Energy sector lost 53,200 jobs since 2014: report

0

The number of Canadians working in the energy sector has dropped by nearly a quarter in the last five years, according to a report by Petroleum Labour Market Information (PetroLMI).

Petroleum Labour Market Information (PetroLMI), a division of Energy Safety Canada, came out with a report this week highlighting the aggressive decline in energy sector jobs. The report says employment of Canadians in the flailing sector has dropped by 23 per cent, or 53,200 jobs, since 2014.

It attributes low oil prices and a lack of pipeline capacity as prevailing reasons for this downward trend.

“Until such time as additional export capacity becomes available, the employment outlook for Canada’s oil and gas sector will continue to be impacted,” said Carol Howes, PetroLMI’s vice-president.

Howes added that the overall uncertainty in the market makes creating accurate forecasts for the industry very difficult.

“Many exploration and production and oil sands companies reported only limited capital and production guidance for 2019 because of the uncertain market conditions. Given PetroLMI’s reliance on capital and operating expenditures to project workforce requirements for our proprietary modelling system, we have for the first time limited our forecast to one year,” she said.

Between 2014 and 2019, PetroLMI estimates the energy sector workforce in Canada shrank from 226,500 jobs to 173,300 jobs.

Another report from PetroLMI on the energy labour market found that about 40 per cent of employees believe uncertainty in the industry will negatively affect their jobs.

As multiple pipeline projects have been cancelled or postponed, the Canadian oil and gas sector has been left barely surviving after crude oil price crash in 2014.

Canada requires increased pipeline capacity to sell to foreign markets, but so far that has failed to happen.

Since 2016, only one new pipeline project has been submitted for government approval, while in the United State 14 have been submitted, leading to what may be a permanent competitiveness crisis in Canadian oil and gas.

Until Canada can get new pipelines built or see a massive increase in prices, fear and uncertainty will be at the centre of the energy sector.


Trudeau government will consider handgun ban if re-elected

0

It’s too late to consider a handgun ban before the 2019 federal election this fall, but the Trudeau government will explore it if re-elected.

Bill Blair, Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction Minister, refused to tell the Senate Committee on National Security and Defence if a government-initiated report on the effects of a handgun ban would be finished by the time of the election.

“Canadians expect us to take the time to do it right and I’ve been doing my very best to take that time,” Blair said.

He also inferred that further discussion on a handgun ban may have to wait until after the election this fall.

The committee was discussing the proposed Bill C-71, which amends several of the firearms rules in Canada. Some on the committee wanted to see the report before C-71 becomes law.

One senator, Liberal-appointee Marilou McPhedran, questioned Blair on waiting until after the election to deal with the report on the assumption that the Liberals will win.

“It’s not an assumption, it’s an intent,” he answered.

Bill C-71 proposes a number of changes new restrictions to the purchase of firearms and makes changes to the enforcement of current firearms laws and regulations — but comes short of any form of firearm ban.

Blair had promised a report on the effects of a handgun ban, and public consultations, by the end of 2018. Four months into 2019 the report has yet to be completed.

The Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, still discussing C-71, struck down a proposal Monday to put a handgun ban into to the bill.

McPhedran attempted to amend Bill C-71 to include a handgun ban, but that amendment failed 2-6 with three abstentions.

A spokesperson for Bill Blair said that his office plans on releasing the Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction report in “early 2019.”


KNIGHT: Scheer not ‘chilled’ by threatened lawsuit

0

Threatening a libel lawsuit is often called ‘libel chill.’ By design it is intended to shut someone up who is being critical.

On March 29, 2019, after the explosive recording and related documentation from former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould was released, the Leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition released a press statement concerning the Prime Minister’s handling and involvement in what has become known as the SNC-Lavalin scandal or more colloquially on social media as #lavscam.

Within days the PM, Justin Trudeau’s lawyer Julian Porter, QC, dropped a letter on the Opposition Leader Andrew Scheer threatening a libel suit citing 4 paragraphs of the news release which Porter stated, “The Prime Minister supports wide-ranging and vigorous debate on matters of public policy. However, your statement, in its entirety is beyond the pale of fair debate and is libellous of my client personally and in the way of his occupation as Prime Minister.”

Scheer consulted with his lawyers and issued a statement essentially saying “Bring it.”

He even repeated his comments in a press scrum outside the qualified privilege of the House of Commons.

When asked in a similar scrum whether he would respond to Scheer’s challenge, Trudeau said this, “You can’t be lying to Canadians, and I think highlighting that there are consequences — short-term and long-term — when politicians choose to twist the truth and distort reality for Canadians.”

Oh? Was this the same Prime Minister whose story has changed at least five times (by my count) since the story first broke in the Globe & Mail in February?

Since the resignation of his Principal Secretary Gerald Butts, it’s not clear who is advising the Prime Minister. But in trying to use libel chill to shut Scheer up has failed utterly. It also breathed new life into the SNC-Lavalin story at a time when it was just starting to dissipate. One wonders who, if anyone, in the PMO possesses any functioning political antennae? Because with this move it sure isn’t apparent.

The other problem Trudeau has is that legal precedent is not in his favour.

In 1994, the Ironworkers union Local 97 brought a libel lawsuit against Gordon Campbell, then the Leader of the Opposition in British Columbia. The matter was decided in 1997 in the Supreme Court of BC by the Honourable Mr. Justice MacDonald who dismissed the lawsuit brought by the union.

In a like manner Campbell had distributed a press release to the press gallery and that triggered several news stories and opinion columns. In the judgement MacDonald said: “The official opposition (indeed any members an opposition party) and its leader have both a duty and an interest to investigate and expose any impropriety or irregularity in the management of government monies by the government of the day, and to communicate their findings to the electorate. The electorate has a corresponding interest in receiving such information.”

On ‘the surface of things that might suggest any action brought by the Liberal Party of Canada against the Leader of the Opposition would not be successful.

Then there’s the fact that if Trudeau actually brings a lawsuit, he exposes himself, Butts, Michael Wernick, the resigned Clerk of the Privy Council Office to be questioned under oath by lawyers for the Conservatives.

Considering how he has dodged and dived in the House during Question Period, I cannot even conceive any lawyer for the Prime Minister would allow that to happen. Yet, if Trudeau follows up and files a lawsuit that is what will happen in the discovery process long before the matter sees the inside of a courtroom.

It looks more and more by the day this this was merely an attempt at libel chill and it, like all the other defences tried by the Prime Minister has blown up in his face.

Scheer’s challenge, in my opinion, will never be accepted.


KNIGHT: RCMP staffing issues hindering organized crime money-laundering investigations

Despite the publicity about money-laundering in B.C. casinos and real estate in the last two years, the RCMP is still having problems staffing the section to do the investigations.

True North fellow Leo Knight takes a closer look at the issue.

FUREY: The government plans on policing the internet

Surprise! Just as the government starts feeling the heat on Lavscam, they announce that they have to regulate social media.

How will they monitor the internet? We’re not entirely sure, but one thing is clear – Canadians don’t want the government to police the internet!

True North’s Anthony Furey explains in his latest video.

SIGN OUR PETITION: https://www.truenorthinitiative.com/stop_the_government_from_policing_the_internet

Family of alleged Omar Khadr victim seek to force him to answer questions

0

The family of an American soldier Omar Khadr allegedly killed in Afghanistan has filed with a Canadian court to force Khadr to answer questions about the incident.

Khadr, who is currently living as a free man in Alberta, admitted to killing Sgt. Chris Speer in 2002 in Afghanistan, but has since changed his mind about what happened.

In a civil court in Utah, a judge has ordered Khadr to answer to the suit, but so far Khadr has refused to discuss the incident with them.

Now the plaintiffs — Speer’s family and others injured by Khadr, have filed a motion in Canada asking that he be forced to address the suit.

“What is important are Mr Khadr’s actions that day and leading up to that day,” said Jamie Schacter, the lawyer for the plaintiffs.

“The plaintiffs and the Utah court hold Mr Khadr responsible.”

Khadr, who holds Canadian citizenship, was sentenced by an American court to eight years for war crimes he committed in Afghanistan.

In 2012 Khadr was transferred to a Canadian prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.

However, he never spent a day behind bars in Canada — in 2015 he was released on bail while he appealed his war crimes charge in the United States.

In 2013, Khadr sued the Canadian government in a $20 million civil case, claiming Canada failed to protect his rights while he was in prison in the United States. Trudeau’s government decided not to fight Khadr’s claims and gave him a $10.5 million settlement.

Earlier this year a Trudeau-appointed judge cancelled the remaining three years of his sentence, saying that had never got bail his sentence would have expired by now anyway.

Khadr is now a free man, using $3 million from his taxpayer funded settlement to purchase an Alberta strip mall.

Now the Trudeau government is hunting for whoever leaked the settlement to the public before it was official.

After confessing in 2010, Khadr has since claimed that his confession was made under duress and in now denying everything — even refusing to speak about his past confession to the Utah court.

The plaintiffs still hope a Canadian judge will accept their motion and force Khadr to speak. The court date for the victims’ motion has not yet been set.

Trudeau bends to pressure on immigration in recent changes to asylum laws

0

Due to the efforts of groups like True North, the federal government has implemented changes to the Refugee Protection Act which bars migrants from making asylum claims in Canada if they have already filed claims in another country.

The provision which is meant to discourage “asylum-shopping”, is another instance of a shift in the Liberal’s approach to the border crisis.

Originally, the Liberal government took a lax approach to the border, instigated by the 2015 “Welcome to Canada” tweet by Justin Trudeau. However, recent measures have indicated a remarkable shift in the government’s approach, including seeking to engage US officials in talks to amend loopholes in the Safe Third Country Agreement.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau defended the latest decision, claiming that it’s the government’s priority to ensure that Canadians have confidence in their country’s immigration system.

Since its conception, True North has advocated for a common-sense approach to immigration and Canada’s border policy.

Our investigative reporters and fellows have been at the front lines trying to keep the government accountable on the border and have kept tabs on what the crisis might cost Canadian taxpayers.  

Despite True North’s best efforts, there is still good work to be done.

Since April 2017, only 3,150 of the asylum claimants in Canada had prior applications in the United States. Since the same year, around 42,000 migrants had made asylum and refugee claims at the irregular points along the United States border with Quebec.

The cost of illegal migrants crossing into Canada is expected to exceed $1.1 billion this year according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer. Migrants continue to cross into Canada unabate, and the omnibus measures will affect only a fraction of those who pass through the non-official border checkpoints.

However, this is not the first instance where True North has swayed public perception. According to a study conducted by Mission Research, which measured media impact around the UN’s global migration compact, True North had a significant impact shaping people’s perceptions around the agreement.

According to the report, True North had a significant impact in criticizing Justin Trudeau’s pro-compact approach while also benefiting the opposition’s anti-compact criticism.

Liberals reward “billionaire friends” with carbon emissions fund

0

The federal government is giving Loblaws $12 million to upgrade its refrigerators, Environment Minister Catherine McKenna announced Monday.

The sum is part of the Liberal government’s $2-billion Low Carbon Economy Fund, introduced in 2017 to encourage businesses and organizations to reduce carbon emissions.

Critics have pointed out the company’s controversial past which involves an admitted bread price fixing regime and offshore tax avoidance allegations.

The company admitted the fixing in its 2018 annual report, claiming that those involved “regularly increased prices on a coordinated basis.” In an attempt to reimburse consumers affected by the company’s actions, Loblaws issued $25 gift cards to anyone who purchased bread from its stores during the affected period.

As a result, the company faced a $1 billion class action lawsuit headed by lead plaintiff and poverty activist Irene Breckon.

In another case, the company was ordered to pay back $368 million in unpaid taxes through an offshore account in Barbados.

The 2018 ruling detailed a scheme dating all the way back to 1992, involvingthe offshore Glenhuron Bank Ltd.

During question period Tuesday, NDP MP Niki Ashton criticized the Liberals for “rewarding billionaire friends” in their decision to give Loblaws the funds.

“In the eyes of this Liberal government it’s clear that every problem can be solved by giving money to your billionaire friends,” she said.

McKenna replied by claiming that the federal government is “investing in clean solutions” and that Loblaws was awarded the amount in a “fair and open competition.”

LAWTON: Ethics investigator is Liberal cabinet minister’s sister-in-law

The woman leading investigations on ethics and conflict of interest violations by federal members of parliament is the sister-in-law of a Liberal cabinet minister, Dominic LeBlanc.

Though Martine Richard has recused herself from the SNC-Lavalin investigation, True North’s Andrew Lawton says there are broader issues with having someone related to a representative of the Liberal government in such an investigative role.

Accused thwarted Kingston bomber released on bail

0

A minor from Kingston accused by police of planning a terrorist attack has been released on bail following a hearing earlier this month.

The alleged young offender was charged in January with planning to “deliver, place, discharge or detonate an explosive or other lethal devices against a place of public use with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury,” and remained in police custody until last week.

Under the bail conditions the accused, who cannot be identified because of his age, must surrender his passport, wear an ankle monitor, and be in the presence of an adult family member at all times.

Him and another person were arrested late January after a series of raids by the RCMP in Kingston.

Police began their investigation after receiving a tip from their American counterparts at the FBI.

The other person, identified as 20-year old Hussam Eddin Alzahabi, was arrested but later released without charges.

In their raids the RCMP found trace amounts of explosives — enough for the RCMP to perform a controlled demolition for disposal.

While the RCMP has not disclosed the motives of the accused, or if he was connected to any established terrorist organization, officers did say no target had been set for the planned attack.

A publication ban prevents reporting on much of the court proceedings.