fbpx
Saturday, June 21, 2025

Canada to defer Huawei approval decision until after election: report

The federal government will not be deciding if the Chinese telecommunications firm Huawei should have access to Canada’s 5G network until after October’s federal election, according to a CBC report..

A CBC story citing anonymous sources said the government will almost certainly leave the issue until later this year or next year given the tensions between Canada and China.

While Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale has previously indicated that Canada will be taking its time with the Huawei decision, sources indicate that the decision might be pushed back a staggering amount of months at an important time for 5G in Canada.

This move would mean the government could avoid dealing with the contentious issue until the election is over.

Despite mounting evidence and numerous security experts suggesting there are serious security concerns about Huawei, the federal government has continuously dragged its feet with the issue.

Huawei has already been banned in the United States, Australia and New Zealand, and is heavily restricted in the United Kingdom.

True North has reported on the various security concerns Huawei and its technology pose.

Among these concerns were the telecommunications firm’s connection to the Chinese government, the presence of the Chinese Communist Party in its organization and its refusal to cooperate with investigations done by other countries in the past.

Huawei became the centre of another controversy in Canada when Canadian authorities arrested Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou on an American warrant in January.

China quickly retaliated by arresting two Canadians, Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, depriving them of legal rights.

The anonymous sources claim that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is hesitant to decide on Huawei until the Chinese make clear the fate of the Canadian detainees.

The Canadian government has so far failed to bring them home, meanwhile, China continues to hurl abuse at our country.

As True North’s Leo Knight has reported, given the clear the security concerns Huawei poses, and the attacks China has made against Canada to spare a Huawei executive from punishment, the decision to ban Huawei should be a no-brainer.

The federal government has yet to publicly comment on the report.

FUREY: Why is Trudeau refusing to do anything on the China file?

Every single week, China tightens the screw on us more and more. Yet our Prime Minister continues to do nothing.

True North’s Anthony Furey reports on the latest troubling development involving China, which shows this spat has permeated into the day-to-day lives of Canadians.

Conservatives want CSIS to investigate former ambassador John McCallum

The Conservatives want Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) to investigate if former ambassador and Liberal MP John McCallum encouraged the Chinese government to interfere in Canadian politics.

In a letter to CSIS Director David Vigneault, Conservative MPs Lisa Raitt and Pierre Paul-Hus wrote that an investigation is necessary to prove the integrity of Canadian democracy.

“Canadians expect that the upcoming election will be conducted in a free and fair manner and that any and all incidents of foreign interference will be fully investigated, with action taken to prevent said interference,” they wrote.

“We believe Mr McCallum’s actions, as confirmed by his own public statements, deserve the utmost scrutiny of your agency.”

South China Morning Post reported that McCallum told the Chinese government that they should not hurt the Liberals’ chances of reelection as a Conservative government would hold China more accountable.

“Anything that is more negative against Canada will help the Conservatives, (who) are much less friendly to China than the Liberals,” McCallum said.

“I hope and I don’t see any reason why things will get worse, it would be nice if things will get better between now and (Canada’s federal) election (in October).”

McCallum was a long term Liberal MP and cabinet minister until he was made ambassador to China in 2017. In January he was fired for compromising remarks he gave to Chinese media.

At the time of his dismissal, McCallum said it would be “great” if Canada drops charges against an executive of the Chinese firm Huawei, Meng Wanzhou. Wanzhou is fighting deportation to the United States. She is accused of misleading authorities about her business dealings with Iran.

Canada-China relations have only worsened since McCallum was relieved of his duties. Canada has yet to find a replacement for McCallum.

As China continues to show Canada disrespect it’s likely that this new revelation will only push Canada-China relations to a new low.

CSIS has not yet responded to the Conservative’s letter.

LAWTON: Lindsay Shepherd banned from Twitter

Free speech activist Lindsay Shepherd has been permanently banned from Twitter, though the transgender person who was attacking her in a heated exchange has kept their account. The episode further illuminates Big Tech’s anti-conservative double standards, True North’s Andrew Lawton says.

Support Andrew and True North in their fight for free speech by joining Andrew’s Heritage Club: https://tnc.news/lawton-heritage-club/

Free speech activist Lindsay Shepherd permanently banned from Twitter

Prominent free speech activist Lindsay Shepherd has been permanently suspended from Twitter.

Shepherd’s ban this week appears to be linked to a heated exchange between Shepherd and Jessica Yaniv, a transgender woman, on Twitter.

In the exchange, Yaniv consistently hurled insults towards Shepherd, even referencing her infant son and reproductive organs.

Yaniv taunted the former teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier by poking fun of a reproductive condition from which Shepherd suffers. 

“I heard @realDonaldTrump is building a wall inside of your uterus aka your “reproductive abnormality” hopefully the walk works as intended,” Yaniv tweeted.

As expected, Shepherd defended herself.

“At least I have a uterus, you fat ugly man” Shepherd tweeted back, adding, “Of course, he thinks reproductive issues are something to be mocked.”

The exchange occurred on Sunday July 14, 2019. On Monday, Shepherd’s account was suspended on Twitter.

Yaniv celebrated Twitter’s decision to ban Shepherd, tweeting “Time to throw a party! Hatred has no place in this world. Bye Felicia!” 

Yaniv is no stranger to controversy. In November 2018, Feminist Current founder Meghan Murphy was also suspended from Twitter for allegedly “deadnaming” Yaniv, using Yaniv’s legal male name. Murphy sued Twitter for deceptive trade practices and breach of contract.

Shepherd, a contributor to True North, filed an appeal to Twitter but it was denied. 

Manitoba lowers taxes in wake of carbon tax

The Manitoba government has lowered the Provincial Sales Tax (PST) and will be delivering other cost-saving measures for Manitobans ahead of the provincial election in September.

“This change will put more than $300 million back on the kitchen tables of Manitobans each year. It will save a family of four approximately $500 a year and a single individual approximately $180 per year,” said the Manitoba government in a statement.

“Reducing the sales tax rate also ensures the competitiveness of Manitoba businesses and savings for those who invest in them.”

The move to reduce the PST from 8% to 7% will be the most significant saving for Manitobans, providing most of the around $350 million in total savings announced by the province. 

Manitoba Finance Minister Scott Fielding says he is proud of the various ways his government has helped the public, listing them prior to the PST reduction came into effect.

“We’ve increased the basic personal exemption, ended bracket creep, lowered ambulance fees and, on July 1, we will cut the PST back to seven per cent,” he said.

These new cost-saving measures will help lessen the burden of the carbon tax, which was imposed on Manitobans by the federal Liberal government earlier this year.

Manitoba is one of five provinces which launched legal challenges to the federal carbon tax plan. Until one of the challenges succeeds in court Canadians will have to deal with the added costs of nearly everything they do.

Manitoba is particularly confident about its challenge, as the province argues that it made significant efforts to reduce greenhouse gases before the carbon tax which were ignored by Ottawa.

Considering nearly all revenue from the carbon tax comes from ordinary Canadians, rather than big polluters, the consumer-focused tax cuts may counteract the unpopular carbon tax.

The Pallister government, who recently called for an election for early September, is also promising to cut the sales tax from home and renters’ insurance, among various other promises.

The Manitoba Progressive Conservatives under Pallister hold a comfortable lead over the opposition NDP in recent polls.

Prince Edward Island adds voice to carbon tax challenge

Canada’s smallest province is taking on the federal government.

Earlier this week, it was announced that Prince Edward Island will be joining Saskatchewan’s challenge to the carbon tax as an intervener, even though PEI’s premier supports a carbon tax.

The announcement came the same day that Quebec announced it will also be joining the Saskatchewan government’s court challenge.

Saskatchewan’s first challenge was defeated by a provincial court in a split 3-2 decision. This appeal to the Supreme Court already has Ontario, Manitoba, New Brunswick and Alberta signed on as interveners.

The addition of Quebec and Prince Edward Island brings that total number of provinces taking part in the challenge to seven.

True North created a petition, asking PEI and Quebec to unite with their conservative counterparts and join onto the challenge.

It appears they listened.

Both provinces are putting their names into the challenge to have their positions heard.

Quebec, in particular, is looking to ensure that their own autonomy on the issue is protected, as the province has a separate cap-and-trade system which was fitted to Quebec’s own needs.

The intervention of PEI comes as a surprise to many, as Premier Dennis King stated in the past that his government would not bring up the issue.

When he was first elected, King made sure to distance himself from other Conservative governments, saying he has a “different brand” of conservatism.

King runs only a minority government, with opposition Green Party and Liberals fully supporting the carbon tax.

LAWTON: Recapping Canada’s “media freedom” conference

True North’s Andrew Lawton is back on Canadian soil after covering the first ever Global Conference for Media Freedom, where the Canadian government proved it isn’t all that interested in free speech and media freedom.

Andrew was live to talk about what happened.

Listen on iTunes


Listen on Spotify


Listen on Soundcloud

GORDON: Should Canadians trust Elections Canada?

Last October, True North founder Candice Malcolm wrote a report for the Toronto Sun about how Elections Canada had given a non-citizen a voter registration card telling her to register in order to vote in the 2019 federal election. The asylum seeker had only been in the country for 18 months when receiving the unsolicited letter from Elections Canada encouraging her — an ineligible non-citizen — to illegally vote.

When Malcolm asked Elections Canada how an asylum seeker ended up on the voting list — something that the asylum seeker said was common — the hallowed institution in charge of running and protecting Canada’s federal elections said it was “rare” for non-citizens to receive voter registration cards.

“From time to time, a non-citizen may inadvertently be included in the register and may therefore receive a voter information card in error. In the rare case that a non-citizen gets a voter information card, we ask that they call their local Elections Canada office and ask to be removed from the National Register of Electors,” said Natasha Gauthier of Elections Canada to Malcolm last October. 

As Malcolm’s article blew up on social media because Canadians were miffed that newcomers without citizenship were being invited to vote, Elections Canada swiftly responded denying this concerning story was a major problem to the integrity of the federal vote.  

“The voter information card is not currently accepted as ID. At no time have electors been allowed to vote by showing a voter information card as their only piece of ID,” Elections Canada’s Twitter account shot back. “Bill C-76, currently before Parliament, would allow the voter information card to be used as a proof of address. Elections Canada would not accept the voter information card alone–it would have to be shown with another accepted piece of ID that proves their identity.”

Yet the new voting rules under the Trudeau government’s Bill C-76 have severely weakened the requirements for voters to prove their identities, not to mention show they’re even Canadian. 

Now, under the new legislation, anyone can vote (albeit illegally if a non-citizen) by providing a voter information card and bank statement or utility bill and student ID card or other combinations of paperwork that do not require photo verification. If an individual doesn’t have these documents — which do not prove citizenship — the individual can have another person vouch for them that they’re telling the truth. 

But what is even more disturbing is that at the beginning of May, news broke that Elections Canada was removing 103,000 people illegally on the voter register who are not Canadians. That’s hardly the “rare” occurrence Elections Canada adamantly claimed it was last year, trying to dismiss Malcolm’s report. And with tens of thousands of asylum seekers illegally entering the country in the past couple of years one wonders if many of these non-citizens are receiving voter registration cards in the lead up to this election. 

In light of the recent news Elections Canada paid Liberal-loving social media influencers $325,000 before pulling the plug on their biased get-out-the-vote campaign, serious questions arise if Canadians should have faith in this institution to deliver a fair and clean election this October. 

Should Canadians trust Elections Canada — encharged by the Trudeau government to monitor fake news during the election — to set the record straight when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s director of communications spread categorically false information on Twitter about then-prime minister Stephen Harper’s record? 

Should Canadians trust Elections Canada to effectively allow Canadian expats to vote? 

Does Elections Canada — accused of anti-Conservative bias and too many Liberals in its ranks — unfairly target the Conservative Party of Canada while letting the Liberal Party of Canada largely off the hook? 

Will Elections Canada investigate Liberal stalwart John McCallum telling China it’s in its interest to get Trudeau re-elected? 

As the mainstream media take a bailout bribe from the Trudeau government and follow its directive to focus election coverage on the Russian ruse and “fake news” as the main culprits assaulting Canada’s democracy, we at True North will look at domestic actors poisoning and weakening our democracy from within. 

Minister says state-owned CBC to define misinformation in the media

The minister responsible for the government’s crusade against online “fake news” and “misinformation” has decided that the government-owned CBC can decide what is and isn’t trustworthy news.

Democratic Institutions Minister Karina Gould tweeted last week an article by the CBC titled “The real ‘fake news’: how to spot misinformation and disinformation online.” 

In the article, the author attempts to define honest reporting and gives examples of dishonest journalism.

The article dredges up examples of fake news from the 2016 American Presidential election and the UK referendum to leave the EU in an attempt to show the damage misinformation causes. However, the article lacks evidence that “fake news” is a serious threat in Canada.

The article also only seems to give examples from right-wing sources, leaving readers in the dark about the threat of misinformation from the Left. 

The Canadian government has spent millions and endless resources in an attempt to combat “misinformation” online.

The government has also announced it will be regulating social media companies in various ways ahead of the election, even going so far as to say they might force companies to censor “fake news” or risk getting shut down.

Related stories