fbpx
Monday, October 6, 2025

Alberta releases provincial police force plan, stricter penalties for repeat offenders

Source: Facebook

The Alberta government has unveiled a bill aimed at holding high-risk offenders accountable and creating an independent provincial police agency.

The announcement, made by Public Safety Minister Mike Ellis on Wednesday, aims to address critical staffing shortages within the RCMP and tackle the rise of violent crime while implementing an ankle bracelet monitoring program to monitor high-risk offenders.

If passed, Bill 11, also known as the Public Safety Statutes Amendment Act, will feature two key amendments intended to protect Albertans by holding violent criminals accountable and responding to the evolving public safety needs in the province.

One amendment will advance Alberta’s sheriff service department into an autonomous police force.

The new independent force is poised to partner with existing municipal, First Nations police bodies, and the RCMP. The force will be subject to civilian oversight.

The new police force is not intended to replace the RCMP; instead, it will augment and support it, according to Ellis. 

“Our aim here is to bring the police-like functions, that the Alberta sheriffs have taken on over time, under the same kind of legislative framework and civilian oversight as Alberta’s police services,” he said.

Ellis said the RCMP has indicated to him that they are more short-staffed than they should be.

“The RCMP just do not have enough human beings to police Canada, regardless of the amount of money that we give them. They’re having trouble from a hiring perspective,” he said.

“When somebody calls 911, I expect somebody to show up, and I do not care what the uniform is. And, to me, that is the number one priority.” However, Ellis said this has been a challenge in some cases.

Bill 11 passed its first reading in the legislative assembly on Tuesday. 

Before diving into a proposed budget or timeline, Ellis said the bill needs to pass legislation. The government continues to assess costs, expenses, training, equipment, and governance.

In addition to the new police force, the bill introduces an amendment to the Corrections Act, establishing a provincial program mandating ankle bracelets for violent and sexual offenders and those out on bail.

“The federal Liberal-NDP alliance’s Bill C-75 have (sic) created an environment in Canada where repeat violent offenders and organized crime have been able to thrive, with little to no consequences,” said Ellis. “Our federal justice system is not holding criminals accountable for their actions and letting the public suffer the consequences.”

The legislation would give courts the power to monitor those considered a risk to public safety while out on bail or serving a community sentence. 

“Alberta’s government cannot sit idly by. Enough is enough,” said Ellis. 

The rollout of the electronic monitoring system is expected to begin this fall.

The amendment empowers provincial courts to prescribe electronic GPS monitoring as a bail condition for offenders, particularly individuals with a history of physical and sexual violence.

People subject to wearing the court-ordered electronic monitor device must wear it on their ankles. The device would be monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week. 

“When the public safety is at stake, we’re going to do whatever it takes to protect Albertans and help ensure their peace of mind,” said Ellis.

The National Police Federation, certified to represent about 20,000 RCMP members since 2019, is the largest police labour relations organization in Canada, and second largest in North America.

The organization’s president issued a press release in response to the Alberta government’s announcement.

“We are deeply concerned and perplexed about the announcement made today by the Government of Alberta to introduce new legislation laying the groundwork for a new independent police agency,” said Brian Sauvé. He added that Alberta has not increased funding for the RCMP to keep pace with the province’s population growth and evolving crime.

“Proposed changes to policing in Alberta have been deeply unpopular with Alberta residents and today’s announcement appears to be yet another attempt to force an unwanted and expensive policing change on taxpayers,” he said. 

“Rather than legislation, bureaucracy and more government spending to explore alternative policing services, it’s time to invest in the highly trained, professional provincial policing service accountable to Albertans: The Alberta RCMP.”

Majority of Canadians don’t believe Online Harms Act will make internet safer: poll

Source: Unsplash

The majority of Canadians don’t believe that the Trudeau government’s plan to regulate social media sites under Bill C-63, also known as Online Harms Act, will lead to a safer internet landscape, according to a new Leger survey. 

Half of the respondents said that they would support the controversial Online Harms Act in theory, introduced to protect children and others from harmful internet content, however they were not convinced that the government would be able to do so while still protecting free speech.

Justice Minister Arif Virani introduced the legislation to, the government argues, usher in a new era of digital safety by launching a commission to regulate social media companies and hiring an ombudsman to address complaints from Canadians. 

The bill includes seven designations of harmful content, including content that encourages minors to commit self-harm and terrorist material. It also, controversially, includes what the government terms “hate speech.”

Social media companies would be given a 24 hour deadline to remove content once deemed harmful by the government or risk hefty fines for noncompliance. 

Of the 1,527 survey respondents, 70% said they support the government’s plan to regulate the internet, while 25% said they didn’t.

Within the cohort of supporters however, only 41% believe that the Online Harms Act will actually make the internet a safer place with another 32% saying it won’t. 

Even less believed that the government could regulate online hate without clamping down on free speech, with a minority of 10% of respondents saying that they “completely trust” the government. 

That number grew to 33% when asked if they “somewhat trust the government,” while 27% answered that they “do not trust at all.”

Another quarter of respondents, 23%, said that they “barely trust” the government when it comes to protecting free speech.

When respondents were asked which political party they trust the most to regulate online material, 20% said the Conservatives, while 17% said the Liberals. 

Only 13% said they would trust the NDP.  

“My view, having reviewed the bill, is that it’s superfluous, overbroad and full of linguistic ambiguity,” senior litigator with the Democracy Fund Mark Joseph told True North. 

“Much of the conduct at which the bill is directed is already illegal in Canada. If passed, a vast new censorship bureaucracy will be created with a mandate to implement ever-expanding rules based on an ill-defined concept of ‘harmful content.’”

The Online Harms Act would not only regulate harmful content but also aims to increase the jail sentence for those convicted of hate propaganda offences from two years to five. 

Judges would potentially have the option to sentence individuals to life imprisonment if found guilty of advocating for genocide. 

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association said that particular measure not only poses a serious risk to free speech but also violates sentencing principles of proportionality. 

Joseph noted that if the bill does pass, the “Canadian Human Rights Commission would regain the powers it lost when section 13 (of the Canadian Human Rights Act) was repealed after a series of scandalous prosecutions” under the Harper government. 

Virani and other justice department officials claim that such sentencing would only apply in the more extreme cases and that the proposal is only there as an option for judges to use at their own discretion. 

“Since we have no assurance that these types of prosecutions would not recur, we can reasonably predict that they will,” said Joseph. 

“And we have seen this type of legislation in Europe: the results have ranged from comical to terrifying.  In sum, the Bill is a trojan horse that will release an army of government and citizen censors on the Canadian public.”

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has voiced his discontent with the Online Harms Act, saying that regulation powers should be left as is, to police and the courts, and should not be “pushed off to a new bureaucracy.”

Majority of Canadians worry legacy journalists are lying to them

Source: Unsplash

A majority of Canadians feel that establishment journalists and reporters were misleading them, according to a newly released global trust index.

The 2024 Edelman Trust Barometer Canada report is part of an annual trust survey by the Trust Institute, a research initiative by the global public relations firm Edelman.

The survey engaged 1,500 Canadian respondents, covering attitudes towards media, politicians and scientists in 28 different countries. 

Overall, trust in Canada was declining with Canada dropping one point from a rank of 53 to 52 in the index since last year. 

When Canadians were asked if they felt “establishment leaders were lying to them,” a total of 55% of people replied that journalists and reporters were purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations. 

That number is 5% higher than last year when 50% of Canadians said the same thing. 

Government leaders had the highest number of people who believed they were misleading them with 60% of Canadians. 

“In a year marked by natural events and geopolitical crises, Canadians maintained neutral trust towards institutions in general; however, significant increases in the belief that business and government leaders are purposely trying to mislead people could degrade our neutral position,” wrote researchers

“When it comes to innovation, concerns about governments’ inability to effectively regulate innovations as well as the fear that science has become politicized is putting innovation at risk.” 

Concerns behind the declining trust in institutions were led by job losses (82%) and inflation (72%).

Additionally, Canadians were more likely to trust their peers (77%), scientists (74%) and professional experts (60%) than journalists (50%) for information about innovations and technology.

More Canadians said they were likely to resort to online research (48%) instead of the national media (47%) for information. 

Earlier this year, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed the issue of declining trust in the media and blamed “conspiracy theorists” and “social media drivers” for the situation. 

“There is out there a deliberate undermining of mainstream media. There are the conspiracy theorists, and there are the social media drivers who are trying to do everything they can to keep people in their little filter bubbles to prevent people from actually agreeing on a common set of facts,” said Trudeau.

“The way that the CBC and CTV, when they were our only sources of news, used to and Global News used to project across the country, at least a common understanding of things.”

Ratio’d | This video is SICKENING and Justin Trudeau is to blame

A viral video showing the horrifying scenes inside of a Vancouver homeless shelter, in which a “safe injection site” is conveniently located next to it, shows the destructive consequences of the “safe supply” and “harm reduction” ideology. Homeless and drug addicted Canadians can be seen overdosing, screaming and passing out into plates of food. Is this really how we treat addiction in Canada? Or is this what managed decline looks like?

Canadians are being told to accept policies that are resulting in the deaths of thousands of our fellow countrymen and making our cities unliveable. Concerned Canadians are also now being told to essentially make life easier for armed intruders breaking into homes to steal cars.

It’s tough to imagine Canada being in a worse state than it is right now.

Watch the latest episode of Ratio’d with Harrison Faulkner.

Pierre Poilievre’s housing strategy praised in U.K. parliament

Source: X/Facebook

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s housing strategy is making waves across the Atlantic.

British Tory MP and former secretary of state for housing Sir Simon Clarke praised the Canadian Conservatives’ approach to housing in the U.K. parliament as an example his party should follow. 

Sir Simon made the comments in a Westminster Hall debate, a forum for MPs to raise issues with government ministers.

“I do not know how we can make the case for popular conservatism when in too many areas of England people cannot accumulate capital in their own lives. I certainly feel that is why major political change may be brewing in parts of the country that we have long called our heartlands,” Sir Simon said. 

“One need only contrast the recent success of the Canadian Conservatives to see the amazing difference that embracing pro-home-ownership policies can deliver, even among the youngest voters. The U.K. is falling behind in the quest for higher productivity and better.”

Poilievre, who has made tackling Canada’s housing crisis a priority of his campaign, released his housing plan last year, titled the Building Homes Not Bureaucracy Act. 

The policy aims to address the housing crisis in big cities by encouraging the construction of more affordable homes and speeding up the process of building them.

His approach would mandate that big cities increase the number of homes built by 15% each year, compounding annually. Failure to meet these targets will result in a withholding of federal funding equivalent to the percentage of homes missed. 

The plan rewards cities that surpass the 15% increase target with a building bonus proportional to their performance. Conversely, cities will have transit and infrastructure funding withheld until sufficient high-density housing around transit stations is built and occupied.

Additionally, the policy would impose penalties on what Poilievre calls “gatekeepers” and remove GST on the construction of affordable rental homes below market value. 

While speaking to the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade last week, Poilievre blasted the Liberal government for failing to address Canadians’ housing needs. 

“We are spending twice as much as the rest of our competitor countries to build fewer homes,” said Poilievre. 

EVs will “rely heavily” on repairs post-warranty and training is lacking: automotive group

Source: Unsplash

A national automotive group is warning that Canada lacks a standardized training system for electric vehicle technicians as the Liberal government seeks to completely phase out new fuel-powered vehicles by 2035.

According to the Automotive Industries Association of Canada, the auto care sector is not ready to deal with a surge in new electric vehicles and the burden will get only worse once the cars exceed their warranty. 

“However, it is not just the manufacturers that need to adjust—this affects the auto care sector as well, wrote the association in a press release. 

“While this new mandate pushes consumers to purchase ZEVs (zero-emission vehicles), once the vehicle’s warranty is over, more ZEV owners will come to rely heavily on the auto care sector.” 

The association said a standardized training program needs to be in place that allows for up-skilling opportunities. More importantly, the organization said that the training system needs to be affordable and offered in both rural and urban areas. 

“Standardized training is needed. If the federal government wants to achieve the goal of the EV mandate, then there must be standardized training in place for the auto care sector,” the group argued. 

“Servicing and repairing EVs is complex, and for people to safely service and repair them, standardized training needs to be available.”

While there are training programs available currently, the association said that the responsibility to install a standardized system shouldn’t be on businesses but rather on the government, since it’s imposing its mandate. 

“Canada is lacking a comprehensive national strategy where the government plays a role in enabling workers to receive standardized training about the foundations of repairing and servicing EVs,” reads the statement. 

“The responsibility to initiate these trainings, when EVs are becoming government mandated, should not solely be on the companies.”

In December 2023, the Liberal government announced its plan to require that all new vehicle sales by the year 2035 be electric.

Toronto residents told to make keys accessible to auto-thieves to prevent home invasions

Source: Facebook

A constable with Toronto Police Services caused a stir over comments made during a community meeting last month that residents should leave their keys accessible to auto thieves as a means to prevent them from being harmed in a home invasion.

Const. Marco Ricciardi told Toronto residents that due to the dramatic increase in auto thefts, residents could protect the safety of themselves and their families by leaving their car keys outside their front door, so thieves can easily access them during a robbery.  

“To prevent the possibility of being attacked in your home, leave your fobs at your front door, because they’re breaking into your home to steal your car. They don’t want anything else,” said Ricciardi at the meeting.

The meeting was held in Etobicoke to respond to residents’ concerns of auto thefts and break and enters, which have spiked exponentially over the past several years.

With a 400% increase in Toronto auto-thefts, the problem has gotten so out of control that it has garnered international coverage.

Toronto police reported 6,640 car thefts in 2021, 9,785 in 2022 and 12,170 last year. The amount of thefts in 2023 was triple what it was in 2015. 

Toronto Police Services released a statement in response to the public backlash over Ricciardi’s comments, saying that it was only meant to prioritize personal safety over stolen property.

“An officer at a recent community meeting suggested that people leave the keys to their vehicle in a faraday bag by the front door. While well meaning, there are also other ways to prevent auto theft motivated home invasions,” reads the statement. 

“For additional context, in Toronto, home invasions and break and enters for auto theft occurrences rose 400 percent in 2023. Police are concerned about an escalation in violence, where all sorts of weapons and firearms are being used to steal vehicles, and that includes during home invasions. ”

The Trudeau government recently pledged $28 million in funding for the Canada Border Services Agency to help it crackdown on the problem. 

“After eight years of Justin Trudeau, car thefts are up 300% in Toronto and 100% in Ottawa and Montreal. Nationally, car thefts are up by more than a third since his Liberal government took office,” said Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre in response to the funding announcement. 

Auto thefts across Canada have gotten so bad that residents in some higher-income areas have started hiring private security to patrol their neighbourhoods. Plus, there has been a dramatic spike in auto insurance premiums.

Premiums on commonly stolen models have increased anywhere from 25% to 50% since 2022, according to data from Rates.ca, a website that aggregates insurance pricing. 

Certain models now come with a $500 high-theft vehicle surcharge. 

For example, the average 35-year-old Toronto male resident with no prior convictions paid 26%  more to insure his Honda CR-V in 2023 compared to what it would cost in 2022.

“Nothing confusing about the word ‘woman,’” Conservative MP tells Supreme Court

Source: Facebook

A senior Conservative MP is hitting back at the Supreme Court for sowing confusion about what a “woman” is.

Melissa Lantsman, the Thornhill, Ont. MP and deputy leader of the Conservative party, took aim at a Supreme Court of Canada decision saying “woman” was a more confusing term than “person with a vagina.”

“No, there is nothing confusing about the word ‘woman’, it’s common sense,” wrote Lantsman in a post on X. “It’s not hateful, bigoted, wrong or unfair in any way. This is just complete nonsense that moves nothing forward. It’s not ‘progress.’”

Lantsman posted a picture of the definition of the word “woman” from the Oxford English Dictionary, which described it as “An adult female human being. The counterpart of man.”

The Supreme Court of Canada, in a recent decision released Friday, found the term “woman” used by a judge to describe the alleged victim as “problematic.” Instead, the case deemed that “person with a vagina” would have been a more suitable expression.

Justice Sheilah Martin, who was appointed by Justin Trudeau in 2017, noted that the trial judge’s choice to say “a woman” might have been “unfortunate and engendered confusion.”

While Martin didn’t specify why the word “woman” was potentially confusing, she used the term “person with a vagina” when referring to the complainant in her judgment. No individuals involved in the case identified as transgender, and the term “she” was consistently used to describe the complainant, according to the National Post.

The former president of Athletics Alberta and author of the book Unsporting, Linda Blade, has been one of the most vocal advocates for women’s rights, particularly in sports. 

“To my knowledge this is first time a Member of Parliament in #Canada has invoked the #AdultHumanFemale definition for the word WOMAN. Thank you @MelissaLantsman,” wrote Blade in a reply to Lantsman on X. “The (Conservative Party of Canada) continues its march towards reality-based positions.”

Firearms advocate Tracey Wilson criticized the Supreme Court’s phrasing in her own post to X.

“After generations of women fighting to be equal, recognized — we have been reduced to an organ. Pathetic,” said Wilson, concluding her post with an SOS emoji.

Canadian government ordered national security review into TikTok last year

Source: Unsplash

The Trudeau government has acknowledged for the first time that it launched a national security review of the Chinese-owned TikTok platform last year.

The revelation comes on the heels of the passage of a bill to ban TikTok from the United States unless the China-based owner, ByteDance, sells off its share in the company. The bill passed the House of Representatives on Wednesday and is now before the Senate. 

Should it pass there, U.S. President Joe Biden says he will sign off on the ban.

Asked for the Canadian government’s position on the app, a spokesperson for Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne declined to comment.

When asked if the Trudeau government was considering implementing measures akin to the recent American bill, Champagne’s office said that it had already “issued an order for the national security review of TikTok Canada” on Sept. 6, 2023, according to a Canadian Press report.

This was the first time the existence of such a review was acknowledged by Canadian officials.

While details about the review were scant, Champagne’s office did confirm that the review was based on the expansion of a business which would constitute the establishment of a new Canadian entity. 

Details of the review cannot be made available online as a routine matter of confidentiality under the Investment Canada Act, noted Champagne’s office, but added that TikTok would be the subject of “enhanced scrutiny.”

TikTok will be reviewed under a newly introduced Liberal policy on foreign investments in the interactive digital media sector that was implemented earlier this month. 

According to the new policy statement, “hostile state-sponsored or influenced actors may seek to leverage foreign investments in the interactive digital media sector to propagate disinformation or manipulate information in a manner that is injurious to Canada’s national security.”

The Liberals say that the review is not in relation to the proposed U.S. bill however, which cites concerns over ByteDance’s obligations to potentially be forced to hand over any data from the app to the Chinese government should they demand it.

Chinese security laws dictate that Chinese businesses and organizations must comply with the communist government’s intelligence gathering efforts.

A survey conducted by Toronto Metropolitan University found almost 30% or Canadian respondents had TikTok accounts.  

The Andrew Lawton Show | A carbon tax revolt is underway

Source: Facebook

Seven of ten provincial premiers have called on the federal government to scrap its planned carbon tax increase, although Justin Trudeau continues to double down. With Trudeau’s government paying no heed to calls from his provincial counterparts and the cash-strapped Canadians they represent, Trudeau is making it clear it’s his way or the highway. True North’s Andrew Lawton discusses Colin Craig of SecondStreet.org.

Also, True North’s Rachel Emmanuel was barred from reporting on Trudeau’s visit to Calgary yesterday and threatened with arrest if she even stood inside the building hosting the prime minister’s press conference. She joins to explain what went down.

Plus, from the ongoing trial of Tamara Lich and Chris Barber to the Coutts 4, concerns about politicized prosecutions are abound in the justice system. Former Encana CEO Gwyn Morgan delved into the phenomenon in an essay for C2C journal, on “the worrisome wave of politicized prosecutions.” He joins Andrew to discuss.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

Related stories