fbpx
Sunday, May 18, 2025

LEVY: As Trump kills DEI, the Toronto school board goes all-in

Source: Facebook

In Monday’s inauguration speech, U.S. president Donald Trump made it clear that under his watch harmful DEI will be DEAD in America.

He followed that up the same day with an executive order to eliminate all Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs in the federal government and in federal agencies.

With any luck, common sense and merit will replace these divisive policies south of the border where DEI hires in progressive cities have proven to be ill-prepared to manage crises. 

The horrible mismanagement of the January 1 terrorist attack in New Orleans and the raging wildfires in L.A. come to mind. 

But while the pendulum is swinging the right way in America — where many have realized the harms of DEI — Canada has not yet gotten the message.

The trustees on the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) programs committee doubled down last week with a ridiculous motion calling for the province to put in place mandatory Equity, diversity and anti-racism certification for all Ontario teachers.

The motion was brought forward by student trustee Angelika Bell, who has represented the Black Caucus Liaison with the Student Trustees Association and is very involved with Mayor Olivia Chow’s Youth Cabinet.

Bell received an Equity and Diversity award from the City of Toronto last spring and was also an advocate for menstrual equity (former black activist director Colleen Russell-Rawlins lauded her activism last year).

In other words, this engaged teen appears to have DEI in her blood. 

She reportedly told the board mandatory certification would equip teachers to better engage in discussions about race and identity particularly in the wake of the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7 of 2023.

Perhaps they would be better to engage in discussions about academics and ensure literate students graduate.

Although technically Bell can’t move a motion, NDP trustees Deborah Williams and Debbie King — both black activists — took carriage of it.

The motion claims that the lack of mandatory equity and anti-racism certification in the Ontario College of Teachers has prevented the achievement of an inclusive and equitable education environment — and that according to research from the TDSB’s Centre of Excellence for Black Student Achievement, black high school teachers experience “significant challenges” pertaining to micro-aggressions and isolation.

The motion quotes percentages of racism, bias and hate incidents from 2022-2023, which I’m willing to bet has totally been overtaken by the rampant antisemitism in the board.

The motion passed unanimously. Even Jewish trustee Alexandra Lulka (who should know better) voted in favour of it.

It goes to the full board Wednesday evening.

Although the board’s NDP trustees will do everything to hang onto their woke ideology and despite the changes in public sentiment towards DEI, it is beyond shameful that this would even be considered.

These trustees are exceptionally tone deaf.

DEI at the TDSB, like the examples I previously mentioned, has been an unmitigated disaster.

It has divided students, lowered standards and given black students and board administrators preferential treatment.

The decision to remove auditions and applications based on merit and use random selection to specialized art, music, math, science and sport programs at the TDSB came as a result of anti-black racism and equity initiatives.

Through the board’s Centre of Excellence — which was added in 2021-22 at a cost of $2.3-million a year — specialized camps, basketball programs and mentorships have been offered to black students only.

These anti-racism initiatives saw the removal of student resources officers — specialized cops — in the board’s schools and eliminated consequences for bad behaviour, most specifically suspensions and expulsions.

As a result, some TDSB schools have become war zones.

But the far greatest impact of these DEI initiatives has been the toll it’s taken on teachers and school administrators — the very people who would be subjected to this certification.

The most striking is the tragedy of Richard Bilkzsto.

In July of 2023, the much-loved principal committed suicide — the result of dealing with tremendous stress after being humiliated at DEI training sessions by “race expert” Kike Ojo-Thompson.

The DEI consultant targeted Bilkzsto repeatedly at two sessions in 2021 for daring to challenge her anti-black racism dogma. She accused him of white supremacy more than once in front of 200 colleagues, among other things.

Ojo-Thompson was never forced to account for her actions, considered “egregious and harassment” by the WSIB.

In fact, she is now a partner in charge of human capital consulting at Deloitte.

True North revealed last October that an alleged education ministry review of DEI and the circumstances leading to Bilkzsto’s death was an utter sham.

So much for conservative values.

A similar TDSB review appears to have been swept under the rug.

This is the kind of destructive ideology TDSB trustees are trying to foist down teachers’ throats.

One can hope such abject nonsense never sees the light of day.

Immigration cuts won’t halt population growth, projected to hit 80M in 50 years: Stats Can

Source: X

The Liberal government’s recent immigration cuts will not prevent Canada’s population from ballooning further, and it could reach over 80 million people within 50 years.

This is according to Statistics Canada’s population projections released on Tuesday.

Statistics Canada’s calculations use the country’s population, as estimated on July 1, 2024, as a baseline and use recent trends along with Canada’s most recent immigration plan. 

“It is very important to note that Statistics Canada’s population projections are not predictions. The utility of population projections lies in their timeliness, giving decision-makers and planners an essential tool for planning for the future today,” reads the report. “Given that the particulars of this future remain uncertain, several projection scenarios are proposed, allowing users to consider a number of possible future evolutions.”

On the high end, Statistics Canada estimates that Canada’s population will reach just under 80.8 million by 2074. On the lower end of the projection, the agency said that the population would be no lower than 45.2 million. The mid-growth scenario projects Canada’s population to reach 59.3 million by 2074.

Irrespective of which growth projection occurs, Statistics Canada said that migratory growth will be the key driver of population growth in Canada. The agency previously revealed that 97.6% of population growth came from international migration in 2023. 

Statistics Canada previously reported that population growth caused by record immigration was outpacing the rise in employment. 

Canada’s birth rate fell to a record low last year, resulting in the country having one of the lowest fertility rates in the world. Canada reported a measly 1.26 children per woman in 2023. A fertility rate of 2.1 is required for a population to grow naturally. 

The agency added that population aging will also occur no matter the circumstances. In the medium growth scenario, Canada’s population aged 85 and older will double between 2031 and 2051, from 1.2 million to 2.8 million.

The share of those aged 65 and older would also increase in every province and territory. 

Canada’s healthcare system will need $2 trillion to meet its ageing population’s needs, according to a C.D. Howe Institute report. 

Regardless of the growth scenario, Alberta’s demographic weight will increase while Newfoundland and Labrador’s, Quebec’s, and Yukon’s will decrease between 2024 and 2049.

In the high-growth scenario, Alberta’s population will increase by 56% between 2024 and 2049. On the low end, it will still increase by 25%. Conversely, the high-end would see Newfoundland and Labrador with little change between 2024 and 2049, while the low-growth scenario would see the province’s population decrease by 16%.

Other provinces and territories have variations on whether their population percentage will increase or decrease depending on the growth scenario and how interprovincial migration plays out.

Canadians have previously flocked to Alberta in search of affordable housing.

A previous Angus Reid survey highlighted that almost three in ten Canadians were considering relocating provinces to find more affordable housing. Almost half of those who said they’d relocate chose Alberta. 

True North compiled a list of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s immigration failures. 

Opioid deaths in Canada see dramatic increase since 2016

Counterfeit OxyContin pills - Source: rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Fatal opioid overdoses have steadily been on the rise in Canada, with deaths showing a consistent upward trend ever since the government first began nationally tracking the issue in 2016 until last year.

The Public Health Agency of Canada observed a dramatic elevation in deaths over the past eight years, tallying a total of 49,105 opioid toxicity deaths during that period.

While opioid deaths began to somewhat stabilize in 2024, they had been significantly increasing, going from less than 3,000 a year in 2016 to over 8,000 in 2023.

According to the government agency’s data, males 30 to 39 years of age are most likely to die from opioid toxicity, accounting for 72% of total deaths since 2016. 

Regionally, British Columbia is home to an overwhelming majority of the “accidental apparent opioid toxicity deaths in Canada,” noted Public Health Canada, responsible for 84% of all deaths recorded last year. 

Alberta and Ontario are the provinces that saw the next two highest figures of fatal overdoses

The bulk of accidental opioid deaths from January to June of last year involved fentanyl at 79%, up nearly double from from 2016 when fentanyl was a factor in 40% of deaths.

The majority of accidental deaths in 2024 (82%) involved non-pharmaceutical drugs. 

Over half of the deaths last year also involved a stimulant.

Unsurprisingly, hospitalizations as a result of opioid-related poisoning have also been steadily increasing since 2016, with 45,707 recorded to date.  

“Most accidental opioid-related poisoning hospitalizations occurred among males (64%) and among individuals aged 60 years or more (25%) so far in 2024 (January to June),” reads the report. “Among the 2,846 opioid-related poisoning hospitalizations so far in 2024 (January to June), 18% involved co-poisoning with a stimulant.”

Fentanyl and its analogues were detected in 33% of hospitalizations in the first six months of last year. 

The lethal drug’s involvement has also been on the rise, shooting up 106% since 2018, when Public Health Canada first began specifically surveilling fentanyl.  

However, the agency noted that it has appeared to have somewhat stabilized in recent years.  

Criminal Intelligence Service Canada recently released its 2024 Public Report on Organized Crime report, which found that “organized crime remains a preeminent threat to Canada’s security, contributing to thousands of deaths annually from overdoses due to illicit drugs, as well as firearms and gang violence.”

Organized crime groups began shifting their efforts to producing domestic fentanyl as opposed to importing it from overseas about five years ago, according to the RCMP. 

As fentanyl imports from abroad began to slow down in 2019, gangs began producing within Canada to keep up with the demand but now produce enough to export it in large quantities.

The RCMP busted what it called the “largest and most sophisticated” drug-production laboratory in Canadian history last November. The “super lab” as they called it was being operated by an international organized crime network.

The illicit facility was located in Falkland, a rural community east of Kamloops, B.C. According to Mounties, the facility could produce several kilograms of methamphetamine, fentanyl and MDMA weekly.

U.S. President Trump cited the import of fentanyl from Canada among the reasons for his pledge to impose punitive 25% tariffs on all Canadian products being shipped south of the border, which will tentatively take effect on Feb. 1. 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre addressed Trump’s concerns in a statement released on Tuesday.

“Things have gotten so bad that Canada has become a source country for dangerous drugs like meth, fentanyl and MDMA. In the Canadian organized crime supply chain for dangerous drugs, there are as many as 90 importers, 61 manufacturers, 527 domestic distributors and 15 exporters,” he said. 

Canada also now has over 70 organized crime groups that smuggle illegal guns over the American border, with the most significant points of entry being in Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Manitoba.

The Conservatives have been calling for measures to address Canada’s border security issues and ongoing fentanyl crisis since last fall when they introduced a motion that the government implement various changes to protect Canadians from deadly drugs.

Among the proposals is reversing the “catch-and-release Bill C-5,” which removed mandatory jail time for some violent offenders.

ANALYSIS: Trudeau must repeal the EV mandate

Source: Raw Pixel/Facebook

Last Monday, Transport Canada released a bombshell statement, announcing that the Trudeau government’s program granting a $5,000 rebate to Canadians purchasing an Electric Vehicle (EV) had run out of money and would be discontinued, “effective immediately.” This followed a prior announcement from the government of Quebec that they would be suspending their own subsidy, which had amounted to $7,000 per EV purchased.

This is, of course, a game changer for an industry which the Trudeau government (as well as the Ford government in Ontario) has invested billions of taxpayer dollars in. That’s because, no matter the country, the EV industry is utterly dependent upon a system of carrots and sticks from the government, in the form of subsidies and mandates.

EVs have remained notably more expensive than traditional Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles, even with those government incentive programs. Without them the purchase of EVs becomes impossible for all but the wealthiest Canadians.

Which is fine. Let the rich people have their toys, if they want them. Though if they justify the expense by saying that they’re saving the planet by it, I may be tempted to deflate them a bit by pointing out that EVs are in no way appreciably better for the environment than ICE vehicles, how all the lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, aluminum, copper, etc, contained in just one single EV battery requires displacing about 500,000 lbs of earth. Mining these materials often takes place in poorer countries with substandard environmental regulations.

Moreover, the weight of those batteries means that EVs burn through tires more quickly than gas-and-diesel driven vehicles, and wear down roads faster as well, which among other issues leads to an increase in particulate matter in the air, what in the old days we referred to as “pollution.”

That is a potential issue, but one that is mitigated by the fact that EVs make up a small minority of cars on the road. Regular people have proved unwilling to drive them, and that will be even more true now that the consumer subsidies have disappeared.

Of course, it will be an issue if the Trudeau Liberals get their way. You see, Electric Vehicles are one of the main arenas in their ongoing battle with reality. And so even with the end of their consumer subsidies, they remain committed to their mandates requiring every new vehicle purchased in Canada to be electric by 2035, now just a decade away!

They’ve done away with the carrots, and they’re hoping to keep this plan moving with sticks alone.

This is, in a word, madness.

As I’ve said before, the Electric Vehicle mandate is a terrible policy, and one which should be repealed immediately. Canada is about the worst place to attempt this particular experiment with social engineering. It is famously cold, and EVs are famously bad in the cold, charging much slower in frigid temperatures and struggling to hold a charge. Which itself is a major issue, because our country is also enormous and spread out, meaning that most Canadians have to do a great deal of driving to get from “Point A” to “Point B.”

Canada is sorely lacking in the infrastructure which would be required to keep EVs on the road. We currently have less than 30,000 public charging stations nationwide, which is more than 400,000 short of Natural Resources Canada’s projection of what we will need to support the mandated total EV transition.

Our electrical grid is already stressed, without the addition of tens of millions of battery powered vehicles being plugged in every night over a very short time. And of course, irony of ironies, this transition is supposed to take place while our activist government is pushing us on to less reliable energy sources, like wind and solar!

Plus, as I’ve pointed out before, the economic case for EVs, such as it was, has been completely upended by the recent U.S. election. Donald Trump’s victory means that our neighbors to the south are in no immediate danger of being forced to ditch gas-and-diesel driven cars. Consequently, the pitch by the Trudeau and Ford governments that Canada was putting itself at the center of an evolving auto market has fallen flat. In reality, they’ve shackled us to a corpse.

So on behalf of my fellow Canadians I say, “Thank you,” to the government for no longer burning our tax dollars on this particular subsidy. But that isn’t even half the battle. It must be followed through with an even bigger next step.

They must repeal the EV mandate.

Poilievre demands recalling Parliament immediately to save Canada from tariffs

Source: YT: Pierre Poilievre

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has called on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to reconvene Parliament immediately, citing a national “emergency.”

“Liberals have shut Parliament in the middle of this crisis. Canada has never been so weak, and things have never been so out of control,” said Poilievre. “Liberals are putting themselves and their leadership politics ahead of the country. Freeland and Carney are fighting for power rather than fighting for Canada.”

The Conservatives are urging Trudeau to reopen Parliament so that new border controls can be passed, along with trade retaliation agreements and a plan to revive Canada’s economy.

While Poilievre has previously called for retaliatory tariffs, he said he’d rather collaborate with the new U.S. administration.

Trudeau said that everything is on the table, including retaliatory measures. 

In his Tuesday release, Poilievre said retaliatory measures were necessary, adding that they would require Parliamentary consideration. 

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said that 100% of the blame for Canada’s situation with the looming tariffs should be put on Trudeau. Despite this, she said that the two countries’ 100-year relationship shouldn’t be jeopardized over a trade war and that collaboration was still possible. 

Despite not following through with his proposed tariffs the day he was sworn into office, U.S. President Donald Trump reaffirmed his commitment to imposing tariffs eventually. 

The tariffs were initially proposed on Canadian imports until the country secured its border against illegal immigration and drug smuggling. 

The Liberals subsequently announced a $1.3 billion border security plan. 

“Our American counterparts say they want to stop the illegal flow of drugs and other criminal activity at our border. The Liberals admit their weak border is a problem,” said Poilievre. “That is why they announced a multibillion-dollar border plan—a plan they cannot fund because they shut down Parliament, preventing MPs and Senators from authorizing the funds.”

Trudeau announced that his resignation would be official once the Liberal Party of Canada’s leadership race concluded on Mar. 9. 

Governor General Mary Simon agreed to prorogue Parliament until Mar. 24, the latest date the government could remain suspended before it runs out of money without a supply bill being passed. Prorogation killed various bills. 

Poilievre urged the Governor General to tell Trudeau to recall Parliament for a non-confidence vote over a month ago.

According to House of Commons procedure, recalling the House typically starts with a formal request to the Speaker. If the Speaker determines that reconvening is in the public interest, a resumption date is set, and members are provided with a minimum of 48 hours’ notice to travel to Ottawa.

The Speaker of the House, Greg Fergus, is a Liberal MP; however, he is supposed to act impartially and uphold non-partisan principles in his role.

“The Prime Minister has the power to ask the Governor General to cut short prorogation and get our Parliament working,” concluded Poilievre. “Open Parliament. Take back control. Put Canada First.”

The Rachel Parker Show | Smith goes to Washington + is Western alienation on the rise?

Source: X

Today on the Rachel Parker Show, Rachel is joined by Shaun Newman of the Shaun Newman Podcast. Shaun breaks down Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s trip to Washington, D.C. and how she’s doing representing Alberta’s interests on a global stage.

Also on the show, Rachel and Shaun speculate about the next federal election and discuss whether the looming trade war has caused a rise in Western alienation.

Tune in now! 

Where do the Liberal leadership candidates stand on the carbon tax?

Source: Facebook

As the range of possible candidates for the Liberal party’s leadership narrows, an increasing number of contestants are voicing their opposition to the current carbon tax scheme.

Despite the fact that the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had made the carbon tax a pillar of their government’s agenda to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, MPs, cabinet ministers, and close confidants of Trudeau’s are running against his carbon pricing plan.

Here is what we know about the Liberal leadership candidates and where they stand on the carbon tax.

Chrystia Freeland

Source: X

Former deputy prime minister and finance minister Chrystia Freeland told Liberal members that she would scrap the consumer carbon tax as prime minister, arguing that the policy’s unpopularity outweighs its effectiveness at reducing carbon emissions.

“It is also the case that we need to get better at listening to Canadians and at listening to what Canadians are telling us,” said Freeland at her campaign’s opening rally.

“And we have heard very clearly from Canadians in provinces where there is a consumer-facing price on carbon that they don’t like it. That’s something that we have to listen to. Democracy means that when somebody tells you something that you have to listen, and I will say, our party hasn’t been good enough at that.” 

Freeland’s opposition to the carbon tax comes despite her role in greenlighting multiple increases to the carbon tax and routinely defending the policy as what’s best for Canada during her time as Trudeau’s finance minister.

“I am really proud to be a member of a government that has made climate action a priority. Ours is the only major party that continues to advocate for a price on pollution, the most economically rational way to fight climate change,” said Freeland in the House of Commons this past fall.

Karina Gould

Government House leader Karina Gould said she would keep the carbon tax to help fight climate change, but will halt the annual increases to ameliorate affordability concerns. 

“What I am proposing is that we need to immediately cancel the increase to the price on pollution ahead of April 1st,” said Gould at her campaign launch event.

“We need to bring in measures that are going to help Canadians make the decisions that they want to make because Canadians are actually making those decisions already. They’re already looking for ways to reduce their emissions, but sometimes it’s too expensive.”

Gould has also voiced her emphatic support for the carbon tax as a minister in the Trudeau government, arguing that the carbon tax helps to put more money in the pockets of everyday Canadians, not less.

“When they (the Conservative party) talk about the price on pollution, they conveniently omit that Canadian families get more money back than they put in. The Conservatives want to put their hands in the pockets of Canadians and take that money away,” said Gould in a fall debate in the House.

Mark Carney

Source: CPAC (YouTube)

Former central banker Mark Carney has not been nearly as clear regarding his stance on the carbon tax compared to the other candidates.

According to reporting from the Toronto Star, Carney campaign officials have said the former Bank of Canada governor has been telling Liberal MPs in private that he would scrap the consumer carbon tax to focus on industrial emitters.

However, at Carney’s campaign launch event, Carney did not say that he would definitively repeal the carbon tax if elected prime minister, only pledging to replace it with a policy more effective at reducing carbon emissions than the current system.

“I’ve said for a long time that if you were going to take out the carbon tax, you should replace it with something that is at least, if not, more effective,” said Carney.

“And by effective it’s not just having the same impact in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but it’s making our companies more competitive, it’s creating jobs, it’s ensuring that Canadian households are made whole in terms of their finances.”

Carney promised to roll out an alternative plan to the carbon tax in the coming weeks.

In years past, Carney has been an enthusiastic supporter of carbon taxes, touting the policy at global conferences while condemning the Trudeau government for giving exemptions to the tax.

“Everyone should try to have a price on carbon,” said Carney in a BBC interview at COP26.

Chandra Arya

Source: ParlVu

One of the race’s most unfamiliar faces has taken the hardest lines against the carbon tax within the Liberal party. 

Ontario MP Chandra Arya has pledged to repeal the carbon tax, calling on scientists, engineers, and industry professionals to take the lead in fighting climate change.

“Scientists, engineers, and industry professionals will lead the way in crafting fact-based policies to grow our economy and tackle climate change effectively. Activist-driven policies, like the consumer carbon pricing mechanism, will be let go,” reads Arya’s platform.

Arya has not specified whether or not he would scrap the consumer carbon tax or the tax on both industry and consumers. 

Frank Baylis

Former Liberal MP Frank Baylis was the first candidate to enter the Liberal leadership race, but has not clarified his position on the carbon tax.

In an interview with CTV News, Baylis said that eliminating the carbon tax will not solve Canada’s affordability crisis and that the party ought to look at restoring Canadian labour productivity.

“What Mr. Poilievre is doing is calling this thing ‘axe the tax’ as if this is going to solve the affordability issue for Canadians. It’s not. It’s not the problem,” said Baylis.

“The problem is that we’ve lost our productivity. We’ve lost our good jobs. We need to get our Canadian dollar up.”

The Liberal party’s leadership race is set to conclude on Mar. 9.

Iranian-Canadians sound alarm about Canada giving safe haven to regime officials

Source: Instagram

Canada’s Iranian diaspora has growing concerns about the country becoming a safe haven for high-ranking members of the Iranian regime, revealed documents from the Hogue Commission.

The Hogue Commission on foreign interference received hundreds of submissions during its public consultations period last year after asking what threats Canada faced from outside hostile forces.

Among those were many Iranian-Canadians who expressed the need for the government to take more action to stop the Iranian regime from meddling with Canada’s democracy.  

Canada’s Iranian diaspora specifically called for better security screening when it comes to stopping regime officials from arriving in Canada after serving the country’s dictatorship.

For example, two Iranian brothers convicted for skirting sanctions on Iran by exporting restricted materials back to their home country in the U.S. managed to legally resettle in Canada shortly after their sentencing with new identities.

“Certain attendees talked about the presence of Iranian government officials who were involved in criminal activities and human rights abuses in Canada,” wrote the commission.

One witness suggested the government create a section within the immigration and foreign affairs departments to better “scrutinize immigration applications from Iran.”

Several submissions from the public consultations also noted that “Iranian Canadian community organizations have been infiltrated and taken over by persons acting on behalf of the Iranian regime.”

An Iranian police chief was seen in Richmond Hill, Ont. testified one witness and a former Iranian cabinet minister was spotted in Montreal where he was enjoying a “summer vacation.”

An anonymous witness told the inquiry that Iran’s regime “wants to exert influence in Canada because there is a large and well-educated Iranian diaspora.”

Iranian human rights activist Nazanin Afshin-Jam MacKay told the commission that Canada “is known as a safe haven for Islamic regime officials and their families.” 

The experience for Iranian Canadians having to see former IRGC officials living in Canada is “very traumatizing,” she said, citing an incident that involved “Iranian nuclear officials” being invited to the University of British Columbia. 

Afshin-Jam MacKay went on to describe the “feelings of despair” she endured upon “seeing the children of Iranian regime officials driving fancy cars around Vancouver” who she claimed were aided by realtors who helped officials “to park their money” in the province.

She also expressed the need for border agents to undergo further training, suggesting that they familiarize themselves with the online database Faces of Crime, which is publicly available and documents abuses inflicted at the hands of the Iranian regime. 

Ottawa accused Iran of targeting dissidents in the diaspora with threats and intimidation along with several other countries, including China, India and Russia. 

The government banned senior officials within the Iranian regime from entering the country in 2022 in response to Tehran’s brutal suppression of protests advocating for women’s rights. 

However, it’s known to Canadian authorities that as many as 18 Iranian senior officials are currently residing in Canada. 

The RCMP thwarted an Iranian plot to assassinate the former attorney general of Canada and minister of justice, Irwin Cotler last fall. Cotler is an outspoken critic of the Iranian regime and a prominent human rights advocate. 

The RCMP warned him last October of an imminent assassination plot to be carried out within 48 hours. Cotler has been under constant RCMP protection since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel. 

According to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, Cotler has been a high-profile target of Iran since 2008, after he launched a global campaign to have the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps listed as a terrorist entity.

Ottawa ultimately did list the IRGC as a terrorist organization last June, along with the United States, while diplomatic ties with the country were severed over a decade ago. 

Trudeau 100% to blame for Canada’s tariff crisis: Danielle Smith

Source: Facebook

While President Donald Trump has postponed his tariff threat back to Feb. 1, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says that the blame for any tariffs, should they materialize, lies squarely on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. 

“Let’s be super clear about why we find ourselves in the situation that we’re in today. It lands 100% at the feet of Justin Trudeau, who even just a few weeks ago gave a speech where he thought it was an affront to women that Kamala Harris didn’t win,” Smith told reporters at a Tuesday press conference. 

Smith said Canada is in trade negotiations with a new administration in the United States. She added that Trudeau keeps poking the bull and damaging the relationship between the two countries.

“So if there’s a failure, it lands at his feet, which is why I’m counting down the days to when he’s gone, and we can have a reset. It’s 47 days to go, and I hope he doesn’t continue torching the relationship,” said Smith.

Smith said she’s doing what she can to negotiate with the United States administration through her province’s Washington office. Smith held the press conference from Washington, D.C. where she has been meeting with various U.S. governors, senators, and business leaders over the last few days.

She called on all premiers to do the same because there will be a new prime minister in 47 days and likely another new prime minister shortly thereafter. Due to the rapid turnover of the federal government, premiers will be the only constant voices in negotiations. 

Despite being a provincial premier, Smith clarified that she was negotiating for all Canadians and not seeking a specific carve out for her province alone.

Smith’s negotiations for Canada to remain tariff-free have focused on the mutually beneficial relationship between the two countries, and that the United States has a $58 billion trade surplus sans energy, confirmed by the National Bank of Canada’s report. 

The day before meeting with reporters, Smith issued a press release with six steps the country could take to avoid future tariffs being imposed. One suggestion was to restore immigration levels to those under former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. 

Prior to Trump’s inauguration, Smith reiterated her call for a federal election and proposed leveraging Canada’s energy to deal with the threat. 

Whether the tariffs come on Feb. 1 or Apr. 1, as suggested by the executive order, Smith doubled down on her preferred approach of collaboration over retaliation.

She previously refused to support a potential export tax on Alberta energy. Following a meeting between the country’s premiers and the prime minister last Wednesday, Alberta refrained from signing the joint statement that outlined the proposed retaliatory measures to Trump’s tariffs. Every other premier and Trudeau signed it. 

Trudeau recently said he supports matching tariffs dollar for dollar with the U.S.

Smith explained that Canada’s economy is one-tenth the size of the U.S.’s and that Canada is much more reliant on its Southern partner than vice versa.

“Trying to go tit for tat in a tariff war without addressing the underlying issues is not going to go well for Canada,” said Smith. 

Despite Smith’s reluctance, an Ipsos poll from the same day as her press conference highlighted that 82% of Canadians support a retaliatory tariff.

However, she said that she doesn’t govern based on opinion polls.

“This is a relationship that’s lasted more than 100 years. We have, from time to time, skirmishes. But you don’t torch a 100-year relationship over a temporary problem,” said Smith. “You identify the issues that are causing the irritation, and then you work through them one at a time.” 

Instead of fighting, Smith wants to double down on oil production and pipeline capacity. She wants to get as many projects on the go during this 4-year administration before a potential change in government and change in energy stewardship leads to abandoning projects like what occurred with Keystone XL.

The Candice Malcolm Show | CBC journalists lash out at conservatives for talking to Trump

On Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump was sworn into office and kicked things off with a vengeance. He went right to work and began signing one executive order after another. Canada was spared on Day One, but Trump later pledged to implement his 25% tariffs on February 1.

On today’s episode of the Candice Malcolm Show, Candice discusses the latest news out of Washington and the urgent need for an election in Canada. Candice describes the total lack of federal leadership in negotiating with Trump and how Danielle Smith speaks for many Canadians when she opposes retaliatory tariffs and urges Canada to fix its border and national security instead.

Candice covers the CBC’s deranged reaction to common sense conservative proposals, and points out the biggest fake news story of the inauguration.

Later in the show, Candice is joined by PPC Leader Maxime Bernier and the two have a spirited discussion about the need for another conservative alternative, why immigration should be the ballot box issue, and a better way to negotiate with Trump.

Related stories