fbpx
Thursday, September 25, 2025

BONOKOSKI: Trudeau finally addresses Canada’s illegal immigration crisis

US President Joe Biden’s visit to Ottawa helped the Trudeau government address one of its biggest political blights on the government’s immigration file – the closing of Roxham Road.

During the first stage of the U.S. president’s first visit to Canada, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau confirmed Canadian law enforcement authorities will now reject migrants at illegal crossings, including the road intersecting Quebec and New York State, which led to 40,000 migrants jumping into Canada last year.

Roxham Road, if allowed to continue, would have been a huge election issue for the Trudeau Liberals, especially since Quebec Premier Francois Legault has stated on many occasions that Quebec cannot afford the crossing’s burden financially or socially.

The deal would apply the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) across the entire Canada-United States border. It would close a loophole which allowed migrants arriving in Canada from the United States between official ports of entry to make asylum claims. Canadian authorities patrolling the border are now able to turn asylum seekers back to the United States.

The agreement, which came into force in 2004, stipulated that asylum seekers must make their claims in the first safe country they reach.

The deal also allows American authorities to turn back asylum seekers travelling to the United States from Canada.

“To address irregular migration, we are expanding the Safe Third Country Agreement to apply not only at designated ports of entry, but across the entire land border, including internal waterways, ensuring fairness and more orderly migration between our two countries,” said a release the PMO.

In other words, the deal closes a loophole which allowed migrants to make asylum claims between ports of entry thereby ending the jumping of the queue.

Opposition parties and the Quebec government have pressured the Trudeau government on Roxham Road. Both Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Quebec Premier Legault have called for the irregular border crossing’s closure following a spike in asylum seekers this year.

The loophole became a source of tension between Canada and the United States due to a spike in migrants arriving in Canada via Roxham Road. The road, about 50 km south of Montreal, runs from Quebec to New York State. Of 39,540 asylum seekers arriving in Canada illegally by land last year, 39,171 came to Quebec, according to government data.

As part of the deal, Canada has agreed to accept 15,000 migrants from the Western Hemisphere through official channels over the next year.

Amnesty International, a human rights advocacy group, condemned the changes to the STCA.

“Closing Roxham Road by extending the Safe Third Country Agreement is an affront to the rights of refugee claimants seeking safety in Canada,” Ketty Nivyabandi, secretary general of Amnesty International in Canada, said in a media statement.

“People fleeing their home countries, and then risking their lives by crossing irregularly into Canada, would not take such drastic steps if the United States’ immigration and refugee-protection system could be counted on to respect migrants’ rights.”

Nivyabandi said it’s “unconscionable” that the government would make the change while the Supreme Court is reviewing the STCA.

Biden and Trudeau said in a joint statement that they anticipate the agreement “will deter irregular migration at our shared border.”

Nivyabandi disagreed, saying the change will only push migrants to attempt to cross at more remote and dangerous locations along the border, or force them to rely on smugglers.

Meanwhile, asylum seekers warned by police they could be sent back to the United States as of midnight Saturday continued to walk into Canada through the unofficial border crossing at Roxham Road.

Danielle Smith takes aim at Trudeau and Notley

True North’s Andrew Lawton caught up with Premier Danielle Smith following her speech at the Canada Strong and Free Networking Conference in Ottawa for a wide-ranging discussion about Alberta’s priorities.

Smith took aim at the Trudeau government’s climate change agenda and “just transition,” which she argues unfairly targets Alberta. She explains how the Alberta government is responding to the federal government’s demands and what the oil and gas sector is already doing for the environment.

Plus, with a looming spring election, Andrew wants to know who Smith considers to be her main opponent – Alberta NDP leader Rachel Notley or Prime Minister Justin Trudeau?

LEVY: Parents stand up to school board’s woke antics

The woke trustees on the Waterloo Region District School Board were left virtually speechless last week by a series of parents concerned with the board’s policies on gender ideology and the age-inappropriate books contained in school libraries.

At one point, radical trustee and former chairman Scott Piatkowski suggested that trans activist Julia Malott was in the “minority” in the trans community for taking the position that parents need to be kept in the loop about a student’s wish to socially transition (which includes, changing his or her pronouns).

“I’m blessed to have a number of trans people in my life that I’ve spoken to on issues like this,” he lectured Malott, who transitioned at age 28. “Their point of view is quite different than yours.

The meeting erupted into chaos as Piatkowski — who is being sued for defamation to the tune of $1.7-million by 20-year teacher Carolyn Burjoski — put his foot in his mouth yet again.

Comments of “unacceptable” ensued.

“There is a lot of hate towards transgendered people who don’t follow the exact kosher script,” Malott told the arrogant trustee, adding that most with her point of view don’t want to come in and speak.

(Piatkowski, sporting an N95 mask, didn’t engage in any follow-up).

Malott told trustees it is not the responsibility of the school to decide whether children should transition and to hide a student’s wish to transition from his or her parents.

“This overstep of parental rights is dangerous and irresponsible,” she said.”How will we ensure appropriate medical supports are available to students?”

She said there are many cases showing a relationship between gender dysphoria and autism, borderline personality disorder and other underlying mental issues.

Not telling parents will result in “isolating” students from their families and the medical community they need, she added.

“We must do better,” she said. “Transition may not be right for some, transition may be right for others,” she said.

David Todor, a Waterloo father of two young girls, returned to the board to speak after upsetting trustees and the board’s education director so much in January, they issued an open letter about his speech.

The letter bordered on defamatory, and to this the board’s education director Jeewan Chanicka has never taken responsibility for approving it or being behind it.

To accentuate his concerns about the age-inappropriate literature on the board’s approved reading lists, Todor read from a highly controversial and sophisticated book called “Identical,” which covers themes of incest and rape.

When he read a passage from the book depicting a father’s (a district court judge) sexual abuse of his young daughter, masked trustee Kathleen Woodcock tried to stop him, expressing concern that his reading was “against their human rights policy.”

Ironically she claimed it might “cause harm” to those watching. 

After some confusion, the chairman allowed Todor to continue his “quote.”

Another trustee, Mena Waseem, who repeatedly appears on Zoom, kept insisting Todor provide the context in which the passage was written.

“I believe it’s useful to know the context,” she said, not bothering to simply look up the book and discover the background for herself

The book itself is recommended for kids at minimum 14 years and older.

Todor referred to the fact that teacher Carolyn Burjoski was shut down by then chairman Piatkowski in January of 2022– amid accusations of transphobia – for reading from similar but not as explosive books contained in elementary school libraries.

He reiterated that asking his daughter about their sexual orientation is none of the board’s business.

“You Intimidate parents’ concerns by labelling opposing discussion as hate speech,” he said, noting that Chanicka refuses to be accountable for the school board’s policies on gender ideology.

“When will the board shift the focus from sexuality and political nonsense to teaching academics?”

The trustees – or at least most of them – came across as downright idiotic at last week’s meeting, not that they see themselves.

The deputations laid bare how ignorant they truly are about transgendered people and how they merely follow a woke script to make themselves look good.

In fact, the chairman asked the name of the book after Todor had named it – suggesting to me that they don’t even listen until something proves to challenge their woke view of the world.

It also showed how little they know about the highly sexualised books available in school libraries–that they blindly trust the lead and the assurances of activist Chanicka, who has no credentials, in my view, to lead a school board.

In fact, the Old Guard socialists vehemently resisted any attempts to make the book selection process open and transparent, once again suggesting they insist on propping up the potentially harmful impact of Chanicka’s and his bureaucrat’s choices.

Trustee Mike Ramsay suggested that stopping Todor’s reading speaks to the (lack of) maturity amongst his colleagues.

He said the Human Rights Code is constantly used instead of being transparent.

“It’s very easy to throw that out and refuse to answer legitimate questions to be answered,” he said.

He’s right.

The board voted 6-4 against giving Todor answers to his questions.

Instead, they grilled him on the book in a concerted attempt to attack his integrity for being against the book’s highly controversial themes.

What the woke sheep on the board – like Woodcock and Piatkowski – refuse to recognize is that parents are starting to speak up and they have the right to get answers without being labelled as hateful or transphobic.

These parents are not going away. 

BONOKOSKI: Canadians deserve a public inquiry into Chinese interference

The electoral riding of Don Valley North is a melting pot.

According to the 2021 Canada Census, it is 29.2% Chinese, 25.1% White, 13.8% South Asian, 7.9% West Asian, 5.1% Black, 5.0% Filipino, 3.9% Korean, 2.5% Arab, 2.2% Latin American, and 1.2% Southeast Asian

Thirty-one languages are spoken.

What makes it stand out in recent days, however, is that its federal member of Parliament Han Dong and his provincial counterpart Vincent Ke have both left their party’s caucus to sit as Independents after being labelled by anonymous CSIS operatives as part of the Chinese election interference.

Coincidence? One would think not.

Both are Chinese nationals. Both have resigned with great fanfare—Dong from the federal Liberals; Ke from the provincial Progressive Conservatives—to fight for the cleansing of their names.

Dong got jumped again on Wednesday when the same CSIS sources accused him via the media of visiting the Chinese consulate in Toronto to beg for no early release of the Two Michaels, the China-jailed Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig.

An early release would favour the federal Conservatives, Dong allegedly argued to Han Tao, China’s consul-general in Toronto.

At least that’s the spilled story.

The Two Michaels, as they grew to be known, were scooped off the streets of China as a quid pro quo for Canada arresting Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou on behalf of the Americans for allegedly courting technological deals with Iran.

They spent 1,019 days in Chinese prisons.

Ford revealed this week that his former chief of staff, Jamie Wallace, was briefed by CSIS about Ke. The Ontario government said it requested the briefing after Global News first asked Ford’s office about allegations concerning Ke.

The Premier’s office confirmed the briefing happened last fall. Ke left the PC caucus on March 10, when Global reported on allegations that. Ke was part of a Beijing-led effort to interfere with the 2019 federal election, which he denies.

Ke has called the allegations “false and defamatory,” but said he does not want to be a distraction for the government.

Ford’s office called the sparse and “very secretive.”

“It’s always sensitive so it’s kind of tough to answer all the details but it was quick. I was briefed through my staff and let’s see what happens here,”  Ford said.

“With CSIS, everything’s a big secret. They don’t give you a proper briefing in my opinion. They will say a few comments and ‘We can’t tell you; we can’t tell you; we can’t tell you.’ Well they’re in charge of national security so let them continue on with their investigation. We’ll co-operate any way we can and let them do their job. But they’re very secretive.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has ordered two closed-door probes into Chinese election interference that will be reviewed by special rapporteur David Johnston, the former governor-general.

Ford declined to say whether he supports a public inquiry into the matter.

“That’s up to the federal government if they want to do that. I can tell you one thing, what people want, doesn’t matter provincially, federally or municipally, they want transparency in their elections, they don’t want any inference from any outside source,” he said.

 “And that’s what we believe in and we’ll always fight for transparency, when it comes to anything, including elections.”

Arpan Khanna wins hotly contested CPC nomination race in Oxford

Following a highly publicized nomination race, Arpan Khanna will represent the Conservatives as the candidate for the Conservative stronghold of Oxford in a by-election later this year.

Khanna, who ran as a Conservative candidate in Brampton North in 2019 and served as Poilievre’s Ontario co-chair in last year’s Conservative leadership race, was up against retired Conservative MP Dave MacKenzie’s daughter, Deb Tait, and Toronto political strategist Rick Roth.

Following the Conservative party’s disqualification of pro-life candidate Gerrit Van Dorland and allegations of election meddling, all eyes were on the riding of Oxford to see who Conservative members would pick to be their candidate.

Earlier this month, the Conservatives disqualified Van Dorland – a long-time Conservative activist from Otterville, Ontario. 

According to a statement from pro-life political action group RightNow, Van Dorland was targeted for his beliefs.

“The party gave no reason for Gerrit’s disqualification,” said an email sent by RightNow co-founder Scott Hayward to the organization’s supporters. “The real issue is that Gerrit is pro-life and more than likely to win the nomination.”

A Conservative spokesperson told True North Van Dorland was disqualified for failing to disclose details in his application.

“Although the Conservative party does not typically discuss internal party matters, we are aware of information being circulated regarding the nomination contest in Oxford, Ont. that requires clarification and context,” the spokesperson said. “Gerrit Van Dorland, a nomination applicant in Oxford, was disqualified from standing in a nomination race by the party’s National Candidate Selection Committee (NCSC) due to a failure to comply with the obligation to disclose required information during the candidate application process. The recommendation to disqualify this individual was first made by the local Candidate Nomination Committee.”

The party did not specify what details Van Dorland allegedly did not include in his application.

Following Van Dorland’s disqualification, Khanna and Roth expressed disappointment in the party’s decision. Roth alleged Van Dorland’s removal “sets a dangerous path of ignoring grassroots voices for a preferred parachute candidate,” referring to Khanna. 

On Thursday, the Hill Times reported that a complaint was filed with Elections Canada regarding hundreds of alleged fraudulent members eligible to vote in the nomination race. 

Oxford has 6,000 Conservative members after the cut-off date to vote in the nomination. A source connected to the Khanna campaign revealed that approximately 2,700 votes were cast and Khanna won on the first ballot.

The Oxford by-election must be called by July 29.

Majority support income-based speeding tickets: poll

The majority of Canadians support a new model of issuing speeding tickets, which increases charges based on the offender’s income, according to a new survey.

The Research Co. survey released Friday shows 65% of Canadians support a “progressive punishment” approach to speeding tickets – increasing the fine based on each offender’s level of disposable income and how much the offender exceeded the speed limit.

The idea was least popular among families earning more than $100,000 annually. The families were 10% more likely than the national average (24%) to answer in opposition.

The majority of Canadians had similar ideas about parking tickets.

In the survey, 58% supported the same progressive punishment model for parking tickets, based on income and days the ticket was outstanding.

Support for a progressive speeding-ticket model was highest in the provinces of British Columbia and Quebec, and lowest in Alberta.

The online survey of 1,000 Canadian adults was completed between Mar. 18th and Mar. 20th, 2023. It has an accuracy margin of within +/-3.1%, 19 times out of 20.

Alberta Roundup | Smith has a plan to win in big cities

This week on the Alberta Roundup with Rachel Emmanuel, Rachel discusses Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s plans to win big cities like Edmonton and Calgary in the upcoming spring election.

Also on the show, Rachel explains what provincial governments said to Canada’s top court this week as they argued against Bill C-69.

Finally, an Alberta cabinet minister has announced they won’t seek reelection this spring.

Tune into the Alberta Roundup now!

Many Canadians say its OK to lie in relationships

Nearly half of Canadians say it’s OK to lie to protect a relationship, according to a new survey.

Research Co. surveyed 1000 Canadians, finding that 45% said it’s OK to protect a relationship with lies, such as by withholding information that may cause anger or anxiety.

“Practically half of men (49%) see no problem with fibbing in order to protect a relationship, compared to 40% among women,” the report said.

Not only do many Canadians believe it’s sometimes OK to lie, many wish they’d been lied to at certain times throughout their lives.

Roughly half said there was a moment in their past in which they wished the truth had been concealed.

While respondents picked and chose different situations they thought it was appropriate to lie in, the group ironically held on to the ideal that no person should ever lie.

A strong majority (74%) said that people should always tell the truth, no matter the consequences.

The survey also revealed that those who voted NDP in the last federal election were least likely to say people should always be truthful (65%), compared to 80% of those who voted Conservative or Liberal.

The Research Co. survey was conducted online between Mar. 10th and 12th, and holds an accuracy margin of 3.2%, 19 times out of 20.

Shareholder calls on three banks to re-invest in oil and gas

An energy sector advocate is petitioning three major banks to invest in oil and gas – and to trash their Net Zero commitments.

Advocate corporation InvestNow filed shareholder proposals to the banks of CIBC, TD, and BMO, using its partial ownership to request that the banks re-invest in Canada’s energy sector.

“If banks continue on the divestment path from the sector, we will see more hardship for everyday Canadians,” a Wednesday statement from InvestNow wrote. “Our economy will be hobbled, factories will shut down, people will lose their jobs, [and] energy poverty will grow.”

Executive director Gina Pappano said each banks’ plan to cut finances to the energy sector is an attack on a Canadian cornerstone.

“It means threatening the livelihoods not just of the hundreds of thousands across Canada who work in the sector, but the millions – that is all of us – who depend on it.”

“It’s time for the banks to stop their demonization of and attack on the oil and gas sector.”

In 2021, BMO bank declared its “Net Zero ambition,” including that its finances will be exclusively for Net Zero emissions by 2050. 

TD Bank and CIBC made similar commitments.

While statements from each bank said change is necessary, Pappano thinks Canada’s rapid action will be counterproductive.

“The growing demand for oil and gas around the world will be met by other, less responsible, less environmentally friendly suppliers.”

In 2019, the Government of Canada reported that Canada represented 1.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

True North Update from the Canada Strong and Free Conference

Some of the biggest names in conservative politics were at this year’s Canada Strong and Free Conference in Ottawa, including former Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.

True North’s Andrew Lawton, Rupa Subramanya and Anthony Furey gives an update from the conference and have a discussion on a wide-range of issues, including the conservative movement in Canada, how Canadians can push back against the radical left and much more.

Tune into a special True North update from Ottawa!

Related stories