fbpx
Monday, July 21, 2025

“I don’t make my views known”: The plight of conservative students

In an age where university campuses are dominated by the forces of woke, some young Canadians are choosing to identify as “conservative” in face of the left-wing political status quo. 

According to a recent Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology report, 73 per cent of academics from Canadian universities identify as “left-wing.” Further to this, 80 per cent of conservative Canadian scholars feel “hostility” towards their beliefs on campus.

For many of them, this leads to self-censorship.

A self-identified conservative since high school, Amanda is uncomfortable sharing her political beliefs on campus. 

“There’s a prevailing liberal mindset among my peers and some professors, and my views are often in the minority,” said Amanda, 19, a second year York University student and self-identified conservative. “I find myself putting on a facade whenever I am on campus because I feel as though my opinions will be rejected, and it will be more difficult to make positive connections with my peers. I don’t make my views and opinions known in the classroom, out of fear of them being dismissed.”

Amanda confessed that concealing her views can be good for marks.

“I find completing assignments for left-leaning professors easy as it is easy for me to virtue signal liberal ideas for grades,” she said.

Others, like recent University of Toronto computer science graduate Nick Ruiz, rejected this approach.

“I strongly disbelieve with hiding your conservatism,” Ruiz said. “That is not to say you spill out all your beliefs to your coworkers and permanently turn them off to the idea, but I just think the cognitive dissonance with trying to change your personality to conform to what others say is a futile and useless effort unless you are willing to seriously compromise your beliefs. At work, I am fully expecting to hear things I may have to fight back against.”

Despite the prevailing Liberal mindset on university campuses, recent polling suggests that Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives are appealing to young voters between the ages of 18 and 34, leading with 46.5 per cent of the vote. The momentum is credited to an ideological pendulum swing. 

Some of these Conservative-supporting students end up participating in the Conservative Party of Canada’s long-running summer internship program. One of these is Joel, an outspoken “fiscal and social conservative” going into his final year of law school.

Joel is particularly passionate about pushing back against Canada’s “pro-death culture,” specifically the expansion of assisted suicide.

“In the near future, I suspect that offering Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) to babies and mature minors will become normalized,” he said. “This murderous practice is a gross violation of the right to life and sadly feels inevitable…. I do not think there is one solution that will fix it. It requires many solutions, such as educating the Canadian public about MAID, encouraging political and religious organizations to speak up, writing letters to MPs, peaceful protests, and so on.”

Joel said his political identification stems from his family’s origins. 

“My parents grew up in a corrupt socialist country that kept many of its citizens poor and without freedom,” said Joel. “When my parents moved to Canada, they made sure that I did not buy into the socialist agenda that is often pushed by the media and by our universities.”

Amanda is hopeful that conservatism will ultimately win.

“I choose to remain a conservative despite the liberal cultural and political landscape because I believe that there is value in truth and tradition,” she said. “Far-left liberalism has gone too far, and I will always turn to truth and tradition to lead our society down the right path.”

This appeal to tradition was familiar to Isaac Leclerc, an 18-year old parliamentary assistant to Conservative MP Jeremy Patzer. Leclerc credits his political beliefs to his upbringing on his grandparents’ farm in rural Casselman – a francophone village just east of Ottawa.

“Something I particularly appreciate about conservatism is the preservation of heritage and cultural values,” said Leclerc, who will be studying economics at the University of Ottawa in the fall. “Growing up as a francophone in Ontario, the atmosphere around the French language was almost militaristic, and it had to be. With English dominating the media and an anglophone province, French would soon be relegated to Quebec without a concerted effort to preserve our language and culture. This fits right in with the conservative idea that the traditions and values of our past are worth preserving.”

Ruiz, the computer science graduate, said authenticity is key no matter what.

“The upside of not compromising your beliefs is worth the extra effort it takes to slowly and thoughtfully engage with others in a meaningful way that doesn’t turn them off to what I believe to be ultimately true about our human experience.” 

BONOKOSKI: Many unanswered questions remain on Ford’s Greenbelt land swap fiasco

Source: Facebook

Amid Ontario’s Greenbelt controversy, the resignation of the housing minister’s chief of staff continues to resonate.

But Ryan Amato is confessing to nothing.

In his resignation letter to Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Steve Clark last Tuesday, obtained by Global News, Amato said his role in the Greenbelt decision has been “unfairly depicted” and suggested he would be vindicated in any investigation.

“I am confident that I have acted appropriately, and that a fair and complete investigation would reach the same conclusion,” Amato wrote in his letter.

“However, these public statements have made it impossible, as a practical matter, for me to continue in my present role,” Amato said. “I hereby resign effective immediately from my role as Chief of Staff to Minister Clark.”

A bombshell report by Ontario’s auditor general Bonnie Lysyk put Amato at the centre of the Ford government’s controversial decision to allow development on 7,400 acres of former Greenbelt land.

The report said Amato had picked all but one parcel of land that was ultimately removed from the Greenbelt. It also explained how influential developers handed Amato packages with information on the lands they wanted to see removed.

“I do not wish to be a distraction from the Government of Ontario’s important work in getting More Homes Built Faster,” Amato’s letter said, before thanking Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Clark for formerly appointing him to the job.

The day after the Ford government announced Amato’s resignation, investigators with the RCMP said they were taking over a potential probe into the Greenbelt controversy to avoid the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) being accused of conflict.

The OPP, which had been reviewing several complaints from the public about the Ford government since late 2022, said they had sent the file to the RCMP “to avoid any potential perceived conflict of interest.”

So, it is there it now sits.

The report said Amato had picked all but one parcel of land that was ultimately removed from the Greenbelt. It also explained how influential developers handed Amato packages with information on the lands they wanted to see removed.

The report also heavily criticized the process in which decisions regarding the Greenbelt’s development were made, indicating that it “favoured certain developers,” lacked transparency and failed to take factors such as environmental, agricultural and financial impacts into consideration.

The process for determining which sites would be cut from the Greenbelt took place within a strict three-week timeline, which the auditor general says was implemented by Amato.

The report also suggested that certain criteria for the sites were altered when it was determined that most of the sites would not fit the set parameters.

According to Lysyk, the decision by Amato will see the land value of those chosen sites increase by $8.28 billion.

“We’re correcting the process,” Ford said. “I’m first to admit the process could have been better.”

The process, according to the auditor’s report, involved developers handing “packages” directly to the Clark’s chief of staff with instructions on which specific lands to remove from the Greenbelt — instructions that were ultimately approved by Premier Ford and his cabinet.

Ford, once again, denied any personal knowledge of the communications between political staff and developers.

“You get stuff put in front of you before cabinet, which I did. My exact words cross the T’s dot the I’s [and] everything’s fine,” Ford said. “I can’t micromanage.”

When asked whether the Greenbelt deals amount to corruption, Ford said it was a “nasty thing to say.”

“I’m trying to build homes, that’s my intention,” Ford said.

Ratio’d | Canada may have the largest housing bubble OF ALL TIME

Source: Flickr

Owning a home used to be the most important investment a Canadian could make, but unfortunately, it’s only a dream for many now.

The housing crisis continues to worsen, and politicians don’t seem to really care. In fact, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau assured Canadians that housing is not a federal issue. Whether it’s reducing immigration levels or cutting unnecessary red tape, there are ample ways the government can improve the housing situation in Canada.

As the crisis worsens, some Canadians are even resorting to living in their cars – and trying to convince others that it’s a great lifestyle. What is happening?

Tune in to the latest episode of Ratio’d with Harrison Faulkner!

Charlie Angus deletes post about death of unvaccinated woman

NDP MP Charlie Angus deleted an offensive post politicizing the death of unvaccinated Canadian Sheila Annette Lewis on Sunday after receiving widespread backlash. 

Lewis died over the weekend while awaiting an organ transplant that had been denied to her due to the fact that she was not vaccinated against Covid-19.

Her death prompted a series of condolences on social media, including from Conservative candidate Roman Baber and party leader Pierre Poilievre.

“The Canada Health Act forbids discrimination, but Sheila Lewis was denied transplant because of a lawful medical choice. Her death is a tragic failure of medical ethics and the administration of justice. I’ll work to right this wrong until the last day of my career. RIP Sheila,” Baber posted on X (formerly Twitter). 

Poilievre responded by agreeing with Baber’s message. 

Soon after Poilievre’s post, Angus took issue with the comment claiming that Lewis died because of “disinformation, anti-vaxx bullshit and conspiracy.” 

“A woman died because she prefered (Sic.) to fight for disinformation, anti-vaxx bullshit and conspiracy. Pierre Poilievre says she is a hero and supports a candidate so bogus that Doug Ford kicked him out,” wrote Angus in reference to the Ontario Premier’s decision to remove Baber from caucus while he was still an MPP over his opposition to lockdowns. 

Angus’ comments drew the ire of many who accused the MP of being disrespectful and politicizing Lewis’ tragic death. 

“Now an elected MP – Charlie Angus of the NDP – takes a shot at the recently deceased Sheila Lewis, who he didn’t know from Eve. What a gutless worm. Charlie would have removed Sheila from the transplant list with glee. She was vermin to him. Get these creeps out of office,” wrote X user Don Wilson. 

Toronto Sun journalist Joe Warmington also pitched in, calling Angus’ post “heartless.” 

“Heartless comment. That’s a human being who should not be mocked,” wrote Warmington. 

Superior Court Judges were Liberal party donors and may even be members of the exclusive Laurier Club

Numerous superior court justices that have been appointed under the Trudeau government have also been found to have attended federal Liberal party fundraisers shortly before their appointments, according to a National Post investigation.

Since 2016, more than three times as many Liberal donors have been appointed to judicial positions when compared to Conservative donors.

Data from the government’s Orders in Council database was analyzed by the Investigative Journalism Foundation (IJF) and the National Post to see if any federally appointed judges under the Liberal government had attended party fundraisers in the past. Names from the orders and council database were then compared with lists from Elections Canada’s Regulated Fundraising Events Registry (from 2019 to present) as well as names listed on the historical event records from the Liberal party’s website.

Any federal fundraiser that charges over $200 for per attendee and features a party leader, cabinet minister or leadership contestant is required to notify Elections Canada. 

Three federally appointed judges to Alberta’s superior trial court appear to have similar names to those who were listed on the Liberal’s fundraising registry, according to the National Post report.

Robert Armstrong, Michel Bourque and Kevin Feth are all Alberta judges appointed under the Trudeau government who appear to have similar names to those who attended Liberal fundraising events prior to their appointments.

Armstrong and Borque both attended numerous Liberal fundraisers that included high-level cabinet members only months before being appointed to Alberta’s Court of King’s Bench. Armstrong was appointed in February 2021 and Borque in December 2021.

The name Michel Borque appears on the Liberal party fundraiser list five times from October 2017 to September of 2021. The name Robert Armstrong is listed as attending three fundraisers from July 2018 and October 2020. Both Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland were in attendance at several of those same events.

Those same names, as well as the name Kevin Feth are all registered to be members of an exclusive club for Liberal donors called the Laurier Club. In order to be a member of the Laurier Club one must make an annual donation of $1,700 dollars, the maximum amount a person can legally contribute to a national party. 

Jana Steele was appointed to the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario in May 2020 and the name Jana Steele also appears on the Liberal historical events list twice in 2018 and 2019. 

In 2018, a Jana Steele attended a Laurier Club event headlined by Trudeau. The event in 2019 was a breakfast reception hosted by Trudeau at the Fairmont Royal York hotel in Toronto that cost attendees $1,625 per ticket.

The remaining two recently appointed judges in question are sitting on the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the Supreme Court of Newfoundland. 

The IJF and National Post reached out to all six judges for comment regarding their potential ties to the Liberal party and to confirm whether or not the names on the list were in fact theirs, however none had responded. 

They also spoke to Mohammad Hussain, a spokesperson for the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) in July, asking why Liberal donors were being appointed at a higher rate than those of Conservatives and Hussain replied by saying, “the process is always based on merit. We do not use political party databases.”

The process for appointing federal judges begins with Independent Judicial Advisory Committees (JAC) and the minister of justice offering recommendations of good potential candidates for the role, however it is the prime minister who makes the final decision on appointment. 

The prime minister can ignore JAC recommendations and is not required to make public if they decide not to select a candidate that had been highly recommended by the JAC.

Boise State University political science professor Lori Hausegger believes that more transparency should be provided in the judicial appointment process.

“A key question is whether the current government skipped over others in the pool that weren’t at that fundraiser,” said Hausegger. “Of course, if they were all ‘highly recommended’ and the Liberals chose someone they knew a little more about, that is a much different scenario than if they chose someone ‘recommended’ over someone ‘highly recommended’ who wasn’t at the fundraiser.”

The co-founder of Democracy Watch, Duff Conacher, said that appointing judges who had previously attended fundraisers headlined by the prime minister could undermine, “public confidence in the independence and impartiality of judges across the country.”

“Having the prime minister at an event and being able to show the prime minister how much you support his party, face-to-face, is something that everyone should be very concerned about, because it’s access and influence that’s only available to those who can afford it and it taints decisions,” said Conacher. “As the Laurier Club shows, Liberals have explicitly said, ‘Give us more cash, you get more access.’ And access gives you the opportunity for influence.”

‘Let them eat lobster,’ Liberal minister blasted for video showing off seafood meal while Canadians struggle

The Liberals’ new small business minister, Rechie Valdez, is facing backlash on social media over a video she posted showing off a meal of lobster and oysters during the Liberal cabinet retreat in Prince Edward Island.

This comes as more Canadians hit up food banks amid a rising cost of living.

Some social media posts compared Valdez, who is now earning a $287,400 salary as a minister, to the former Queen of France, Marie Antoinette, who supposedly said, “let them eat cake” when informed that starving peasants had no more bread. 

Valdez’s lobster video was part of her “Foodie Friday” series, in which she visits local restaurants and tries their food. She visited the Lobster On The Wharf Restaurant in Charlottetown.

“We’re here at Charlottetown, we’re trying out Lobster On The Wharf, and we’re gonna check out their amazing fresh seafood,” said Valdez. Adding, “I’m so excited for this.”

The video then shows the food Valdez had, including oysters and a lobster roll, as well as her feasting away.

Valdez received instant criticism over the video on X (formerly Twitter), with many calling it out of touch.

Conservative MP Kyle Seeback wrote “eating lobster and collecting per diems while Canadians can’t pay their mortgages. Breathtakingly out of touch.”

Conservative Senator Leo Housakos meanwhile said, “and here I thought the retreat was about finding ways to help struggling Canadians put food on their table amid a soaring cost of living crisis. The only food this Minister is concerned with is her own.” He also called Valdez out of touch.

National Post columnist Chris Selley asked “who runs Liberal comms, and what is wrong with them?”
640 Toronto talk radio show host Alex Pierson wrote “the struggle is also real for politicians. They get it. They REALLY get it.”

Another X user meanwhile said “I am a Maritimer… I can’t afford Lobster now… too expensive… but the Trudeau Cabinet can… because we are paying for it. Not smart Rechie… people are having a difficult time buying groceries.”

“I saw a girl sleeping in a shopping cart under a bus stop the other day because it was raining. The disconnect between what people like me see everyday and what people like you think matters to Canadians is so completely out of touch,” wrote another X user.

Valdez posted her video amid many Canadians struggling financially due to the rising cost of living. 

Sixty per cent more Canadians are expected to use food banks this year, something food banks are already feeling amid an increase in demand. Food banks have reported record usage this year, and are also running out of food.

Earlier this month, the Ottawa Food Bank had to cut volunteer shifts because it was short on food. “We’ve never seen anything like this,” CEO Rachael Wilson told Global News.

A survey also found that almost one in five Canadians are eating less than they should be due to rising food prices, while new data from Statistics Canada shows that one in four Canadians would not be able to afford a $500 unforeseen expenses

Several Canadians have taken to social media to vent about the struggles of living in Canada.

Valdez’s office did not respond to a request for comment from True North.

LEVY: Hamilton teacher has had enough of the woke indoctrination

Source: Flickr

This Hamilton high school teacher has only this school year left before retirement and although she loves her job tremendously, she can no longer deal with the woke indoctrination and the preferential treatment given to black students and administrators.

She says she derives great satisfaction from working with “underprivileged” kids at her inner city school and with endeavouring to give them “some hope.”

“I do like the underdogs … that’s where I get a lot of gratification helping these kids succeed,” she says.

The outspoken teacher is yet another who asked to remain anonymous for fear of repercussions from the board’s woke administrators.

At her school, “poverty” is the biggest issue, not colour, she says.

Things started to change for her in 2017 when she was placed on leave after being accused of racism for presenting an alternate view of a provincial policy.

“I was being targeted by the principal,” she says, noting like Toronto principal Richard Bilkszto she “felt awful” and went off on stress leave.

Her former female principal, she says, regularly wore a BLM shirt to school at the same time she herself was being investigated for sharing a “political opinion” about the provincial policy.

Clearly she didn’t express the right political opinion.

The principal — in her view a KOJO prodigy — even told her to “check her privilege” and constantly made her do reports on colonisation. 

That principal has since been transferred to another board.

The Hamilton school board doesn’t hire on merit, she says, but on affirmative action. The result has been the worse administration team possible, some of them downright toxic.

“I am so distraught with the education system,” she says. “I love my job but the political climate is awful.”

The school has a grad coach, specifically for black students, which she finds highly selective.

That coach, she feels, is not qualified to help students at all except to offer an office for them to hang out.

No one stands for the national anthem anymore, she adds.

“The inmates are already running the asylum…they need structure…they need something,” she says.

The teacher says many students still don’t know how to read or write properly even though they’re in high school and they don’t do anything about that.

They also don’t push for students to attend class. But kids are pushed through nonetheless because failing kids is “a lot more work.”

I asked whether things got worse with the hiring of Sheryl Robinson-Petrazzini as director last September.

Robinson-Petrazzini, who came from the Toronto District School Board, is the same official who tweeted a thank you in 2021 to DIE trainer Kike Ojo-Thompson of the KOJO Institute for making former principal Richard Bilkszto feel the “discomfort” needed to “disrupt” anti-black racism.

Robinson-Petrazzini’s toxic tweet remained public for months until Bilkszto’s lawyers threatened to sue her.

As reported previously in this space, Bilkszto ended his life in mid-July, the result his family and his lawyer say of the bullying the occasional principal experienced at two KOJO sessions in the spring of 2021. He was subsequently cancelled by the acolytes of black activist education director Colleen Russell-Rawlins.

The teacher says she’s been told the Hamilton board senior executive does not appear to be gelling because Robinson-Petrazzini still lives in Scarborough and is not familiar with the Hamilton culture.

But a couple of principals have still been sent home for eight months over alleged racist issues, she’s been told.

Violence is also prevalent in their schools along with lots of dope smoking, which is uncontrollable. Kids are always running rampant in the hall, she adds.

“Nobody does anything about it because there are no suspensions,” she says.

She says, sadly, the boards don’t “take care” of students anymore.

There’s no accountability and no structure.

“It’s not about doing what’s best for kids anymore,” the retiring teacher says. “It’s all about getting your grad rates up and your suspension rates down.”

Statistics Canada obsesses over drag queen story times, pronouns in podcast episode

Statistics Canada dedicated an entire episode of its publicly-funded podcast “Eh Sayers” to discussing drag queens, exposing kids to drag culture and correct pronoun usage. 

On Aug. 21, the federal department released an episode titled “I Got 99 Problems But Being Misgendered on the Census Isn’t One” featuring host and Statistics Canada communications officer Tegan Bridge. 

Appearing as guests were drag king Cyril Cinder and Statistics Canada’s Anne Milan. 

“Welcome to Eh Sayers, a podcast from Statistics Canada, where we meet the people behind the data and explore the stories behind the numbers. I’m your host, Tegan Bridge, and I’m whispering because we’re listening to drag story time. Shh!” says Bridge as she began the podcast. 

Throughout the half-hour-long show, the host and guests touch on Statistics Canada’s decision to survey the self-identified gender identity of Canadians in the latest census but mostly spend the time waxing about the virtues of drag queens. 

“Drag kings are drag artists who present or perform a masculine persona as part of their drag performance,” explains Cinder. 

“I perform a lot in bars or in very different venues, music venues. I’m also a story time performer, so I will entertain and read books to children and audiences and families of all ages.” 

Cinder has in fact appeared in drag queen story times hosted by the taxpayer-funded National Arts Centre in Ottawa. 

As reported by True North, Cinder’s public Instagram profile displayed X-rated content including prosthetic male genitalia and a graphic with the text “Cyril Cinder’s Bitch.” Cinder has since deleted the explicit posts. 

“Why are drag story times important?” asks Bridge. 

“Whether or not we are, you know, exposing kids to a positive queer role model for the first time, or to someone who’s maybe a bit more gender nonconforming, doesn’t quite match the boys and girls archetypes and binaries that they’re often exposed to at home and at school and in media,” replies Cinder. 

“It’s an opportunity for them to see that and see that that’s not that strange actually, that that’s okay, that there’s nothing too weird about being fabulous and sparkly and excited and fun.”

Statistics Canada’s Bridge also framed gender binaries as a “problem” that needs to be dealt with. 

“The gender binary can be used to control people. It can be used to force people into things that they don’t want for themselves, right?” Cinder explains. 

“What are your preferred pronouns?” asks Bridge. 

“Yeah, so I actually identify as non-binary out of drag, but my drag character, Cyril Cinder, is a man that is the gender identity of that character. So in drag, I exclusively use he/him pronouns, but out of drag I use she/he/they pronouns. Any pronouns really I’m comfortable with. But whenever I’m referring to Cyril Cinder, the drag character, I always prefer to use he/him,” explains Cinder. 

Bridge also insinuated that gender was a “performance” people choose to put on at any given time before touting the department’s decision to add gender identity options in the 2021 census. 

“It was historic to include this information. It’s the first time that census data was released on the transgender and non-binary population among all the countries around the world. And so we’re very proud of that,” says Milan.

Catholic school district turned blind eye to ‘revenge porn’ and serial sextorter

Jimmy Dziedzina looks more like a biker than a teacher. With an imposing horseshoe beard and slicked back white hair, the shop teacher could have been cast as a mechanic on “American Chopper.” His no-nonsense demeanour makes him the kind of teacher that parents fondly remember from a generation ago.

At his secondary school in Mississauga, Ont., part of the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board recently profiled by National Review for turning a blind eye to endemic student violence, Dziedzina played an active part in student life. He coached girls’ varsity flag football and developed a strong rapport with many student athletes. However, in the spring of 2021, Dziedzina noticed that one student, Stephanie (not her real name), “was in a lot of distress.”

Stephanie was an outstanding athlete and had the perfect complement of brains to match her brawn, the veteran teacher said. “She’s just an incredible kid.”

However, Dziedzina could tell that something was clearly bothering Stephanie. “I eventually got her to open up and she told me that there was a boy in the school who was threatening her with cyberbullying – of sending out unconsenting naked pictures of her,” the educator said.

“I started hearing things about this guy having stuff on his phone,” Stephanie told True North. “Not just of me, but with other girls, as well. Obviously, that made me very worried. It would make anyone worried.” The teen said she had “caught him taking photos of me that were not consensual,” but hadn’t thought anything of them since they broke up. 

“I don’t think people that take these photos realize how bad it is to actually have them. They think it’s just a joke or something.”

Dziedzina’s mind instantly went to the story of Amanda Todd, a 15-year-old student from British Columbia who committed suicide following a “sextortion” plot in 2012. Todd’s story was a watershed moment for cyberbullying, and the tragedy underscored for Dziedzina the gravity of the situation.

“It should be enough to let anybody in charge of students appreciate the seriousness of that crime. And this is where it all started with me.”

He said he notified Stephanie’s family and was instructed by a union representative to alert law enforcement. When Dziedzina approached the school’s principal about the incident, however, the administrator was “initially resistant to reporting the allegations to police,” the teacher told his lawyers. In the end, the principal “reluctantly” contacted the police, Dziedzina said, but the administrator’s apparent hesitancy to pursue the matter left the teacher angered and frustrated.

Police eventually spoke with Stephanie and the male student, Carl (not his real name), but nothing came of the investigation, likely, according to Stephanie, because the images had been deleted, destroying any prosecutable evidence. Peel Regional Police did not respond to a request for comment. 

Dziedzina said the indifference of school administrators seemingly emboldened Carl, and his harassment of Stephanie continued. The teacher encouraged her to keep a log of any future incidents. Over the coming months, Stephanie said Carl spread sexual rumours about her while his new girlfriend allegedly stalked, screamed and even threatened to kill her. This was despite the fact that Stephanie had graduated by then.

A year later, another student reported to Dziedzina that Carl had threatened a different female student with explicit non-consensual photos — which the teacher deems child pornography, given that both girls were minors at the time. The second female student was contacted by the True North, but did not respond.

However, Carl allegedly took it a step further this time. “Not only is he doing the same thing, he actually now passed pictures of this other girl to a boy in the school and that boy threatened her with these unconsenting naked pictures,” Dziedzina alleged.

When teacher Jimmy Dziedzina approached his superiors about an alleged serial sextorter, the administrator’s “reluctance” angered and frustrated him. When the sextortion allegedly happened again, Dziedzina took matters into his own hands.

The teacher decided to speak with Carl. Minutes before Dziedzina’s morning class finished, he ducked out to get Carl, who was in the gym. He took the student back to his office, which was fitted with a glass door and was visible to nearly two dozen students and another teacher.

“I’m hearing you’re now doing this to another girl. I’m going to speak to her. If it’s true, I will be calling the police,” Dziedzina said he warned him. He then told Carl he also needed to leave Stephanie alone. “My last words to him were: ‘You need to stop the constant harassment.’”

According to Dziedzina, the interaction “lasted under two minutes” and Carl remained quiet. They parted company and Dziedzina — thinking nothing of the encounter — left the school for lunch. Shortly afterwards, he got a call from a union representative informing him that he was not allowed to return to school and would be placed on paid leave.

Carl reportedly complained to the school’s athletic director that Dziedzina had threatened to hurt him. The principal called in the police to investigate.

“If anything comes up with (Stephanie), I swear to God I’ll be the one to break your skull,” the student alleged Dziedzina threatened him, according to a document prepared by the teacher’s lawyers that was shared with True North. Carl further accused the teacher of calling him a “little s–t” and other profane names throughout the brief exchange. And he alleged that the teacher had blocked his exit when he had attempted to leave the office. Dziedzina has denied all allegations.

Carl’s family has declined to comment on the matter.

For Dziedzina, a teacher of three decades with no track record of abuse toward children or minors, the accusations were devastating. Later that month, police filed two serious charges against him — one of forcible confinement and another for threatening to cause bodily harm — which legal counsel informed him could carry a maximum sentence of up to 15 years in prison.

“I think, as a teacher, it’s proper if you are guilty of this, you’re gonna feel the pain of being guilty,” Dziedzina said, appreciative of the severity of the accusations.

Accompanied by his attorney, at month’s end, Dziedzina voluntarily surrendered to police, was placed in handcuffs and officially processed. An interview conducted by a female officer, and witnessed by her male partner, led to all charges being dropped that same day.

“I’m thinking, I’ve been exonerated, we’re going to finally deal now with the distribution of child pornography,” Dziedzina said.

Despite the charges being dropped, however, the school board decided to launch its own hearings into the teacher’s conduct. Dziedzina alleges that the board’s manager of employee relations focused the administration’s sole attention on him, disregarding Carl and the accusations against the student. 

“Since the incident you are inquiring about involves two minors, it would be … inappropriate for us to comment,” Bruce Campbell, a spokesman for Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, told True North.

Asked whether administrators were aware of the allegations against Carl or if any disciplinary measures were imposed, Campbell insisted the “matter was fully investigated and appropriately addressed.” Pressed to clarify when the board was alerted or what specific actions were taken, Campbell said: “That will be the extent of our comment on this matter.”

The incident had also been referred to the Children’s Aid Society of Peel and, in late June 2022, the society “verified” claims that Dziedzina had threatened Carl and placed him “at risk of emotional harm.” Within a month of the ruling, the school board sent Dziedzina an official notice that he was being referred to the Ontario College of Teachers, the body responsible for accrediting educators in the province.

Two weeks later, however, the Children’s Aid Society overturned its initial determination that Dziedzina had placed Carl “at risk of emotional harm.” While the body continued to maintain that the teacher had made a “direct verbal threat” to Carl, its director of legal services, Deana DeGrâce, informed Dziedzina that the emotional harm accusation had not been verified and that a “correction” would be made to child protection records.

“The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board will be notified of the change,” she informed him. Peel’s Children’s Aid Society did not respond to a request for comment from True North.

Despite the police dropping charges and the Children’s Aid Society withdrawing its accusation of emotional harm, Dziedzina remains entangled in an ongoing legal battle with the school board to be reinstated. However, according to Dziedzina, his union has been unhelpful advocating on his behalf or keeping him informed about his ongoing arbitration claim. 

“The important point is that the board has not rescinded what they said about me,” Dziedzina defiantly maintains.

School urges “dignity and respect” as busty trans teacher returns to classroom

Nora Frances Henderson Secondary School in Hamilton is bracing for what it believes will be a whirlwind of media attention and potential protests in response to its hiring of busty trans teacher Kayla Lemieux.

In a memo to parents from the school that was later obtained by the Toronto Sun’s Joe Warmington, principal Tom Fisher outlined what preparations the school would be making for Lemieux’s return to the classroom.

Fisher said the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board high school has “an obligation to uphold individual rights and treat everyone with dignity and respect” and “should the school be subject to any disruptions or protests; we are committed to communicating with you as openly and as frequently as possible to ensure student safety – and to share any operational plans.”

Several operational changes to the school will include “having students enter and exit the building using assigned doors at entry and dismissal” and “locking exterior doors during school hours, only using the front main doors during school hours.”

Additionally, “all students and visitors will be required to use an intercom system to enter and exit the building” and the school is asking parents “to email or call before coming to the school if they wish to visit to speak to an employee.”

Fisher said that the school welcomes Lemieux, who has become world famous for “gender expression.” 

Lemieux previously worked at Oakville Trafalgar High School until the teacher’s tenure was cut short following an enormous backlash from the public to photos of her giant prosthetic breasts.

Although the breasts are prosthetic, Lemieux claims that they are real and a result of a “hormone sensitivity to estrogen” and the result of a condition called ‘gigantomastia.’

The previous high school asked her to present a doctor’s note that would provide some medical backing to her claims however Lemieux refused, calling the school’s queries offensive. 

“The diagnosis is based on verbal discussions I have had with my doctor,” said Lemieux in an interview with the Toronto Sun in February. “I don’t think women, in general, have formal diagnosis (sic) of their breast size. I also personally consider breast size irrelevant.” 

“I decided to break my silence and put my name next to my statements, and now I am being asked to provide proof. I really don’t know how to help you with that.”

However, several images of Lemieux emerged wherein she was not wearing the prosthetic breasts, leading many to believe that Lemieux’s behaviour and transition was disingenuous. 

A neighbour of Lemieux’s also confirmed that she could often be seen dressed as a man. 

It was the photos of Lemieux not wearing the prosthetic breasts that ultimately led to her suspension from Oakville-Trafalgar high school. 

“I consider myself to be a private citizen,” said Lemieux. “I never felt I was obligated to reveal personal details about myself based on special interest from media. And I never wanted any attention,” said Lemieux.

The public announcement of Lemieux’s return to teaching has enraged many parents in the province who feel that her appearance is unprofessional. 

“This is just ridiculous – if ‘Kayla’ doesn’t wear the boobs all the time – WHY must they be worn at school if NOT for attention – This is sad for the kids – Why does the school allow this circus & at the kids’ expense?!’ wrote one person on X.

Lemieux claims to be intersex as a defence to often being seen with drastically different appearances, the term meaning, “born with both male and female sex organs.”

Related stories