of Vancouver Island Speaks stated that they are currently seeking a new venue for the “Detransing Canada” panel event.

Related stories