fbpx
Sunday, September 14, 2025

Islamist cleric tells congregation not to vote for “filthy” candidates who support “homosexuality, zionism”

Canadian Islamist and cleric Younus Kathrada told his congregation to avoid voting in the upcoming election or face divine judgement, according to a clip posted by the Middle East Media Research Institute. 

In a sermon, Kathrada claimed that all Jews and Christians were “evil” and candidates were “filthy” for supporting homosexuality and Israel.  

“He or she approves of homosexuality,” said Kathrada, “which Allah declared forbidden from above the seven heavens. You think that they want good for you? I already told you what Allah said: “Never will they [Jews and Christians] be pleased with you.” They will continue to oppose you. You are fighting a losing battle. They are all evil. Every single one of them.”

Kathrada also warned those in the audience that they will have to face divine judgement for having practiced their democratic right.

“On Judgment Day, you will stand before Allah and be asked about it. If you plan on voting… Ask yourself, prepare the answer first – what am I going to tell Allah when Allah asks me: “You voted for that filthy non-Muslim. Why?” said Kathrada. 

Earlier this year, Kathrada appeared in another video at the Dar Al-Ihsan Islamic Centre in Victoria telling Muslim youth that wishing Christians “merry Christmas” was a sin that was worse than murder.

When confronted about the bigoted comments, Kathrada was unapologetic.

“I stand by what I said and I will not retract unless I am proven to be wrong. What you see is what you get, unedited, uncut,” said Kathrada in a follow-up statement. 

Kathrada has been denounced for past anti-semitism during his speeches and sermons and was once investigated by the RCMP for hate crimes. Kathrada was alleged to have called Jews “brothers of the monkeys and the swine” and said that Allah called for Muslims to kill them. 

Other Muslim religious leaders have condemned Kathrada’s views and claimed that his comments are not representative of a majority of practicing Muslims.

“The word Muslim should not be mentioned here. If he is a religious leader, he does not represent Muslims in Canada,” said Richmon Mosque’s Imam Zijad Delic.

The South-African born cleric has also encouraged Muslims to practice jihad and martyrdom for their beliefs. 

Brampton Liberal candidate accused of accepting $50,000 in illegal cash donations

A source who volunteered for Brampton North Liberal candidate Ruby Sahota in 2015 says Sahota personally stapled illegally donated campaign cash to membership applications in the lead-up to her nomination.

The source, who spoke to True North on the condition they not be named due to fear of retribution said that thousands of dollars in $5 and $10 bills were attached to Liberal Party of Canada membership forms by Sahota and a volunteer. Sahota’s campaign then submitted these applications to the Liberal party.

Sahota won the nomination, then went on to win her seat for the Liberals in 2015. She’s now seeking re-election.

True North has also obtained court documents alleging Sahota’s 2015 nomination and general election campaigns illegally received $50,000 in cash from a restaurant owned by Sahota’s family, as well as $17,000 in undeclared expenses incurred on the restaurant’s credit card.

The allegation appears in a divorce application filed by Sahota’s former sister-in-law, Satinder Kaur Johal, against Sahota’s brother, Rajveer Singh.

Also named as respondents in the file are Sahota’s and Singh’s parents, Harbans Singh and Surinder Kaur Singh, because of their involvement with the restaurant and other commercial ventures. 

Johal and Singh, who are now divorced, owned a Brampton Fionn MacCool’s franchise with Harbans Singh.

“In or around 2014, my husband’s sister, namely, Rabinder Ruby Sahota, decided to run as a nomination candidate for the Liberal party in Brampton-North (sic),” Johal alleges in the court filing. 

“My husband, without my consent gave her $10,000.00 for her nomination membership and spent $40,000.00 for her election. This money came by way of cash transactions at the restaurant as well as payment through his father’s MBNA Credit Card in the amount of $17,000.00. Even that amount was paid from the restaurant during the marriage.”

The case never went to trial and these allegations have not been proven in court. 

Sahota won the Liberal nomination at a March 2015 meeting that saw more than 3,700 Liberal members of Brampton North show up to vote. Reports at the time said this set a new record for the most members to vote at a nomination meeting in Ontario. 

While the Liberal party removed its membership fee in 2016, at the time of Sahota’s nomination it cost $10 to join the party: all membership forms required would-be members to affirm they were paying with personal funds and would not be reimbursed.

Donations to nomination campaigns are capped at $1,600 per person. Corporate donations are illegal, and all contributions over $200 must be publicly disclosed.

Sahota’s 2015 nomination campaign’s return filed with Elections Canada says the campaign spent $16,827. Most of this went towards advertising and bulk mailing, though a $3,616 payment to Sahota’s father, Harbans Singh, is listed only as “VARIOUS.”

The campaign claimed just under $22,000 in monetary and non-monetary contributions from 17 donors.

True North has chosen not to publish the entire court record because it contains a number of family details not relevant to Sahota or her campaigns.

Numerous inquiries to Sahota’s personal email address and campaign media representative went unanswered, as did text messages, phone calls and an email to Sahota’s brother.

Johal, who works as a lawyer in Brampton, declined to comment.

FUREY: Are we going to see a Liberal-NDP Coalition?

Jagmeet Singh has been floating the idea of a Liberal-NDP coalition if Andrew Scheer forms a minority government on Monday.

Although this technically “legal”, this is something that hasn’t been done in Canadian politics in a century.

True North’s Anthony Furey discusses why a coalition goes against Canadian tradition.

Liberals reveal they will regulate social media content if re-elected

The Liberal party has told an advocacy group that it will regulate social media content if re-elected.

The response came after the Ukrainian Canadian Congress sent a questionnaire to all federal parties, which included a question on “online hate and disinformation.”

In its response, the Liberal party made it clear that social media companies will have to abide by government “hate speech” rules or face consequences.

“To help stop the proliferation of violent extremism online, we will move forward with new regulations for social media platforms starting with a requirement that all platforms remove illegal content, including hate speech, within 24 hours or face significant financial penalties,” the Liberal response said.

“This will also include other online harms such as radicalization, incitement to violence, exploitation of children or creation or distribution of terrorist propaganda.”

The Conservatives, the Greens, and the NDP all told the Ukrainian Canadian Congress that they would not create additional internet regulations.

Internet censorship and regulation has been floated by the Trudeau government since first being elected in 2015.

In May, Justin Trudeau warned of vague “financial consequences” for social media companies that fail to censor content to the government’s liking.

“They have to step up in a major way to counter disinformation and if they don’t, we will hold them to account and there will be meaningful financial consequences,” he said.

The plan the Liberals announced later in May for a “digital charter” to regulate the internet remains equally broad and vague, leading to questions about the extent a digital charter could be used for censorship.

Liberal concern about “disinformation” and fake news appears to only slanted towards one side of the political spectrum, with the government spending $366,985 to study right-wing extremist beliefs without apparent concern about left-wing extremism.

Some commentators are suggesting that internet censorship is already on the rise.

One example of which is Press For Truth, a conservative-libertarian Facebook page that got shut down without warning in 2018 despite being well-established with over 350,000 followers.

The Liberal party ended its response to the Ukrainian Canadian Congress by vowing to  prosecute those who spread “hate speech” without going into details.

“Because hate speech continues to harm people offline as well, we will also look at options for civil remedies for victims of hate speech,” the response said.

This week’s FAKE NEWS with Candice Malcolm

The CBC is suing the Conservative Party but don’t worry they insist that they’re neutral and very fair. 🤔

Surprise! The Toronto Star endorses Justin Trudeau! (they get $115,000 a week from the Trudeau government) 🤷

Meanwhile, the media party loses their mind about the possibility of a Scheer government and pretends parliamentary tradition doesn’t exist.

True North’s Candice Malcolm dissects this week’s most biased news.

Former Liberal MP says Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen “must resign”

A former Liberal MP has written an editorial calling for the immediate resignation of Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen, claiming the minister mislead applicants of an immigration pilot program. 

Former Immigration Minister and five-term Liberal MP Joe Volpe, who now runs the Corriere Canadese, an Italian language newspaper based out of Toronto, has published multiple editorials denouncing the Liberal cabinet minister.

“Even in the dying days of the 2019 election campaign, Ahmed Hussen’s questionable immigration policies and programs are taking their toll on Canadian residents who placed their trust in his “vision” and his Pilot Programs,” Volpe wrote in an editorial last Thursday.

Volpe slammed Hussen for allegedly misleading undocumented immigrants in the construction sector on a pilot program that would give them a path to legal residency.

Volpe, himself an Italian immigrant, also accuses Liberal MPs of spreading misinformation on the pilot program and bizarrely claiming the program never existed. This, after former Liberal immigration minister John McCallum publicly discussed the same program. 

“Several Toronto area MPs, Julie Dzerowicz and Peter Fonseca among them (although the Tribunal did not name them in its findings), were active in promoting the Pilot Project,” he wrote.

Volpe has become a vocal critic of the Trudeau government since leaving politics, having recently criticized the government for giving generous clipping contracts to the mainstream media.

Hussen, MP for York South-Weston, has been one of the most outspoken members of Trudeau government, calling his critics “intolerant” and divisive” when they disagree with his politics.

In June, Hussen raised eyebrows by suggesting that refugees should be admitted as economic migrants, while at the same time advocating for a dramatic increase in the number of refugees accepted to Canada.

“My wish is that we continue to increase levels in our immigration system for refugees. I’m very open to saying that, and I will do whatever I can, in whatever position I am in, to continue to push for higher refugee numbers every single year,” Hussen said. This flies directly in the face of public opinion, where the majority of Canadians want fewer refugees and lower immigration levels. 

In July, while thousands of asylum seekers entered Canada through the United States, Hussen called Ontario Social Services Minister Lisa Macleod “not Canadian” for arguing that her province should not solely responsible for covering the costs of housing asylum seekers.

Volpe ended his latest editorial by saying that Hussen and the other MPs who pretended the pilot project did not exist should resign.

“If they were honourable individuals, they would resign their public office and forgo the effort to seek re-election.”

Green advocacy group says $171,999 pro-carbon tax ad campaign “not partisan”

The commissioner of Canada’s elections won’t “speculate” as to whether a six-figure sum spent advertising pro-carbon tax messages to Canadians violates the new third party rules, True North has learned. 

Canadians for Clean Prosperity, a green energy advocacy group, has put $171,999 into Facebook advertising since June, urging Canadians to vote against political parties opposed to a carbon tax. Its posts also make clear that the Conservative Party of Canada is the only one of the four major parties against a carbon tax.

Facebook’s new ad registry contains 1,012 separate advertisements from Clean Prosperity’s Fair Path Forward page. Most of the advertising ceased in early September, though $151 was spent promoting ‘get out the vote’ posts between Oct. 9 and Oct. 15, the registry shows.

Neither Canadians for Clean Prosperity nor Fair Path Forward is registered with Elections Canada as a third party, a requirement for organizations or individuals that spend more than $500 engaging in partisan activities, election surveys, partisan advertising or election advertising.

Clean Prosperity’s executive director says the organization’s activities fall outside of the third party legislation.

“Clean Prosperity and Fair Path Forward both did not register with Elections Canada, as the content of our ads is not partisan,” Michael Bernstein said in an email to True North. “Our ads, which you can see in the Facebook Ads library, have been focused on issues – namely carbon taxes and climate change. The only ads we’ve run since the writ dropped are about the importance of considering the environment when voting.”

Elections Canada’s website says “organic social media campaigns” can count as partisan activity.

“An activity promotes or opposes a political entity by naming it, using the party’s logo or showing a photograph of the candidate, for example. In some situations, even without directly referring to a party or a candidate, an activity could be perceived as partisan,” the website says.

“Issue advertising” – defined by Elections Canada as “advertising that takes a position on an issue that is clearly associated with a candidate or party, without referring to the party, candidate or other actor” – is regulated in the election period, but not the pre-election period, which spanned from June 30 until the day before the writs were issued.

The bulk of Fair Path Forward’s online advertising appeared during the pre-election period. While most of the ads are generic in nature, asking voters to think of the planet when casting their ballots or questioning “why…there are still some politicians against putting a price on carbon pollution,” others specifically reference the Conservatives.

In June, Fair Path Forward advertised a post linking to a Toronto Star op-ed saying “Andrew Scheer’s climate plan will be less efficient and more expensive.”

In July, the page advertised a CBC article about a Clean Prosperity report that took aim at the Conservative party’s climate plan.

Clean Prosperity published a press release in September, titled “Conservative Party releases highly deceptive ad about the carbon tax and rebate.”

In the release, which was picked up by numerous news organizations, Clean Prosperity doesn’t just criticize the Conservative position on the carbon tax, but quotes Bernstein as accusing the CPC of “fake facts” and deception.

“Using fake facts to attack climate policies is not much better than climate denial,” Bernstein says in the release. “I would encourage the Conservative Party of Canada to take down this deceptive and misleading ad, and instead focus their energy on improving their own climate plan.”

Bernstein, who is one of the two spokespeople for the Fair Path Forward campaign, also praised the Liberals in a separate statement published the same day as the one about the Conservative carbon tax ad.

“The Liberal Party of Canada’s announcement that they intend to reach a net-zero emissions economy by 2050 is a big deal,” he wrote. “For the first time in Canada, we now have a climate target from one of the two leading parties that, if met, would ensure we’re doing our part to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.”

In the statement he urged the “Conservatives to revisit their climate plan,” citing Clean Prosperity’s July report accusing the Conservative climate plan of leading to increased emissions and added costs.

That 15-page report, co-authored by Bernstein, focuses exclusively only the Conservative Party of Canada’s “A Real Plan to Protect Our Environment” policy paper. Clean Prosperity did not publish any similar reviews of any other party’s plan.

If the Conservatives don’t comply, Bernstein says “voters should take that into account when deciding who they’re going to support in October’s election.”

These are “quotes supporting the carbon tax and/or increased climate ambition, including correcting the record on a misleading statement about the carbon tax,” Bernstein told True North. “They are issue-based stances, not partisan ones.”

Bernstein published an op-ed in the National Observer on Oct. 11, grading the various political parties’ plans to cut carbon pollution. The Conservatives came out on bottom with a D score, while the Liberals and NDP were tied in first place with their respective B grades. (The Green party came in third with a B-).

An Elections Canada spokesperson declined to comment on whether Fair Path Forward and Clean Prosperity are in violation of the third party rules, simply stating that “any individual or organization that incurs more than $500 in expenses on regulated activities must register as a third party with Elections Canada.”

The $500 doesn’t just apply to advertising, but all expenses supporting the legislation’s four regulated activities.

The Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections declined to address the legality of Clean Prosperity’s activities.

“Our office doesn’t speculate about the legality of a particular issue,” a spokesperson said in an email. “It may also be useful to know that the Act does not regulate the content of advertising, except in very limited circumstances.”

The spokesperson reiterated the requirement for organizations spending more than $500 to register with Elections Canada as a third party.

Clean Prosperity’s board chair and founder, Greg Kiessling, has a long history of political contributions, in particular to the Liberals.

Elections Canada’s donor database shows that Kiessling has given to the Liberal, NDP, Green and Conservative parties. In 2016 and 2017 he contributed a combined $1775.00 to Michael Chong’s leadership campaign. (Chong was the only Conservative leadership candidate supporting a carbon tax). He also gave the Conservative Party of Canada $629.00 in 2016.

Since 2014, however, Kiessling has donated $6798.27 to the Liberals, the database shows. He also made a $5000.00 contribution to Stephane Dion’s leadership campaign in 2006. His most recent donation was $1600 – the legal maximum – to the Liberals in May of this year.

Bernstein does not appear in Elections Canada’s donor database, though someone with the same name has made several donations to the Conservatives.

English exam system is corrupt, compromised, immigration lawyer claims

With files from Candice Malcolm

Earlier this year, Larissa* came to Toronto from Brazil on a visitor visa. She worked illegally for a bit while in Canada before deciding she simply didn’t want to leave, so she contacted an immigration lawyer for guidance on how to stay in Canada legally and permanently.  

It’s not an uncommon story, according to her immigration lawyer Richard Boraks. 

One of the requirements to immigrate to Canada is to prove one’s competency in the English language, which can be done by taking an exam called the IELTS (International English Language Testing System). The IELTS exam (known colloquially as “the Yeltz exam”) is a standardized test that assesses the English language proficiency of those who do not speak English as a first language. 

It is administered by a privately-run company that works with the federal government and immigration department to determine who can come to Canada. 

Four skills are tested: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. The maximum number of points one can earn in each category is nine. 

To come to Canada under the Federal Skilled Worker Program, one must have received at minimum an average score of seven. To come under the Federal Skilled Trades Program, one must have at least an average of four in reading and writing, and five in speaking and listening. 

Larissa decided she wanted an average score of 7.5, but she didn’t think she could obtain that score by actually writing the exam, so she searched “buy ielts online” and started contacting those who could forge a certificate for her.

True North was shown screenshots of the WhatsApp conversations between Larissa and the IELTS certificate hucksters. The first IELTS certificate seller Larissa contacted ended up swindling her out of £250 GBP (approximately $423 CAD). She sent the money, but never received the doctored certificate. 

However, she eventually found another seller who made her a certificate for a pretty penny. This time, she paid £500 GBP (approximately $844 CAD), and successfully received an authentic IELTS certificate. Notably, her certificate was stamped from India, even though Larissa had never been in India – she was still in Toronto. 


Larissa’s IELTS certificate (acquired fraudulently) shows a stamp from India. 

“Is the certificate valid? I don’t know. Never tried it,” said Boraks in an interview with True North. “But no one has been charged for a fraudulent IELTS certificate, ever. Period, finish, full stop.”

“Indian authorities and British authorities are cracking down on this, but in Canada, the CBSA [Canadian Border Services Agency] isn’t doing anything,” he said. 

Boraks is referencing a recent report that Niagara College in Ontario ordered over 400 students who had been admitted to its January 2019 programs and had taken IELTS tests in India to undergo a second English test or risk losing their offer of admission. A probe found “inconsistencies” between the IELTS test scores submitted by some students from India, and their actual English proficiency. The college made 1,300 admission offers to Indian applicants during the winter 2019 term; of which 428 were asked to retake the IELTS test or take an alternative English test.

Boraks brings attention to the fact that IELTS is co-owned by IDP Education, and 50% of IDP Education is owned by SEEK Ltd. 

“SEEK is in the recruitment business. They’re in the business of moving bodies around the world,” Boraks told True North. 

This means an English proficiency exam company is in partnership with companies that help people find jobs around the world – mostly in the English-speaking world. 

“Look at Laurentian University. They set up entire courses [for international students largely from India], and none of the kids showed up,” said Boraks.  

“They all went to work illegally, working 60-80 hours as truck drivers. You need drugs to stay awake for that long as a truck driver. But eventually, if you’re taking drugs, you’re useless as a truck driver. Then these undocumented people become unemployed and turn to crime. That’s why there is so much crime in places like Brampton,” Boraks states.

Boraks claims the recent IELTS fraud cases have been brought to the attention of the RCMP.  

“But these immigration scams, the RCMP has no permission to look into them. They’re not allowed to ask questions. There are hundreds of millions of dollars wrapped up in these scams.” 

*name has been changed

The mainstream media’s reaction to a values test for newcomers

Last week, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said Quebec has the right to use a values test in its immigration system.

Two years ago, Conservative Leadership Candidate Kellie Leitch proposed the same type of values test for newcomers in Canada. Leitch’s proposal included conducting face-to-face interviews with immigrants for values including equal opportunity, hard work, helping others, generosity, freedom and tolerance.

Here are a few examples of the mainstream media reacting to Kellie Leitch’s proposal two years ago:

Lawyer questions Kellie Leitch’s understanding of immigration system – “Immigration lawyer Evelyn Ackah questions Leitch’s knowledge of the current system.” (CBC)

Fact check on Kellie Leitch’s ‘values check’ – “Leitch’s claim that screening prospective immigrants for anti-Canadian values would be akin to security screening and a matter of asking some simple questions doesn’t hold up.” (Macleans

Here’s How 11 Muslims Feel About The “Canadian Values” Debate – “Any attempt at narrowly and definitively describing Canadian values is bound to be fruitless.” (Buzzfeed

Dale Smith: Where is the ‘Never Kellie’ movement? (TVO

Heather Mallick: Kellie Leitch gets it wrong every single time (Toronto Star)

CBC’s ’22 Minutes’ Mashes Kellie Leitch’s Values Test With ‘Stranger Things’ – “This is so good” (Huffington Post

Lots of Canadians Would Fail the ‘Values Test’ A Conservative MP Wants Immigrants To Take (Vice)

Thomas Walkom: Kellie Leitch’s Trumpian immigration plan could work for her: (Toronto Star)

Bob Hepburn: Beware: Kellie Leitch is on a winning roll (Toronto Star

Nick Kouvalis: The shrewd strategist behind Leitch’s Tory leadership bid (Macleans)

Here is how the mainstream media reacted to Justin Trudeau’s approval of a values test:

Trudeau campaigning heavily in Liberal ridings: research report

With files from Cosmin Dzsurdzsa and John Ployer.

Since the writ dropped, Justin Trudeau has spent half of his time campaigning and endorsing candidates in Liberal-held ridings while on the campaign trail, and a majority of his time in Ontario and Quebec.

True North researchers used official Liberal party campaign itineraries as well as events reported in the news to compile this report. Our analysis stretches from the beginning of the campaign on September 11 to October 17, the day this report was compiled. 

The report looks at three key areas of the Trudeau Liberal’s campaign:

  1. How many visits the Trudeau campaign dedicated to each province
  2. A federal breakdown of what party held ridings where Trudeau visited and stumped for the local Liberal candidate 
  3. A provincial breakdown of which party held the riding in which Trudeau attending a campaign event with the local Liberal candidate

Quebec and Ontario account for over two thirds of campaign visits

Campaign stops were split into two categories for methodological reasons: general visits were stops in which Trudeau appeared in a city without campaigning for a candidate from a specific riding, whereas candidate rallies targeted specific ridings in any given area. 

To see how much attention the Liberal leader gave to each province of Canada, we took into account both general visits and candidate rallies for the following percentages. The two debate appearances and one pre-debate appearance were also considered in our count.

Of Trudeau’s 85 campaign stops made since September 11, his top destination was Ontario, where 44 percent of his visits took place. 

Put together, Ontario and Quebec received a total of 71 percent of Trudeau’s time while campaigning, with Quebec making up 27 percent of total campaigning.

The maritime provinces collectively came in third place for frequency of visits, making up for 14 percent of total visits. New Brunswick and Nova Scotia were the most frequently visited provinces in the region, both receiving five visits each, followed P.E.I, and Newfoundland and Labrador which only received one visit each. 

After the maritimes, visits to British Columbia made up nine percent of the total campaign stops. Notably, British Columbia was also the first stop of the Trudeau campaign. Nunavut then followed B.C., which received two campaign stops, both of which happened in the same day. 

Meanwhile, Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, only received one single visit by Trudeau each. 

Liberal and NDP-held ridings the top national destination for Trudeau

For our federal breakdown of the ridings targeted by the Trudeau campaign, we only took into account candidate rallies, of which we counted 56. To be more specific, candidate rallies were campaign stops where Justin Trudeau appeared with and promoted candidates for targeted ridings. General visits were not included for the sake of statistical accuracy and because of the general and open-ended nature of those events. 

In this section, we looked at which party held the seat in the last Parliament. 

Over the course of the campaign, Trudeau spent exactly half of his time campaigning for candidates in Liberal-held ridings across the country, making up a total of 28 individual appearances alongside Liberal MPs.

NDP-held ridings were the next most frequently targeted ridings on the federal stage. A total of 27 percent of Trudeau’s time was spent campaigning with the local Liberal candidate in ridings held by the NDP. 

Relatively little attention was paid towards campaigning in Conservative-held ridings, coming in with only 14 percent of total visits despite the CPC being a tight contender for the election.

Interestingly, the next most frequented ridings were those held by four different Independent candidates, making up a total of eight percent of all campaign visits. These were the ridings of: Jody Wilson-Raybould (formerly Lib.), Jane Philpott (formerly Lib.), Tony Clement (formerly CPC) Hunter Tootoo (formerly Lib.) and Pierre Nantel who is now running as a Green Party candidate (formerly NDP). 

Finally, Bloc Quebecois-held ridings received the least amount of visits, making up only two percent of Trudeau’s campaign stops. 

The high volume of visits to Liberal-held ridings could be an indication of some concern about losing base support due to repeated scandals by the party leader. It could also indicate that the Liberals are worried about losing support among traditionally progressive voters to the NDP and the Greens, who have been performing well in recent polls. 

At the same time, the high frequency of visits to NDP-held ridings might be an attempt to scoop up new seats to give the needed edge to maintain government. 

NDP-held ridings in Quebec and Liberal-held ridings in Ontario get most attention from Trudeau

Breaking down Trudeau’s candidate rallies by province gives a clearer picture of the Liberal Party’s strategy and which kind of voters the Liberals are intending to target in this campaign. 

In Ontario, Trudeau spent a majority of his time campaigning in the province by visiting ridings already held by the Liberals. More than half (53 percent) of candidate rallies in the province were in ridings held by the Liberals. Ontario was also the province with the highest quantity of visits to Conservative-held ridings, making up 23 percent of his visits in the area.

Visits to NDP-held ridings in Ontario made up a total of 17 percent of Trudeau’s time on the campaign trail, which is low compared to his national average of 27 percent. Independent ridings held by former Liberal Jane Philpott and former Conservative Tony Clement each received one single visit from Trudeau, making up for seven percent of his total time spent campaigning with Liberal candidates in the province. 

Quebec paints a much different picture than Ontario, with NDP-held ridings taking the lead for Trudeau rallies with Liberal candidates. A total of 58 percent of his time spent in Quebec was spent in NDP-held ridings. On the other hand, unlike Ontario, Trudeau spent only one fourth of his time in Quebec tending to Liberal-held ridings, indicating a much more confident position with regard to their popularity in the province and the re-election of his Liberal MPs in Quebec.

Both ridings held by the Bloc Quebecois and Independent candidates tied with eight percent of Trudeau’s rallies in the province, with each receiving one individual visit by the Liberal leader. 

Trudeau’s single visit to Alberta was to Edmonton-Strathcona — a riding formerly held by NDP MP Linda Duncan, who announced she will not be seeking re-election.

Related stories