fbpx
Monday, September 29, 2025

CAMPUS WATCH: Ontario University says not respecting “ze/zir” pronouns violates human rights policy

Ottawa’s Carleton University says refusing to use one’s preferred “they/them,” “ze/zir,” “xe/xir,” and “e/em” pronouns is a violation of its human rights policy, and has an online portal to report incidents of misgendering.

On its website, Carleton says “one of the easiest ways university staff, faculty, and student leaders can make the spaces they work in feel safer for their trans and nonbinary students and peers is by learning and using their correct pronouns.”

“People often assume they know what someone’s pronouns will be based on their name, the way they dress, or the way they look,” adds Carleton. “This assumption is harmful as it reinforces the idea that people of a certain gender have to look, dress, or act a specific way.”

Carleton says common pronouns include “She/her/hers” and “He/him/his,” as well as “They/them/theirs,” “Ze/zir/zirs,” “Ze/hir/hirs,” “Xe/xir/xirs” and “E/em/eirs.”

“Some people use multiple pronouns. In this case, you can choose any of the pronouns they’re comfortable with or switch back and forth.”

The university also recommends that people use “they/them” pronouns for everyone until they get to know people’s “correct pronouns.” 

Not using one’s preferred pronouns is considered “misgendering” – which Carleton says is a violation of its human rights policy. 

“If someone has told you their pronouns and you repeatedly refuse to use them, you are in violation of the university’s Human Rights Policy.” 

Violating Carleton’s human rights policy can lead to disciplinary action.

“Subject to the provisions of applicable collective agreements and University Personnel Policy, sanctions that may be considered where a complaint is upheld include a letter of reprimand, modification of responsibilities, suspension with or without pay, expulsion or dismissal,” reads the Carleton’s Human Rights Policies and Procedures document. “The University may also order that one party cease to have any contact with the other party, restrict access to University facilities and/or schedule the respondent to participate in discrimination or harassment awareness training.”

Carleton says disciplinary action will depend on the following; the severity of the violation, whether the violation was intentional or unintentional, mitigating or aggravating circumstances affecting either party, whether there was an imbalance of power between the two parties, the respondent’s record at the university, and sanctions applied in similar cases.

Furthermore, a complainant can “request that appropriate remedial measures be taken to correct damage done to his or her career development, academic progress, physical or emotional health, reputation or finances.”

In addition to a strict pronoun policy, Carleton University has an online portal to report incidents of transphobia, including misgendering and “dead naming” (referring to a transgender person by their pre-transition name).

“Have you experienced transphobia at Carleton? Transphobia can take many forms, and can occur via person-to-person interactions or through administrative process containing incorrect or out-of-date information. It could look like picking up a marked assignment listing your legal name instead of your chosen name, a professor or supervisor refusing to use your pronouns, or being told you are using the wrong bathroom,” notes the university.

People can use the online portal to report transphobic incidents they’ve either experienced themselves or that they’ve witnessed.

Gender identity and gender expression were added to the Ontario Human Rights Code in 2012, giving protection to those who use genderless pronouns. Gender identity and gender expression were also added to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act in 2017 when the Trudeau Liberals introduced and passed Bill C-16.

Carleton is not the only Ontario post-secondary institution that requires students, faculty and staff to use one’s neopronouns.

McMaster University in Hamilton considers intentionally using the wrong pronouns as “harassment based on gender identity.” 

Toronto’s Humber College’s Gender Diversity Policy notes that “all individuals within the College community are entitled to be referred to by the gender pronoun(s) of their choice,” and that “Intentionally addressing a trans or non-binary member of the College community by the incorrect name or pronoun is considered to be a form of anti-trans harassment and/or discrimination.”

The University of Toronto says its Policy on Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment has a definition of gender-based harassment that “includes but is not limited to engaging in a course of vexatious comment or conduct related to a person’s sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression that is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome.”

In 2016, University of Toronto psychology professor Dr. Jordan Peterson – who has since become a bestselling author and podcaster – garnered international attention after he said he would not be using preferred “genderless” pronouns.

In a National Post op-ed titled “The right to be politically incorrect”, Peterson said, “I will never use words I hate, like the trendy and artificially constructed words ‘zhe’ and ‘zher.’” 

“These words are at the vanguard of a post-modern, radical leftist ideology that I detest, and which is, in my professional opinion, frighteningly similar to the Marxist doctrines that killed at least 100 million people in the 20th century.”

Carleton University did not return True North’s request for comment in time for publication.

BC Conservatives send BC United to fourth place in weekend by-election

BC United – formerly the BC Liberals – was left licking its wounds on Saturday after finishing fourth in the by-election for Langford–Juan de Fuca, the riding of former premier John Horgan.

Predictably, the riding went to the NDP’s Ravi Parmar who received Horgan’s endorsement, resulting in a 53.3% sweep for the ruling party. 

However, political observers were shocked to see the recently rebranded Conservative Party of British Columbia’s candidate, local realtor and carpenter Mike Harris, place second with 19.9% of the vote. 

Although it was the first time the Conservatives ran a candidate in the riding, they came out ahead of the Green Party – the former second place holders in 2020. 

Green Party candidate Camille Currie came out with 17.6% at the end of the evening while the BC United candidate Elena Lawson only received 8.6%. 

According to Harris, his Conservative campaign received the edge over BC United’s because of the party’s “vague mushy middle platitudes.” 

“Our message resonated. Instead of vague mushy middle platitudes, we took issues head on, like scrapping the carbon tax, hiring back healthcare workers and building a commuter rail in Langford,” Harris told True North. 

“Voters aren’t looking for a candidate and issues built by a committee of consultants, they want authenticity. I offered that to the voters and it’s why I believe the right and centre right chose me over BC United. It’s why I think this is the canary in the coal mine for next year.”

BC United Leader Kevin Falcon himself had also called for a lifting of the vaccine mandate for healthcare workers in the lead-up to the election.

When True North contacted BC United for comment on Saturday’s results, Communications Manager Zoe Frankcom pointed to Falcon’s weekend statement in which he claims that the party’s decision to change its name came with a price

“When we changed our party name just two months ago, we knew that it would take time for voters to learn who we were and that we’d likely pay a price for having a relatively unknown brand in the pending by-elections,” wrote Falcon. 

“That was a price we were prepared to pay in order to immediately get started on building our new brand identity and connecting with people in every corner of the province.”

However, the by-election results for Vancouver–Mount Pleasant showed a better performance for BC United, placing second behind the NDP – where the Conservative’s Karin Litzcke received 4.9% and came in fourth. 

Sources close to the party who wish to stay anonymous told True North that there is a lack of acknowledgement in the significance of the loss from the leader and confusion about BC United’s strategic branding. 

“As a party, we have nothing further to add. We did expect these results given both ridings are historically NDP strongholds and our very recent name-change,” Frankcom re-iterated to True North.

The shocking second-place result for the BC Conservatives is the latest in a trend of successes for the party which a few years ago was only considered a fringe alternative remnant from the province’s annals of history (the last time the party had any real influence provincially was during a coalition in the 1940s.) 

The party currently has one representative in the Legislature, its current leader and former BC Liberal MLA John Rustad who crossed to join the party in February, shortly after he was kicked out of his former party’s caucus by Falcon over controversial climate change comments. 

Following Harris’ performance, Rustad pledged to “run (a) full slate” of candidates and to “unite the right” in the upcoming provincial election next year. 

In fact, the BC Conservatives have run candidates in every by-election for the past year, with a gain in their results in nearly every single riding they contested. 

They first ran BC Conservative candidate Dallas Brodie in Vancouver–Quilchena last April, which is now Falcon’s riding. At that time, Brodie came out with 6.6% of the vote. 

That performance was followed by fielding BC Conservative candidate Harman Bhangu in the Surrey South byelection in September 2022 where he received 12.7% of the vote ahead of Green Party’s Simran Sarai. The riding was won by then-BC Liberal’s Elenore Sturko. 

Besides Falcon’s statement on Saturday, reactions from BC United have been virtually non-existent. 

The Andrew Lawton Show | Trudeau’s internet takeover is well under way

Bill C-18 – one of Justin Trudeau’s internet regulation bills – is now law, prompting Facebook to ban news so as to avoid having to pay out media outlets. While Facebook made the decision to block news links, True North’s Andrew Lawton points out that the whole thing is Trudeau’s fault, as he’s the one who thinks Big Tech needs to subsidize the legacy media.

Plus, 330 active duty and former members of the Canadians Armed Forces have launched a lawsuit against the Canadian military over the vaccine mandate that either coerced vaccination or forced CAF members out of service. Valour Law lawyer Catherine Christensen, who’s representing the soldiers, joins The Andrew Lawton Show to discuss the case.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

Feds propose mandating woke requirements on broadcasters as C-11 becomes law

The Trudeau government is proposing to have the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) impose woke “Equity, Diversity and Inclusion” (EDI) requirements on broadcasters as part of its Sustainable and Equitable Broadcasting Regulatory Framework.

This comes as the government’s controversial internet censorship legislation Bill C-11 received royal assent. 

The changes sought by Heritage Canada seek to ensure “the meaningful participation of Indigenous persons in the broadcasting system,” to support “greater inclusion of equity-seeking groups in the broadcasting system,” to redefine Canadian programs and to create “an equitable, flexible and adaptable regulatory framework” among other things.

“The broadcasting system should serve the interests of all Canadians. Part of this is recognizing and overcoming the challenges faced by certain Canadians, including Indigenous persons, Black and other racialized persons, Canadians of diverse ethnocultural backgrounds, members of OLMCs, persons with disabilities, members of 2SLGBTQI+ communities, women, and members of other equity-seeking groups,” reads the government’s regulatory proposal.

As part of its EDI push, the government wants the CRTC to take into account demographic trends when setting expenditure requirements for broadcasters. The latter would include “data concerning the participation of Black and other racialized persons in the Canadian broadcasting system.”

The CRTC would also have to ensure requirements are created to support black, Indigenous and other “equity-seeking” creators.

Equity spending mandates would need to consider “the challenges and obstacles that (groups) face, including systemic racism and the obstacles faced by those whose first language is not an official language.”

Meanwhile, Indigenous spending mandates would need to take account of “the importance of reconciliation with Indigenous peoples and the challenges and obstacles that they face, including those stemming from historical injustices or the legacies of colonialism.”

The CRTC would also be directed to “meaningfully engage with Black and other racialized communities, OLMCs, and other equity-seeking groups regarding support for the creation, availability and discoverability of programming made by members of these communities and groups.”

A tentative reporting requirement would also see the CRTC publish progress made on its EDI agenda. 

The CRTC has already mandated EDI for Canada’s state broadcaster, CBC.

As part of the CBC’s license renewal, the CRTC is requiring that CBC dedicate a minimum of 30% of its independent English programming spending to producers who “self-identify” as Indigenous, official language minorities, visible minorities, disabled or LGBTQ.

The percentage of dedicated funds will increase to 35% in 2026. 

CBC is also being mandated to track employee demographics, and engage in consultation with “equity-seeking” groups.

In a Jan. 2022 National Post op-ed, former CBC journalist Tara Henley touched on the state broadcaster’s woke EDI agenda, citing it as a reason behind her departure from the network. 

“To work at the CBC now is to accept the idea that race is the most significant thing about a person, and that some races are more relevant to the public conversation than others It is, in my newsroom, to fill out racial profile forms for every guest you book; to actively book more people of some races and less of others,” wrote Henley.

It should, however, be noted that Canadian Heritage referred CBC’s broadcasting license back to the CRTC amid 16 petitions in writing, meaning there is a possibility that the CBC’s EDI mandate could be rescinded. It however remains in effect for now.

Bill C-11, which received Royal Assent in April, expanded the CRTC’s regulatory powers under Broadcasting Act to cover all audiovisual content on the Internet, including content on Tik Tok, YouTube, Spotify, and podcast clients. 

The Bill has been heavily criticized by many, who have said among other things that it is a censorship bill that will harm content creators.

Canadians have until July 25 to make their thoughts known to the government on the proposed Sustainable and Equitable Broadcasting Regulatory Framework. Social media users and creators and their content would be excluded from the proposed regulation.

Heritage Canada told True North it would not be able to submit a comment in time for publication.

Smith renews AHS administrator’s appointment following reduced wait times

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has renewed Alberta Health Services’ (AHS) official administrator Dr. John Cowell’s appointment until the end of the year following a reduction in hospital and ambulance wait times. 

Cowell was appointed to establish a Health Care Action plan in November, weeks after Smith became Premier and dismissed former provincial chief medical health officer Deena Hinshaw. 

In the months since, ambulance wait times in Calgary have been cut by nearly half. 

“Dr. Cowell’s appointment has now been extended to the end of the year to continue the work to further improve health care so Albertans can access it when and where they need it,” Smith wrote on Twitter. 

Cowell was charged with reducing ambulance, emergency room, and surgical wait times and developing long-term reforms through consultations with front-line workers. He reports directly to the provincial Health Minister, a role given to Adriana LaGrange after Jason Copping lost his seat in the May provincial election.

AHS data from May shows massive improvements in wait times since Smith became premier and appointed Cowell.

For example, Calgary ambulances responded to urgent calls in metro and urban areas in 12 minutes on average in April, compared to nearly 22 minutes last November. 

There’s also been a huge improvement in red alerts, which are issued when no ambulances are available to respond to 911 calls in a given area. Calgary spent about four minutes on red alert in April, down from 4.2 hours in November.

The government of Alberta says other improvements include a 17% decrease in wait times at emergency departments, fewer patients waiting longer than clinically recommended for surgeries, and the addition of more nurses, paramedics and other front-line staff.

LaGrange says Albertans can already see tangible results.

“I look forward to working with (Cowell) over the next six months to continue improvements in health care delivery until a permanent governance structure for AHS is developed,” she said in a statement. 

Muslim parents demand end to gender indoctrination during weekend Calgary protest

Keean Bexte / The Counter Signal

A Calgary Muslim community group protested against the presence of gender ideology in the public education system this Saturday.

Several hundred parents and locals joined the YYC Muslims in front of the Calgary Municipal Building. They were also met by a group of counter-protesters.


Among the chief concerns expressed by the protesters were inappropriate content in school lessons around LGBTQ issues and supporting parental rights over education. 

According to one protest organizer, Mahmoud Mourra, gender ideology content being peddled by school boards onto kids is confusing children. 

“(I need) to protect my kids who are underage to have the freedom of choice to decide what they want to decide or do whatever they want to do when they’re eligible to make the right decision,” Mourra told the Western Standard. 

Executive Director of the Alberta Parents’ Union Jeff Park also told the outlet that opposition to certain elements of the curriculum was not political. 

“What we do support is parents having a say, parents having an influence over how their kids will be educated,” said Park. 

“It’s been clear from plenty of the events this month that the balance has shifted.”

Opponents to the protest claimed that LGBTQ education was necessary and saved lives. 

Several shocking stories have emerged from across the country of sexually explicit material being presented by sex educators to children in Canadian schools.

The latest incident involved Planned Parenthood bringing a “sex alphabet” card deck to a Grade 9 classroom in Saskatchewan which featured obscene and pornographic terms relating to sexual fetishes and activities. 

Another educator at an Edmonton school was also recorded berating Muslim students who refused to participate in Pride events. 

Schools in Ontario have also seen mass absences from largely Muslim families as a result of the aggressive push for Pride month celebrations and gender indoctrination. 

Similar protests have also occurred in Ottawa. 

Planned Parenthood suspended from Sask schools after providing explicit content to Grade 9 class

The Saskatchewan government has suspended Planned Parenthood from presenting in the province’s schools after the group made sexually explicit “Sex from A-Z” cards available to grade 9 students.

The cards being made available to kids at Lumsden High School north of Regina caused outrage among concerned parents. 

The province’s education minister Dustin Duncan said on Thursday, “I have directed and will be directing boards of education and administration to suspend for the time being the work in schools of Planned Parenthood as it relates to their involvement in health and wellness courses.”

The “Sex from A-Z” cards in question were developed by the AIDS Committee of Toronto with the assistance from CATIE. They are “intended for gay, bi and queer young people,” and are described as “a fun and accessible resource that facilitates humorous and frank discussion among young people about sexuality and HIV and STI prevention.” 

The cards feature explicit language about sex, sexual acts and certain fetishes.

The U card is for “Urophilia,” which is a urine fetish, while another card discusses defecating on partners. The C card discusses “Cathodilla” which is “being attracted to one’s television set.” Meanwhile, S is for “Snowballing” which the sex card defines as the oral exchange of seminal fluid.

The sex cards also discuss porn. M being for “Money Shot” – “the cum shot in porn movies, when the oiled-up cowboy ejaculates.” The X card is for “XXX” – “a rating for pornography.” 

“There’s a lot of different kinds of porn – there’s something for everyone,” the card claims. 

Other notable cards include the one for R, which discusses “Raw Sex”, and the one for G, which talks about glory holes. The full deck of cards can be found HERE.

Duncan said the cards are “completely inappropriate to be in a classroom” and have “no part of being in a classroom.” The minister noted that the situation upset him both in his capacity as a politician and as a father.

“I want to make sure that the Ministry of Education also is undertaking a review of our own information to ensure that it is appropriate and age-appropriate in particular,” he added.

Duncan doesn’t believe the situation precludes Planned Parenthood from being a part of delivering resources and information to classrooms in the future.

In a statement to CTVNews, the school division said the “inappropriate” sex cards were a secondary resource made available to students at a side table.

“While the presentation itself was aligned with the Saskatchewan curriculum, the presenter brought a secondary resource which was not. This secondary resource, consisting of an A to Z sexual vocabulary, was inappropriate for students.”

“It was not referred to in the actual presentation but was available at a side table after the presentation.”

Meanwhile, Planned Parenthood Regina executive director Julian Wotherspoon told The Canadian Press the suspension of her organization was disappointing. Her organization believes “people of all ages have a right to that information about their sexual health.”

“It’s a little disconcerting that this decision was made so quickly and without consultation with us to establish that this resource was not part of what we were teaching,” said Wotherspoon. “We’re hoping they will follow up with us at some point.”

Wotherspoon added that the Aids Committee of Toronto sex cards are usually not brought into classrooms as they are meant for more mature audiences. Planned Parenthood also apologized for what happened in Lumsden.

Wotherspoon also praised the group responsible for the sex cards as a “reputable source for material that is engaging, informative, sex-positive and stigma-reducing,” adding “We have a lot of their stuff around.”

Duncan claims Planned Parenthood initially did not have any issue with the sex cards. 

“My understanding is the feedback from people that have called my office to say that they have contacted Planned Parenthood and Planned Parenthood didn’t have an issue or didn’t see what the issue was with this material.” 

“Anybody that’s going into a school needs to be a lot more careful than that to ensure that the information they just happen to be bringing along from their office is appropriate.”

Duncan also said he believes parents should be informed when their kids are learning about sex.

This is not the first time that these particular “Sex from A-Z” cards have been given out to students in publicly funded schools. 

Earlier this year, the cards were given out to grade 8 and 9 students by a public health nurse at Fort Nelson Secondary School in Fort Nelson B.C. Cards were also given out to Chilliwack middle school students back in 2015.

The Daily Brief | Toronto voters head to the polls

Source: Elections Canada

Toronto voters head to the polls today to elect a new mayor, as former NDP MP Olivia Chow continues to enjoy a comfortable lead in the polls.

Plus, the National Capital Commission has announced that Ottawa’s Sir. John A. MacDonald Parkway will be renamed Kichi Zībī Mīkan, a move that is being criticized as “another ill-advised act of moral cowardice.”

And the Alberta RCMP are continuing to pursue charges and investigations after Premier Danielle Smith said the province would hire arson investigators following an unprecedented wildfire season.

Tune into The Daily Brief with Andrew Lawton and Lindsay Shepherd!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAILY BRIEF

Toronto goes to the polls to pick its next mayor as Chow’s lead narrows

As Toronto voters head to the polls to pick the city’s next mayor, Olivia Chow’s resounding lead in the opinion polls has been narrowing as support for Ana Bailão surges in the final weeks of the race.

Of the 102 candidates that will be listed on voters’ ballots, 7 have distinguished themselves as the race’s competitive candidates who have any chance at winning. 

Chow has been the person to beat this election, having consistently led all major polling companies’ opinion polls by double digits, reaching support in the low to mid-30s. 

However, the former NDP MP’s support has been slipping the recent weeks as Bailão’s support surged after a last-minute endorsement from the popular former mayor John Tory. 

Tory said that Bailão is the candidate who can best tackle the city’s challenges and called his former deputy mayor a “fighter,” a “negotiator,” and a “leader,” who “can deliver on the promise of Toronto.”

Forum Research’s final poll shows Chow at 29% while Bailão has 20% support. 

In the last month of the campaign, Mark Saunders has tried to position himself as the anti-Chow candidate – the only one who can win the election and stop her from making traffic congestion, crime and affordability worse.

However, this has not translated into a corresponding bump in support, as Saunders has remained flat at around 15% support. 

Anthony Furey – who is currently on leave as True North’s VP for editorial and content – has challenged Saunders, bringing centre-right policy ideas to the ballot, flanking the former police chief on the crime issue, drug injection sites, homeless encampments, and bike lanes. 

Forum placed Furey at 11%, down two points compared to last week’s poll. 

Lagging candidates include Josh Matlow and Mitzie Hunter polling at 8% and 5% respectively, as their progressive campaigns have been unable to siphon off support from Chow and the slightly more centrist Bailão.

Mainstreet Research pegs Chow at 34%, Bailão close behind with 25%, Saunders at 11%, Furey at 10%, and Matlow and Hunter battle it out for fifth at 7% and 5% respectively. 

Voters are able to begin voting today at 10 am, and voting will continue until polls close at 8 pm. 

Toronto was thrown into a mayoral byelection just a year after a scheduled municipal election saw former mayor Tory win a resounding victory for a third term. However, Tory’s tenure was cut short after a story in the Toronto Star reported that he had been having an affair with a city employee, compelling him to resign. 

Candice Malcolm personally endorses Anthony Furey for mayor of Toronto

True North’s founder and editor-in-chief Candice Malcolm personally endorsed Anthony Furey for Toronto’s mayoralty after the Toronto Sun’s editorial board endorsed Mark Saunders.

Furey – who is currently on leave as True North’s VP of editorial and content – was formerly the Toronto Sun’s national comment editor, working for Postmedia for 12 years. Despite this, The Sun’s editorial board endorsed Saunders, who they claim can keep citizens safe and prevent property taxes from skyrocketing.

Malcolm called the Sun’s endorsement of Saunders “shameful,” slamming the paper for failing to support their colleague of over a decade.

“This is shameful. The Sun cannot even muster the courage to endorse their own man, Anthony Furey,” said Malcolm.

“Furey edited the paper and worked for the company for over a decade and this is how they repay him? Sad. Pathetic. Wrong.”

Malcolm went on to wholeheartedly personally endorse Furey’s campaign, commending him for speaking the truth and crafting a high-quality platform.

“Anthony Furey is the best candidate – best ideas, most energy, most passion & a true outsider who will shake up the establishment. He’s the sole candidate who addresses the issues the Toronto Sun covers & purports to care about. I’m stunned they didn’t endorse him.”

“Not once since I started True North in 2016 have I made a political endorsement. But after the Sun fiasco, I’ve changed my mind. This time, it’s different. I (personally) fully and unreservedly endorse Anthony Furey for mayor of Toronto. He’s the mayor Toronto needs.”

Furey has campaigned on a platform of scrapping Toronto’s bike lanes, ending the city’s drug supply program, hiring 500 more police officers and instituting a hiring freeze on bureaucrats. 

The Toronto Sun encouraged Saunders to incorporate many of Furey’s ideas into his platform if elected mayor, lauding Furey for his ideas to tackle the city’s homelessness crisis and deal with homeless encampments. 

Related stories