fbpx
Sunday, July 20, 2025

LEVY: TDSB teachers say curriculum has taken a back seat to DEI training

Teachers working within the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) say since the pandemic, curriculum has taken a back seat to Diversity and Equity (DEI) training.

“No one talks about the curriculum anymore,” one teacher says. “They (the administrators) talk about equity, human rights, diversity.” 

“This is not what I signed up to do for a career,” says the elementary school teacher.

Over the past week, I spoke with a series of teachers who’ve been living silently with pent-up frustration about the crazy woke edicts they are now required to pursue in their classrooms and how the culture has changed so drastically in the past two years under education director Colleen Russell-Rawlins.

The recent tragic suicide of principal Richard Bilkszto appears to have rattled many working for the TDSB – both principals and teachers  – prompting some to come forward, courageously to speak about their experiences.

Efforts to obtain a response from Russell-Rawlins through her spokesman Ryan Bird were recently rebuffed.

Bird informed True North that while they appreciate the opportunity, they don’t have any further comments “beyond existing statements” issued late last month.

In one statement, the board announced its own internal review by a preferred contractor of the series of events leading to Bilkszto’s suicide.

In his claim against the TDSB, filed three months before he ended his life, the popular long-time principal alleged he was bullied and harassed by DEI trainer, Kike Ojo-Thompson, hired by the TDSB.

This occurred during two sessions in the spring of 2021. Audio made public of the sessions authenticate his claims.

Russell-Rawlins followed up the board statement the next day by pledging a continual commitment to DEI training.

The three elementary school teachers interviewed this past week asked to remain anonymous given the repercussions that await them if they are even suspected of speaking out of turn, or for looking at a visible minority student or colleague the wrong way.

“They will destroy our careers … we have to be very very careful,” says one teacher.

If principals are the front line dealing with what they describe as a “culture of terror,” the teachers are the foot soldiers who find themselves forced to simply shut up and lead indoctrination sessions that have little to do with teaching the basics.

The first elementary school teacher says during the bimonthly meetings at her school this past year, the focus was consistently on Indigenous education.

She says they learned about Indigenous games, cooking methods and Indigenous story-telling and were expected to replicate these experiences with their students.

They were also subjected to daily events of 45 minutes to one hour that take kids away from the basics. These have included steel pan drumming, East Indian dancing, seminars on Islamophobia and brainstorming sessions on anti-black racism.

There is some spelling, reading and math thrown in for good measure, says the teacher, but the “primary focus is on diversity activities.”

“It’s okay if you’re not doing reading, writing and math but it’s not okay if you’re not doing the diversity stuff,” she says. “You will be labelled a racist or an Islamophobe or anti-Indigenous.”

She said teachers in her school were expected to “bring evidence back” every two weeks – whether a video, audio file, student pictures or a slide show – to the principal or vice-principal. That evidence was subsequently taken to the superintendent, the teacher says.

The teacher says as a consequence, they can’t keep up with the curriculum and this is why test scores are “in decline across the province.”

A second elementary school teacher agrees that the climate in her school has “changed dramatically.”

They are told to cover certain aspects of anti-black oppression and critical race theory without any support or training. There is always the fear they’ll do something wrong, she says.

“Teachers to me are the Lee Harvey Oswalds for the principals,” she said. “We’re the ones who take the bullet for this and the principals don’t back us.”

A third teacher says he was transferred by a vindictive, spiteful principal – Caucasian herself – who repeatedly allowed black students to leave class and who claimed there were “too many old white people” at his school.

The allegations against him were “completely fabricated,” he said.

“It’s awful how teachers are treated.. It’s just so disrespectful,” he said, noting the union doesn’t back them up at all.

The teacher says the amount of focus on DEI training instead of curriculum seems to vary from school to school and superintendent to superintendent.

The second teacher says she focuses on curriculum and gets in trouble for doing so.

“There are too many interruptions in the school year that take away from reading, writing and math,” she said.

“There’s so much fear about being labelled a racist,” she added.

The first teacher says she is in support of “back to basics’ message promoted by education minister Stephen Lecce, but unless the ministry finds a way to “hold school boards accountable [it] won’t happen at all.”

She found Russell-Rawlins’ statement contending that the board intends to continue its DEI work to be “profoundly insulting and a slap in the face.”

All three teachers feel the parents don’t realize what’s going on or turn a blind eye to all of it.

“There is so much pent-up frustration about what’s really going on and how the public doesn’t know where their taxpayer dollars are going and what they are funding,” says the first teacher.

“It’s like the floodgates have finally opened … finally we are seeing in print what my colleagues and I have been very carefully talking about watching, experiencing and whispering about for 2, 3, years.”

Manitoba Premier says schools should inform parents if kids want to change genders

Manitoba Progressive Conservative Premier Heather Stefanson is pledging to enhance parental rights if re-elected this fall, saying parents should be informed if their child is wanting to identify as a different gender at school. 

Stefanson’s pro-parent stance comes less than two months before Manitoba heads to the polls for the province’s 43rd general election.

“We believe that parents know what is in the best interest of their children,” said Stefanson at a press conference. “That’s why a re-elected PC government will formalize and enhance rights for parents and guardians in the Public Schools Act.”

“A lot has changed in 30 years,” she added. “What we’re hearing is parents want to be better informed so they can make decisions on behalf of their children.”

Stefanson’s PCs are proposing to enshrine the following parental rights in the province’s Public Schools Act.

● The right to be involved in addressing bullying and other behaviour changes

● The right to be informed about curriculum

● The right to advance notice before any presentations are made in school from outside the school system

● The right to consent before any image of the child is made, shared or stored

These new rights would be added to the seven already existing parental rights in the Public Schools Act.

When asked by a reporter if she believes parents should be informed if their child is wanting to go by a different gender identity at school, Stefanson said yes. 

“Yes. I think it’s all of those things. We know parents know what’s in the best interest of their kids. That will all be part of the consultation process.”

When asked about a case where a gender dysphoric child does not want their parents to know about their social transition, Stefanson said “these [questions] will all come up in the consultation and that parents will decide where they want to move forward on that.”

Stefanson is the second Canadian premier to voice support for the right of parents to be informed if their child is wanting to change genders at school, a phenomenon that is becoming more common amid woke elementary school teachers teaching gender ideology to children.

Back in June, New Brunswick Progressive Conservative Premier Blaine Higgs modified his province’s education policy 713 to require that children under the age of 16 obtain parental consent before they can change their gender at school. 

Polling has shown that across Canada, support for parental rights policies around gender identity is high, especially among parents.

A Leger poll commissioned by SecondStreet.org found that 54% of people living in the Prairie provinces agree that schools should make parents aware that their kids are wishing to change genders or pronouns. Just 20% disagree. 

The poll also found that most people believe schools should be making teaching materials on race and gender available to review for parents ahead of time before they are taught in the classroom.

Despite strong support for parental rights in the province, Manitoba NDP leader Wab Kinew criticized Stefanson’s pledge, calling it a “dog whistle.”

“Heather Stefanson and the PCs are trying to divide Manitobans. In this case, they’re very clearly blowing a dog whistle about LGBTQ folks,” said Kinew. 

In response, PC MLA Rochelle Squires told True North that “unlike Wab Kinew and the NDP, we believe Manitoba parents have the right to be informed of what is going on with their kids in school.”

Squires also said that “as a mother, I remember sending my kids off to school. What they’re learning, how they’re feeling and if they’re struggling— these are things parents need to know about and be involved in.”

Manitoba, like other Canadian provinces, has had controversies related to gender ideology in schools. Earlier this year in Brandon, a School Division voted against a proposal to create a committee aimed at vetting and removing inappropriate queer books made available to children in schools.

The latest poll from Mainstreet Research showed Stefanson’s PCs ahead of the NDP by four points, with the parties receiving 42% and 38% support respectively. 

The Manitoba general election will take place on October 3.

LAWTON: Should Canada boycott the WEF? (feat. Spencer Fernando)

Earlier this week, the media took aim at Pierre Poilievre for vowing to reject the “globalist Davos elites,” after announcing he would ban his cabinet ministers from attending World Economic Forum events. Independent journalist Spencer Fernando joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to discuss the potential implications of this stance, and whether Poilievre’s concerns about the WEF are justified.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

OP-ED: Ottawa and Washington wasted many billions during Covid

In both Canada and the United States, the federal government spent a massive amount of money during Covid. A significant portion of this money was mismanaged, poorly targeted, wasteful or simply excessive. And taxpayers in both countries will bear the cost of this fiscal waste for years to come.

In Canada, the largest federal government pro­grams were the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS), which cost $100.7 billion, and the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and its successor, the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB), which totalled $100.4 billion.

There were several problems with the design of these programs. For instance, money was provided to individuals and businesses that were not in genuine need, and excessive amounts of support went above what was required to stabilize income for Canadians affected by Covid restrictions.

For instance, according to a report by the auditor general (AG), the government paid $4.6 billion in CERB and other benefits to ineligible Canadians. The AG also recommended that the government investigate the nature of another $27.4 billion in Covid spending. Overpayment recipients included 1,522 prisoners, 391 dead people and 434 children too young to be eligible. Finally, the AG found that 51,049 employ­ers, who received $9.9 billion in CEWS payments, did not demonstrate a sufficient revenue drop to be eligible for the subsidy.

A similar story emerged with our southern neighbours. For instance, during the pandemic, the U.S. federal government enacted the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which provided an estimated $800 billion in payroll funds for small businesses, and Economic Impact Payments (i.e. stimulus payments) estimated at $814 billion.  

According to independent analyses, these programs were also poorly designed, excessive and largely ineffective. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) estimated that at least 21.5% of unemployment payments—one in five—were “improper” and cost at least $191 billion.

Another study found that between $335 billion and $395 billion of the $510 billion distributed over the first two phases of the PPP in 2020—equivalent to 66 to 77% of the money—didn’t go towards paycheques but rather to businessowners, shareholders, creditors and others. And that about three-quarters (72%) of PPP benefits went to Americans in the top 20% of household income.

Now, according to a new analysis on Covid spending published by the Fraser Institute, Canada’s federal government spent $359.7 billion while the U.S. federal government spent $5.1 trillion. In both cases, each country financed this spending entirely through borrowing.

The analysis estimates both countries wasted at least 25% of their total Covid spending—$89.9 billion in Canada and $1.3 trillion in America.

As the spending was financed by borrowing, taxpayers in each country will pay higher debt interest costs moving forward. Specifically, over the next 10 years, Canadians will pay an estimated $21.1 billion in interest costs attributable to Covid fiscal waste. Consequently, the total cost of Canada’s Covid fiscal waste will reach an estimated $111.0 billion by the end of 2032/33.

During the same 10-year span, Americans will pay approximately $289.4 billion in federal debt interest payments due to Covid waste, which brings the total cost of COVID fiscal waste to more than $1.56 trillion.

Even though the pandemic has ended, the ongoing costs of wasteful Covid spending are far from over, with Canadian and American taxpayers paying the bill.

Jake Fuss and Tegan Hill are economists at the Fraser Institute.

Half of Canadians don’t have a primary care physician, some have stopped looking

A recent survey found that half of Canadians are without a primary care physician and of those who have one, most say it’s a struggle to acquire timely appointments with them.

One in five respondents also said that they do not have a family doctor in a survey conducted by Angus Reid Institute and the Canadian Medical Association (CMA).

The difference between a family doctor and a primary care physician is that a family doctor treats both children and adults, whereas a primary care physician mostly treats adults with internal medicine.

Of the Canadians who do have a family doctor, 29% said it was difficult for them to get an appointment and 37% said that it will often take days to retain an appointment. A minority of respondents, about 15%, said that getting an appointment with their family doctor was easy.

For those without a family doctor, 26% said they have quit looking altogether, while another 38% responded to having been searching for one for over a year. 

“As a family physician working in Canada, I understand and I know the value of primary care,” said Dr. Kathleen Ross, president of the CMA, “And when you don’t have access to that, there’s delayed diagnosis, difficulty navigating a complex system, patients are left to their own devices to try and sort out their medical concerns. We need to address this urgently.”

In 2022, the CMA released a report that found family doctors have a higher rate of burnout compared to other medical and surgical specialists based on their own responses. A majority of family doctors, 69%, also responded to having a poor work-life balance which affected their mental health due to an increased workload.

It’s estimated that over 6.5 million Canadians do not have a family physician or nurse practitioner that they are able to see when needed, according to a survey conducted by the CMA in April of this year. 

Atlantic Canada appears to suffer the most from a shortage in medical physicians with Nova Scotians reporting the highest number of residents without a family doctor at 67%. New Brunswick fell close behind with 61% of respondents lacking a family doctor or citing difficulty getting an appointment if they do have one. Newfoundland and Labrador responded similarly with 58%.

Quebec had less of a problem with access to family doctors with 26% of respondents without one and Ontario hurt the least by the shortage with only 13% saying they didn’t have one. 

Of those who have immigrated to Canada in the last five years, 44% say they have yet to acquire a family doctor, that number dropped down to 14% for those who have lived in Canada for over twenty years.

This comes at a time when patients who have died while on a waiting list for surgery are up by 49%, according to data analysis from SecondStreet.org. 

SecondStreet also conducted a poll last fall that found 72% of Canadians were open to the idea of private healthcare alternatives. 

I think the average Canadian recognizes now that the health-care system is on its knees,” said Ross, “The cracks in our system are not new and they do run far too deeply for any one solution or any one entity or any one jurisdiction to solve on their own.”

While some respondents believed more funding to the healthcare system would help, it’s, “definitely not the whole solution,” said Ross. 

“Streamlining applications for physicians who want to work in Canada from other jurisdictions could be part of our manpower solution,” said Ross. “But we recognize that when we do that, we’re actually taking manpower from other countries and jurisdictions as well.”

Ross said that the CMA is working on helping physicians gain mobility throughout Canada. 

“Having the ability to get a licence in one province and have that licence portable to other areas across Canada would go a long way to helping us address some of our challenges with staffing in rural and remote areas in particular,” she said.

OP-ED: ChatGPT – Can it be “Red-Pilled” or is its Worldview Baked in for Life?

Source: ChatGPT

After decades in relative obscurity – the domain of mathematicians, computer experts, futurists and military researchers – artificial intelligence has been creeping into public consciousness. More and more products and processes boast of being “AI-enabled.” Reports seep out of China of entire factories and seaports being “run by AI.” Although it all sounds very promising – if slightly menacing – much of the AI discussion has remained vague and confusing to people not of a technical bent. Until one AI creation burst out of this epistemic fog, thrust into the cultural mainstream and proliferated in a digital blur: ChatGPT.

Within weeks of its appearance last November, millions of people were using ChatGPT and today it’s on just about everyone’s lips. Mainly, this is because it’s so darned useful. With ChatGPT (and several similar generative AI systems put out by competitors) the barely literate can instantly “create” university-grade essays or write poetry, the colour-blind can render commercial-grade graphics and even works of art, and wannabe directors can produce videos using entirely digital “actors” while ordering up the needed screenplays. The results are virtually if not completely indistinguishable from the “real thing.” Generative AI is showing signs of becoming an economic and societal disruptor. And that is the other big source of the surrounding buzz.

Useful and creative: ChatGPT and similar AI systems can pump out university-grade essays, write poetry, even create works of art. Shown on top, two images generated by DALL-E; on bottom, an image created using Photosonic. (Sources of images: (top two) Aaron Hertzmann’s blog; (bottom) Whitesonic)

For along with its usefulness, ChatGPT is also deeply threatening. It offers nearly as much potential for fakery as creativity – everything from students passing off AI-generated essays as their own work to activist artists posting a deep-fake video of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg vowing to control the universe. Critics have warned it would facilitate more convincing email scams, make it easier to write computer-infecting malware, and enable disinformation and cybercrime. Some assert using ChatGPT is inherently insincere. Among myriad examples, a reddit user boasted of having it write his CV and cover letters – and promptly wrangling three interviews. A chemistry professor gave himself the necessary woke cred with a canned diversity, equity and inclusion statement for his job application. Two U.S. lawyers were fined for citing non-existent case law that, they maintained, had been entirely concocted by ChatGPT – including fake quotes and citations.

Bias in the machine: One researcher in the U.S. plotted ChatGPT on a political matrix and found it leaned to the left, being against the death penalty and free markets and in favour of abortion, higher taxes on the rich and more government subsidies. (Source of image: David Rozado)

Then there’s the issue of politics. Though its defenders claim ChatGPT merely reflects what is on the internet – meaning it is fundamentally amoral – and others have described it as “wishy-washy,” some commentators claim to have detected a distinct left-wing bias. Asked in one exercise to write an admiring poem about Donald Trump, ChatGPT claimed it couldn’t “generate content that promotes or glorifies any individual.” Yet it had no problem doing just that for Joe Biden, cranking out the cringeworthy lines: Joe Biden, leader of the land,/with a steady hand, and a heart of a man. One U.S. researcher testing ChatGPT’s political leanings found it to be against the death penalty and free markets, and in favour of abortion, higher taxes on the rich and greater government subsidies.

The mushrooming popularity of generative AI tools makes this issue of acute interest – especially given that millions of users won’t be alert to potential political biases or attempts to manipulate them. Finding out where ChatGPT sits on the political spectrum seems rather important. So is determining whether the bot might be amenable to being influenced by its human interlocutors. Can the artificial intelligence, in other words, learn anything and gain any wisdom from the natural kind? The research process underlying this essay aimed to find out.

Read the full op-ed at C2CJournal.ca.

Ottawa Detective was singled out by police leadership for her opposition to Covid mandates

Ottawa Police Service (OPS) leadership singled out a detective because she opposed Covid mandates and was critical of the vaccine, and even forbid her from discussing Covid at work, according to evidence and testimony provided during Detective Helen Grus’ discreditable conduct tribunal, which recessed Friday.

The 20-year OPS veteran and Grus’ legal team say they still lack disclosure for key pieces of evidence to defend against allegations she brought the force into disrepute by probing links between the Covid vaccine and sudden infant deaths, including access to final autopsy reports and other evidence seemingly germane to the charge.

Through the five hearing days that began on August 14, Ottawa Police prosecutor Vanessa Stewart expressed several times that Grus’ admission she breached policy by failing to record her activities was sufficient evidence to find her guilty.

Grus’ admission made during a nearly three-hour compelled statement she gave to Professional Standards Unit (internal affairs) investigator Jason Arbuthnot, in conjunction with testimony from three police witnesses, including Arbuthnot, also revealed superiors did in fact single out Grus.

(Left to right) Detective Helen Grus and her legal team Bath-shéba van den Berg, Blair Ector

Approximately a month before OPS announced its mandatory vaccine policy for all members, the tribunal heard that Grus received a September 9, 2021 email from her commanding officer Sergeant Marc-André Guy forbidding her from discussing Covid or the experimental vaccines at work, or even considering the shots as a possible cause of sudden infant deaths.

Grus’ counsel Blair Ector referred to these constraints as “the Grus rules” and claimed that “those rules directly targeted my client.” The tribunal would later hear evidence that Guy also told Sexual Assault and Child Abuse (SACA) detectives to avoid working alone with Grus and instead use a buddy system to avoid what Sgt. Guy described as “disruptive” conversations about Covid-19.

Grus was also sent to work from the Stittsville police station because other co-workers feared the unvaccinated Grus could infect them with Covid and in Sgt. Guy’s compelled statement to PSU investigator Sgt. Arbuthnot, he suggested that Gru­s “either lied, or found a loophole” to rent a hockey rink in Kemptville for her three boys and his friends to play when minor hockey leagues were requiring participants have two doses of the Covid shots.

Grus’ defence showed that at the time, Grus was able to rent the rink due to local Covid ordinances, which stated participants under the age of 18 did not need to be vaccinated.

The tribunal also learned that in two recent performance reviews of Grus’ SACA work in 2019 and 2021, Sgt. Guy grades her work as exceptional: “Meets and exceeds expectations; exceeds all expectations.” But Grus’ opinions about Covid mandates and vaccines appeared to change his attitude towards her, as noted in Sgt. Guy’s September letter to his underling.

The tribunal has also denied Grus’ defence team of Ector and Bath-shéba van den Berg disclosure of evidence regarding Professional Services Unit’s (PSU) abandoned investigation of the internal leak to CBC, which publicized confidential police information about its original investigation of Grus for insubordination, later changed to discreditable conduct on July 26, 2022.

Lawyers for OPS argued and tribunal trial officer Chris Renwick, a retired Ottawa police superintendent, agreed that the autopsies and CBC leak are inadmissible as evidence for the Police Services Act charge against Grus.

According to testimony thus far, the allegation against Grus hinges on wrong-think and a nexus of policy and paperwork errors: that the SACA unit detective engaged in an unauthorized investigation for personal reasons, then neglected to keep an accurate duty book record of it.

Stewart remained relentless as she was tedious in keeping Police Services Act tribunal within these narrow parameters and Renwick ruled in Stewart’s favour overwhelmingly more often than he did for the defence.

This pattern continued throughout the five-day session: Stewart’s constant objections to evidence presented by Ector and van den Berg, including Pfizer’s own documents admitting its mRNA Covid vaccine technology could harm pregnant women and newborns.

While Ector and van den Berg prevailed on entering the Pfizer documents–contained in multiple volumes of evidence, Grus compiled about the Covid vaccines and related injuries–they were denied entering perhaps the most shocking evidence of all: notice of a 36-hour wiretap of Grus and her family between February 18-19, 2022, granted weeks after she was suspended. 

Renwick agreed with Stewart that ‘section 188’ wiretap provision was likely in relation to a criminal matter while the current tribunal serves an administrative law function.

“Take it to the Minister of the Attorney General (of Ontario),” Stewart said.

Sergeant Guy remained adamant about his position on the vaccine, even with the understanding that there are health risks.

As of publication, Public Health Agency of Canada admits nearly 11,000 “serious adverse events” including 88 miscarriages while Pfizer’s own documents released in 2022 under Texas court order indicate more than 50% of pregnant and nursing mothers and/or their infants suffered adverse events, post-rollout of the fast-tracked drugs.

Nevertheless, Sgt. Guy told the tribunal that as far as he was concerned, “If there was information there was a link (between the vaccines and infant deaths), it’s still not a criminal matter…I would close the case.”

Van den Berg then suggested to the tribunal that because public health officials had vouched for the safety of the vaccines, any harm caused by the drugs could amount to criminal code violations, including criminal negligence or breach of trust by a public officer.

Despite the written warning from Sgt. Guy and an alleged verbal warning from Guy’s superior Staff Sergeant Shelley Rossetti, Grus persisted with her probe and attended two town hall-style meetings hosted by senior ranking police officers, including then-Chief Peter Sloly, on December 13, 2021 and January 15 to share her findings.

Protesters outside of the tribunal.

During those confabs, the tribunal heard that Grus’ raised what she perceived as a spike in sudden infant deaths concurrent with the vaccine rollout, queried how OPS would deal with members who declined mandatory Covid shots, and offered support to fellow members suffering serious adverse events they attributed to the jab.

Contained in a nearly three-hour audio recording of her compelled statement to Sgt. Arbuthnot, Grus can be heard crying as she recounts officers who brought their vaccine injuries to the attention of police brass during the town halls.

“(One member) had heart issues, another swollen lymph nodes the size of a grapefruit,” she says. Answering why she accessed RMS files on one particular infant death file, Grus replies, “I’m not OK with babies dying and not getting answers.”

“Every death is suspicious until you rule all suspicion out,” she told Sgt. Arbuthnot.

On January 30, 2022, Grus unknowingly worked her last day as a member of the SACA unit, the same day she reached out to the father of a deceased child to query the vaccine status of the mother. The tribunal heard testimony from Sgt. Arbuthnot that to his knowledge, neither OPS nor Ontario’s privacy commissioner received a complaint about the query.

Four days later February 4, 2022, OPS issued a ‘chief’s complaint’ for Grus, indicating she was under investigation for accessing the police’s “RMS” database “for the purpose of researching and collecting information involving the death of children. It is further alleged that you have made inquiries as to whether the parents of these children were vaccinated.”

The tribunal also heard evidence that in her two-decade career, Grus became a trusted co-worker that others sought out for advice and that her tenacious investigative skills, like combing through RMS reports without permission of a lead investigator cracked a cold case in 2018, which ended in apprehension and prosecution of a violent child rapist. 

Both van den Berg and Ector argued that Grus was not conducting an “unauthorized investigation” but rather compiling evidence to take up the chain of command, which she attempted during the “chief’s meeting” or OPS town halls.

By February 15, 2022, Sloly had resigned as Ottawa Police Chief and was replaced by Deputy Chief Steve Bell, one day after the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act in response to the Freedom Convoy, which had gridlocked the downtown core since January 29.

On March 28, 2022, seven weeks after Grus was suspended and was under investigation by PSU, local CBC Ottawa published a story based on anonymous leaks from Ottawa police about Grus’, alleging she sought out the vaccination status of as many as nine mothers whose children recently experienced sudden infant death.

Based on the evidence presented to the tribunal and Sgt. Arbuthnot’s testimony, Grus queried the vaccine status of just one mother.  Sgt. Arbuthnot also testified that the CBC report played a role in the decision to lay discreditable conduct charges.

With eight more police witnesses scheduled to undergo cross examination, including two additional police witnesses called by Grus’ defence team and the possibility of five expert witnesses, the tribunal is expected to drag well into 2024.

The tribunal resumes on October 30.

The Rupa Subramanya Show | The woke takeover of Canada (Ft. Ari Goldkind)

In Canada, violent criminals are being released from jail despite being a threat to the public and are often reoffending, leaving many Canadians wondering what is happening to our justice system. The reality is that woke bail reforms implemented by the federal government have enabled criminals to be judged by their skin colour rather than the crimes that they commit.

Meanwhile, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives are being implemented across classrooms in Canada. Far-left activists have full control of what Canadian children are being taught.

What is happening in Canada? Criminal defence lawyer Ari Goldkind joins The Rupa Subramanya Show to discuss the woke takeover of Canada’s institutions and if there’s any hope for the future of our country. Tune into The Rupa Subramanya Show!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE RUPA SUBRAMANYA SHOW

SaskPower says achieving Liberal clean electricity targets “isn’t feasible”

Saskatchewan’s electricity regulator says achieving the Liberal government’s 2035 target year to decarbonize the province’s electricity grid is impossible

According to an interview with the outlet Pipeline Online, SaskPower spokesperson Scott McGregor said that the Clean Electricity Regulations unveiled by Liberal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault last week were unfeasible in every aspect. 

“SaskPower is working as fast as it can to decarbonize the power grid while also providing reliable, sustainable, and cost-effective power,” McGregor told the outlet.  

“We’re committed to achieving a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions power system and we’re on track to do so by 2050 or earlier. We’re also on track to reduce GHG emissions by 50 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030. However, reaching net zero by 2035 isn’t feasible technically, logistically, or financially.”

McGregor said that SaskPower will use the 75-day consultation period to express concerns about the target with the federal government. 

“As stated in the previous note, the CER would require SaskPower to effectively rebuild our entire power system, through retiring the majority of our existing generating units and replacing them with new, ultra-low emitting units or non-emitting energy sources, while also growing the system to support expanding electricity needs that are expected to support growing demand,” explained McGregor.

“Saskatchewan’s power system took nearly a century to build, and with the CER, we are being told to rebuild it with new and non-emitting generation sources, expanding our transmission system, and modernizing our distribution network in a fraction of that time.” 

Both Saskatchewan and Alberta have been outspoken about the impossible expectations placed on the provinces which heavily rely on fossil fuels, coal or natural gas for power. 

Earlier this week, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said she was committed to her province’s original target year of 2050 and would not be complying with the federal government’s draft regulations plan. 

“We will never allow these regulations to be implemented here, full stop,” said Smith.

“If this were to be implemented in Alberta, we’re looking at massive immediate increases to power bills for every Albertan, making life more expensive for families and businesses,” she continued.  

“So let me be clear, any plan that makes electricity more expensive and less reliable is a bad plan and the Clean Electricity Regulations are an exceptionally bad, poorly thought out and illogical plan.”

Electricity costs in Alberta double when compared to last year

Electricity costs have doubled in Alberta from the same time period in 2022, hitting a new record high for the country. Prices have gone up by 128% in the province, driving an 11.7% increase throughout the country, according to Statistics Canada

StatsCan said the high costs are in part due to the hot summer Alberta faced this year, which led to residents consuming more than usual. In addition to the heat, a provincial rebate that was implemented in July of 2022 saw prices drop by 24.4% at the time. However, the rebate ended this past Spring, bringing costs to consumers back up again. 

National Bank of Canada Economist Stegace Marion said he believes it’s the province’s rapidly growing population that is the cause for the increase in costs, not the weather.

“There is much more than a base-year effect at play,” said Marion in a report. “Alberta’s electricity demand reflects not only the summer heat, but also record population growth. Looking ahead, we don’t see much respite for Albertans, given the federal government’s policy decision to decarbonize the electricity grid relatively quickly.”

Alberta has seen a 5% increase in their total population over the last year with around 200,000 newcomers.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government has raised taxes on fossil fuels with plans to achieve net-zero carbon emissions for all electricity generation by 2035 however, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has vowed to “never” implement these federal regulations. 

“We will never allow these regulations to be implemented here, full stop,” said Smith. “If it comes down to it, we are going to do our own thing. We have to.” 

Smith argues that the Trudeau government’s timeline for their target goals is too costly and could cause the province to have blackouts. The plan to have a net zero grid by 2050 is estimated to cost as much as $400 billion dollars. 

Alberta has the largest oil and gas sector in the country and it generates about 89% of the province’s power. 

All wind and solar projects in Alberta have been halted by Smith for the next seven months as the provincial government determines whether their existing base-load power supply will be capable of handling Albertan’s needs in the event of a power outage from wind and solar. 

“The Alberta Electric System Operator asked for us to do a pause to make sure that we could address issues of stability of the grid,” said Smith, adding, “The Alberta Utilities Commission asked us to do a pause while we figured out how we could deal with end of life reclamation.”

Smith’s government is also using the pause to review the effects these projects will have on agricultural and public lands. 

Related stories