Temporary residents continue to climb, pushing Canada’s population past 41 million

Canada surpassed 41 million people in the first quarter of 2024 as the country continues to experience rapid growth driven almost exclusively by international migration. 

According to Statistics Canada, the population stood at 41,012,563 as of April 1, 2024, increasing by 242,673 people, or 0.6%, from the previous quarter. 

The new milestone of 41 million people comes less than a year after Statistics Canada announced that Canada’s population had reached 40 million people.

The quarterly population growth follows Canada’s annual population increasing at rates not seen in 66 years.

99.3% of Canada’s population growth in the first quarter of 2024 is thanks to international migration. 121,758 permanent residents immigrated to Canada, eclipsed by the 131,810 non-permanent residents added to the population in the first quarter of the year.

Interprovincial migration slowed by 8.7%, but Alberta continued to lead the way.

While almost 90,000 Canadians migrated provincially, most provinces and territories saw net losses in their exchanges with other provinces or territories.

Alberta gained 12,500 more interprovincial migrants than it lost, followed by New Brunswick, which saw a net gain of 1,627, and Yukon, which gained 60 more people than it lost. 

“This was the 11th straight quarter of net gains for Alberta, following losses in 19 out of 24 quarters from the third quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2021,” reads the report.

Alberta saw the biggest gains in interprovincial migration from Ontario and British Columbia, seeing 9,398 and 9,218 migrate to Alberta, respectively. On the flip side, most people who left Alberta also went to British Columbia and Ontario, with 5,744 and 3,893 leaving, respectively. 

“For the 10th quarter in a row, Ontario (-9,020) had the largest net loss of people to other provinces and territories in the first quarter of 2024. Ontario has posted net losses in interprovincial migration for the past 17 quarters (since the first quarter of 2020),” reads the report. 

The increase in temporary migrants is 21.5% higher in the first quarter of 2024 than in 2023. 

While Canada added 131,810 non-permanent residents in the first quarter of 2024, it added only 108,435 in the first quarter of 2023. 

However, the increase in non-permanent residents is much lower than the record highs set in the second and third quarters of 2023, when Canada saw 233,361 and 312,758 temporary residents enter the country, respectively.

Currently, just under 2.8 million non-permanent residents live in Canada. More than 85% of the temporary residents are work or study permit holders; the rest are asylum claimants, protected persons and related groups.

Following his admission that the level of temporary foreign workers and international students resulted in a system that was “out of control,” Immigration Minister Marc Miller announced that Canada would bring temporary residents from 6.2% to 5% of the total population.

6.8% of Canada’s total population is now non-permanent residents. During the first quarter of 2022, non-permanent residents comprised 3.5% of Canada’s total population. During the first quarter of 2023, temporary residents made up 4.7% of Canada’s population.

All provinces saw increases in temporary residents except Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick. 

Non-permanent residents with work permits increased, while temporary residents with study permits decreased.

“A lower number of people who hold only study permits is not uncommon in a first quarter, but the magnitude of the decrease in the first quarter of 2024 was greater than that in the same quarter of 2023 (-16,003),” reads the report.

The Liberals imposed a 2-year cap on international students, reducing the number by 35%. Work hours were also restricted, while higher permit fees for international students were implemented at the beginning of 2024 in response to massive fraud in Canada’s international student program. 

A Leger poll conducted near the end of 2023 showed that 75% of Canadians believe that immigrants are contributing to the housing crisis, while 73% believe that immigrants are putting pressure on the healthcare system and 63% believe that immigrants are putting pressure on the school system.

Trudeau drops $220k on airplane food for six-day trip to Indonesia

While many food bank shelves lay bare due to the ever growing demand, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Indo-Pacific trip racked up a food bill of over $223,000 in airplane catering alone.

Trudeau took a trip to Singapore last fall to meet with business leaders and the president of Indonesia before attending a G20 summit in India. 

The total expense of the trip was nearly $2 million, but it was the catering that took the biggest bite. 

Initially said to be around $180,000, a response to an order paper question in the House of Commons later revealed the final airplane catering bill to be $223,234.

The Royal Canadian Air Force CC-150 carried as many as 72 passengers during one leg of its journey over the six-day trip. On one flight alone, the catering bill was $85,000, or at least $1180.55 per person, assuming that bill corresponded with the 72-passenger flight. 

Other flights had just 37 passengers on board at one time. 

Trudeau and his entourage were served a selection of pan fried beef tenderloin with port wine sauce and beef brisket with mashed parsley potatoes with truffle oil. 

However, if one wasn’t in the mood for beef, they could enjoy the braised lamb shanks with steamed broccoli and boiled baby potatoes. 

The gourmet meals were capped with slices of baked cheesecake with pistachio brittle. 

All to be washed down with Flow water, a premium brand of boxed alkaline spring water. 

Flow water is a personal favourite of Trudeau’s, making regular appearances on his personal grocery expenses. 

It’s a brand possibly not known by the middle class, nor those working hard to join it. 

“This should go without saying, but the feds shouldn’t be billing taxpayers hundreds of thousands for airplane food when many Canadians can’t afford their own grocery haul,” Franco Terrazzano, federal director for the Canadian Taxpayer Federation, told True North. 

Food Banks Canada has been warning of low stock for the past year as more and more Canadians depend on the donations of others to put food on the table.

The problem has gotten so bad that one in five Canadians now have an acquaintance who had to resort to using food banks to meet their needs, according to a new national survey.  

Nanos Research conducted the survey between May 31 and June 2 and found that while only 2% of respondents said that they had used food banks themselves, nearly twice as many knew of a family member who had.

“In March 2023, there were almost 2 million visits to food banks across Canada, representing a 32 per cent increase compared to March 2022, and a 78.5% increase compared to March 2019, which is the highest year-over-year increase in usage ever reported,” reads Food Banks Canada’s latest report released on Tuesday.

The report projects that one in four Canadians may soon be living below the poverty line, based on its Material Deprivation Index. 

“The government told taxpayers it would cut down on these extravagant trips, but dropping more than $200,000 on airplane food doesn’t exactly scream fiscal responsibility,” said Terrazzano. 

“Struggling Canadians have every right to be furious with the Trudeau government for spending six-figures on airplane food.”

40 Canadian professors sign letter calling for end of DEI in universities

Dozens of Canadian university professors have signed a letter to Parliament calling on the federal government to end mandated “diversity, equity and inclusion” initiatives in universities.  

The Canadian government continues to mandate DEI quotas through its Canada Research Chairs program, a federal initiative intended for the recruitment and retainment of scholars at academic institutions.

In their letter, the 40 signatories highlighted several issues with DEI policies in universities.

“These policies disproportionately punish small institutions, are not supported by evidence, employ flawed metrics with no end goal, and are unpopular with the public who funds the research,” the professors wrote. 

They believe the feds should be “abolishing DEI from the Tri-Council agencies.”

The federal “Tri-Council” is made up of Canada’s three federal research agencies, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

The letter’s authors provided several cases they see as evidence of DEI’s failures. 

They cited a Feb. 2024 research report from Wilfrid Laurier University social scientist David Millard Haskell, one of the signatories, which not only found that DEI is ineffective at addressing the issues it claims to address, but that it leads to even more prejudice and bigotry.

“Haskell found that there is no evidence that DEI reduces bias or alters behaviour. In fact, DEI interventions have been shown to do harm by increasing prejudice and activating bigotry,” the professors noted. 

The professors also cited a comprehensive analysis of research from the U.K. government finding it is “often near impossible to discern” whether DEI initiatives work.

The professors claimed in their letter that the public is on their side, citing research from Prof. Eric Kaufmann showing 70% of Canadians prefer colour-blind approaches to race rather than affirmative action.

The professors noted that many in academia disagree with DEI, but are scared into silence.

“Many agree with us – including senior, tenured faculty – but will not speak publicly for fear of repercussions,” the professors wrote. “Specifically, they are scared even to question Tri-Council policies relating to diversity, equity and inclusion.”

They added that this fear of repercussions “reinforces our recommendation to abolish (DEI) altogether.”

As previously reported by True North, DEI initiatives and ideology in Canadian academic institutions have been discriminatory, divisive and expensive.

Several universities have engaged in restricting hiring practices to meet DEI quotas.

Quebec City’s Laval University had a Canada Research Chairs job posting that was closed to able-bodied white men, the University of Waterloo was looking exclusively for professors who identified as “gender-fluid,” women, sexual minorities or visible minorities to fill similar positions. The University of Toronto, meanwhile, outright barred white people from a Canada Research Chairs education position while UBC had a medicine position opened exclusively to people with disabilities. 

True North also reported on racially segregated DEI graduation ceremonies and freshmen orientations taking place at many Canadian universities. Racially segregated DEI student lounges, swim times and other racially segregated events have also been observed on Canadian campuses.

Documents leaked to True North’s Lindsay Shepherd meanwhile revealed troubling times within Wilfrid Laurier University’s Faculty of Social Work, with the Indigenous faculty members and the black dean accusing each other of racism. 

Another True North investigation found that top Ontario universities are spending millions on six-figure salaries for DEI officials. 

Canadian officials have also suggested that DEI quotas may continue even after diversity targets are met.

The Andrew Lawton Show | Parents suing Catholic hospital for not giving their daughter assisted suicide

The parents of a young woman who battled terminal cancer before ending her life through assisted suicide are suing the Catholic-run St. Paul’s Hospital for transferring her to a hospice that offered MAID instead of providing it where she was. They say the hospital and the province of British Columbia violated her Charter rights. True North’s Andrew Lawton says if so-called MAID is going to continue to expand, conscience rights for facilities and practitioners that want nothing to do with it need to be protected.

Also, the City of Toronto is forging ahead with its renaming of Yonge-Dundas Square to “Sankofa Square.” But the whole exercise is based on a lie about Henry Dundas. Andrew discusses with historian and former member of Parliament Lynn McDonald.

Plus, new research from the Fraser Institute shows that parents want teachers to focus on teaching facts and not giving their own opinion or “interpretation” in the classroom. Do you agree? Education policy analyst Paige MacPherson joins the show to unpack the numbers.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

The Daily Brief | RCMP surprised hate groups becoming increasingly racially diverse

A True North exclusive reveals the RCMP is surprised that hate groups in Canada are recruiting racialized people and becoming increasingly ethnically diverse.

Plus, Canadian legislators entertained the leader of an international “anti-hate” activist organization that X CEO Elon Musk blamed for a $100 million loss in advertising revenue after he took over the platform in 2022.

And new immigrants are finding out Canada isn’t all it’s made out to be with 43% reporting dissatisfaction with the cost of living and employment.

Tune into The Daily Brief with Cosmind Dzsurdzsa and Lindsay Shepherd!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAILY BRIEF

Trudeau government underestimated cost of EV subsidies by $6.3 billion

The Liberals have already gone billions of dollars over budget for subsidies given to electric vehicle manufacturers in collaboration with provincial governments.

The federal government is now spending more money on capital expenses for projects across the EV supply chain than large automotive corporations are spending themselves on these projects.

Over the past four years, the Trudeau government in collaboration with the governments of Ontario and Quebec have struck 13 deals with multinational auto-making corporations to match investments with an equal amount of private sector funding.

As part of these deals, Canada is committed to dolling out an estimated $46.1 billion in subsidies to EV producers according to the Trudeau government’s initial estimates.

However, an analysis by the Parliamentary Budget Officer found that the government spends an estimated 14% more on the EV supply chain than the private industry. Originally meant to be $46.1 billion in government subsidies to EV manufacturers, the figure has ballooned to an estimated $6.3 billion more than the original target.

“PBO estimates total corresponding government support (for capital and operating expenses) to be up to $52.5 billion, which is $6.3 billion (14 per cent) higher than announced investments.” reads the analysis.

The PBO estimates that of the $52.5 billion of taxpayer dollars being spent, $31.4 billion comes from the federal government while $21.1 billion will come from the provinces. 

To make Canada a world leader in electric vehicle manufacture and create jobs, the federal government is subsidizing select battery manufacturing plants, assembly plants, and raw materials plants to become a key contributor to the EV market.

The largest of the recent subsidies went to Honda, where the feds and Ontario had given the Japanese auto-maker a $15 billion subsidy to build vehicle assembly plants and a few manufacturing plants.

Other notable subsidies include the $7 billion given to Northvolt by the federal and Quebec governments, a $7 billion subsidy for a Volkswagen EV battery plant, and $5 billion for a Stellantis battery plant. 

The federal government had come under fire last year when it was revealed that Stellantis – receiving billions in taxpayer dollars – was hiring foreign temporary workers at the plant, challenging Trudeau’s claim that the subsidies would provide new jobs for Canadians.

Last year, the PBO published a report claiming that the subsidies for EV manufacturers will take around 20 years for the government to recuperate their funds from the subsidies. 

The Trudeau government has been committing to transitioning Canadians away from using combustion engine vehicles and towards a completely electrified vehicle market. 

Beyond subsidies, the Trudeau government introduced a ban on the sale of new combustion engine vehicles by 2035.

Edmonton Prolife launches Charter lawsuit against Edmonton agency over booth ban

Edmonton Prolife is suing the Explore Edmonton Corporation for excluding their booth from Klondike Days, citing Charter violations.

Lawyers from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms filed a lawsuit against the Explore Edmonton Corporation on behalf of Edmonton Prolife earlier this month.

The Explore Edmonton Corporation, owned by the City of Edmonton, manages local venues and promotes tourism in the city.

Edmonton Prolife has had a booth at Klondike Days since the 1980s, according to the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. The not-for-profit organization aims to provide awareness, support, and resources to those facing unplanned pregnancies and situations that could result in end-of-life care.

“Edmonton Prolife applied for a KDays booth on February 8, 2024. On May 14, 2024, it received a vague notice that its application had been rejected because it had not met vendor criteria or because of lack of available space,” said the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.

In Jan. 2022, Edmonton Prolife applied for a booth at Klondike Days. The application was accepted in July 2022. Edmonton Prolife was told it could have a booth at the exhibition to present its materials. 

“However, eight days later, Explore Edmonton unilaterally cancelled the organization’s booking without any explanation,” reads the news release.

The not-for-profit did not reapply in 2023.

Email exchanges from 2022 between Explore Edmonton staff, obtained through a freedom of information request, allegedly revealed the corporation’s intentions to exclude Edmonton Prolife. 

“(The emails) showed that the corporation looked for ways to exclude Edmonton Prolife from KDays. These email exchanges disclosed that Explore Edmonton disliked their pro-life message and believed that it made guests feel unsafe, despite a lack of any supporting evidence,” said the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.

Another factor allegedly cited without any evidence of security risks was the recent court ruling in the United States on abortion.

“Edmonton Prolife’s application seeks relief for Explore Edmonton’s violation of its section 2(b) Charter right to ‘freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication’,” reads the news release.

Klondike Days were hosted by Northlands until 2019. In 2017, Northlands told Edmonton Prolife that their booth would not be welcome anymore, citing a “new policy” prohibiting “political and religious organizations” from setting up booths at the event.

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms represented Edmonton Prolife, arguing that Northlands’ decision infringed on section 2(b) of the Charter. The formal request led to discussions, and Edmonton Prolife was re-permitted to have a booth after Northlands reconsidered. 

“Public spaces are important forums for people to express a wide range of ideas. Governments are custodians of public spaces and must comply with the Charter when managing these public spaces,” said Darren Leung, counsel for Edmonton Prolife. “Government bodies like the Explore Edmonton Corporation are legally required to be neutral and have no right to censor content that they dislike or disagree with.”

True North reached out to the Explore Edmonton Corporation for comment but received no reply.

Canadian veteran slams Canada’s euthanasia program for targeting peers

One Canadian veteran has had enough of Canada’s euthanasia program after hearing her peers were offered death as an alternative to potentially life-saving healthcare.

Kelsi Sheren is the CEO of Brass and Unity, a jewellery company which works to prevent military veterans from committing suicide. 

Sheren served as an artillery specialist and a female searcher during the war in Afghanistan after enlisting at 19 years old. She was diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder upon her return home to Canada.

Having considered suicide regularly after returning from war,  Sheren views herself as someone who could have been a candidate for euthanasia.

She started her fight against Canada’s “medical assistance in dying” program after hearing her fellow veterans had been offered assisted suicide at a time when accessing treatments can be difficult.

She told True North in an interview at a pro-life conference in Mississauga on Saturday that she faced more barriers accessing psychedelic plant medicines through Canada’s special access program than many Canadians face to access state-sanctioned suicide.

“Why is it that we can access death care, but we can’t access a genuine treatment that can help us become a functioning healthy, taxpaying part of society?” Sheren said.

She credits plant medicine therapy such as ayahuasca and psilocybin treatments for her mental health recovery.

“We have plant medicine which solves a significant amount of psychological issues, and trauma, and we can use those things but when we have our hands tied behind our back and bricks tied to our feet, how do you expect us to heal?” she said.

Sheren, with the help of lawyers, had to pay out-of-pocket, wait months, and wade through bureaucracy to access what she considered to be a potentially life-affirming treatment, while her fellow service members were being offered MAiD when they asked for support. 

“My issue with (euthanasia) is how we are killing people and how we have a predatory behaviour of telling individuals that they can’t heal, they can’t get better, and the solution to their problems is death,” she said. 

For Sheren, the solution for many veterans is in healthcare and treatment.

She said the government shouldn’t be in charge of the program, because many of the problems that lead someone to want suicide could be a result of the government’s mismanagement.

“We don’t look after our own people. We send our money to other places, our schools are overflowing and there are not enough teachers, classrooms, housing or jobs,” she said. “We charge people astronomical amounts to live here, and then we wonder why people want to die.” 

Aside from what she views as the government creating a stronger incentive to kill off the most vulnerable than it is to fix issues in the country, Sheren also objects to the process of killing itself.

She pointed to studies conducted by anesthesiologist and intensive care medicine specialist Dr. Joel Zivot on the effects of paralytic drugs in capital punishment, drugs that he said are similar to those used in the death cocktails offered by doctors in the “MAiD” program.

In an interview with True North, Zivot warned that the use of paralytics in Canada’s “MAiD” system may be giving patients a “terrifying” death rather than the peaceful death many advocates of the program say it is.

Though there haven’t been large-scale autopsies to study the effects of MAiD, Zivot found that 79% of U.S. prisoners had a “bloody frothy liquid” in their lungs after being executed with two paralytic drugs.

He said paralytics such as rocuronium, which is used in Canada’s euthanasia programs, can do the same thing as the drugs used to execute those prisoners in the U.S., in a process he said was “akin to waterboarding.”

“(Parilytics) have no effect on unconsciousness or pain control, when a person is given only a paralytic they would be very much awake and very much in pain,” Zivot said. “Outwardly, if you looked at a person who was paralyzed, you know, it might look very peaceful because, of course, they wouldn’t be moving at all…but on the inside their internal experience could be quite terrifying.”

He said MAiD practitioners are “suffocating people to death.”

Some euthanasia-performing doctors have disputed Zivot’s claims saying patients would be in a coma during the time of death and wouldn’t feel the pain Zivot described.

Zivot also warned that the system is being used to bypass long-standing rules that prevent organ donors from a donation that would kill them.

He said the allowance of donating organs such as lungs or hearts creates new incentives to kill people while using “MAiD” to harvest their organs.

Another report warns of devastating economic impact from Liberals’ emissions cap

The third report released this year found that the federal oil and gas emissions cap will result in huge production losses and billions in lost GDP for Canada. 

The Deloitte Canada report, commissioned by the Alberta government, estimates that the emissions cap will reduce oil production by more than 626,000 barrels per day, resulting in $282 billion in lost GDP for Canadians over a decade. 

“Three internationally respected firms have now shown that the federal emissions cap will devastate Alberta’s economy and hurt all of Canada,” said Alberta’s Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz in a press release.

“There can no longer be any debate – the federal cap will lead to production cuts, lost jobs, reduced income, weakened investment, and less funding for essential services – devastating families and businesses from coast to coast. Let’s scrap the cap and reduce emissions without hurting Canadians.”

While the Alberta government commissioned the report, it also explored the effect of the cap on other provinces. Researchers found that no province would be hit as hard as Alberta. 

Between 2030 and 2040, Deloitte Canada estimates the cap would result in real GDP in Alberta being $191 billion lower, with real GDP in the rest of Canada falling an additional $91 billion. The report estimates that employment in Alberta would fall by 2% or 55,000 jobs. In comparison, the rest of Canada’s employment would fall by 0.5%, or 35,000 jobs over ten years.

By 2040, Alberta’s GDP would fall by 4.5% and the rest of Canada by an additional 0.4%. On top of that, government tax revenues, which fund services and programs for Canadians, would be reduced by 5.8% in Alberta and 1.3% in Canada by 2040.

Due to lower employment opportunities, Deloitte Canada estimates that 2,400 people would move from Alberta to other provinces yearly, resulting in 25,880 leaving the province between 2030 and 2040.

The Alberta government said the cap would affect more than just the oil and gas sector. Negative impacts on the supply chain would trickle into the mining, refining products, utilities, agriculture and forestry, and construction and services sectors.

“The report shows that the cap will harm GDP, cost jobs, and weaken investment. There are ways to reduce emissions without harming our collective well-being, and it’s time to give up on this failed idea,” said Alberta’s Minister of Finance, Nate Horner.

Deloitte Canada’s report follows an even more harrowing report from the Conference Board of Canada, showing the cap would reduce Canada’s GDP by up to $1 trillion between 2030 and 2040 and cause up to 151,000 jobs to be lost by 2030. 

The report from the Conference Board of Canada resulted in the Alberta government submitting a 24-page response to the federal government’s draft Regulatory Framework to Cap Oil and Gas Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

“[The cap] clearly violates Section 92A of the Constitution Act, 1867,” said the Alberta government in its lengthy response.

The response seemingly fell on deaf ears.

After The Conference Board of Canada’s report was released, S&P Global Commodity Insights released a report of its own. The report explored various possibilities, with the worst-case scenario resulting in two million barrels of oil being lost daily by 2035 due to the emissions cap. 

Alternatively, S&P explored a scenario where the federal government supported the oil & gas industry, which would result in an additional $1.3 trillion in GDP contributions and support 383,000 jobs annually by 2035.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith previously invoked the Sovereignty Within a United Canada Act to defend the province from the Liberals’ program designed to mandate a net-zero electricity grid by 2035, arguing that it was unconstitutional. 

“Alberta’s government continues to call for the federal government to abandon the proposed oil and gas emissions cap and work with all provinces and territories to develop pathways to achieve emissions reductions while supporting economic growth,” concluded Alberta’s press release.

Steven Guilbeault says second Trump term “very worrisome” for climate agenda 

Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault says the prospect of a second Donald Trump presidency is “very worrisome” for the climate change agenda.

Guilbeault’s comments come as Trump continues to surge in the polls.

America’s carbon emissions decreased during Trump’s first term.

Guilbeault made the comments in an interview with iPolitics, where he was asked if he was worried about “the possibility of Donald Trump returning to the White House and re-opening protected areas in the Arctic for more drilling.”

Guilbeault boasted about how the Trudeau government has shown it can work with both Republicans and Democrats. He did however admit that he finds Trump troubling on the environmental front..

“There are some things that Trump and his team have put out that are very worrisome from an environmental perspective, whether it’s on climate or whether it’s on nature,” Guilbeault said. “You would like to think that nature should be a nonpartisan issue.”

He went on to say that “there’s nothing more conservative than conservation. The conservation movement was largely started by conservative people,” and that he’s “hoping that can be the case” in both the U.S. and Canada.

Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows that in 2019, the United States’ carbon dioxide emissions were at the lowest they had been since 1992, while per capita emissions were at a low not seen since 1950.

The drop in America’s carbon emissions came despite Trump pulling the United States out of the United Nations’ Paris accord.

Trump has also spoken favourably of hybrid vehicles, while also stressing the need for Americans to have consumer choice.

“We should sell electric, but we should also sell combustion engine gasoline cars. We can sell hybrids. The hybrids are fine,” said Trump in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

According to polling, Trump has a lead over incumbent Democrat president Joe Biden, who is currently dealing with a historically low approval rating.

The Real Clear Politics average puts Trump at 0.8% over Biden nationally, as well as ahead in several swing states Biden carried in 2020, including Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.