fbpx
Friday, July 11, 2025

LEVY: More union members complaining about antisemitism in leadership ranks

Source: CUPE

Eighty Jewish CUPE workers have now signed on to a human rights complaint claiming antisemitism against CUPE Ontario and its president Fred Hahn, the lawyer overseeing the complaint says.

After the human rights complaint by 25 members was publicized two weeks ago, lawyer Kathryn Marshall says her office was “completely inundated” with calls from other fed-up members who wanted to join the claim.

“They don’t want their union dues to fund discrimination against them,” she told True North. “They want to redirect their union dues to Jewish organizations of their choice.”

She said they’re also demanding accountability from a union they say has been engaged in antisemitic acts for many years.

“This is nothing new,” she said.

In the filing, the CUPE union members took issue with a post by Hahn on X (formerly Twitter) on Thanksgiving weekend in which he was grateful for the “power of resistance around the globe.”

The original complaint also claims the CUPE union leader posted a picture to Instagram in which he parroted the chant, “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free” – a chant considered a call to arms to eradicate the Jewish state.

Marshall said Hahn’s repeated anti-Israel tweets subsequent to October 7 “brought it (the antisemitism) all to light.”

Many non-Jewish members have reached out to her as well to say they’re “really offended” by what’s going on and want to lend their support.

“Since Fred Hahn’s apology, they (the CUPE brass) haven’t stopped their discriminatory behaviour … they’re just doubling down on it,” she said.

She called his apology “really insincere.”

“No one is accepting that apology… in fact his actions since that apology demonstrate how insincere he is,” she said.

Hahn has been seen protesting front and centre along with Sarah Jama, who was kicked out of the NDP caucus for her antisemitic hate, and NDP MP Matthew Green.

Hahn’s tweets or reposts are nearly 70% about pro-Palestine protests, a ceasefire and other anti-Israel propaganda.

One would think he was an activist rather than the head of Ontario’s largest labour union.

Marshall feels they’ve doubled down because they are “filled with hatred and discrimination” and don’t view their actions as discriminatory.

The basis of it is “antisemitism,” she said.

But unions are not used to being “held accountable,” Marshall added.

“They really operate in an environment where they can intimidate people, fill them with fear, they can coerce people, that’s the environment they are used to,” she said.

She feels they are “just shocked” that anyone would call them out and take action against them.

“They have no fear of consequences,” she said. “That’s why it’s really important to fight back.”

She says CUPE hasn’t filed its defense yet but she suspects it will be something “very unoriginal” and they will try and claim this is just “freedom of expression.”

She said she’s a huge champion of free speech but like most Canadians she recognizes “there is a distinction” between defensible speech and inciting hatred against a group of people.

“That is exactly what CUPE and especially Fred Hahn is doing,” she said. “What has that to do with the labour rights of their members?”

She says many of the people who’ve contacted her resent that they’re using union dues for political activism instead of fighting the real union issues at hand.

In response to my inquiries, Hahn said they have not received any communication from the human rights tribunal and cannot speak to any allegations or verify the number of complainants.

“However, our union understands the fundamental importance of human rights and we take these matters very seriously. We firmly believe there has been no violation of Ontario’s Human Rights Code and in any forum we will be happy to stand on our record of fighting discrimination and oppression in all their forms,” Hahn said in a statement.

Marshall anticipates it will be a lengthy battle. 

She vowed to “fight hard.”

The Candice Malcolm Show | This is what “decolonization” really means

Decolonization is a radical Leftist theory that has been pushed and promoted in institutions across Canada. Professors, students, politicians and journalists have all bought into this warped academic theory.

So what exactly does it mean?

Well, the radical Left has repeatedly told us what they mean by decolonization. It’s time we take them seriously and listen to what they are saying.

Decolonization, according to radical Leftists, simply means October 7th-style massacres. It means mass murder of so-called settlers (what we call civilians).

On this episode, Candice unpacks this radical ideology and explains how extremists have taken over Canada’s institutions. She talks about the extremism we’re seeing on university campuses and how to put a stop to it.

Plus, True North’s Rupa Subramanya joins Candice to debate the limits of free speech and how Canada should respond to the pro-Hamas rallies taking place across our country.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE CANDICE MALCOLM SHOW

“No indication” of terrorism in Rainbow Bridge car explosion that killed two people

Two people are dead after a vehicle exploded on the American side of the Canada-U.S. border at the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls, N.Y. New York Gov. said there was “no indication” that the incident was related to terrorism, despite earlier media reports.

A car in Niagara Falls, N.Y. careened towards the American customs checkpoint, reaching high speeds and at one point going airborne Wednesday morning. The vehicle exploded on impact.

Officials said the vehicle had two occupants who died in the explosion. A border guard was also treated for minor injuries.

All four border crossings between Ontario and western New York were closed initially, but the other three reopened by Wednesday evening.

The nearby Buffalo airport suspended inbound and outbound international flights and put in place enhanced security screening for vehicles arriving at the airport.

American media outlets previously reported that there were explosives in the vehicle and that law enforcement officials were treating it as a terrorism incident, though this was later walked back.

The vehicle collided with screening booth after clearing a median at high speeds from local roads in Niagara Falls, N.Y. The vehicle did not immediately enter the United States from Canada, as was originally suspected by some media reporting.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said in the House of Commons that Canadian agencies are “fully engaged” in the response to the incident.

“There are a lot of questions and we are following up to try to get as many answers as rapidly as possible,” Trudeau said. “We are in close contact with U.S. officials and will continue to work closely with them. We will continue to be engaged.”

Trudeau confirmed the closure of the four border crossings and said “additional measures are being contemplated and activated” at other border crossings.

The incident happened at the Rainbow Bridge, which links the two Niagara Falls cities, around 11:20 a.m.

Witnesses reported hearing a loud bang and seeing smoke near the U.S. customs booth.

The authorities did not provide any details about the nature of the incident or the status of the driver, but fire crews said it was a “dangerous situation” that required evacuating the area. 

In a statement, the Buffalo field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigations said that it was investigating the incident.

“The FBI Buffalo Field Office is investigating a vehicle explosion at the Rainbow Bridge, a border crossing between the U.S. and Canada in Niagara Falls. The FBI is coordinating with our local, state and federal law enforcement partners in this investigation. As this situation is very fluid, that’s all we can say at this time,” wrote the FBI. 

Ontario Premier Doug Ford also addressed the incident on Wednesday afternoon saying that the Ontario Provincial Police were involved in the response.

Several police agencies, including the Niagara Falls Police Department and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, responded to the scene and cordoned off the bridge.

The closure of the Rainbow Bridge also affected the other three border crossings in the region: the Peace Bridge, the Lewiston-Queenston Bridge, and the Whirlpool Bridge. 

All of them were closed to traffic in both directions until further notice, creating long delays for travelers on the eve of Thanksgiving.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she was aware of the situation and that state agencies were ready to assist if needed.

“I’ve been briefed on the incident on the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls and we are closely monitoring the situation,” she said in a statement.

“State agencies are on site and ready to assist.”

This is a developing story that will be updated as more information is made available. 

The Daily Brief | Trudeau unveils billions in new spending despite inflation crisis

The Trudeau government will increase federal spending and will not provide any tax relief for Canadians despite the ongoing inflation crisis and warnings from economists and opposition politicians to scale back its spending.

Plus, a True North exclusive reveals a controversial Diversity Equity Inclusion trainer got more than $315,000 from Toronto, Peel school boards.

And a federal body in charge of human rights law says you might be perpetuating “settler colonialism” if you celebrate Christmas.

Tune into The Daily Brief with Lindsay Shepherd and Isaac Lamoureux!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAILY BRIEF

Liberal economic update vows fight against “environmental racism”

The Liberal government’s fall economic update unveiled a commitment to battle so-called “environmental racism” as part of its strategy to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. 

The 2023 Fall Economic Statement was presented to the House of Commons Tuesday by Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and it included billion in new spending. 

Citing investments in a clean economy and safeguarding vulnerable minority groups, the update linked the concept to Ottawa’s fight against climate change.

“Investments in a clean economy are an important part of Canada’s plan to reach net-zero by 2050. Achieving this plan will ultimately help protect those that are most at risk of climate change, especially women, Indigenous people, and residents of rural and coastal communities. Fighting climate change also fights environmental racism,” reads the update. 

“Environmental racism” is a concept promoted by climate activists, who argue that climate change and carbon dioxide pollution disproportionately affect minority groups. 

“Environmental racism refers to the disproportionate burden of environmental hazards placed on racialized individuals, groups and communities due to environmental policies, laws and decisions,” writes the Government of Canada.

This is not the first time that Ottawa has embarked on the fight against what it calls environmental racism. 

The federal government has since endorsed Private Member’s Bill C-226, also titled “An Act respecting the development of a national strategy to assess, prevent and address environmental racism and to advance environmental justice.”

“This enactment requires the Minister of the Environment, in consultation or cooperation with any interested persons, bodies, organizations or communities, to develop a national strategy to promote efforts across Canada to address the harm caused by environmental racism. It also provides for reporting requirements in relation to the strategy,” the bill reads. 

The bill is currently before a Senate committee for consideration. 

The Andrew Lawton Show | Liberal fiscal update brings more taxes, more spending, more debt

The Liberals delivered their fall fiscal update yesterday, painting a grim picture of Canada’s finances despite Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland’s claim that Canada is not and never has been “broken.” The update shows more spending, more deficits, and more taxes, with millions more going to bailing out Canadian journalists and ballooning debt servicing costs. True North’s Andrew Lawton discusses with Conservative finance critic Jasraj Singh Hallan.

Plus, the federal government has vowed to fight to defend its plastics ban despite a court finding it was unconstitutional. What does this mean for Canadian industry? Catherine Swift of the Coalition of Concerned Manufacturers & Businesses of Canada joins to weigh in.

While antisemitic protests have become a mainstay across the country, Quebec has proven to be a particular hotbed for Jew hatred. National Post Barbara Kay explains why that is.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

Liberals reiterate pledge to regulate “online hate”

Federal justice minister Arif Virani called for legislation to quell online hate on Tuesday, saying that it’s an “absolute priority” during the Israel-Hamas war. 

A rise in online hateful rhetoric has been part of the fallout from the conflict in the Middle East, with several incidents of violence in the streets and at religious and community centres in places like Toronto and Montreal. 

“That’s not what we need in this country, and I think an online hate bill can help to address that,” said Virani, prior to the government’s weekly cabinet meeting in Ottawa.

The Liberals initially promised to introduce legislation to combat hate speech and terrorist content during their election campaign in 2019. 

“I’m deeply disappointed,” said chair of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network Bernie Farber. He was a member of a panel of experts tasked with guiding the development of the legislation in 2022.

“It’s a pretty frustrating situation,” said Farber, who is calling on Ottawa to better protect Canadians from online hate, saying that there is a “dire need” for the legislation. 

According to Farber, the question is not if Canadians can become radicalized by the online content they consume, but when. 

In June 2021, the Trudeau government tabled a bill that claimed to protect Canadians from online hate speech, which would have amended both the Criminal Code and the Youth Criminal Justice Act. 

Additionally, it would have allowed groups to file hate speech complaints under the Canadian Human Rights Act. 

The bill would have brought back provisions that the previous Conservative government repealed from the Canadian human rights code in 2013.

The bill didn’t pass and Trudeau promised to table a new version of it within 100 days of re-forming the government in September 2021, however the deadline was never met. The government instead assembled a new panel of experts to provide recommendations for the new version. 

University of Calgary professor Emily Laidlaw, who also served alongside Farber on the panel, said that the legislation will likely be “highly controversial” as it is an issue of free speech. 

“It’s time to have that discussion,” said Laidlaw. “This is extraordinarily complicated legislation.”

According to her and Farber, the bill will require the creation of a regulator to deal with social media companies to hold them accountable for allegedly hateful rhetoric which appears on their platforms.

“It will be an important shared responsibility led by Justice Canada with the support of Canadian Heritage. Minister Virani will introduce legislation in due course,” confirmed the Prime Minister’s Office in a recent statement.

Virani acknowledged that it will be more difficult to regulate online platforms than it will be to introduce changes to criminal law.

“My hope is that it’s tabled soon, because I’m hearing that from stakeholders and I’m hearing that from concerned Canadians.”

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) has been in talks with the government regarding the legislation, according to CTV News.

Shimon Koffler Fogel, chief executive of CIJA, said he wants to see “a clear, transparent protocol” so that platforms can deal with those who are spreading hateful rhetoric.

Fogel said the CIJA has been trying to suspend the account of Laith Marouf, a former consultant for the federal government from X, even writing a letter to its owner Elon Musk.

Marouf has accused the CIJA of trying to “silence their critics,” and cited the fact that hate propaganda laws already exist which “protect criticism of their supremacist political ideology and colonial project.”

The National Council of Canadian Muslims has also reported seeing an increase of hateful comments against Muslims since Oct. 7. CEO Stephen Brown said it has had many conversations with the government regarding the legislation. 

However, the legislation must start from a framework that has clearly defined “what is considered hateful in Canada,” said Brown.

“We also oppose anything that would prevent legitimate criticism of foreign governments or anything that would prevent legitimate expression of political views.”

Brown said that users have had their accounts suspended for posting certain messages that call for a ceasefire or expressing support for Palestinians.

“It’s becoming increasingly difficult to express support for Palestinians online,” said Brown. “How are the social media platforms handling it?”

Trudeau called the rise of antisemitism and Islamophobia in Canada and around the world “really scary,” on Tuesday, saying that the possibility of a two-state solution is in danger.

“People are forgetting a little bit that we’re a country that protects the freedom of expression, that protects liberty of conscience, that respects and supports people even when we disagree with them,” said Trudeau.

“We have to remember that just waving a Palestinian flag is not automatically antisemitism. And someone expressing grief for hostages taken is not an endorsement of dead civilians.”

No answers yet about Winnipeg virus lab and firing of China-linked scientists

After nearly four years, Canadians still have no answers about what exactly went on at the highly secretive National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg after two scientists were implicated in a national security scandal involving alleged collaboration with communist China. 

A long-awaited probe into the activities of two scientists who were fired from Canada’s top-level biosecurity lab in Winnipeg is still underway, according to the RCMP. 

Vanity Fair’s latest report cites records showing that the federal police force is continuing to investigate the incident. 

“National security criminal investigations are often complex, multijurisdictional, and resource intensive, and can take several years to complete,” an RCMP official told the outlet. 

The implicated scientists, Xiangguo Qiu and her husband Kending Cheng, were accused of sharing sensitive information and samples with China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where the lab leak hypothesis cites as a potential birthing ground for the Covid-19 virus.

The case has sparked controversy and speculation since July 2019, when Qiu, Cheng and several Chinese students were escorted out of the National Microbiology Laboratory and stripped of their access to the lab. 

The RCMP confirmed that it was a tip from an allied intelligence agency that put them on the pursuit but did not reveal any details of the allegations.

One of the most alarming aspects of the case was the revelation that Qiu had sent 24 vials of Ebola virus and six vials of Henipaviruses, both deadly pathogens, to the Wuhan lab in March 2019. 

Qiu had also collaborated with Chen Wei, a major general in the People’s Liberation Army and a leading bioweapons expert in China.

The Trudeau government has faced criticism for its lack of transparency and accountability on the matter. 

In 2021, the Liberals refused to comply with a House of Commons order to supply the documents related to the case, citing national security concerns. 

It also sued former house speaker Anthony Rota to prevent the disclosure of the documents, a move that was unprecedented in Canadian history. 

Trudeau then called for new elections in the fall of 2021, effectively shutting down the parliamentary inquiry into the lab. 

Liberals lavish legacy media with $129 million more in bailout funds

The Liberal government has pledged an additional $129 million in taxpayer funds over the next five years to bail out failing legacy media outlets.

This hefty top up is in addition to the $600 million media bailout announced in 2019, sparking concerns about government influence over journalism. 

Outlined in the Fall Economic Statement presented by Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland to the House of Commons Tuesday, the new measure proposes to upgrade the Canadian journalism labour tax credit. 

Effective January 1, 2023, the federal government aims to boost the yearly limit on labor costs that can be claimed per eligible employee from $55,000 to $85,000.

Additionally, the tax credit rate is set to temporarily increase from 25% to 35% for a four-year period.

While the government claims that this measure is essential to support journalism in the face of economic challenges, critics accuse the government of using the allure of federal subsidies as a way to buy appealing coverage. 

The total cost of this proposed tax credit enhancement is estimated at $129 million over five years, with $10 million per year in ongoing expenses starting in 2024-25.

The lack of transparency surrounding the distribution of funds has also raised concerns. 

Last year, the Trudeau government invoked confidentiality and cited “taxpayer information” as reasons for withholding details about which legacy media companies received money from the initial $600 million media bailout. 

“Since January 1, 2019 how much funding has each outlet received to date?” asked Conservative MP Chris Warkentin.

“Confidentiality provisions under section 241 of the Income Tax Act prevent the Agency from releasing taxpayer information,” replied Revenue Minister Diane Lebouthillier.

The Canada Revenue Agency refused to divulge specific information about cash payments, responding to an Inquiry of Ministry tabled in the House of Commons in 2022. 

Since the inception of the media bailout program, very few details about federal payments to media outlets have been disclosed. 

Food banks across Canada facing unprecedented demand, “close to a breaking point”

Source: Pexels

Food banks across Canada are facing a crisis. More people than ever, from people working two jobs to students, are turning to food banks for the first time ever. 

This increase is pushing these vital services to their limits. One-third of this year’s visitors at Hamilton’s central food bank supplier were first-time users, reflecting a troubling national trend of rising food bank dependency.

The latest report from Hamilton’s Food Share, the emergency food shipping and receiving hub, highlighted a 40% increase in overall service demand. 

Ashley Mitchell, the resource development manager, pointed out that not only are first-time visitors on the rise, but long-term users are also frequenting more than ever.

“Families, individuals, couples, and not only just people that are experiencing hunger, but also people that have full-time jobs, have part-time jobs,” Mitchell said to Global News. “These are people that haven’t necessarily needed the food bank system before and maybe aren’t the type of person you typically think of that are leaning on a food bank.”

Hamilton Food Share’s 2023 Hunger Report showed that nearly half (46%) of the households surveyed would face homelessness if they did not receive assistance from the food bank.

Meanwhile, 58% of households spend more than half of their income on rent alone.

Regions across Ontario, including Waterloo, echo this dire situation, with some reporting up to a 43% increase in food bank usage. Kim Wilhelm, interim CEO of the Waterloo Region Food Bank, disclosed a worrying 200% rise in student users alone.

As previously reported by True North, International students studying in Canada on student visas are filming themselves going to food banks to get “free food”, as a way to save money. These students are telling their followers that this is a normal and acceptable thing to do. Canadians who donate to food banks are intending that it goes to those in need, not to international students with enough money to pay international tuition fees.

Heading further East, New Brunswick has seen a similar sharp increase, Stephane Sirois, Executive Director of Food Depot Alimentaire in New Brunswick, told True North.

“The system was not designed to support this volume of demand. We are close to a breaking point,” said Sirois. 

He said that the trend of over one-third of food bank users being first-time users in Hamilton was a similar situation to that of New Brunswick. He added that more working-class people are visiting food banks, with seniors on a fixed income seeing a significant increase.

“We’re not seeing any signs of reversing the trend in the near future. In the next couple of years, numerous Canadians will have to renew their mortgage at a much higher interest rate. This will put even more families over the edge and make them vulnerable to food insecurity,” said Sirois. 

According to Sirois the challenges around housing should be the top priority. The added financial burden of paying more for rent and mortgages are causing a lot of financial stress on individuals and families, he added. 

Central provinces have seen similar issues. Manitoba has seen a rise of 30% in Food Bank users over the past year, confirmed John Heim, Senior Manager of Marketing & Communications with Harvest Manitoba. In 2023, he said that 40% of food bank users in Manitoba are employed. 

It’s even worse in Western Canada. 

In British Columbia, the number of visits to Food Banks since March 2019 has increased 57%. In rural communities with populations of 10,000 and under, that number of visits increased to 101%.

Since 2022, the cost-of-living crisis has been the main contributor to food insecurity in B.C., Dan Huang-Taylor, Executive Director of Food Banks BC, told True North. The cost of goods at the supermarket, mortgage, and interest rates have pushed people who were close to the poverty line beneath it, he added.

“This has resulted in more people turning to food banks than we’ve ever seen in the 40-year history that we’ve operated in B.C.,” said Huang-Taylor. 

Clients visiting food banks in B.C. who cite job income as a primary source of income are now higher than any other client group — higher than people on social assistance or pensions. 

“We’re seeing this alarming trend of people who are working full time, maybe two jobs, and they’re still not able to make ends meet,” said Huang-Taylor. 

He added that some food banks, specifically those in smaller demographics, may have to consider starting to scale back services. Many food banks are seeing drops in donations of 30-40% of both monetary and food, said Huang-Taylor. Food banks also pay more for the food themselves, experiencing the same pinch at the supermarket as their clientele.

Food banks hold onto contingency funds to tackle emergencies that arise. Given the rise in demand, some food banks have had to use these reserves to meet the surge. 

Related stories