Jamil Jivani blasts NDP and Liberals over bill that “ignores parental rights”

Parental rights exist in Canada, whether the Liberals or the NDP like it or not, argued Conservative MP Jamil Jivani.

Conservative MP Jamil Jivani called out the NDP-Liberal coalition for not respecting parental rights in a committee hearing Thursday. He made the comments while debating a bill that could change the way Canadian teachers and parents interact with children.

Conservative MPs fought against NDP-led Bill C-273, which would repeal a provision of the criminal code that allows parents and teachers to use “reasonable force” on a child.

NDP MP Peter Julian brought forward the bill to ban physical punishment on children, stating that many developed countries have these laws and Canada needs to catch up.

One of Bill C 273’s goals is to adhere to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s sixth recommendation which called for the government to repeal section 43 of the Criminal Code of Canada.

In 2004 the Supreme Court of Canada determined the scope of what “reasonable force” entails.

The decision makes it illegal to use physical force to discipline teenagers or children under the age of two, to use objects against a child of any age, or to slap the head of any child and prohibits teachers from using force against children as punishment though they can use reasonable force to be able to remove a child from a classroom for example.

The Conservative amendment to the bill would codify the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision.

Without the amendment, Conservatives warn the bill could completely remove a parent or teacher’s right to use any force against a child.

“(The Amendment) addresses my primary concern and one that I’ve heard from many people, which is that Bill C273 does not recognize or respect parental rights,” Jivani said at the Standing Meeting on Justice and Human Rights. “Parental rights deserve recognition just as teacher safety does in any consideration of this bill, in any consideration of section 43 of the Canadian Criminal Code.”

The Conservative party’s main concern with the repeal of section 43, often referred to as the “spanking law” or “Corrines Quest,” is it potentially prohibits parents from using reasonable force on a child, such as spanking a child who reaches for a hot stovetop or holding a child who refuses to sit in a chair during a “five-minute time out.”

Without the amendment, Conservatives worry that the bill would also prevent parents and teachers from breaking up a fight between children.

“We have heard from many parents who are concerned about their place, being completely excluded, undermined, disrespected, and disregarded by the current Liberal government,” Jivani said. “It’s not hard to see why many moms and dads might feel that way. At the very top of the Liberal government, there is a prime minister who has said quite clearly that he does not respect or recognize parental rights.”

Jivani noted how Justin Trudeau lectured concerned Muslim parents last year by telling parents their concerns about gender idealogy in schools are due to “misinformation and disinformation” fuelled by “the American right wing.” 

“The prime minister showed fundamental disrespect for the rights of moms and dads,” Jivani said. “It’s not just the Liberal party that has this chronic ideological problem.”

He noted that NDP member of the committee Randall Garrison explicitly said, in February, “There’s no such thing as parental rights in Canada.”

“This is not just morally incorrect; it is also factually incorrect. The most relevant Supreme Court of Canada decision on section 43 of the Criminal Code…says quite clearly that the legislative purpose behind section 43 is parental rights,” Jivani said. “It is not an American right-wing idea. It is a Canadian idea recognized by our highest court in the land.”

He mentioned a post on X made by Melissa Mbarki of Muskowekwan First Nation, the daughter of a residential school survivor, who responded to Liberal MP Seamus O’Regan’s criticism of Pierre Poilievretelling Trudeau to “butt out” of New Brunswick’s gender identity school policy debate.

“This is why we call the current government the NDP Liberal government. It’s quite obvious that these parties work together on ideological objectives that seem completely inconsistent with what the vast majority of Canadians actually want from their government,” he said.

“I think it’s important that we point out that without (the) amendment from the Conservative Party, we would actually be continuing the allowance of an ideological agenda. That seems hell-bent on the marginalization of moms and dads and raising their children.”

Poilievre demands corporate leaders “fire lobbyists” in open letter

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre wrote an open memo to corporate Canada, imploring business leaders to fire their lobbyists, ignore politicians and instead listen to the people. 

The memo addresses the recent capital gains tax hike brought forth under the Trudeau government’s latest 2024 budget announcement. 

A decision Poilievre said made for many worried business leaders contacting him to see what his party was going to do about it.

“My answer: “No. What are you going to do about it?” reads Poilievre’s memo. “Most are stunned silent by the question. They had been planning to do nothing except complain and hope their useless and overpaid lobbyists meet Chrystia Freeland or Justin Trudeau to talk some sense into them while the opposition hounds the government to reverse course. Sorry. That won’t cut it.”

The opposition leader goes on to say that the reason businesses and entrepreneurs are under attack from the federal government is because Prime Minister Justin Trudeau knows that “they won’t do anything about it.”

“He knows he has raised payroll and energy taxes on businesses, attacked the resource sector with unconstitutional laws, and faced no consequences from the business community,” reads the memo. 

He cited how the Liberals killed TransCanada’sEnergy East pipeline and then later did the same to the proposed $20 billion Teck Frontier Mine. 

“In both cases, the companies’ gutless executives agreed to take the fall,” said Poilievre.

Poilievre also mentioned how Beer Canada was gracious to the Liberals for only increasing the excise tax by 2% because they were worried it could have been raised even higher. 

“The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) once gave an award to Trudeau’s then-national revenue minister for letting businesses distribute T4s electronically (wow, big deal!) just a few weeks after the Liberal government in the fall of 2017 had unleashed a wicked tax assault on small private businesses’ passive investments and income sharing with families,” the memo continued.

He also talked about how the Business Council of Alberta hosted an event to praise the Trudeau government after it kiboshed two pipelines via “their anti-resource law C-69 and imposed a hated carbon tax on small businesses with no rebates for over five years now.”

Poilievre called for all businesses in the province to cancel their memberships and cut their funding to the Business Council. He also called for small businesses across Canada to do the same for the CFIB.  

“At the most, the Chamber of Commerce, Business Council, and Canadian Federation of Independent Business hold pointless luncheons and meetings and write op-eds or record interviews that almost no one sees,” reads the memo. “As leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, I refuse to meet the aforementioned groups. They tell me what I already know.”

Poilievre argued that the only area where any business lobby “has borne fruit has been the rotten fruit of undue handouts, privileges, and protections by the state.”

He advised businesses not to come to politicians regarding Trudeau’s latest tax hikes, but rather to consult with Canadians themselves. 

Poilievre stressed that if tax hikes will force doctors out of the country, then medical associations must ensure that every patient is aware of that. If engineers will have to leave Canada for better job opportunities, said Poilievre, then both parents and students must know that’s what their future may hold. 

Poilievre delivered a similar message when he met with the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade in March. 

While Poilievre said his government would operate under the complete opposite policies as the Liberals, the memo also instructed businesses not to seek help from him unless they had already convinced the people that what they wanted would be beneficial for Canadians. 

“If you do have a policy proposal, don’t tell me about it. Convince Canadians that it’s good for them,” he said. “ Communicate your policy’s benefits directly to workers,  consumers and retirees. When they start telling me about your ideas on the doorstep in Windsor, St. John’s, Trois-Rivières, and Port Alberni, then I’ll think about enacting it.”

Poilievre wrote about how this had been done in the past, citing how in 1988 Canada’s free trade agreement with the U.S. was in peril as only 38% of Canadians supported it at the time, with 43% opposing it. 

The country’s business community campaigned hard to show Canadians what they stood to lose if the agreement became obsolete, and eventually swayed the majority back into its favour. 

“Want to stop the latest tax hike? Or get bureaucracy out of the way to build homes, mines, factories, pipelines and more? Then cancel your lunch meeting at the Rideau Club. Fire your lobbyist. And go to the people,” the memo concluded. 

The Daily Brief | Are we witnessing a sinking ship?

Amid plummeting polls, a Liberal MP announced that she won’t run again, claiming she’s been the victim of threats and misogyny.

Plus, a True North exclusive reveals a Palestinian group linked to the recent anti-Israel protests is a recipient of the Canada Summer Jobs funding.

And despite BC backtracking on its decriminalization plans, the Trudeau government is still considering decriminalizing drugs in Toronto.

Tune into The Daily Brief with Cosmin Dzsurdzsa and William McBeath.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAILY BRIEF

House Speaker won’t resign despite accusations of partisanship

House of Commons Speaker Greg Fergus is rejecting calls to resign for forcing Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre to leave parliament during Question Period on Tuesday.  

Fergus gave Poilievre the boot after he referred to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as a “wacko” prime minister with “wacko policies.”

In response, the Conservatives argue that Fergus failed to remain impartial as the House Speaker and furthermore that he censured Poilievre after having just allowed the Liberals to use unparliamentary language. Fergus was elected as a Liberal MP prior to being chosen to be Speaker.

Moments before Poilievre’s wacko comment, Trudeau had accused the opposition leader of “shameful, spineless leadership,” claiming that Poilievre pandered to white nationalists for votes. 

Poilievre had offered to withdraw his statement and replace the word wacko with “radical” and or “extremist,” however Fergus demanded that he withdraw the statement completely.

In the roar of frustration from the Conservative bench, an MP could be heard yelling, “they (the Liberals) can call us white supremacists.”

“I replace the word with extremist,” Poilievre replied. 

“I will ask the honourable leader of the opposition one last time to please withdraw that comment, and simply withdraw that comment,” said Fergus. 

“I simply withdraw and replace with the aforementioned adjective,” answered Poilievre.

After Poilievre refused to simply withdraw the statement, Fergus kicked him out. His exit was followed by the majority of Conservative MPs who left the house as well out of solidarity.  

Conservatives demanded that Fergus resign on Wednesday, however, according to his spokesperson Mathieu Gavel, that won’t be happening. 

“Speaker Fergus has no intention of resigning,” Gravel told the Globe and Mail in a statement. Gravel said that Fergus instructed Trudeau to “reframe” his previous statements about Poilievre, to which he complied.  

“The Speaker offered Mr. Poilievre four opportunities to withdraw his comment and reframe his question. Mr. Poilievre did not avail himself of those opportunities,” said Gravel.

While Fergus is a Liberal MP, it’s still incumbent upon him as Speaker of the House to remain non-partisan, behaviour that  Conservatives say he’s failed to exhibit.   

Conservative ethics critic Michael Barrett said that equal rules must be applied in the House of Commons, as the prime minister hurled “personal insults,” at Poilievre beforehand, instead of defending his policies. 

Housing Minister Sean Fraser rebuked any comparison between the way his Liberal party behaved and the comments made by Poilievre on Wednesday.

“Yesterday, from my perspective, I saw the behaviour on the other side dramatically beyond what most people would think would be reasonable,” said Fraser. “This is not two sides of the same coin.”

Conservative MP John Brassard does think the comparison is fair however, saying that Trudeau used “undignified” language by inferring that his party was in any way connected to white nationalists.

Ratio’d | Justin Trudeau’s PATHETIC attack against Pierre Poilievre FAILS

In a desperate attempt to save themselves, the Liberals have once again deployed the boogeyman of “Diagolon” to attack Pierre Poilievre. Nothing that is said about this fictitious meme group by the Liberal government or the legacy media is true. Despite well documented and sourced reporting point to the fact that this is a fake group made of dissidents, the Liberals can’t let it go. They need something to stick but nothing seems to be working.

In fact, polling has only improved for Poilievre after the Liberals tried to smear Poilievre as somehow being connected to a ficitious group which he has already denounced.

Time for the Liberals to move on to their next attack. This one failed.

Watch the latest episode of Ratio’d with Harrison Faulkner!

Liberal MP won’t run again, citing threats and misogyny amid plummeting polls

Another Liberal MP is abandoning the party amid plummeting polls nationwide. 

Liberal MP Pam Damoff won’t seek re-election. In her four-page resignation letter posted to her Facebook page, she said public discourse has deteriorated and trust has been lost in public institutions which she attributed to misinformation and lies spread by politicians and social media.

The MP representing the riding of Oakville North—Burlington announced her resignation, while recent polling shows her riding as a Conservative stronghold, with a 90% chance of the Tories winning the riding. 

The federal ridings of Oakville West and Oakville East most recently have polls where the Conservatives possess a 96% and 98% chance of winning, respectively.

“The threats of misogyny I have experienced as a Member of Parliament are such that I often fear going out in public, and that is not a sustainable or healthy way to live,” wrote Damoff in her resignation letter.

She did not point toward a single example of threats or misogyny. Instead, she decided to focus on the accomplishments she was proud of.  

“While I know that I still have something to offer Canada, Ontario, and my community, the hyper-partisan nature of politics today is not the environment that I see myself serving in,” said Damoff.

Some accomplishments listed by Damoff were “taking action to protect women and end gender-based violence” and “unprecedented investment in public transit and electric buses.” 

Damoff also highlighted the accomplishments of the Liberal party, of which she took notable pride.

One accomplishment she noted of the Liberals was $10 a day childcare, helping reach the highest level of women’s labour force participation in Canadian history.

The Macdonald Laurier Institute recently released a study highlighting the many issues with government-controlled childcare. The study highlighted a decline in childcare across the country, a drastic reduction in supply, and that the government has distorted the nature of women’s work to inflate GDP statistics.

“The government takeover of the childcare sector is entirely unjustified, and the results have been calamitous,” concluded the study.

Another accomplishment of the Liberal party highlighted by Damoff was the carbon tax, which the majority of premiers and Canadians have called to scrap. 

Damoff also took pride in the Liberals’ introduction of national pharmacare.

At least 21.5 million Canadians will have insurance coverage jeopardized by the program.

The Liberal MP previously defended the Liberals against allegations of corruption. She said that Canadians should look at the Taliban if they think Trudeau is corrupt.

“I’ve been told that my government is corrupt, and I often say to people, ‘take a look at Afghanistan; take a look at what’s going on in the Middle East right now if you actually want to see countries where there are terrorists running a country, as in Gaza,” she said.  

Despite announcing her resignation, Damoff confirmed that she will continue to represent her Oakville North—Burlington riding until the next election. 

“Canada is the greatest country in the world. It is not lost on me the challenges we face, issues to overcome, and divisions we have to heal,” wrote Damoff. 

She added that if Canadians focus on what unites us and take the high road, the country will be left off better than we found it.

Two injured in violent anti-capitalist protest in Montreal

An anti-capitalist protest turned violent in Montreal on Wednesday night, leading to one police officer and one citizen injured, along with damaged property in the city’s downtown.

The protest began to escalate around 5:45 p.m. when masked demonstrators threw rocks at police, smashed business windows with street signs and sprayed graffiti on walls.  

SPVM spokesperson Jean-Pierre Brabant told reporters that Montreal police used “chemical irritants” to disperse the crowd and the situation is now under control.  

Around 8 p.m. certain demonstrators “committed acts of mischief on businesses” and “armed assault.” 

The smoke bombs deployed by police as part of the “dispersal operation” occurred near de Maisonneuve and Robert-Bourassa Blvd. in Montreal’s downtown core. 

The crowd was cleared shortly after 8:30 p.m.

May Day, a day marked to remember the victories achieved by worker activism and solidarity, has regularly been the subject of violent protest by left-wing extremists in Montreal over recent years. 

Arrests were made at the Montreal May Day protest in 2022 and during the 2019 protest riot squads were deployed after demonstrators set fires on Ste. Catherine Street. Similar incidents occurred the year before in 2018 as well. 

Both citizens and police officers have been injured at each of these events.

Vivek Ramaswamy says Freedom Convoy protests were more legitimate than anti-Israel demonstrations

Ex-Republican primary candidate Vivek Ramaswamy posted a video explaining why he supports the removal of protesters blockading college campuses though he praised the Freedom Convoy who blockaded roads and, at times, highways.

The video was posted to X Tuesday afternoon and has gained over one million views.

“You’re free to express your own opinion, but you’re not free to break the law as you do it. We need to enforce the rule of law when other students cannot attend their classes,” he said.

Once protesters have been warned and had the opportunity to exercise their right to express themselves, Ramaswamy believes they need to respect laws that allow others to exercise their own freedoms as well.

“So I believe that universities like Ohio State, NIU, Indiana, and Texas are in the right to forcibly remove and when necessary, arrest students that stopped other students from being able to attend their classes and get the education that they have paid to get from those universities,” Ramaswamy said.

Videos posted on X show some of the tactics law enforcement is using to remove pro-Palestine encampment protesters, such as mass arrests, rubber bullets, and in the case of the University of Florida, tear gas.

“I think part of the reason I have first a different distinction (between the truckers and the campus students) is you have a different standing to protest and to engage in civil disobedience when you yourself are the person who’s actually affected by it,” Ramaswamy said. “It’s a very convenient thing to do to be able to appropriate somebody else’s cause, especially from halfway around the world, as your own, but to be then able to exercise civil disobedience on somebody else’s account.”

Civil disobedience is characterized by willfully breaking the law in a non-violent way to enact social change.

“It’s different when you’re talking about Rosa Parks in the back of the bus, or whether you’re talking about Canadian truckers who themselves are being forced personally, to use a COVID-19 vaccine that they did not want to use, that they felt was being foisted upon them, that protested the lockdown policies that affected the way that those truckers themselves were being able to carry out their own work and live their own lives and make a living,” he said. “That I think is a much more sympathetic case for civil disobedience.

He said another distinction between the two protests was the government’s response.

On campuses, Ramaswamy supports using force to remove the encampments that prevent other students from accessing the education they paid for. At the Freedom Convoy, they had never before used the Emergencies Act to freeze the bank accounts of protesters.

“If somebody is blocking a highway or somebody is blocking a college campus, I do think that law enforcement authorities are in the right to actually remove them from the areas they’re blockading so that other people can continue freely living their lives,” Ramaswamy said. “That is different from using backdoor mechanisms that shouldn’t be used in that context.”

He said he would be against the “de-banking” of protesters on campuses as well as calling it “punishment of the wrong kind.”

“It doesn’t relate to the actual act of civil disobedience itself. Arresting them and removing them from campus so that somebody else can go to their class is an action of the right kind,” Ramaswamy said. “But you can’t use backdoor mechanisms that weaponize supposedly neutral terrain, like our financial system, to do it.”

In Canada, anti-Israel encampments have been established at uOttawa in Ottawa Ont., McGill University in Montreal Que., and University of British Columbia in Vancouver B.C.

The Daily Brief | Singh will support Trudeau’s budget

After weeks of speculation, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh announced that his party would support this year’s budget despite raising outstanding concerns.

Plus, the Auditor General slammed the federal government for failing to consult with farmers on plans to reduce fertilizer emissions by 30% by the year 2030.

And British Columbia’s majority NDP government opposed a bill by the BC Conservatives which would prevent biological males from competing in women’s sports categories.

Tune into The Daily Brief with Cosmin Dzsurdzsa and Noah Jarvis!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAILY BRIEF

Federal public servants complain about being in office three days a week

Federal public sector workers are not happy after the federal government called on public servants to return to the office for three days a week, starting later this year. 

An anonymous source within the federal government told CBC News that the policy change will likely come into effect in September, but may be subject to change. 

Around 155,000 Public Service Alliance of Canada members walked off the job last year to maintain the twice-a-week hybrid model. 

“Now, you will be protected from arbitrary decisions about remote work by the government,” wrote the PSAC in a statement last June. 

Their union called the situation a “watershed moment” for workers’ rights at the time; now, along with the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada, they say they have been blindsided by the federal government. 

“It absolutely catches us by surprise,” said Stéphanie Montreuil, head of public affairs, told CBC News. “It came with no warning and no consultations from our part.”

Montreuil said some members are only attending the office to participate in virtual meetings. “We’ve advocated for presence with purpose,” she said.

However, Ontario Premier Doug Ford believes it’s time for federal public servants to return to their offices in downtown Ottawa, hoping the change will bolster the city’s economy.  

“Three days is a good start,” said Ford in response to the news. “When you’re coming here, go out for lunch, maybe go into a store, pick something up, go to the mall — that’s what we need, that’s what stirs the economy.”

Jean-Yves Duclos, Minister of Public Services and Procurement said that it will be left up to individual ministries to have the final say on how employees should return to their offices.

“All departments need to contribute to the conversations that are taking place with the Treasury Board,” said Duclos.

Under the new 2024 federal budget, there is a target for cutting the Public Services and Procurement Canada’s office portfolio by 50%. 

Most public servants were instructed that there’d be a return to the office of up to three days per week in late 2022 via a government mandate.