fbpx
Friday, May 16, 2025

LEVY: If Ford were serious about fighting tariff threat, he wouldn’t have called an election

Source: X

I have come to the sad conclusion that we have absolutely no leadership in Canada’s largest province.

We are run by a power-driven, self-serving man who has become a lapdog to his pollsters and the province’s largest voting blocs, not one who makes the hard decisions and does what’s right.

Instead of dealing head-on with the tariff threats by President Donald Trump, our Progressive Conservative Premier Doug Ford has decided to call a snap election this week to — get this — allegedly get a strong mandate to fight the tariffs.

Hey, how about dealing with the illegals and drugs that cross our Ontario borders?

This election, which reportedly could cost (waste) up to $145-million, will take place at the end of February, more than a year earlier than required.

This is in addition to the fuzzy-wuzzy Ontario ads seen in prime time every single night south of the border — sometimes three or four times a night.

I can only imagine how much Ford has wasted on them.

His threats to remove U.S. liquor from LCBO shelves if tariffs are imposed are just plain silly and his appearance on CNN threatening Trump only makes matters worse.

My prediction is that Ford will get another mandate but only because the other two party leaders — Marit Stiles and Bonnie Crombie — have little to offer in distinct policies.

The two are train wrecks and Ford knows that.

But based on my own experience running for the Ontario Tories in 2009, the turnout to the polls at the end of February will be embarrassingly small and the reception at the doors extremely lacklustre.

Still, Ford has no business calling an election and taking his eye off the ball during these tough times for Ontarians, especially since Trump has declared Feb. 1 the day he will impose tariffs on Canada.

Whether he will or not, I know Americans are already mocking us for the amateurish manner our Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is handling or should I say, mishandling, the threats from south of the border. 

The dilettante’s Team Canada approach seems to have disintegrated into attempts to get his good pal Mark Carney anointed as the new leader.

It reminds me of presidential hopeful Kamala Harris’s lacklustre, even negligent, handling of the hurricane that hit North Carolina during the presidential campaign.

But back to Ford, our allegedly Conservative premier.

I can’t stress enough how disappointed I’ve been with his lacklustre leadership which has pandered far too much to the “progressives” and has focussed on shiny little objects like beer policies and $200 cheques — again to stay in power.

He has dropped the ball entirely on the education file, allowing school boards and the radical left trustees who dominate them to continue with their DEI and CRT ideology, all to the detriment of the school kids he is supposed to serve.

He never cleaned out the DEI and equity advocates left over from the Kathleen Wynne years, who dominate the ministry.

I guess he didn’t have the courage to take on that fight.

(Perhaps Ford should take a lesson from Trump).

His latest education minister, Jill Dunlop, appears to be all talk.

She makes tough pronouncements but when push comes to shove, she, too, continues to give credence to the DEI specialists and race baiters.

Proof of this is the appointment of DEI advocate Patrick Case to study the September field trip at the TDSB which turned into an anti-Israel, anti-Jew hate fest.

That appointment, by the way, occurred in mid-October.

Mark my words, the report will be buried under the rug just as the education ministry did with the so-called review of the (principal) Richard Bilkzsto tragedy.

While Ford has called the Jewish community his “friends” and occasionally has turned up to pro-Israel events, he has done nothing, absolutely nothing, to stem the hatred and violence Jews have encountered on the streets of Toronto and targeted at Jewish institutions.

His Jewish solicitor general Michael Kerzner, who is supposed to oversee Ontario police forces, has made little effort, at least loudly and publicly, to read the Toronto police chief Myron Demkiw the Riot Act.

Demkiw, and by extension Kerzner, have not used the powers available to police to stop the violent and threatening acts by the Hamas sympathizers towards the Jewish community. Instead both have emboldened the Hamasniks with their hands off attitudes and allowed matters to escalate.

I guess Ford has counted the numbers and knows that pro-Palestinian voters, whether legal or illegal, vastly outnumber those in the Jewish community.

(See notes above about pandering to anyone who will put him back in power).

There are so many other ways Ford has proven himself not to be Conservative but these two stick out in my mind.

Lucky for me, I will not be in Ontario on the date of the snap election.

I’m so angry at the waste of time and resources, I’d boycott it anyway.

ANALYSIS: Why everyone should know Thomas Sowell

YT: Thomas Sowell

Thomas Sowell’s searing critique of bureaucracy—“It’s hard to imagine a more stupid or dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong”—is more relevant today than ever. This legendary economist, born to North Carolina sharecroppers in 1930, overcame adversity to become one of the most influential conservative thinkers of the modern era. His insights resonate powerfully across borders, offering lessons for Canada as much as for his native United States.

Sowell’s journey is remarkable. Orphaned young and raised by a great aunt in Harlem, he pursued education against significant odds, earning a PhD in economics under Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago. Initially a Marxist, his views shifted dramatically during a stint with the U.S. Department of Labor, where he saw firsthand how government programs could exacerbate—rather than alleviate—poverty. This transformation launched him as a staunch advocate for free-market economics and an unflinching critic of expansive government.

Over a career spanning decades, Sowell’s writings tackled economics, social theory, and cultural criticism with piercing clarity. From Basic Economics, a primer on economic principles, to Social Justice Fallacies, a critique of modern identity politics, Sowell’s work underscores his belief in personal responsibility and the perils of government overreach. His observations hold profound relevance for Canada, a nation grappling with the consequences of unchecked bureaucracy and policies that often prioritize ideological aims over practical outcomes.

One of Sowell’s most enduring legacies is his critique of affirmative action. As a black professor in elite institutions during its rise, he saw how such policies, though well-intentioned, demeaned highly-qualified individuals by casting doubt on their achievements. His book Affirmative Action Around the World argues that these programs often harm the very groups they aim to help. In Canada, where debates over equity and inclusion dominate policy discourse, Sowell’s insights offer a cautionary tale about the harm and injustice caused by identity-based policymaking.

Sowell’s writing smoulders with an underlying moral righteousness leavened by his good humour and human decency, the twinkle in his eye bouncing and sparkling even as he skewers leftist fallacies and the hypocrites who convey them. Perhaps most compelling is Sowell’s ability to distill complex issues into pithy, unforgettable aphorisms. His work brims with clarity and moral conviction, offering a rare combination of intellectual rigor and accessibility. As Powerline blogger Scott Johnson aptly noted, Sowell elicits “profound feelings of gratitude” for his “expository gifts, depth, fairness, and ability to get to the heart of the matter.” Here are some of his most resonant thoughts:

On Moral Values and Freedom:

●  “Without a moral framework, there is nothing left but immediate self-indulgence by some and the path of least resistance by others. Neither can sustain a free society.”

●  “Freedom has cost too much blood and agony to be relinquished at the cheap price of rhetoric.”

On Socialism and the Welfare State:

●  “Socialism has a record of failure so blatant that only an ‘intellectual’ could ignore or evade it.”

●  “The welfare state is not really about the welfare of the masses. It is about the egos of the elites.”

●  “The real goal should be to reduce government spending, rather than increasing tax rates to cover ever-rising spending.”

On Bureaucracy:

●  “You’ll never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats, procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.”

●  “Open-ended demands are a mandate for ever-expanding bureaucracies with ever-expanding budgets and powers.”

Education has been another of Sowell’s enduring concerns. He decried the ideological indoctrination that has replaced genuine learning in many schools, observing that “much of what is promoted as ‘critical thinking’ in our schools is in fact uncritical negativism towards the history and institutions of America.” This critique resonates in Canada, where debates over curricula often mirror those in the U.S., raising questions about how education is shaping young minds.

Sowell’s keen observations stem from a deep belief in the value of freedom—freedom to succeed or fail, to learn from one’s experiences, and to resist the encroachments of overbearing governments. He warned against the moral hazards of dependency, whether through welfare programs or top-down technocratic solutions. His critiques are not merely academic; they reflect a profound understanding of human nature and societal dynamics.

Canada stands at a crossroads. Our growing bureaucracies, polarized politics, and strained public finances mirror many of the challenges Sowell spent his life dissecting. His call for individual responsibility, limited government, and the preservation of freedom is as urgent here as it is anywhere. In 2025, we should strive for political and administrative leadership rooted in the timeless principles Sowell championed.

Thankfully, at 94, Sowell has lived long enough to see a patriotic revival in his country. If Sowell happens to be observing the goings-on in Canada, he may well witness the beginnings of a similar revival here in Canada. It is certainly overdue.

The original, full-length version of this article was recently published in C2C Journal.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader and former director of five global corporations.

Canada Post gets $1 billion loan from feds despite claiming no taxpayer funding

Source: X

The Liberals are bailing out Canada Post by loaning the Crown corporation over $1 billion right before its cash reserves ran out. However, if the financial losses over the last six years continue, the Canadian taxpayers will never recover that loan.

Canada Post revealed on Friday that the Liberals will provide them with the $1.034 billion repayable loan for the 2025-26 fiscal year. 

“This approach will maintain continuity of Canada Post’s operations but will not solve the Corporation’s structural issues. It will, however, provide a temporary financial bridge while Canada Post and the government work together on a plan to secure the long-term viability of a service that millions of Canadians consider essential,” reads Canada Post’s news release.

Canada Post recorded a financial loss of $748 million in 2023, following a loss of $548 million in 2022. While the Crown corporation delivered 5.5 billion letters in 2006, it delivered only 2.2 billion in 2023. 

The Crown corporation revealed that it has been losing money since 2018 due to high labour costs and regulatory measures impeding the company’s ability to evolve and compete.

“As the Corporation shared in its 2023 Annual Report, without this short-term financing measure, the company would completely deplete its cash reserves by the second quarter of 2025,” reads the release.

The corporation said it is already improving its service through facilities upgrades, new sorting equipment, digital platforms, and more. 

The Crown corporation recently increased postage rates by around 25%, citing inflation and operational challenges. 

The recent Canada Post strike lasted 32 days after over 55,000 workers walked off the job on Nov. 15 as the Canadian Union of Postal Workers looked to increase wages, pensions, and improve employees’ health benefits. 

The Liberal government has maintained, most recently in a question period note for Minister of Public Services Jean-Yves Duclos, that the corporation was not taxpayer-funded. 

“Canada Post is a Crown Corporation that operates at arm’s length from the Government, and its operations are funded by the revenue generated by the sale of its products and services, not taxpayer dollars,” reads the response.

One popular X commenter showcased the financial losses over the last six years in a post to X.

“Canada Post has just secured a $1 billion loan from taxpayers,” said the commenter. “To stay alive.”

Another person on X said that isn’t how it should work.

“If a corporation cannot sustain itself, let it go bankrupt, and Canada Post is no exception. Privatization is the answer,” wrote the user on X. 

“Remember this the next time Canada Post claims they aren’t funded by taxpayer dollars,” wrote another user.

The Rachel Parker Show | Treatment over “safe supply” is paying off for Alberta

Source: Facebook

When the Alberta government began focussing on treatment and recovery to address the drug crisis, “harm reduction” advocates were up in arms about this different approach.

Fast forward a few months, as Alberta Minister of Mental Health and Addiction Dan Williams explains, Alberta is seeing a significant drop in drug overdoses, and more people are getting the treatment they need.

Williams joined Rachel Parker to give an update on Alberta’s recovery model.

Over half of Canadians feeling “financially paralyzed” as costs continue to rise: RBC

Source: Pexels

More than half of Canadians feel “financially paralyzed” by the rising cost of living, with almost half saying that they cannot maintain their standard of living due to the increasing costs.

According to an RBC poll published on Thursday, around one in three, 29%, of respondents said their finances are in a constant state of chaos.

“As financial flexibility continues to erode, it’s not surprising to hear that Canadians are feeling anxious and uncertain about what steps they can take to try to find their footing again,” said Craig Bannon, an RBC financial planner.

Canadians who felt most paralyzed by rising costs lived in Atlantic Canada. Atlantic Canadians were also the most likely to feel they could not maintain their standard of living, spending all their income on essentials and living paycheque to paycheque.

Furthermore, the majority of Canadians, 60%, worry that they don’t have enough money to cover unexpected expenses today.

A Fraser Institute study highlighted that Canadians spend more on taxes than on food, shelter, and clothing combined. 

However, the feeling of financial paralysis decreased with age. Canadians aged 29-44 were most likely to feel financially paralyzed due to rising costs, with 63% of respondents in that age group feeling that way. The percentage decreased with age. 

A previous survey showed that inflation is outpacing income for the majority of Canadians. A TD Bank report showed that income inequality reached its highest levels since 2015.

Every one of the 15 metrics measured by RBC was worse among millennials than among boomers (Canadians aged 61-70). Millennials also generally felt worse than Gen X (Canadians aged 45-60) in all categories, barring a few.

While many Canadians were worried and anxious—like the 44% who said that it was not a matter of if but when they would run out of money to live comfortably—many were already making drastic changes to cope with the cost of living.

For example, over a quarter of Canadians, 27%, have taken on debt to cover their monthly basic needs. Almost a quarter, 23%, have asked family for money or moved in with relatives. 

Nearly half have lost hope — 48% say that they don’t believe they’ll ever be able to get ahead financially.

A previous study highlighted that 45% of Canadians said they are “greatly affected” by the continuously rising cost of living.

Rising costs have caused more Canadians to declare bankruptcy, as Canada faced a 15.4% rise in personal insolvencies in 2024. Business insolvencies similarly rose at the fastest level in 37 years.

Illegal immigrants from Jordan, Sudan apprehended crossing into Manitoba

Source: Facebook

A group of migrants from Jordan, Sudan, Chad, and Mauritania were apprehended near Emerson, Man. while attempting to cross into Canada illegally.

The group, discovered via aerial surveillance, included individuals ill-prepared for the region’s freezing temperatures. Emergency services were called with at least one ambulance dispatched to provide medical assistance.

Authorities confirmed that all six individuals were arrested and transferred to the custody of the Canada Border Services Agency.

The crossing comes as the federal government implements a $1.3 billion initiative aimed at addressing illegal crossings and other threats. These measures include 24/7 aerial surveillance using helicopters, drones, and mobile towers.

According to the Manitoba RCMP, two Black Hawk helicopters first began monitoring the border on Jan. 17. 

“They are being used to patrol, detect, and respond to both north and southbound threats at the Canada-U.S. border, ultimately preventing illegal crossings of people, goods and drugs,” reads an RCMP press release. 

The upgraded surveillance systems, which played a key role in spotting the group near Emerson, are a cornerstone of the government’s response.

Additionally, the federal government is also rolling out a dedicated “strike force” to improve response times and operational coordination.

The arrests come just as U.S. President Donald Trump, a staunch critic of Canada’s lax attitude towards illegal cross-border trafficking, has repeatedly called on Canada to tackle illegal migration and the drug trade, warning that failure to act would result in tariffs. 

In response, the Liberal government has said it is committed to addressing the U.S.’ concerns by prioritizing slowing the flow of fentanyl, equipping law enforcement with advanced tools, and improving the inspection of exports to combat illicit trafficking.

The measures also aim to reduce illegal migrant crossings into the U.S. while enhancing information-sharing between agencies.

Despite Ottawa’s announcement of renewed border measures, Trump has not indicated that he would not follow through on his tariff threats. 

Most Canadians want stricter measures against Khalistani separatists: poll

Source: Media Bezirgan

Nearly three in four Canadians support stricter policies to prevent foreign separatists, such as the Khalistani movement, from operating in Canada, with over half saying they oppose the movement’s activities in Canada.

According to a recent Leger 360 poll, 54% of Canadians oppose the Khalistani separatist movement’s operations in Canada, with 72% saying there should be stricter actions by the government to prevent foreign separatists from organizing in the country.

The survey asked a sample of 1,515 voting-aged Canadians, statistically weighted to represent Canada’s population according to available census data, their thoughts on foreign separatist movements in Canada. The data was collected from Dec. 13 to Dec. 16.

The report states that for comparison purposes, a probability sample of the same size yields a margin of error no greater than 2.52% 19 times out of 2020 for the Canadian sample.

This comes just months after Khalistan-led protesters stormed Hindu temple property after an altercation in Brampton, Ont., and related protests outside temples in Surrey, B.C., which led to a pro-Indian riot in Brampton the following night.

The Khalistan movement, primarily spearheaded by “Sikhs for Justice” in North America, advocates for a Sikh-led state to be carved out of India, with most of its territory being in the Indian state of Punjab. The Indian government has declared Sikhs for Justice as an “unlawful association.”

The poll found that 30% of Canadians believe that Sikh Canadians face “unfair scrutiny” due to the actions of a small minority of Sikhs in Canada involved in separatist activities in Canada, though another third disagree that they do.

Only 10% of respondents said they support Khalistani separatists operating in Canada, with just 2% saying they strongly support it. Among respondents of South-Asian heritage, however, 28% said they support the movement in Canada. 

Ontario was the province with the most measured support. Still, only 11% of Ontarians reported support for the foreign separatist movement in Canada. According to the latest census reports from 2021, Ontario houses the largest South Asian population in Canada. 

The Greater Toronto Area alone, namely Brampton and Mississauga, housed nearly 1.2 million South Asian individuals in 2021. For instance, in 2021, 52.4% of Brampton residents identified as South Asian. That number is expected to have grown substantially since then.

Just over half, 54%, of respondents said they opposed Sikh separatist activities domestically, with 37% saying they strongly opposed the movement in Canada.

Over two-thirds, 68%, of Canadians express concern about allegations that the Indian government has interfered in Canadian domestic affairs, including threats towards Sikh Canadians. A third of Canadians said they were “very concerned” about the allegations.


The RCMP announced a series of arrests of Indian nationals allegedly connected to the murder of Khalistan-separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar at a Surrey, B.C., Sikh temple in June 2023. 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused New Dehli of orchestrating the alleged assassination, which led to heightened diplomatic tensions between Canada and India. The spat led to both countries demanding the withdrawal of the other diplomats over the following years.

Despite this, just over half, 53%, said they were aware of the accusations that India was intimidating and assassinating Sikh Canadians, though 79% of South Asian respondents said they were aware.

Though many Canadians reported a high level of concern about the topic, only 20% said they follow news about the Khalistan separatist movement closely. 76% of Canadians said they were not following news on Khalistan separatist news, with 35% saying they don’t.

Nearly half of Quebecers reported that they don’t know whether or not they support Khalistan activities in Canada. At the same time, 84% of Quebecers reported that they did not follow the news closely about their activities. Quebec had the highest level of disconnect from the issue at large.

The Alberta Roundup | Is the tariff dispute 100% Trudeau’s fault?

Source: PM.GC.CA

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is 100% to blame for any tariffs that will be placed on Canadian imports by President Donald Trump.

Plus, the Government of Alberta says it cannot move forward with rebuilding Jasper, which was devastated by wildfires, unless the federal government, the municipality, and Parks Canada hold up their ends of the bargain.

And Calgary City Council voted to maintain its pay increases despite affordability concerns and widespread opposition.

These stories and more on The Alberta Roundup with Isaac Lamoureux!

Heinz Canada responds to Trudeau’s “misleading statements” about its ketchup

Source: Facebook

Kraft Heinz is calling out Prime Minister Justin Trudeau after he claimed the company didn’t use Canadian tomatoes in their ketchup while discussing retaliatory measures in response to looming 25% trade tariffs.

Following a meeting with premiers earlier this week, Trudeau suggested Canadians buy alternatives to Heinz Ketchup to avoid paying tariffs that may potentially be applied to the product.  

“That’s why we will look, as we have in the past, at things that have replacements for Canadian consumers that wouldn’t be tariffed,” he said. “The example from last time was Heinz’s ketchup being replaced by French’s ketchup because French’s was still using Canadian tomatoes in its ketchup.”

Trudeau was referring to retaliatory tariffs that could be implemented in response to U.S. President Trump’s pledge to impose a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports as early as Feb. 1. 

Kraft Heinz Canada responded to the prime minister’s comments on Thursday by saying it was “deeply disappointed” by Trudeau’s “misleading statements” regarding its product. 

While Kraft Heinz Canada did shut down a hundred-year-old tomato processing plant that had been operating out of Leamington, Ont. in 2015, the company returned to producing ketchup in Canada five years later in response to consumer backlash. 

“With the exception of the five years from 2015 to 2020, we have made HEINZ Ketchup in Canada for more than 100 years. We were resolute in our decision to bring the production of HEINZ Ketchup back to Canada in 2020 and are proud that HEINZ Ketchup is made in Canada, by Canadians, using Canadian tomatoes,” wrote the company in a statement. 

The company noted that the Montreal plant opened in 2020 still used tomatoes grown in Leamington. 

“More than 1,000 hard-working Canadians at our Mont Royal Quebec facility, together with our many suppliers in the Province, produce HEINZ Ketchup for Canadians using tomatoes grown in Leamington, Ontario. As one of the largest manufacturers of food in the country, Kraft Heinz is also the largest purchaser of tomatoes in Ontario.” 

An X user pointed out that not only is the Heinz Ketchup processing plant located in Canada, but it’s also about 10 minutes away from Trudeau’s constituency office. 

Trade minister says Canadians must “bear the sacrifice” of govt’s response to Trump tariffs

Source: Facebook

Minister of Transport and International Trade Anita Anand says that Canadians will just have to “bear the sacrifice” of the Trudeau government’s so-called “Team Canada” approach to U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat of imposing 25% tariffs. 

“We will use all tools in our toolbox to address any illegal tariffs that come forward and that should not just be one province alone,” Anand told CBC News Tuesday. “All of us need to bear the sacrifice that would be made if we move forward with retaliatory measures of this sort.”

Anand went on to say “Canada has vast natural resources and raw materials and we need to diversify our markets going forward so that we ourselves are leveraging the depth of our natural resource sector.”

Trump has confirmed that the tariffs could take effect as early as Feb. 1. 

“There are no winners in a trade war, as every tariff levied reduces prosperity and standards of living on both sides of the border,” Renaud Brossard, vice president of Communications at the Montreal Economic Institute told True North. 

“Every tariff levied is essentially a tax on those who consume or transform the targeted goods into further manufactured parts, ultimately contributing to an increase in the cost of living.”

Renaud’s understanding of what a trade war with the U.S. might look like for Canadians has not been lost on certain premiers either. 

Despite the Trudeau government’s branding of its “Team Canada” approach to retaliatory measures, dissent has been brewing among the premiers, which began with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.

After being the only premier of 13 to refuse to sign a joint statement on Canada-U.S. relations, it now appears she has some support from Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe and Premier François Legault in Quebec.

Legault said any retaliatory action involving energy exports south of the border should first require the approval of provinces and those most affected earlier this week. 

“Regarding energy, I think it is important that if it affects a province, that this province has to give its consent first,” said Legault during a caucus retreat in St-Sauveur, Que.

Moe echoed this sentiment by saying that his province was “most certainly not supportive of export tariffs” and that his government intended to “ensure that an export tariff couldn’t be applied on Saskatchewan products.” 

According to Renaud, imposing retaliatory tariffs will only guarantee that “Canadians would see higher prices and a drop in product availability in stores, which is a concerning thought as families are still feeling the effect of the recent inflationary wave.”

“If Ottawa is intent on retaliating to U.S. tariffs on a dollar-for-dollar basis, it’ll find out that we’ll run out of an economy much faster than our U.S. counterparts do,” he said. 

Related stories