fbpx
Saturday, September 27, 2025

Vaccinated senior ordered to quarantine for not using ArriveCAN suing federal government

A fully vaccinated woman who was fined and ordered into quarantine this summer for not using the ArriveCAN app is now suing the federal Liberal government.

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) announced in early February that a lawsuit had been filed on behalf of several Canadians who were penalized for not using the ArriveCAN app, including 71-year-old Burlington resident Joanne Walsh.

The lawsuit seeks monetary damages for plaintiffs, whom lawyers alleged had their guaranteed Charter rights infringed upon. The lawsuit comes in addition to another suit that challenges the constitutionality of ArriveCAN.

As exclusively reported by True North, Walsh was told to isolate for 14 days when she came back from Niagara Falls, New York, this summer amid her refusal to use the government’s ArriveCan app. 

On a separate occasion, she was fined $6255 for not complying with the requirement.

True North spoke with Walsh and one of her lawyers, Henna Parmar, about the lawsuit.

Walsh told True North that “the point of suing the government is to show that ArriveCAN was unconstitutional, therefore it never should have been set up.” 

Walsh’s lawyer argues that ArriveCAN laws encroached on three Charter sections; including section 8, which protects privacy.

“(The) privacy of Canadians is one of the fundamental rights which our Charter protects. ArriveCAN’s disclaimer that Canadians’ private information could potentially be widely shared is a serious concern to the Plaintiffs and should be for all of us,” said Parmar.

Parmar believes the ArriveCAN app also violated section 7, which provides the right to liberty, and section 9, which provides the right not to be arbitrarily detained.

“The measures required unvaccinated Canadians and Canadians who did not use ArriveCAN to quarantine in their home for 14 days,” noted Parmar.

Parmar added that the lawsuit “compels the government to justify the legality and scientific rationality of requiring Canadians to use an app that calls into question several civil liberties.”

In addition to finding ArriveCAN to be unconstitutional, Walsh believes the app unfairly targeted seniors, amid many of them not having smartphones.

“Most seniors would’ve been affected by (ArriveCAN)” claimed Walsh, “they could not… go out and travel because they had to use this thing”

“From the beginning, I knew that this was discriminatory against seniors”

Previous legal challenges to Trudeau government Covid-19 travel measures were not successful. The Federal Court ruled that quarantine hotels were constitutional, while a lawsuit against the federal travel vaccine mandate was tossed out.

However, Parmar noted that for the ArriveCAN lawsuit, “the plaintiffs have brought a statement of claim where they are seeking Charter damages for having their Charter rights infringed,” and that the latter was not the case in prior lawsuits.

“A decision on Charter damages is a real issue that needs to be heard,” she added.

Walsh is hopeful that her lawsuit will be successful, saying “I’m convinced that (what happened) is injustice, that justice will prevail, and I won’t have to pay (the fine).”
The Trudeau government ended the ArriveCAN requirement on Oct. 1, however, the app still exists as an optional way for people to complete their customs and immigration declaration. Canadians were cumulatively fined millions of dollars for breaking various federal travel Covid-19 rules.

New centre-right provincial party ‘Sask United’ set to launch

Saskachetwan will see a new political party launched by the end of February. 

The Saskatchewan United Party, or Sask United for short, is a new centre-right party in the province seeking to challenge the dominance of the governing Saskatchewan Party, which is viewed as an alliance between Saskatchewan liberals and conservatives against the NDP. 

On Sask United’s website, the party claims to stand for the family unit, lowering taxes, balancing the budget, a school curriculum free from ideologies, and other traditionally conservative priorities. 

Furthermore, on Sask United’s Twitter page, they have challenged digital ID, criticized the government for failing to address criminal violence and advocated for a reduction in the role of government. 

Sask United is being led by former Saskatchewan Party MLA Nadine Wilson, who resigned from the governing party after a dispute regarding her vaccination status. 

While Sask United was registered in November 2022 with Elections Saskatchewan, the party is holding its official launch event on February 28, where they will reveal their policy agenda.

In a video posted to Twitter, MLA Wilson said that the party will be announcing their party’s constitution, along with the party’s principles and vision for the province. 

“We are going to introduce our vision for Saskatchewan, our constitution, and the principles of our party,” said Wilson. 

While Wilson has been leading the party since being registered in November 2022, she has been sitting as an independent MLA because Saskatchewan’s parliamentary rules stipulate that a party must have a minimum of two sitting MLAs to be officially recognized in the legislature. 

Saskatchewan’s politics have been dominated by the Saskatchewan Party since the 2007 election, when Premier Brad Wall formed the Sask Party’s first majority government. Since then, the Saskatchewan Party has held an overwhelming majority in the legislative assembly and has led to the Liberal Party of Saskatchewan losing their entire parliamentary caucus.

Wind power generation grinded to a halt across Alberta Thursday night

Alberta electricity data shows that power generated by wind farms throughout the province grinded to a near halt on Thursday.

As first reported by Pipeline Online, by suppertime on Feb. 23 wind farms were producing on average between 11 and 20 megawatts – about 0.3% of their 3,618 megawatts capacity.

Part of the reason behind the decline in energy production was due to extreme cold weather conditions which trigger wind turbines to go into hibernation. Wind turbines could break in below -30 C temperatures.

Alberta also saw low levels of wind ranging between 3 kilometres per hour to 5 kilometres per hour in some regions. 

Out of Alberta’s 36 wind farms, only 11 megawatts of electricity was being produced. A vast majority – 31 turbines – were not operational at all. 

As noted by the Twitter account Reliable AB Energy, at that time Alberta’s electrical grid was relying on fossil fuels with 91.3% of the energy produced being attributed to that source. 

“Wind is at 0.4% of capacity and producing 0.1% of total generation, while solar is at 33.2% of capacity and producing 3.61% of total generation. At the same time we are importing 811 MW or 7%,” tweeted the account which tracks Alberta’s energy grid. 

Despite this unreliability in energy production, Alberta is seeking to add yet another wind farm to its repertoire. 

TransAlta Corporation is currently planning to build a new wind power plant in Cardston County with up to 50 operational turbines. 

Some residents have not taken well to the proposal arguing that the plan wasn’t well communicated and could disrupt business and local wildlife. 

“There is inherent value in wild spaces and we have far too few intact landscapes left and this is one of them,” resident Julia Palmer told Global News.

Is self-defence a right in Canada?

A Milton, Ont. man made headlines this week after shooting and killing an armed intruder. Despite using a legally-owned firearm, the man now finds himself being charged with second-degree murder. Criminal lawyer Sam Goldstein joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to discuss self-defence laws in Canada and his expectations for the case.

The Alberta Roundup | Will Edmonton become Canada’s first 15-minute city?

This week on the Alberta Roundup with Rachel Emmanuel, Rachel discusses a couple major announcements made at the Alberta Recovery Conference earlier this week — including Premier Danielle Smith’s revelation that Budget 2023 holds $275 million in funding for the mental health and addiction’s office.

Rachel also touched on a sole-source, three-month contract worth $72,500 awarded to a marketing agency where Smith’s former leadership campaign manager is a part-owner.

Finally, Rachel dove into Edmonton’s controversial 15 minute cities proposal. Is it intended to create a better quality of life for downtown residents or is there something more sinister behind the plan?

Tune into the Alberta Roundup now!

Yet another survey shows people think things are broken in Canada

A second survey this month has found the majority of Canadians think things are broken in the country.

The Abacus Data survey released on Thursday shows 65% of Canadians agree it feels like many things in Canada are broken – particularly in a handful of areas.

Many respondents said the healthcare system was doing worse than a few years ago (66%), followed by air travel (53%), government services (50%), the education system (49%), and customer service (46%). 

“It’s hard not to worry that there is a deep seated potential for Canadians to get caught up in the ‘Canada is broken’ narrative,” said public-sector research director Richard Jenkins. 

While four-in-ten said Canada was working equally to or better than a few years ago all-things-considered, no more than 16% said any of the areas improved.

The remaining six-in-ten who said the country was malfunctioning were split between blaming global factors and blaming the Canadian government.

Jenkins pointed to the three-in-ten who blame the government, and said the ‘Canada is broken’ narrative has power behind it.

“While only a minority currently blame government,” he said, “that minority has the potential to reshape the electoral map and party system in the forthcoming elections.”

Those who intended to vote Conservative were three-times more likely than any other party to have said things are worse and the government is to blame.

Earlier this month, Leger polling found 67% of Canadians agreed everything feels broken – a common statement of Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre.

Half of respondents in the Leger poll said they were angry with the way Canada was being managed, and 68% said rising costs were the most important issues impacting them and their families.

Abacus Data conducted its survey between February 9th and 18th.

BONOKOSKI: Trudeau really doesn’t want us talking about China’s interference

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, his late father a huge fan of China’s brand of communism, believes MPs who rattle on about foreign election interference are playing right into China’s hands.

The result, he says, is the undermining of Canadians’ overall confidence in our democracy. This troubles the younger Trudeau.

After all, he too is a fan of Chairman Xi Jinping’s dictatorial grasp on communist China, and he has admitted to it. So what’s bothering him?

What’s bothering a prime minister who took forever and a day to kick the huge Chinese megafirm, Huawei, to the curb and therefore out of the running to assist in Canada’s next generation of the 5G Internet network?

If Canadians happen to think Trudeau has an unwise soft spot for China it was this incredible long delay in following the Five Eyes’ advice and giving Huawei the old heave-ho before it has the opportunity to breach Canada’s technological security infrastructure.

But, for a long while, it appeared as if Trudeau might be in subliminal cahoots with Beijing commies.

And now he wants political critics of China’s alleged interference in our 2021 election to be all hush-hush so Russia and China do not get the chance to destabilize our democracy, and for all parties to work together to make sure Canadians trust the electoral process.

This all came after one of his Liberal MPs, Jennifer O’Connell, accused Conservatives during a committee studying election interference of using “Trump-like tactics” when questioning past election results.

Then there was the Globe and Mail’s recent revelation that Beijing had religiously worked the 2021 election to secure the Liberals’ minority government and the defeat of a number of Conservative hopefuls.

This beefed up the concerns of the MPs on the Commons Procedure and House Affairs committee who were already looking into allegations of Chinese interference in the 2019 election to support 11 mostly Liberal candidates in the Greater Toronto Area.

Conservative MP Michael Cooper was the most vocal committee member, accusing the Trudeau Liberals of downplaying Chinese election fiddling and for taking no “meaningful action.”

He then said Trudeau appeared “content to turn a blind eye to this interference” because it suited him and the Liberals.

This is what wound up Jennifer O’Connell.

“I think that it’s dangerous for Canadians to go down this road,” she said. “We’ve seen our neighbors to the south and what happens when you start demonizing democratic institutions and undermining their legitimacy.”

The CSIS documents, on which the Globe based its exclusive and which only the Globe has seen, apparently revealed that Chinese diplomats and their proxies were instructed to discredit the Conservative Party, seen as too critical of Beijing, and detailed how they made cash donations to political campaigns, plus how they hired foreign Chinese students to volunteer full time in election campaigns.

Trudeau then tried to ho-hum it, saying that China’s attempted interference is “not a new phenomenon” and is ”something that countries around the world have been grappling with, and Canada is no exception.”

Cooper is asking for the gamut —emails, briefing notes, plus records of all conversations on foreign actors interfering in the 2019 and 2021 elections, including the documents the Globe obtained to base its story on.

O’Connell called the Conservatives’ tactics a “fishing expedition.” And accused them of “being reckless.”

Bardish Chagger, the Liberal committee chair, almost let the committee run out of control when Conservative MP Michael Barrett accused her of “playing dirty tricks”.

An exasperated Chagger said she refused to be talked to that way, and suspended the meeting until cooler heads prevailed. And eventually they did.

(In unrelated news, a Chinese buoy used for spying was recently found in the Canadian Arctic.)

Google’s blocking of news links because of Bill C-18 “unsurprising”: expert

A key critic of Bill C-18, also known as the Online News Act, said that Google’s decision to test blocking news links to a segment of the Canadian population was “unsurprising” given the federal government’s conduct in the affair. 

In a Friday morning blog post, University of Ottawa Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commmerce Law, Michael Geist, accused proponents of the bill of misleading Canadians on Bill C-18’s scope and purpose. 

“None of this week’s developments should come as a surprise. Bill C-18 presents Google and Facebook with a choice: pay hundreds of millions of dollars primarily to Canadian broadcasters for links to news articles or stop linking,” wrote Geist.

Some Canadians can expect to have access to certain news sites completely cut off by Google as a result of the Liberal government’s commitment to plow ahead with Bill C-18, also known as the Online News Act

In a test to determine its ability and scope to block news content on its platforms, Google announced it would limit the availability of news to approximately 4% of its Canadian users. 

“We’re briefly testing potential product responses to Bill C-18 that impact a very small percentage of Canadian users,” Google spokesperson Shay Purdy told The Canadian Press.

“We’ve been fully transparent about our concern that C-18 is overly broad and, if unchanged, could impact products Canadians use and rely on every day.” 

Bill C-18 has caused a stir among social media giants like Facebook, Google and others which have argued against certain underlying assumptions contained in the bill – namely, that social media giants were stealing Canadian news content by allowing links to circulate on their platforms.

Both Google and Facebook have argued that allowing access to news was a net benefit to the Canadian media industry. 

“Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez has blithely ignored the risks associated with Bill C-18 for months. By mandating payments for links, the bill creates a real threat to the free flow of information online,” wrote Geist. 

“It also raises press independence concerns, may violate Canada’s international copyright obligations, harm the competitiveness of independent media, and open the door to trade retaliation by the United States.”

The United States has already made moves to express disapproval of Liberal government attempts to regulate the internet. 

US Trade Representative and Ambassador Katherine Tai recently raised the issue of Bill C-18 with Canadian Minister of International Trade Mary Ng in December. 

News report identifies Liberal MP helped by Chinese interference

Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) sources and documents claim to show that Liberal MP Han Dong received assistance from the Chinese consulate in Toronto during his nomination race in 2019.

Global News reporter Mackenzie Gray tweeted on Friday that the consulate was involved in transporting seniors and students to vote for him at a party meeting. It is alleged that CSIS had urged senior officials in Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office to rescind Dong’s nomination due to the alleged foreign influence involved.

The outlet cited a “combo of CSIS docs and intelligence sources” to substantiate its claims. Sources have claimed that during the 2019 Liberal nomination meeting, the Chinese consulate in Toronto arranged for two buses of Chinese Canadian seniors to attend the event.

It is alleged that the seniors were told to vote for Dong to be the candidate by having his name written on their arms.

It is also alleged that Chinese international students were also equipped with fake residence addresses and sent to the nomination meeting in support of Dong under the pretense that not doing so could threaten their student visa status.

Dong told Global News that he denies the allegations, claiming instead that his nomination followed ordinary procedures.

“My nomination in 2019 was open and followed the rules,” Dong said.

The Prime Minister’s Office has also responded to the story, saying that there was “factual inaccuracies” to the report.

“As you are aware, we are unable to comment on your questions regarding secret or top secret matters. That is the law. There are so many factual inaccuracies in your questions that it is not possible to even begin to answer your questions,” wrote the PMO.

“Han Dong is a strong representative who served his community through the pandemic and consistently works to make life better for people, including calling out discrimination that is too often targeted at the Chinese Canadian community.”

Following reports that China interfered in the 2021 election, Trudeau recently claimed that the leaks to the media had “inaccuracies.”

“We are very concerned with the leaks, particularly because there are so many inaccuracies in those leaks,” said Trudeau.

Fake News Friday | Legacy media pushed fake news about Freedom Convoy

On deck this week, Andrew and Harrison look into the fake news that the legacy media was deliberately pushing disinformation about the Freedom Convoy that escalated the situation.

Next, the Globe endorses The Canadian Screen Awards declaring gender-neutral categories for their awards show. Instead of “Best Actor” or “Best Actress,” you now have one large, non-binary “Best Performer” category. How woke can you get?

Lastly, if you are a wine connoisseur, get ready for this. Did you know that Canada’s wine industry is not inclusive enough? The BIPOC wine-consultants are saying that there is room for improvement when it comes to representation!

Tune into Fake News Friday with Andrew Lawton and Harrison Faulkner on True North!

Related stories