fbpx
Tuesday, October 7, 2025

OP-ED: The angry young socialists poisoning our politics

Source: Reddit

The rise of social media has done considerable damage to political discourse in Canada and elsewhere. And while platforms like Twitter and Facebook take most of the blame, there’s another malignant force on the internet that requires our attention. A growing online community of YouTubers and live-streamers is spouting far-left dogma, praising political violence and denigrating their opponents as evil, far-right fascists.

Known collectively as “BreadTube,” they are shaping the views of millions of young Canadians. Here are three examples of this new source of misinformation and psychological manipulation.

Hasan Piker, known as HasanAbi, is the king of BreadTubers, with over 2.5 million followers on Twitch, the internet’s largest livestreaming platform, as well as 1.3 million YouTube subscribers and 1.4 million followers on X. On a near-daily basis, he comments on the news, reacts to other political pundits, complains about the horrors of capitalism and the West and praises socialism – all while playing video games.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, HasanAbi persuaded radical left congresswomen Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar to play the video game Among Us with him, attracting a huge audience. That caught the eye of NDP leader Jagmeet Singh, who then joined Ocasio-Cortez on a subsequent broadcast. It was a kind of socialist love-in that tried to “reach young people where they hang,” according to the CBC, with discussion of “universal pharmacare, political civility, a living wage and rehabilitation over punishment.”

HasanAbi is not simply a “progressive” commentator with a penchant for gaming: he is a nasty, far-left radical. He rationalized Hamas’s October 7 atrocity as an inevitability for which the “fascist” Israeli government was to blame. After one viewer challenged him about Hamas targeting innocent Israeli civilians, he launched into a vulgar rant:  “You want every single Palestinian to be f—— executed ruthlessly in the streets so that you can build another f—— theme park in Gaza. You f—— baying pig.”

He called another commenter who questioned his blaming Israel for the Al-Ahli hospital bombing a “liar,” a “garbage monstrous scumbag” and a “piece of s— genocide denier.” Anyone who objects to his message is insulted in front of his massive audience.

Another prominent BreadTuber, Ian Kochinski, also known as “Vaush,” is a self-styled libertarian-socialist Twitch streamer. His content is similar to HasanAbi’s, but he presents himself as an intellectual able to debunk any right-wing argument. In fact, Vaush is a manipulative propagandist adept at clever rhetorical tactics, self-serving reasoning and distortions of the truth. He demonizes conservatives as being no different from the Ku Klux Klan. He also claims conservatism is based on the same principles as neo-Nazism, the average Republican would have voted for Hitler and right-wing populism is merely racism and/or fascism.

Second Thought is a socialist YouTube channel with more than 1.7 million subscribers pulling in around 2 million monthly video views – more than the CBC’s main YouTube channel. Featuring a young host named JT Chapman, it delivers tightly-edited, well-produced videos about the evils of capitalism and the West while staunchly defending socialism.

In one video on authoritarianism, Chapman presents repressive communist regimes such as the Soviet Union, China, North Korea and Cuba as equivalent to Western democracies. He whitewashes the atrocities committed by these regimes while exaggerating the transgressions of liberal democracies, blurring distinctions between the two economic and political systems and equating Communist secret police forces with plainclothes police officers.

In another video, “This Is Why You’re Poor,” Chapman explains that capitalist societies deliberately seek unemployment because it reminds the jobless they can be replaced; he also argues any indignation over laziness or unemployment is just an elaborate way to guilt people into exploiting themselves further. Chapman defines the left as the “we need healthcare” crowd and the right as the “we need an ethno-state” crowd. In his view, socialism is all things good, while capitalism is entirely bad.

The success of these BreadTubers comes not from the power of their ideas but the force with which they express them, and the way they manipulate their audience to come onside. Through emotional appeals, curated facts and enforced conformity within their communities, they are creating a shared mindset that allows extreme positions to thrive.

Ever wonder why so many young left-wingers are hostile to Joe Biden or Justin Trudeau? Part of the reason is that they have been told by these “influencers” that these two leaders are weak centrists or crypto-conservatives. Why do so many young “progressives” express pro-Palestinian sentiments with such anger and virulence? In part it’s because they are listening to BreadTubers who consider Israel a fascist ethno-state and its supporters “bloodthirsty pig-dogs.”

Politicians such as Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Jagmeet Singh who feel comfortable aligning themselves with radicals such as HasanAbi should be roundly condemned. As BreadTubers grow their followings, the base of Canada’s NDP and Liberal parties and the Democratic party in the U.S. are being dragged further towards extremism. For conservatives, understanding these new sources of leftwing thinking offers critical insight into how the political landscape is changing and what is needed to push back against today’s far left.

The original, full-length version of this article recently appeared in C2C Journal.

Noah Jarvis is a political science student at York University and a reporter for True North.

Liberal MP admits his party plays political games with support for Ukraine

Source: Facebook

The Liberal government’s parliamentary secretary for foreign affairs Rob Oliphant admitted that his party has been playing political games to obfuscate the Conservatives’ support for Ukraine.

In asking a question to Ukraine’s ambassador to Canada before parliament’s foreign affairs and international development committee, Oliphant said that he believes that Canadians and their members of parliament support Ukraine in their war against Russia.

“Canada’s commitment to Ukraine is unwavering, I believe Canadians’ commitment is unwavering, and despite the political games that we play, I believe the opposition’s commitment is unwavering” said Oliphant. 

Oliphant admitted that he may be penalized by his party for making such a statement, but reaffirmed his position.

“I may get in trouble for saying that, but I really believe that and we only get ahead if we do that and don’t play games with this.” 

True North reached out to Oliphant to clarify his position on the Conservative Party’s support for Ukraine, but no reply was given.

Commenting on the video, Conservative MP James Bezan demanded that the Prime Minister apologize for undermining Canada’s unified support for Ukraine for political gain.

“Liberals finally admit that they have been using Ukraine as a pawn in their political games. Trudeau should apologize to all Ukrainians for undermining Canada’s united support for Ukraine with his divisive partisan games.”

In recent months, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has vigorously questioned and attacked the Conservatives on their support for Ukraine.

Trudeau has attacked the Conservatives for opposing his government’s free-trade deal with Ukraine, claiming that the Tories have fallen under the influence of former U.S. President Donald Trump has the Republican Party’s hesitancy to further support the beleaguered country.

However, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has reiterated his party’s support for Ukraine in their war against Russia.

Poilievre has made statements in which he has called Russian President Vladimir Putin an “evil dictator,” and has called for the Canadian government to develop the means to export natural gas to Europe to offset the continent’s dependence on Russian energy.

The Conservative leader claims that his party voted against the updated free trade agreement with Ukraine because of a provision in the agreement that he says will force Ukraine to adopt a carbon tax.

The Canada-Ukraine free trade deal updates an agreement that former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government had crafted.

LAWTON: Why Canada shouldn’t turn its back on Israel

Source: Wikipedia

As we continue to witness pro-Hamas celebrations across the country following the Oct. 7 attacks, the need to back Israel seems more apparent than ever. So why have Liberal and NDP politicians turned their backs on one of Canada’s most important allies? Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs president Shimon Koffler Fogel joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to explain. 

Liberals eyeing new election date that coincides with MPs pension qualification 

Source: Elections Canada

The Liberals introduced a bill to alter the Elections Act in a way that would coincidentally allow nearly 80 MPs to qualify for a cushy House of Commons pension. 

Minister of Public Safety Dominic LeBlanc introduced many changes to the Elections Act on Wednesday, one of which was to move the current scheduled election day from Oct. 20 to Oct. 27, 2025. 

LeBlanc claims rescheduling the date to a week later is to acknowledge the Hindu religious festival of Diwali, saying that the overall bill is designed to strengthen Canada’s democracy. 

Other changes include expanded days for advanced voting and establishing an easier process for mail-in ballots. 

“Our government believes that a strong democracy begins with enabling all Canadians to freely exercise their fundamental right to choose their representatives and we’ll always be there to defend that right,” said LeBlanc. 

However, the rescheduling of election day also carries with it a significant caveat which applies to certain MPs pensions, depending on when they were voted in. 

All MPs receive a pension after six years of service, meaning any MP elected in 2019 will only reach that six-year threshold if the election is postponed past Oct. 20, 2025. 

However, an election date of Oct. 27, 2025 means that they will indeed qualify for the taxpayer-funded benefit. 

The Liberals lost their majority government in the 2019 election, becoming a minority government propped up by the NDP, which was reestablished again in the 2021 election. 

The 2019 election saw 32 new Conservative MPs win seats, 22 Liberal MPs, 20 Bloc Quebecois MPs and six NDP MPs. 

These MPs are the ones poised to benefit from an Oct. 27 election date. 

Election dates are not set in stone and the government does have the right to change them, however, the timing of the change has critics taking notice. 

“I don’t think anyone is going to buy that government spin. Canadians are just going to ask the obvious question: Why do we have to bump the election back a week instead of having it a week early? This looks like the government is pushing back the election so more MPs can take a very lucrative-taxpayer funded pension,” Franco Terrazano, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation told True North.

Those who surpass six years are eligible to begin receiving pension payments on a reduced basis as early as age 55 and qualify for a full pension at age 65. 

Six years of service is the minimum requirement, however pension payments continue to grow the longer an MP serves in Parliament. 

“If politicians don’t want to look shady, then they should stop doing shady stuff like this. The result of this will be taking more money from struggling Canadians and giving that money to already extremely well-paid politicians,” said Terrazano. 

LAWTON: U of T professor punished for encouraging debate

Source: UofT

A University of Toronto professor is facing repercussions after organizing a discussion game aimed at promoting discourse among students, with the university taking particular issue with the statement “men can become women” being used as a starting premise for discussion. Professor Leigh Revers joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to explain what went down, and defend the educational value of engaging with controversial topics in an academic setting.

The Alberta Roundup | Leftists wreck “Recall Gondek” signs

Source: Karen Motyka

This week on the Alberta Roundup with Rachel Emmanuel, Rachel has a big update about the recall Mayor Jyoti Gondek campaign, including that two campaign signs were defaced this week.

Also on the show, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith explains how the provincial fuel tax is different than the federal carbon tax as both will go up next month.

Meanwhile Calgarians are bracing for even higher than expected property tax increases this year, and Gondek is blaming the province — who shot back. Rachel also explains the latest efforts to conserve water ahead of an expected drought this spring.

Tune into the Alberta Roundup now!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ALBERTA ROUNDUP

Protesters stand with Take Back Alberta founder at Elections Alberta demonstration

Source: Isaac Lamoureux

Supporters of Take Back Alberta braved the cold weather and persistent snowfall as they descended on Elections Alberta’s Edmonton headquarters to rally behind the organization’s founder.

David Parker was summoned to appear before the election agency Friday afternoon as Take Back Alberta faces a probe of its practices.

Parker arrived later than anticipated due to the poor road conditions, resulting in his trip from Calgary taking almost twice as long.

Despite running behind schedule, Parker still had time to give a short speech before entering the Elections Alberta building for his interview, scheduled to last an hour.

When he initially organized the protest with a post to X, Parker said that the “notice to attend” was issued with demands that he release the entire list of donors to Take Back Alberta, which he argued violates the Election Act, as the donations were not for political advertising.

The summons followed Parker declaring an “endless war” on Elections Alberta.

He reaffirmed this stance during his pre-interview speech.

“I will not turn you over to them. I will not give your information to them. I will not break my promise to every single one of the over 2,000 people that have donated to Take Back Alberta, and if that means they take me to court, if that means that they try to throw me in prison, so be it, because this is our stand,” said Parker.

“So, I’m going to go in there, and I’m going to answer their questions. I’m not going to be confrontational. But I am not going to give them what they want, which is you,” he added. 

He returned nearly two-and-a-half hours after he left, instead of the initially projected one hour.  Many supporters were still present to give Parker a round of applause.

He and his lawyer both gave exclusive interviews to True North.

Parker simplified the situation, saying that Elections Alberta believes his town halls, where people talk about politics, are election advertising. He disagrees. 

Under the Elections Act, Parker explained that you have an operational account and an advertising account. He said that his activities were done under the operational account, which is not subject to reporting. He cited an example of unions having operational accounts that report no spending, as it’s only required from their advertising accounts.

A ruling will be issued following the interview, which Parker said he will release a recording of.

Regardless of the ruling, Parker will not release his donors list. He said that this is merely an attempt for “the bureaucratic state to thwart democracy. I’ll fight that as far as I have to.”

Leighton Grey, Parker’s lawyer, said that much of the evidence presented was “based on rumours and innuendo.” He said that Parker has a “prodigious memory,” which allowed him to correct any mistakes presented by the investigators.

Grey said there was no substance to any of the allegations.

“Essentially, what they want to do is to define just about any time people get together and talk about politics as some sort of political advertising,” said Grey. He added that if this were true, Charter rights to participate in peaceful demonstrations, protests, and meetings would be meaningless.

Grey said that if Parker accepted Election Alberta’s request to name donors, it could open Take Back Alberta up to civil litigation, as its donors have a constitutionally protected privacy interest.

He said Canadians have become accustomed to meeting, discussing, and sharing ideas, such as politics. 

“There has not really been, in the past, this sort of tension where we’re actually fighting with our government for the right to meet.”

While Section 2c of the Charter, which deals with freedom of assembly, is a neglected area of constitutional law, according to Grey, he said that if Elections Alberta won this case, it would be “a frightening development in Canada.” 

“We’ve always been a free country, and we have these inalienable rights that have been around for a very long time; they predate Canada, actually,” said Grey. “That would be a really shocking development if we actually had to litigate whether or not people can meet together to discuss politics.”

Grey added that the Freedom Convoy may have been the century’s most important public gathering, not just in Canada but the entire world. 

“We have to be careful about what bureaucrats do in the dark. We have to shine light on that because we know, from the pandemic, if we’re not watchful of what’s going on with government, we can be placed in a situation where we lose a lot of the rights and freedoms that, unfortunately, we’ve taken for granted in Canada.”

Elon Musk offers help to Canadian doctor targeted for opposing lockdowns

Source: Flickr

Billionaire and Tesla owner Elon Musk has pledged to support a Canadian physician entangled in legal and professional challenges due to her criticism of COVID-19 lockdown measures. 

Musk’s response came after Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill asked him for help on X, the social media platform he now owns.

“As one of the first Canadian MDs to oppose lockdowns on Twitter in 2020… I’ve been persecuted for four years solely due to my Tweets. Please help a fellow Canadian! ~$300k in court-ordered costs due in four days,” said Gill. She included a screenshot of a post from Musk last August vowing to support those facing hardship from employers over things they do on X.

“If you were unfairly treated by your employer due to posting or liking something on this platform, we will fund your legal bill. No limit. Please let us know,” wrote Musk in the August post.

In response to Gill’s request, Musk wrote in a reply, “We will help.” 

Gill spoke about her ordeal in a podcast interview with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the creator of the Great Barrington Declaration that criticized lockdowns early in the COVID pandemic.

“I was starting to read about the devastating, catastrophic harms of the actual lockdowns. All of this compelled me to speak out in the summer of 2020 about everything that was being ignored, both in the media’s coverage and in the daily conversations that Canadians were having. I didn’t anticipate the response that I received,” said Gill.

Just weeks before the World Health Organization officially declared the pandemic, Gill said she was considered a leader in her profession — one who received positive media coverage.

“Suddenly, when I went against the narrative, I was seen as a black sheep and as someone who should be shunned,” said Gill. “Rather than engaging in any sort of debate or having any conversation about what I was trying to convey, I was being attacked with labels. The media didn’t seem interested in actually hearing why I was concerned.”

Despite even to this day not receiving a single patient complaint to her professional regulator, Gill became the target of a “very malicious campaign.”

Her social media posts resulted in having over two dozen CPSO investigators assigned to her, Gill said.

In an effort to clear her name, Gill launched a defamation lawsuit against the individuals she accused of campaigning against her.

Before any evidence was heard, an anti-SLAPP motion was brought forward. Anti-SLAPP legislation intends to prevent powerful entities from silencing “the small guy.” However, Gill said it was used in the opposite fashion against her, where well-funded defendants with big teams of lawyers succeeded in having her lawsuit dismissed.

In October 2022, an Ontario judge ruled a $1.2 million cost order against Gill. She appealed both the cost and actual decisions.

Finally, Gill was ordered to pay $300,000. She has mere weeks to pay, with a deadline at the end of March. This is money she said she doesn’t have following her legal battles.

“It’s all very daunting right now,” said Gill.

She added that she could have never imagined that the cost of speaking truth to power or being compelled to speak her conscience would lead to this.

“Everything I warned about in 2020, which at the time was based on peer-reviewed evidence, has now come to pass,” said Gill. “It’s been absolutely heart-wrenching and devastating watching the carnage unfold. And being helpless. Because it was all completely preventable.”

“It seems that advocating for the truth and advocating for that scientific evidence to come forward has come at a huge cost.”

As of Friday afternoon, Gill’s fundraiser was at $170,000 of its $300,000 goal.

CAMPUS WATCH: “IBPOC-only” wellbeing workshops held at UBC

Source: UBC

The University of British Columbia held several racially segregated wellbeing workshops for racial minorities, True North has learned. 

The workshops in question, held this month, sought to give attendees the opportunity to “unpack the importance of identity, culture, and histories of systemic racism and histories of systemic racism in topics related to wellbeing.”

“Self-care. Resilience. Trauma. Healing. These words are often brought up in conversations around wellbeing,” reads the description for the workshops. “In this 4-part series, open to IBPOC-only faculty and staff at UBC, these concepts will be contextualized in a more community-centered way.”

“IBPOC” refers to Indigenous, black, and people of colour.

Not all students were invited, with UBC’s website asking those interested to “self-select and enrol in this series” with the “IBPOC-only” rule in mind.

UBC did not respond to a request for comment on why it chose to restrict eligibility based on race. 

The workshops are just the latest instance of UBC hosting “anti-racist” DEI events that are restricted to members of certain races.

As previously reported by True North, white students were excluded from  a 2023 UBC event series called “Decolonial Dialogues,” with organizers wanting to create a “safe space” for those who are Indigenous, black, and persons of colour.

“In creating this space, the planning committee recognizes that identity is complex and everyone will come to this space with different lived experiences. Registering and attending the series is based on each individual student’s self-identification and we welcome those who feel they belong in this space in connection to IBPOC identities,” organizers said.

UBC also recently opened a two-storey black-only space on its campus.

The  “identity-affirming” space spans two floors and offers an impressive list of amenities including a full kitchen, a napping area, couches and bean bag chairs, a fireplace, a television, a printer, showers and lockers, as well as coffee and tea – allowing students of colour to “study, connect with each other, recharge, host events and sessions, as well as build community.” 

LAWTON: Liberal MP “reflecting” on future with party after anti-Israel motion passes

Source. pm.gc.ca

Earlier this week, the NDP’s motion to recognize Palestine as a state was heavily debated amongst parliamentarians, ultimately passing in a softened form proposed by the Liberals, leading Liberal MP Anthony Housefather to tell reporters he would be “reflecting” on his future within the party. Honest Reporting Canada assistant director Robert Walker joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to discuss.

Related stories