Pipeline association says US better for energy sector than Canada

0

As the energy sector in Canada continues to struggle, a major industry organization is highlighting how the United States has become a much better place for companies to build pipelines.

The Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA) recently came out with a report outlining seven recommendations to the government to make building pipelines in Canada easier.

The recommendations, which address the uncertainty, red tape, and lack of accountability in the current pipeline approval process, aims to avoid what CEPA calls a “competitiveness crisis” with the United States.

“An analysis completed by Ernst & Young (EY) for the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA) has found that over the past several years an increase in volume, complexity and duplication of regulations imposed upon the pipeline industry, in addition to other factors, has had a negative effect on the competitiveness of the sector,” the report reads.

The report notes that, since 2016, only one new pipeline project has been submitted to the National Energy Board, whereas 14 have been submitted to the equivalent American agency.

The number of days pipeline projects are in the regulatory review has nearly doubled in Canada since 2009, going from 357 to 681 days.

The United States, on the other hand, has barely seen a change since 2009, going from 292 to 336.

Since the Liberals took office, Canadian competitiveness has significantly diminished compared to the United States; while builds go on south of the border multiple pipelines projects in Canada have been cancelled.

Desperate to see any pipelines get built, the Canadian government purchased the Trans Mountain pipeline for $4.5 billion in 2018, though it still has not begun.

This government also enacted Bill C-69, which will allow special interest groups to hijack the pipeline consultation process and drags out consultation almost indefinitely.

With competitiveness problems and a lack of assistance from the current government, the industry has gotten vocal about their issues.

The vice-president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP),  Bruce Brunnen, summed up this discontent when addressing the 2019 federal budget  — which failed to provide redress for the industry.

“The reality is when we see those indicators all facing down, from an oil and gas perspective, and no recognition from the government of a willingness to support our industry, it’s a pretty strong message towards our industry that we’re not a priority for this government, and that’s disappointing.”


True North Field Report: Asylum Seekers at Plaza Hotel are eligible for a housing allowance after 6-month stay

As exclusively reported by True North, some refugee claimants are purposefully staying within the Toronto shelter system for over six months so they can gain eligibility to a housing allowance that helps pay their rent for up to four years.

Another True North investigation revealed that the homeless shelter system is a tiered system, with many asylum seekers who crossed the border illegally into Canada getting better accommodations than the native homeless population.

https://soundcloud.com/candicemalcolm/true-north-field-report-asylum-seekers-at-plaza-hotel-are-eligible-for-a-housing-allowance

Check out our newest product – The True North Field Report

Listen on iTunes


Listen on Spotify


Listen on Soundcloud

Feds tried to hunt down source who leaked Omar Khadr payout

0

The federal government launched an investigation involving six departments to track down the source who leaked the $10.5 million Omar Khadr settlement, documents obtained by the National Post under access to information reveal.

Khadr, who was recently released from his sentence by an Alberta judge, was given the $10.5 million after suing the Canadian government for infringing on his rights as a Canadian while being held prisoner at Guantanamo Bay. Justin Trudeau’s government opted to settle rather than letting it go to trial, which Trudeau said could cost even more.

On July 3, 2017, news of the settlement was released to the general public by a “federal insider” who was hunted down by the Privy Council Office for several months after the fact.

When contacted by the National Post, the Privy Council Office did not comment directly on their investigation into the whistleblower saying that they “do not comment on personnel matters.”

It is unclear if the hunt which spanned several months ever singled out the individual who was responsible for the Khadr settlement leak.

Khadr was found guilty of murdering American army medic Sgt. Christopher Speer in 2002 and has a long family history with the terrorist cell, al-Qaeda.

On March 25th, an Alberta judge ruled that Omar Khadr had finished his sentence and is now a free man.

According to a poll around the time of the settlement, a majority of Canadians opposed Trudeau’s actions in the case.

When asked by the Angus Reid institute whether the Canadian government made the right choice compensating with Khadr, 71% of Canadians felt that it was the wrong call.

LAWTON: Trudeau threatening to sue his opponent for telling the truth

Justin Trudeau is threatening to sue Conservative leader Andrew Scheer for saying that Trudeau pressured Jody Wilson-Raybould into interfering in the SNC-Lavalin prosecution. Scheer faces possible legal action for drawing the conclusion most Canadians have in the wake of information provided by Jody Wilson-Raybould, most notably her tense call with Michael Wernick.

True North’s Andrew Lawton shares the latest.


FUREY: The Liberal homebuyer grant is everything that’s wrong with millennials today

This year’s federal budget was largely utilized as a Lavscam distraction technique and it failed to distract. That is largely good news.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wanted everyone to stop talking about the SNC-Lavalin affair and focus on how they were going to make life better for [insert your special interest group here].

Few bought it and commentators across the country didn’t spend much time on it.

There is though one new announcement in the budget that I want to take another look at given what it means for society more broadly. Through the Canada Mortgage Housing Corporation the government is planning on giving people $1.25 billion over the course of 3 years in down payment money to help them purchase a home.

You can get 10% towards a new build and 5% on an existing home. They’re calling it a “shared equity” payment because you have to give the money back, but not until the property is sold.

So it’s basically free money.

Plus it’s not like the government, in taking on 10% of the equity, will also receive 10% of the capital appreciation when it’s sold. You just give them back the 10%, pocketing the appreciation that was made on the entire value of the property. Nice deal if you can get it.

And the deal, we’re told, is targeted towards middle-class millennials. It is not a program for, say, helping lower income rural residents own modest homes (there are already regional programs for that across the country). The income cap for this program is $120,000 per year and the cap on the mortgage value is four times your income, as in no more than $480,000. Now that doesn’t get you a lot of house in downtown Toronto – in fact it doesn’t get you any “house” in Toronto – but it does get you at least a one bedroom condo, which is also eligible for this program.

It’s one thing to have programs to help low income people with housing needs, it’s another to help middle-class millennials.

I can tell you from experience, speaking with many people in their 20s and 30s in Toronto and Ottawa and elsewhere, that real estate remains the hottest dinner conversation topic. But so what? Just because everyone is complaining about the price of housing doesn’t mean the government needs to step in and cough up that money.

We don’t need the government to step up anytime a topic is trending. Millennials are also clamouring for another season of Game of Thrones – should the feds also fund that? (On second thought, let’s not give them any idea.)

The budget docs argue the fund will “include eligibility criteria to ensure that the program helps those with legitimate needs while ensuring that participants are able to afford the homes they purchase.”

Huh?

Is someone who makes $120,000 but hasn’t saved up for a down payment for whatever reason someone with “legitimate needs” for government assistance?

This program is everything that is wrong with millennials today.

Why does one middle-class person deserve a down payment from taxes paid by another middle-class person? Picture two people in their early 30s. They both earn, let’s say, $80,000. One of them is frugal and pinches every penny. That person finally saves up enough money for a down payment to buy a condo. The other spends big time on consumer goods and eats out at fancy restaurants every day. That person saves up nothing for a home but can buy one at exactly the same time as the other person because of this government program. How is this scenario fair?

While it’s true that young Canadians are facing a variety of challenges in the current economic environment, it’s also true that they’re just making different choices than previous generations.

Here’s an example: When I was a kid growing up in the 1980s, we almost never went out for dinner. It was something you only did on a special occasion. Now people dine out all the time. A recent study found that 72% of Canadians dine out “more than few times a month. The survey also found 50% of people buy coffee on a daily basis. When I entered the workforce I was initially eating lunch out everyday but clued into how bad of a habit this was and instead brought inexpensive lunches and instead invested my money. I later used that fund to buy my first house.

Instead of tossing money at middle-class people to help them buy their homes, let’s instead ramp up financial literacy and promote fiscal responsibility.

That said, don’t hire the politicians and bureaucrats to teach the courses.

FULL LEGAL DOCUMENT: Trudeau v. Scheer

0

Justin Trudeau’s letter to Andrew Scheer:

KNIGHT: Where the real problem lies in the SNC-Lavalin debacle

As Lavscam develops, many seem to be focused on the optics and politics of it all.

True North’s Leo Knight reminds Canadians what this scandal is all about.

The real issue is whether or not the PMO politically interfered with the prosecutorial independence of the Attorney General’s office. This is what Canadians should be concerned about.

Andrew Lawton and Joe Oliver on Justin Trudeau’s broken balanced budget promise

Justin Trudeau’s most recent budget pushes Canada even further away from a balanced budget, despite Liberal promises to have balanced Canada’s books by now.

Former finance minister Joe Oliver joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to discuss what the government should be doing to bring the country’s economy on track.

Hint: It isn’t what the Liberals are doing.

Manitoba to fight carbon tax in court: Premier

0

Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister has announced his government will be challenging the federally imposed carbon tax in court.

The carbon tax, which was imposed on Manitoba on Monday against the province’s wishes, raises the price tag of pretty much everything Manitobans buy – gas, natural gas, groceries and more.

Premier Pallister says he’s disappointed that he has had to take this step.

“This has been a long and difficult process of negotiation… we tried to keep Justin Trudeau out of the pockets of Manitobans,” he said.

The carbon tax puts the price of carbon emissions at $20 per tonne, which raises the price of gas in the province by 4.4 cents per litre.

The federal government plans on raising the tax every year to $50 a tonne by 2022.

Manitoba is the fourth province to challenge the carbon tax in court — Ontario, New Brunswick and Saskatchewan have all launched their own challenges.

True North will be on the ground to cover the Ontario carbon tax trial on April 15-18.  

The provinces are arguing that the federal government does not have the right to enforce a carbon tax if they already have plans to reduce carbon emissions without new taxes.

Pallister says that Manitoba’s challenge may take up to two years to be heard, but he hopes that a ruling in favour of the other provinces will stop the carbon tax earlier than that.

In the meantime, Pallister has promised to not apply the provincial sales tax (PST) and the goods and services tax (GST) on the carbon tax to lessen the burden the tax will be on Manitobans.

“Ottawa is charging federal sales tax on top of its carbon tax, meaning Manitobans will be hit twice on their natural gas bills,” said Pallister.  

“The added cost of charging GST on top of the federal carbon tax means Manitobans will have less disposable income at the end of the month.  Affordability matters and we are ensuring Manitobans will not be triple charged.”

Pallister has also promised that his government will be implementing its own Made-in-Manitoba Climate and Green Plan which achieves the same amount of carbon emissions decreases that the federal government wants to see without needing the federal carbon tax.


FUREY: Canadians are turning their backs on Justin Trudeau. Literally.

It’s one thing to say conservative minded people are upset with Justin Trudeau, but that is to be expected.

What’s interesting now is that the groups that were core to Trudeau’s brand are the ones who are beginning to their turn backs on him. Literally.

True North’s Anthony Furey asks if Justin Trudeau has been exposed as a fraud, a phony and an imposter?