fbpx
Saturday, August 2, 2025

OP-ED: The path forward for police engagement with mental health calls

Vern White worked in policing for more than 30 years, including as an Assistant Commissioner with the RCMP and as Ottawa Police Chief, and served as a Senator for 10 years.

With the community’s mental health worsening over time, Canada has inadvertently tasked its police with a job they should not be asked to do.

We have seen dramatic changes in policing over the past two decades. But unlike past periods of transformation, this has not come from changes in legislation or court decisions that affect the scope or management of policing. This time, it is expectation from the public for better policing that has demanded change.

It has certainly had an effect on the way policing is provided, and without intervention, some would argue could or has set up policing to fail. There is growing pressure being placed on police to focus not on traditional police work, like investigating organized crime and protecting order in the community. Instead, police are increasingly called upon to perform what are essentially mental health care interventions.

More than a law enforcement agency, policing has become responsible for addressing widespread societal challenges that law enforcement agencies are not readily equipped to handle. For decades now, the mental health system has been unable to meet this growing demand for care. Our country’s collective response has failed to build enough capacity or capability to manage risks and deal with this demand.

Brought about by a shift in mental health care from institutionalization to community-based models, people experiencing mental illness now encounter police much more regularly. When this happens, things don’t always go well. The fact that Canada continues to identify these encounters as caused by the execution of the police response, rather than by a deeper division of labour problems, is causing massive issues.

As overall mental ill-health proliferates, police providing first responses to mental health crises will proliferate too. Reporting on the issue has seen growth with specific age groups, particularly younger people, but as well in our Indigenous communities. We know and have seen that police are responding to large numbers of mental health calls, and that officers most often don’t have the time or training to manage this in a way that is respectful of the caller and the problem.

For those who argue that police forces simply need to better train the police to manage this challenge, the stark reality is that this is a poor use of police resources. An officer should not be expected to be a policing and security professional and a mental health professional at the same time. 

Trained mental health experts with strong knowledge and experience should be the ones on the front line. Not that more training wouldn’t be helpful – it is always helpful – but having mental health professionals dedicated to mental illness is the right response to the problem.

A recent book published in Canada, The Wicked Problems of Police Reform in Canada, looks at this specifically, and argues that a use of police resources to meet a problem that is health-related, rather than crime-related, is negatively impacting both patients and law enforcement. It goes on to say that managing mental illness at the community level has become one of the wicked problems facing policing.

So, I would argue, this problem is not only being handled by the wrong professionals, but it further distracts from policing’s core work of public safety. This is because police feel the need to protect their status in the community and deal with the negativity directed toward them for the way these situations are often handled. 

In essence having the police become the primary or one of the primary respondents to mental illness is not only unhelpful for those afflicted but as well for the service agency, policing.

While some mental health crises would fall into the category of endangering public safety, the vast majority would not. Because we have failed to explicitly ask what police should actually do, we have inadvertently tasked them with a large responsibility for one of the most difficult tasks in health care, mental health crisis response. 

The truly wicked problem emerges when police are blamed for the job they do when handling these situations, but then nothing is done to address the root causes of the issue. Police have called for increased mental health resources to deal with this, and they must be listened to.

If we want to see an effective response to the growing issue of mental health, the most important thing isn’t to ‘better train’ police. While this is an admirable goal in general and may provide some benefits, policymakers need to address the systemic problem beneath police response issues. They need to invest in training many more frontline mental health professionals and increase the capacity and capability of those currently in the health system.

Continuing to approach this problem in the same way into the future will only ever address its symptoms, leaving the disease that causes them untreated.

Of course, reform would not totally remove the police from mental health crisis response – and nor should it, as police are often required to support and protect professionals engaged in this work.

Police reform that puts officers firmly in this supporting role, rather than asking them to lead the response to a huge range of complex mental health challenges, will ultimately make our country safer and a healthier place.

Vern White worked in policing for more than 30 years, including as an Assistant Commissioner with the RCMP and as Ottawa Police Chief, and served as a Senator for 10 years.

UCP say Notley’s comments calling for Trudeau to quell Sovereignty Act were no ‘slip of the tongue’

The United Conservative Party (UCP) government says Alberta NDP leader Rachel Notley’s comments calling on the Trudeau government to quell Alberta Sovereignty Act legislation were no “slip of the tongue.” 

Earlier this month, the UCP caucus demanded an apology from Notley after she said the federal government should squash the act.

“I think if they revoke the Act, that would be the right thing to do,” she said on Wednesday, in response to a question about whether Prime Minister Justin Trudeau should revoke the bill. 

NDP spokesperson Benjamin Alldritt immediately walked back those comments, saying Notley was referring to the provincial government. 

“Notley was NOT referring to the federal government,” Alldritt told the CBC. 

“To be clear – the Alberta NDP is calling for the provincial government to revoke Bill 1, but we are NOT calling for the federal government to disallow it.”

But Alberta’s Chief Government Whip Brad Rutherford said Notley’s remarks were no “slip of the tongue.” 

“Rachel Notley clearly called on Justin Trudeau to revoke an Alberta law and override the will of Alberta’s democratically-elected Legislature,” Rutherford told True North. 

“Ms. Notley didn’t even bother proposing any amendments to the bill she wants Justin Trudeau to revoke. Albertans deserve better than this from the Opposition NDP, who have a duty to contribute to the legislative process.”

“Ultimately, all MLAs in the Alberta Legislature are there to serve Albertans, not Justin Trudeau. The NDP might want to remind themselves of that.”

The Alberta NDP has a policy not to respond to media requests from True North.

Sovereignty Act legislation passed the Alberta legislature on Thursday morning, just ten days after it was tabled; the NDP did not offer any amendments and voted against Bill 1 at all three readings. 

The Opposition says Bill 1 would create “investment uncertainty, jeopardize federal funding agreements and risk Alberta’s economic future.” 

Trudeau has said he’s “not looking for a fight” with Alberta, but added that federal government is not taking anything off the table when it comes to how it may respond to Bill 1. 

The Andrew Lawton Show | Elon Musk needs to stand up to Trudeau’s internet censorship

Since taking over Twitter, Elon Musk has released troves of files documenting how Twitter personnel worked behind the scenes to suppress the New York Post’s story about Hunter Biden’s laptop, shadowban conservative accounts, and ultimately ban Donald Trump from the platform. True North’s Andrew Lawton says Elon Musk’s commitment to free speech warrants a stand against Justin Trudeau’s efforts to regulate and censor the internet.

Also, what yesterday’s Liberal by-election win means for the Conservatives and Canadian Federation of Independent Business president Dan Kelly on why EI and CPP increases need to be put on hold.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

New payroll taxes mean Canadians will lose $300 in take-home pay, says CFIB

Source: Pexels

The Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses (CFIB) is warning that scheduled 2023 payroll tax hikes will mean that every Canadian will see $305 less in take-home pay on the first day of the year. 

Beginning on Jan. 1 Canada Pension Plan premiums will go up to 7.3%, costing up to $255 more in contributions per employee. On the same day, Employment Insurance premiums will increase by 5.2%. 

“The maximum additional amount that an employee will pay in EI and CPP contributions is $304.71. It may not seem like a lot, but $300 can cost one family a trip to the grocery store or pay for their transportation or utility bills. Payroll tax increases will hit Canadians at a time when most are already seeing their cost of living quickly increase,” said CFIB president Dan Kelly. 

“The hikes will also affect small businesses. With rising input costs, staggering labour shortages and a potential recession, the economy is already in a bad shape. At minimum, the government should be pressing pause until inflation is under control.”

Individual employers have the responsibility to raise wages to offset the increases but data indicates many are unable to according to the CFIB. 

“Some businesses are saying what they face these days is as bad, if not worse than during the pandemic. So now is not the time to raise taxes and drive more businesses into despair. Give them a break,” said CFIB senior vice-president of national affairs Corinne Pohlmann.

“During the pandemic, the government froze EI premiums in 2021 and 2022. The same approach should be taken next year as well.”

A majority of small-businesses across Canada have had to take on pandemic debt averaging over $114,000

According to a Department of Industry report from earlier this year, small businesses lost 740,800 jobs or 9% of the entire industry due to government lockdowns and pandemic measures. 

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has blasted the Liberal government for raising taxes on Canadians while many face uncertain economic prospects. 

“The NDP-Liberal (coalition) voted to triple the carbon tax on home heating. They haven’t realized home heating prices are already skyrocketing this winter and their only goal is to make it even more expensive,” tweeted Poilievre last week. 

The Daily Brief | Did Poilievre actually fail his first electoral test?

The Liberals held onto the GTA riding of Mississauga—Lakeshore on Friday as Liberal candidate and former Ontario Liberal finance minister Charles Sousa won Monday’s byelection. While many are declaring the byelection result as a failure for Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre – is this actually the case?

Plus, ahead of a provincial general election in Alberta this spring, Calgary’s city council wants to limit election signs, to comply with its single-use plastics ban.

And the House of Commons was adjourned to pay respects to long-time Liberal MP Jim Carr, who died Monday after a lengthy battle with cancer.

Tune into The Daily Brief with Andrew Lawton and Rachel Emmanuel!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAILY BRIEF

GUEST OP-ED: Canada could take away half of Putin’s energy sales

Colin Craig is the President of SecondStreet.org, a Canadian think tank. You can reach him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter (@colincraig1)

This past April, 11-year-old Yana Stepanenko was standing with her mother and brother at a train station in Kramatorsk, Ukraine when a Russian rocket hit.

The blast took out both of the young girl’s legs and one of her mother’s. Yana told local media, “I opened my eyes. I felt my legs were burning hot. I didn’t know what had happened to them.”

At least 52 people were killed and over 100 people were injured. A month later, Yana lost her father when he died defending his country. The young Ukrainian girl has been robbed of her childhood innocence – these emotional and physical scars will last a lifetime.

In order to stop Putin’s regime from committing more atrocities like this we need to reflect on the old saying “follow the money.” If we do, new research by SecondStreet.org suggests Canada could play a significant role in defunding Putin’s military.

According to the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA), roughly half of Russia’s budget comes from selling oil and gas. As Shuv Majumder, an expert with the Ottawa-based MacDonald-Laurier Institute told SecondStreet.org, Russia is essentially “a big gas station.” This is how Putin is paying for his military’s rockets, tanks and other equipment.

Many observers have noted that Canada has significant oil and natural gas resources and that if we exported more, particularly to Europe, we could help the world get off of Russian energy and reduce the funds Putin has for his military.

SecondStreet.org wanted to investigate just how much Russian oil and natural gas our country could displace. Is it 10%? 50%? More?

We asked eight experts in the oil and gas industry to estimate how much we could increase our exports in the short term (one year), medium term (three to five years) and long term (seven to ten years). We then averaged their responses and compared them with estimates for future Russian exports.

A key assumption we asked survey participants to consider was that Canada made it a national priority to develop and export our resources. This would mean applications for new oil and gas projects would be handled quickly rather than taking years to examine. At the same time, police would act swiftly to remove any protestors who try to obstruct these projects. 

As you might imagine, there isn’t much Canada can do in the short-term. Experts estimated Canada could only displace about 4-6% of Russian oil and gas exports

However, by the end of the decade, Canada could displace upwards of 59% of annual Russian natural gas exports and 46% of their oil exports. Simply put, we could deliver a significant blow to Putin’s cash cow. 

Yes, it will take a while to do so, but we can’t forget that the world is facing a long-term problem with Russia. Even if Putin pulled his troops out of Ukraine today, would you want to buy oil and gas from his regime five years from now? Ten? The answer is obvious.

Readers should note that Germany recently built a new facility to receive liquefied natural gas in just 194 days. Incredibly, such a project would normally take “five years” to complete. 

So how did the Germans do it? Private sector companies worked on the project non-stop while the government passed legislation to expedite approvals. As a result, the German people can stay warm this winter while their nation stops propping up Putin’s military. 

Canada could also employ this expedited approach and help the world get off Russian energy sooner rather than later. Will we rise to the occasion? For the sake of victims like Yana, the answer should be “yes.”

Colin Craig is the President of SecondStreet.org, a Canadian think tank. You can reach him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter (@colincraig1)

Liberals win Mississauga–Lakeshore byelection

Liberal candidate Charles Sousa declared victory in the Mississauga–Lakeshore federal byelection on Monday night. 

At the time of publication, with 220 polls reported, Sousa received 51.4% of the vote defeating Conservative candidate Ron Chhinzer who received 37.3% of the vote. 

Meanwhile, NDP candidate Julia Kole got 4.8%, Green candidate Mary Kidnew received 3.1% and PPC candidate Khaled Al-Sudani walked away with 1.2%. 

Late into the evening the Liberals put out an official statement welcoming Sousa as an MP.

A Mainstreet Research poll just prior to voting day projected that Sousa would win the byelection. 

The seat was held by former Liberal MP Sven Spengemann who resigned from his position to take on a new role at the United Nations. 

Former Conservative MP Stella Ambler held the seat for one term until 2015. Prior to 2011, a Liberal MP represented the community since 1993. 

On Monday, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre tweeted a message of support for Chhinzer. 

“The people of Mississauga-Lakeshore have a strong Conservative candidate to vote for in today’s by-election,” said Poilievre. 

“With 20 years in law enforcement as a police officer & anti-gang expert (Chhinzer) will be a strong advocate to tackle crime & restore safe streets in Mississauga.” 

The byelection was the first of its kind since Poilievre was overwhelmingly elected leader of the federal Conservatives earlier this year. 

Prior to his newfound role as an MP, Sousa served as Ontario’s minister of finance under former Liberal premier Kathleen Wynne’s government. 

He also held Ontario’s immigration ministry and labour ministry files.

Calgary wants to limit election signs, citing single-use plastics ban

Common Sense Calgary is calling Calgary city council’s proposal to limit election signs “ridiculous” and “self-serving.” 

Ahead of a provincial general election this spring, Calgary City Council wants to limit election signs, citing its single-use plastics ban. 

But Kristy Koehler, executive director of the citizen’s advocacy group Common Sense Calgary, says candidates at the municipal level rely on name recognition in the absence of political parties.

“Incumbents, as sitting Councillors, have huge amounts of taxpayer funding to help elevate their profile and name recognition. For many challengers, their privately-funded signage is their only chance to compete,” Koehler told True North.

“This is an entirely self-serving proposition that will favour incumbent Councillors during the next election and should be dropped.”

According to a motion before the city’s executive committee, signs are placed temporarily for the purpose of elections, and sign proliferation creates “visual clutter and unsafe distractions along roadways.” 

The motion says the majority of temporary election signs are made from single-use corrugated plastics.

“Corrugated plastic signs are not accepted for recycling through City of Calgary facilities thereby generating high volume landfill waste,” the bylaws says. “Council has declared a climate emergency and has adopted a single-use item reduction Strategy.” 

As one of Mayor Jyoti Gondek’s first moves in office, Calgary declared a climate emergency in November 2021. The city’s single-use plastic ban fines businesses $250 for “offences” like providing unsolicited plastic cutlery or providing shopping bags without charging a fee.

The executive committee claims that temporary sign complaints increased during the 2021 federal and municipal election periods in a year over year, month over month comparison by over 10% and up to 30%.

Koehler also said if there are concerns over signs not being cleaned up or or disposed of appropriately, council should focus on enforcing the existing rules that prevent this, “not putting new restrictions in place that are politically motivated.”

“Trying to pretend that this restriction is somehow motivated by environmental reasons is also ridiculous. Election signs make up a microscopic portion of signage in the City, and yet Council are focused on something that affects themselves so directly,” she said.

The executive committee has ordered the city’s administration to return with proposed amendments to Bylaws 27M97 — which addresses temporary signs on highways — to support a reduction in the number of temporary signs. 

The committee suggested those amendments include distance between signs and roadways where signs may be prohibited, that the changes align with provincial regulations relating to election signage, and that administration consider the city’s single-use items reduction strategy.

The United Conservative Party (UCP) government will face off with the Alberta NDP in a spring general election. 

Recent polling shows the UCP are a couple points ahead of the NDP for the first time since September. According to a Mainstreet Research poll published on Dec. 3, the UCP are leading by two points. A Dec. 1 Angus Reid Institute poll found the UCP ahead by four points. 

Yukon taxpayers to fund gender-affirming “hair removal, facial feminization” services

The Government of Yukon announced on Friday that new changes to the territory’s healthcare insurance plan will allow people to claim “gender-affirming” services at the expense of taxpayers. 

All residents enrolled in the Yukon Health Care Insurance Plan are eligible under the new coverage. 

“This addresses the gap Yukoners faced when accessing gender-affirming care offered in private facilities,” a news release explains. 

“Yukoners can now access services including tracheal shave, facial feminization, body contouring, vocal surgery and hair removal without having to pay out-of-pocket.” 

The move comes one year after the territorial government announced it would improve access to “gender-affirming health care, including surgery.” 

Some transgender individuals choose to opt for sex-change operations in order to affirm their identity.

Common procedures include top and bottom surgeries and hormone therapy. 

“The Yukon is leading the country in advancing access to gender-affirming surgical and non-surgical procedures and services, and our commitment to providing this coverage has never wavered,” said the territory’s Minister of Health Tracy-Anne McPhee.

“We recognize the past few months has been uncertain for the 2SLGBTQIA+ community, and we are very pleased to announce this amendment to regulation, so Yukoners can access the care they need and deserve.”

In August, the federal government updated the Public Service Health Care Plan to include up to $75,000 in coverage for “gender-affirming care.” 

“New features of the Plan include increased support for mental health and well-being, such as increased coverage for psychological services and an expansion of mental health service providers,” the federal government explained. 

“For the first time, coverage would be available for gender affirmation, placing the Government of Canada as a leader in modernized employee health care benefits.”

Federal health body offering TikTok video creation workshop

A federal body in charge of funding medical research is holding a 90-minute “interactive workshop” on how to create TikTok videos.

Instagram and TikTok for #SciComm is being led by influencer and neurologist Dr. Samantha Yammine who is also known as “Science Sam” online. The event is hosted by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). 

The free event is being advertised to health researchers at Canadian post-secondary institutions on Feb. 7, 2023. 

“This is an introductory workshop ideal for beginners to video, and will focus on easy-to-produce short videos popularized by Instagram Reels and Tik Tok,” the CIHR wrote. 

“Instagram and Tik Tok are the most popular social media platforms used by youth and young adults, and among the fastest growing across all age groups. With their explore-heavy newsfeeds, when used strategically they can be one of the fastest ways to reach massive audiences outside your typical echo chamber.” 

Yammine has used her platform to vocally defend vaccine and mask mandates in Ontario. 

In March, she called the Ontario government’s decision to lift remaining pandemic measures “presumptuous.” 

“I’m concerned about the inequity of lifting mask mandates while things are still not stable. Just like small businesses deserved support when they were forced to close, people left vulnerable by these policies deserve support if they’re being forced to take on higher risks,” she wrote on Twitter. 

“And FYI, individual actions alone are not enough in a public health crisis. But I’ll be continuing to wear a mask in indoor public settings where there’s no eating/drinking because I’d rather save my risk budget for scenarios where it’s more meaningful to not wear a mask.” 

At the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, Health Canada paid social media influencers to support marketing campaigns. 

“A digital influencer marketing program will support the overall social marketing campaign (on specific health and safety issues) which could include experiential events, advertising and other outreach tactics,” Health Canada explained in Mar. 2021.

“Digital influencers are defined as people who have built a reputation for their knowledge and expertise on a specific topic. They make regular posts about that topic on their preferred social media channels and generate large followings of enthusiastic, engaged people who pay close attention to their views.”

Related stories