Conservative MPs say the government is crossing a “red line” with its last-minute amendment to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns primarily used by hunters, farmers and sport shooters.

The House of Commons Public Safety Committee met on Thursday to continue its clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-21, proposed legislation to further restrict access to handguns in Canada.

Committee members spent nearly the entire two-and-a-half hour hearing debating a Liberal amendment which would ban hundreds of additional models of rifles and shotguns, impacting hundreds of thousands of legal gun owners across Canada. 

Conservative MP Dane Lloyd said the government crosses a “red line” with the measure. He said that a “social contract” has existed for generations in Canada in which firearms owners abide by regulations without fear the government will take their guns.  

“Governments of all political persuasions have seen fit to put forward amendments and legislation to close gaps to try to prevent tragedies from happening,” Lloyd said.

“But whenever those laws were passed, there was always an understanding that there was no intention to target law-abiding firearms owners, hunters, farmers, sport shooters and gun collectors,” he continued. 

“And there was always a great deal of deference put into the legislative drafting, into having witnesses come, into creating legislation that ensured that that social contract with firearms owners, with indigenous people with hunters, was preserved and protected.” 

Loyd said the government is impugning democracy by removing the ability for the measure to be debated and studied from the start of the legislative process. The Liberals tabled the motion Tuesday after the second reading debate, and the committee’s study on the legislation concluded. 

“It has precluded our ability to bring in witnesses, to bring in experts to talk about this issue and debate this issue,” Lloyd said. “It’s just been tabled, dropped as an amendment after we have completed our vigorous study.” 

Conservative MP Glenn Motz wondered if the government began discussing the measure while the legislation was being crafted. Witnesses from the Department of Justice and Liberal MP Pam Damoff refused to answer, citing solicitor-client privilege. 

Motz also compared C-21 to “lipstick on a pig.”

“It looks like it does something beautiful, but it actually makes no difference on public safety,” he said.

On Oct. 27, police experts told the committee that C-21 does not address the real issue of illegal firearms. Chief of Regina Police Service Evan Bray said restricting lawful handgun ownership will not meaningfully address the real problem, while president of the National Police Federation Brian Sauvé said the proposed legislation “primarily” targets legal firearm owners who have followed government regulations.

Liberal MP Taleeb Noormohamed complained that the Conservatives were holding up the legislative process through a filibuster, meaning prolonging debate to delay a decision. He said they should exercise the democratic process by voting against the motion.

In an apparent response to Lloyd’s concerns about Canada’s social construct, Noormohamed said the country changes, like when Canada allowed women to vote. 

“It’s really important for us to understand the importance of evolving and that we learned from the past to make a better future,” he said.

“And this legislation, in my opinion, and this amendment, in my opinion, does that.” 

Bloc Québécois MP Rhéal Fortin said his party would vote for the amendment. 

On Wednesday, Alberta Justice Minister Tyler Shandro said the federal government is seeking to ban legal firearm ownership altogether, as evidenced by the measure.

“In the coming weeks, Alberta will explore all available options to take action.” 

Author

  • Rachel Emmanuel

    Rachel is a seasoned political reporter who’s covered government institutions from a variety of levels. A Carleton University journalism graduate, she was a multimedia reporter for three local Niagara newspapers. Her work has been published in the Toronto Star. Rachel was the inaugural recipient of the Political Matters internship, placing her at The Globe and Mail’s parliamentary bureau. She spent three years covering the federal government for iPolitics. Rachel is the Alberta correspondent for True North based in Edmonton.

We’re asking readers, like you, to make a contribution in support of True North’s fact-based, independent journalism.

Unlike the mainstream media, True North isn’t getting a government bailout. Instead, we depend on the generosity of Canadians like you.

How can a media outlet be trusted to remain neutral and fair if they’re beneficiaries of a government handout? We don’t think they can.

This is why independent media in Canada is more important than ever. If you’re able, please make a tax-deductible donation to True North today. Thank you so much.