fbpx
Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Canadians think Quebec disproportionately benefitting from Confederation while Alberta pays

Source: Instagram

Quebec takes more than it gives and Alberta is punching above its weight. These are the takeaways from a new Angus Reid poll on “confederational fairness.”

More Canadians believe that Quebec receives a disproportionate benefit from the nation, while Alberta is the province considered by most Canadians to get a “raw deal,” meaning it gives more to the federation than it receives. 

The polling comes as provincial and territorial leaders meet in Halifax for the 2024 Council of the Federation, a biannual meeting to promote cooperation.

42% of Canadians said Quebec benefits disproportionately from its place in the nation. Conversely, 23% said Alberta gives more than it receives, ten points higher than any other province. 

Alberta Institute Peter McCaffrey says this isn’t just a perception, but a fact.

“The net difference between total federal tax collected and total federal expenditures in Alberta is approximately $20 billion per year,” said McCaffrey. 

While Alberta and Quebec sit on the two poles of the spectrum, residents in Saskatchewan “are most likely to feel little benefit and high levels of angst,” reads the study.

“The figures are closer in Saskatchewan, but it’s important to remember that the unfairness extends not only to direct financial transfers, but also to differences in how people, businesses, and industries are treated in different parts of the country,” said McCaffrey. 

A mere 2% of Saskatchewan’s residents said they felt they got an extra advantage from being in Confederation. Conversely, 58% said they got a “raw deal,” resulting in a net alienation score of -55%, followed by Alberta at -41%. The lowest alienation score came from Quebec, where 19% felt they got an extra advantage, and 31% said they had a raw deal, resulting in a net score of -12%.

A similar poll was conducted by the Angus Reid Institute in 2019. Respondents were asked whether policies from the federal government had “hurt” their provincial economy in recent years.

In 2019, 51% of Canadians felt that the Liberals had damaged their provincial economy. In 2024, that number rose to 57%. The province where residents felt that the Liberals hurt them most was Saskatchewan, with 72% reflecting that sentiment in 2024, a slight rise from 71% in 2019.

While Alberta led the way in 2019, with 82% of its residents saying that Liberal policies hurt its economy, that number fell to 65% in 2024. 

Despite the decrease, McCaffrey said that the financial transfers from west to east are larger than they’ve ever been.

“And, the federal government is seen as working against the west’s interests — actively trying to shut down the very industries that generate the taxes that pay for the subsidies that the west provides to the rest of the country,” said McCaffrey. 

He added that Canadians outside of the west generally assume that the amounts are small, however they work out almost $5,000 per Albertan per year.

The degree to which Canadians felt respected by those in other provinces differed greatly. British Columbians felt they were the most respected by the rest of the country, with 64% of residents sharing that sentiment. The next closest province was Ontario, at 44%, followed by Alberta at 30%. Saskatchewan residents felt the least respected by the rest of the country, at 22%.

The report also noted general satisfaction with the direction provinces were headed. 

Between 2019 and 2024, the percentage of people who were “satisfied” with how things were going in their province declined in every single province except Alberta. 

“When this question was asked in January 2019, the Alberta NDP majority government under Premier Rachel Notley were nearing the end of its term, and there was significant discontent with a struggling provincial economy, especially when it came to the oil and gas industry and the lack of movement on new pipelines,” reads the study.

While residents of every province except Alberta grew less satisfied with their provinces, this dissatisfaction intensified for the nation. 

In 2019, 59% of Canadians said they were “dissatisfied” with how things were going in Canada. In 2024, this number grew to 72%. The province with the least satisfied residents was Saskatchewan, at 82%.

Saskatchewan’s most recent battle with the federal government resulted in the province being granted an injunction, blocking the CRA from attempting to garnish the province’s bank accounts.

Western Canada feels alienated from the federal government, which the study deems a “long-held opinion.”

“At least four-in-five residents in B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba say that ‘Ottawa always favours Ontario and Quebec.’”

McCaffrey said that provinces are tired of the federal government interfering in their provincial jurisdiction. However, he said that the solution is simple.

“The federal government needs to stay in its lane and focus on governing in the areas of jurisdiction that are granted to them by the constitution. 

Edmonton leading Alberta in opioid deaths despite recent improvements 

Source: X

Edmonton remains Alberta’s municipality with the most opioid-related deaths, according to recently released provincial data. 

While Edmonton tops the list, both the city and the province as a whole have seen a decrease in opioid-related deaths when compared to the same period last year. 

Opioid-related deaths in Alberta fell from 436 between Oct. and Dec. 2023 to 355 between Jan. and Mar. 2024, an 18.6% decrease. During the same three-month period in 2023, Alberta saw 442 opioid-related deaths, decreasing 19.7%.

2023 saw a record number of Albertans die from opioid overdoses. In 2023, a total of 2,059 Albertans were killed by drug overdoses, with 1,868 of those deaths being from opioids. 

However, Hunter Baril, press secretary for the minister of mental health and addictions, said that the early data released for 2024 is a promising sign.

“As a jurisdictional comparison, the per capita rate for this year is already 26% lower than B.C. This gives us reason to be cautiously optimistic as the number of people losing their lives to addiction continues to trend downward since peaking last year,” he added.

Dr. Bonnie Henry, B.C.’s provincial health officer, recently submitted a proposal for the government to endorse the legal sale of drugs such as methamphetamine, cocaine, and fentanyl in government-operated stores. The provincial government shut her proposal down almost immediately. 

“Policies like an unsafe supply are not the answer to an addiction crisis. In every jurisdiction this has been done, it has failed,” said Baril. 

Opioids account for the vast majority of drug deaths in the province. 

In 2023, 90.7% of all drug poisoning deaths included opioids. So far, in 2024, 90.3% of all drug poisoning deaths involve opioids. 

Last year, 93% of the opioid-related deaths involved fentanyl. 66% involved methamphetamine, 24% involved carfentanil, and 16% involved cocaine. Multiple drugs can be involved in one death; therefore, drugs present during death are not mutually exclusive. Also, the actual number of deaths involving fentanyl is likely higher as these data do not include unintentional fentanyl poisoning deaths. 

The number of deaths resulting from fentanyl has worsened in 2024. 

This year, 96% of opioid-related deaths involve fentanyl. Mirroring last year, 66% involved methamphetamine, cocaine involvement rose to 16%, and alcohol replaced carfentanil in fourth place at 16%. 

During the first three months of 2024, Edmonton saw a drug poisoning death rate of 53.7 per 100,000 people. During 2023, it was 60.3 per 100,000 people. The rate in 2024 was eclipsed by only Grande Prairie at 55.5. However, in 2023, the highest rate among municipalities was in Lethbridge, at 110.4 deaths per 100,000 people.

“Every life lost to addiction is a tragedy, and our government extends sincere condolences to the families and loved ones left behind,” said Baril.

Alberta is building 11 recovery communities to enhance long-term treatment capacity. Once the facilities are built, they will be capable of supporting 2,000 people per year with recovery. 

Alberta has emphasized a recovery-oriented system over so-called safe supply, which Smith admitted saw safe supply drugs enter the illegal market. 

“We will continue to support a system in which anyone suffering from addiction can pursue recovery, rebuild their lives, and reconnect with their family, community, and culture,” said Baril. 

LEVY: The left wants to “lower the temperature”? They’re the ones who raised it

Source: X

The normally Mean Girls of The View were unusually toned down Monday in the aftermath of Saturday’s assassination attempt on former U.S. president Donald Trump.

Instead of blaming Trump for the violence – which I anticipated they would – they used the opportunity to prop up Joe Biden, for making a statement about his competitor in the presidential race.

“We can all agree with President Biden… we need to lower the temperature in our politics,” said Joy Behar, who suffers from a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. “We must not go down this road in America … we can’t allow this violence to be normalized.”

Commentator Ana Navarro, who claimed to be “shocked and heartbroken” by what happened at the Pennsylvania rally – not to Trump mind you – said this was “not supposed to happen in America.”

While in one breath lecturing us about the need to “tamp down the rhetoric,” she couldn’t resist reminding viewers about the Jan. 6 attack of three years ago on the U.S. Capitol, for which the left will never stop blaming Trump.

Behar also couldn’t help but remind viewers that the shooter was a registered Republican. That’s not entirely true considering reports say he gave a donation to Democratic-aligned political action committee in 2021.

All I can say is their shock and horror is too little, too late.

I wondered if they’ve been living under a rock or so infused with hatred for Trump and for Republicans or so tone deaf they refuse to see what has been going on in America throughout Biden’s term.

I’m referring to the violent protests in support of George Floyd during which Black Lives Matter and its supporters set buildings on fire and created mayhem in cities throughout America.

Biden’s own vice-president, Kamala Harris, backed a bail fund, encouraging followers on X to donate to help the protesters in 2020. One bailed out went on to murder an arch-nemesis, according to reports.

There are the open borders with no vetting of illegals, some of whom have gone on to rape and murder innocent young women.

Let’s not forget the violent protests of the past nine months on university campuses and on city streets by pro-Palestinian agitators with few attempts by the left to put a stop to the rabid rise in antisemitism (not unlike our prime minister who has enabled the rise in Jew hatred).

At least most parties toned down their rhetoric – at least for now. 

News agencies like CNN, MSNBC and our own CBC have cleaned up their act and written headlines that are far more accurate than late Saturday, when they describe the attempted assassination as Trump falling down, not mentioning the shooting whatsoever.

It left one thinking he’d fainted from dehydration.

I suspect that won’t last long.

Give them a few days and they’ll be back to calling Trump “Hitler,” a “dictator,” “an authoritarian in waiting,” and a “threat to democracy”

Look, I will freely admit that Trump is no angel and repeatedly says things that are outrageous.

But I suspect that the left in the U.S. and Canada is as much incensed by his outspokenness and the fact that he doesn’t beat around the bush.

That and the fact they are also in a panic because Biden is far too old to be running again and it would appear that the Democrats have been covering up his mental state for quite some time. Still, some couldn’t wait.

Former Biden press secretary (now a leftist commentator for MSNBC) Jen Psaki couldn’t resist adding fuel to the very incendiary fire the left has helped create by fear mongering.

Biden water carrier Margaret Brennan, host of Face the Nation, was forced to retract her rush to judgment of Trump in this post:

One Canadian media pundit has been absolutely over the top. Globe and Mail columnist Andrew Coyne has been tweeting practically every two hours since the attempted assassination, essentially victim blaming and speculating that this will “embolden” his so-called violent followers. His classless tweets reek of desperation:

This article from the former editor of the radical left publication the Nation tries, as did the ladies from The View, to prop up Biden and the Democrats for acting with class (as they should have) following the shooting. She doesn’t resist taking cheap shots at Trump.

Trust me, the calls to lower the political temperature will only result in a temporary reprieve.

If Trump continues to advance in the polls and Biden continues to falter, the political fires will rage once more.

Liberals force banks to relabel carbon tax rebates for direct deposits

Source: Unsplash

The Trudeau government’s directive to banks to relabel the carbon tax rebates landing in some Canadians’ bank accounts is being criticized as an attempt at putting “lipstick on a pig.”

Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault pushed the government to compel banks to make the change, which went into effect Monday, amid a nationwide wave of backlash against the increasing federal carbon tax.

Carbon tax rebates had previously been given labels including “federal payment” or “EFT Canada,” which confused some account holders about where the payments were coming from, according to the federal government. 

“The fact that they haven’t been doing it now for many years led us to take this position,” said Guilbeault at the time. 

Banks will now label government payments accepted for deposit as either “Canada Carbon Rebate” or “CdaCarbonRebate.”

“What the Trudeau government is doing here is putting lipstick on its carbon tax pig,” Franco Terrazzano, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation told True North.

“Average Canadians know the carbon tax is costing them big time and making the necessities of life more expensive. The government doesn’t have a communications problem, it has a ‘carbon tax is making life more expensive’ problem.”

For example, banks TD and BMO have adopted the “CdaCarbonRebate” label, which fits the 15-character limit imposed by some banks, while CIBC has yet to confirm which label it will use. 

With the exception of Quebec, British Columbia and the three territories which have their own carbon pricing systems, the government pays out the carbon tax rebates every three months on the 15th.

While these changes may make it easier for consumers to recognize how these rebates are being received, the federal carbon pricing system itself remains a highly contentious political issue. 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was booed by a group of Canadian mayors for claiming the carbon tax helps more Canadians than it hurts last month. 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has repeatedly pledged to “axe the tax,” if elected.

The carbon tax has added 17.6 cents to the price of a litre of gasoline, creating a ripple effect on raising the costs of other goods and services as well.

It will cost the Canadian economy $11.9 billion this year, costing each Canadian an average of $295 in lost GDP, rising to $30 billion by 2030, or $678 per person, according to calculations by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

Saskatchewan has taken the strongest stand against the federal carbon tax, refusing to collect it altogether, a move the federal government vowed to fight through the Canada Revenue Agency.  

However, the province was granted an emergency injunction against the CRA to block the federal government from collecting the carbon tax directly by the Federal Court last week.

Saskatchewan is not alone, as seven out of 10 premiers publicly opposed its most recent scheduled tax increase which came into effect on April 1st, calling for it to be halted beforehand to give Canadians some financial relief.

Despite the majority premiers opposing the increase, the Trudeau government went ahead with the increase, raising it an additional 23%.   

“Instead of relabelling his carbon tax, Trudeau should scrap the carbon tax,” said Terrazzano.

Ratio’d | Trump Derangement Syndrome strikes Canada after fatal rally shooting

After an attempted assassination on former U.S. president Donald Trump at his rally on Saturday, which left an attendee dead, the unhinged and deranged responses from Canadian university professors and columnists began flowing in. A UBC professor lamented that Trump’s would-be assassin missed his target while a University of Guelph professor laughed about the death of an innocent firefighter who tried to protect his family from the gun shots.

Canadians shouldn’t be surprised to see this rhetoric from the radical left. This is the kind of language which has resulted in the political climate we are now in. It is now clear, when it comes to political violence and wishing harm and death on your political opposition, there is no comparison that can be drawn between the left and right. Radical leftists wish death on their political enemies.

Watch the latest episode of Ratio’d with Harrison Faulkner.

Rachel and The Republic | SHOCKING – What I saw at the failed Trump assassination

Source: Facebook

Rachel Parker was on the ground during the attempted assassination on former US President Donald Trump. Today on Rachel and the Republic, Rachel explains what she saw, and the perilous seconds when it seemed like the worst might have happened.

Rachel also heard from dozens of Americans in the immediate aftermath of the assassination attempt who told her how America can heal and where the republic goes from here.  She shares their words today.

Tune into Rachel and the Republic now. 

SUBSCRIBE TO RACHEL AND THE REPUBLIC

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to get Secret Service protection following Trump shooting

Source: Facebook

Following the failed assassination attempt on former U.S. president Donald Trump, the Biden administration has finally agreed to provide security for independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 

The Department of Homeland Security caved shortly after Trump wrote on Truth Social that Secret Service protection for Kennedy is imperative “in light of what is going on in the world today.”

In a press briefing on Monday, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said America is in a “heightened and very dynamic threat environment”

“In light of this weekend’s events, the president has directed me to work with the Secret Service to provide protection to Robert Kennedy Jr,” Mayorkas said.

Typically, the DHS secretary determines which presidential candidates are eligible for Secret Service protection in consultation with an advisory committee composed of the Speaker of the House, House minority leader, Senate majority leader, Senate minority leader, and one additional member. 

The DHS considers factors such as candidate polling and a candidate’s threat level, which it defines as “explicit threats of bodily harm to the candidate or indications of inappropriate behavior towards the candidate suggesting potential bodily harm.” 

Kennedy responded to the news on X, writing, “Thank you to President Biden for granting me Secret Service protection.”

“And I am so grateful to Gavin deBecker & Associates for keeping me safe for the last 15 months of my Presidential campaign,” he added. 

Kennedy’s uncle, John F. Kennedy, was elected president as a Democrat in 1960 and assassinated just three years later. 

His father and namesake, Robert F. Kennedy, ran a campaign for the Democrat presidential nomination in 1968, but he was assassinated before the party’s nominating convention. 

Mayorkas’ announcement follows calls from current and past politicians advocating for Kennedy’s protection. 

Hours after the Trump shooting, Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis wrote on X that the federal government should “immediately provide secret service protection” for Kennedy. His nephew, former Rep. Joseph Kennedy III, who has opposed his uncle’s candidacy, told CNN Monday morning that his uncle must have protection as “any candidate for office, at this point, is going to need.”

Mayorkas declined to comment on security failures at Trump’s rally in Butler, Penn on Saturday. 

A shooter was able to get 150 yards from Trump and graze his ear with a bullet. Corey Comperatore, 50, a volunteer fire chief, was killed while shielding his wife and daughter. Two other spectators were critically injured. 

The gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks, was killed by a law enforcement sniper.

Mayorkas said DHS is in the process of choosing who will lead the independent review into the events. 

“We need to move with swiftness and urgency because this is a security imperative.”

Canadian military investigating soldiers over Trump assassination posts

Source: Facebook

The Canadian Armed Forces are investigating two of its members over social media posts lamenting that the attempted assassination of former U.S. president Donald Trump was unsuccessful.

A pair of active servicemen joked about the incident which saw a shooter open fire on the presidential contestant while at a rally in Butler, Penn. The shooting left two dead, including the shooter and an audience member. Trump survived the attack but was grazed by a bullet. 

As news of the incident was circulating, CAF Petty Officer, 2nd Class Jeff Pike and Sgt. Keith Martin made several Facebook posts about it. 

The day after the shooting, Pike referred to the failed assassination as an attempt “at solving America’s problems.” 

“Starting to see the reports on the attempt made at solving America’s problems last night… So, so close.” 

In another post on Monday, Pike commented how the shooter “tried to Make American (sic) Great Again, but missed.” 

Meanwhile, Martin posted a meme gif from the movie Billy Madison depicting American actor Adam Sandler with accompanying text that read, “You blew it!”



Both Pike and Martin have since made their social media accounts private. Neither of the two responded to requests for comment. 

A media relations officer with the Department of National Defence confirmed to True North that both individuals were in active service. Photographs on their social media accounts show the two in military uniform. 

“We can confirm that the individuals you have identified by name are currently serving members. The matter you have brought to our attention is being referred to the Chain of Command to investigate,” said Lt.-Cmdr. Linda Coleman in an emailed statement. 

“While the CAF does not actively monitor the social media accounts of its members, any member engaging on social media is expected to present good judgment and conduct themselves in a manner that respects our clear guidelines regarding professional military conduct, including the behaviour of CAF members both on and off social media.”

All members of the Canadian Armed Forces must adhere to the Queen’s Regulations and Orders. Notably, the posts in question appeared to violate Volume 1, Chapter 19, Section 1 (19.14) and Section 2 (19.36 & 19.44) of the regulations, which pertain to inappropriate comments, expressions of opinions, and political activities.

“Social networks and the comment sections of Web sites are public in nature, and comments and behaviour therein form a permanent part of the public record. CAF members shall ensure that their online activity, whether on–or–off–duty, does not reflect discredit on the CAF, compromise the CAF’s reputation and lead others to refuse, be reluctant to or be unable to work with the CAF,” Coleman told True North. 

In March 2023, True North reported that the military was investigating four serving members for posts bashing Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and the Freedom Convoy movement on similar grounds. 

Poilievre doubles down in face of criticism over deceased Trump shooter statement

Source: Facebook

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre is not apologizing for his statement condemning the assassination attempt on former US president Donald Trump.

Poilievre doubled down on his response amidst some politicians and pundits being outraged with him saying that he’s happy the shooter is dead.

Trump was addressing supporters in Butler, Penn. Saturday evening when a shooter opened fire on the former president. One spectator and the shooter were killed, while two other spectators were injured.

Trump was grazed by one of the bullets but survived the incident.

“I condemn in the strongest of terms the attempted murder of former President Trump today. I am relieved he is safe. My prayers are with other innocent people harmed or killed by this heinous act,” said Poilievre in a statement Saturday.

“I am also happy that the suspected shooter is dead,” he added. “Democracy must prevail.”

Prominent progressives quickly hammered Poilievre, claiming his statement was unworthy of somebody running to become prime minister.

Socialist Ontario NDP MPP Joel Harden wrote on X “I also condemn the assassination attempt of former President Trump. I wish violence on no one. But Pierre Poilievre (saying) ‘I’m glad the shooter is dead’ is not leadership. This is not how a prime minister talks.”

Harden added that “leaders don’t celebrate death. We work for community safety.

Former Alberta Progressive Conservative MLA Thomas Lukaszuk said “that is an irrational, although populist, statement to make. Revenge over due process.”

He added that “if the criminal was apprehended alive, we could have learned so much more, which could serve the future safety of all.”

Left-wing commentator David Moscrop said being happy that the shooter is dead is “an insane thing to say” and referred to Poilievre’s statement as “a wacko tweet.”

Columnist and former Liberal advisor Warren Kinsella said “if you think he’s only a suspect, you shouldn’t be saying you’re happy he’s dead.” Kinsella added that this “goes double for when you’re running to be prime minister. It’s a bad look.”

Globe and Mail columnist Andrew Coyne also criticized Poilievre over his statement.

“In all the reactions from political leaders the world over, I can find no other expressing such lip-smacking satisfaction at the violent death of another human being,” he wrote.

“While others appeal for calm, Poilievre rejoices in retribution. It’s human enough, in such moments, to think it. But to say it — and not in some unguarded private moment, but as the public reaction, with the potential for further violence hanging in the air, of a would-be prime minister… This is not normal,” Coyne added.

Poilievre doubled down on his statement in a Monday morning interview with Global News AM 640’s Alex Pierson.

“Obviously, we’re very pleased that the shooter was killed and that the former president was not,” Poilievre said.

When asked about the criticisms of that statement, Poilievre said, “well what would they say? Did they think he should be alive? I don’t know what they’re offended about.”

“Maybe they just think that you shouldn’t be saying stuff like that,” said Pierson, to which Poilievre asked “why?”

“He killed another human being. I don’t care what you think about President Trump, former President Trump. The reality is he’s a human being and so was the other innocent victim who died here heroically protecting his loved ones.” Poilievre said.

“So I don’t know what people would expect me to say.”

Pierson responded by saying “I am not sure anything you say will ever be acceptable, but that’s the line that we live in, right?” to which Poilievre responded “That’s life and frankly, I don’t care.”

Danielle Smith urges “progressive politicians” to “dial it down” after Trump attack 

Source: X

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith urged her progressive counterparts to reflect on their aggressive rhetoric after the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump. 

Smith is among Canada’s premiers currently participating in the 2024 Council of the Federation, a biannual meeting attended by provincial and territorial leaders to promote cooperation.

“I’m glad that we’re beginning to see that they’ve recognized that things have gone too far. The way in which Conservative politicians have been characterized is outrageous, and I think led to the culture that we’ve seen in the U.S.,” said Smith.

“I certainly hope that some of the progressive politicians here are careful of their language because they’ve been talking about Conservative politicians in the same way, and they need to dial it down,” she added.

Smith was asked to provide examples of what kind of framing would be deemed outrageous. 

“Have you not looked at the headlines about how Pierre Poilievre is described as dangerous? How the leader of the opposition in Alberta has described me as dangerous? When you start using that kind of rhetoric, that ends up creating an elevated risk for all of us,” she said.

The Alberta premier said that while political disagreements occur, leaders should focus on the issues. She said that’s what she enjoyed about the Council of the Federation, that politicians from different parties can come together and find areas of agreement.

Before the council’s summer meeting began, the premiers sent a joint letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Thursday, pleading for unification between the premiers and the federal government. 

“To revive the collaborative spirit of the federation, we urge the federal government to refrain from unilateral actions in areas of provincial and territorial jurisdiction, particularly in health care, education, and housing,” reads the letter. “We urge you and your cabinet colleagues to seize this opportunity to enhance bilateral and multilateral cooperation.” 

Ontario Premier Doug Ford said he would leave it up to his detail team to decide whether he would consider changing his participation in open-area events. 

“I think it’s pretty hot down in the U.S.,” Ford said of the political rhetoric. “Everyone needs to step back; be united. And you can see here, no matter what political stripes the premiers come from, we are united as premiers and will always be that way.”

Minister of Public Safety Dominic LeBlanc said he was not worried about holding public events, as he trusted the RCMP to take the necessary steps to protect Canadian politicians. 

“Yesterday, I convened a briefing with the Commissioner of the RCMP, the director of CSIS, (and) the Deputy Minister of Public Safety. They went through the threat landscape. They talked to me about the additional vigilance that they’ve put in place since the assassination attempt on former President Trump Saturday evening,” said LeBlanc.

He avoided specific measures but mentioned that he had reached out to Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, assuring him that the RCMP had been in contact with his office and that the steps to maintain a safe democracy were in place.

“If you want to change the government, you participate in an election, and you go to vote. You don’t engage in acts of political violence. That’s what’s so disturbing about what we saw with former President Trump on Wednesday evening, where innocent people participating in a political event were severely injured or, in the case of one person, lost his life,” said Leblanc.

Related stories