fbpx
Sunday, June 29, 2025

Taxpayers billed $1.6 billion in overtime for federal workers between 2019-2021

Taxpayers were billed $1.6 billion in overtime pay for federal government workers between 2019 to 2021. 

According to records obtained by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF), the federal workforce ballooned by 15,000 new public servants every year the private sector struggled to retain workers. 

Between 2020 and 2021, $1.1 billion in taxpayer funds went towards overtime costs for federal workers – 56% of whom worked remotely from home. 

“When you spend extra money on overtime and hiring more employees you expect top results,” said theFederal Director of the CTF Franco Terrazzano. 

“The federal government is spending buckets of cash on overtime pay and more bureaucrats and it still can’t meet half its performance targets.”

As for specific departments, Elections Canada workers received $1.4 million in overtime in 2020 despite there not being an election that year. 

House of Commons and Senate staffers were paid $13 million between 2020 and 2021 while sittings remained in a virtual format due to pandemic measures. 

Meanwhile, the office of then-Governor General Julie Payette charged taxpayers $1.2 million in overtime from 2019 to 2021.

Other departments included Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada which billed a combined $76.4 million in overtime hours from 2020 to 2021. 

“If the government is spending so much money on overtime and hiring more bureaucrats, then why can’t it meet half of its own performance targets?” asked Terrazzano. 

“Prime Minister Justin Trudeau needs to take air out of the ballooning bureaucracy.”

On top of overtime, federal workers benefited from $1.3 billion in Covid-19 payouts according to numbers reported by the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO)

Payouts were handed to employees for leaves of absence, parenting duties and pandemic related reasons. 

“The Treasury Board was unable to provide actual personnel expenditures,” wrote the PBO.

“Leave was likely under-reported by many organizations. Indeed, in each subsequent data update provided by the Treasury Board there was an increase in the number of hours previously reported.”

Brampton city councillors call for end to Patrick Brown’s “scandalous” time as mayor

Five city councillors and both deputy mayors of Brampton released a letter condemning mayor Patrick Brown, alleging he is corrupt.

The letter alleges that Brown used his office as mayor to pay off cronies with taxpayer dollars, employed nepotism and shut down city council’s investigations of the allegations.

On Tuesday, the Conservative Party of Canada’s Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC) disqualified Brown from the party’s leadership race amid allegations that his campaign had violated the financial provisions of the Canada Elections Act. LEOC did not specify what the allegations were.

The letter from several of Brampton’s elected officials applauds the Conservative party for tossing Brown from the race, saying they have noticed a similar pattern of corrupt behaviour. 

The councillors allege that Brown assigned lucrative government contracts to friends and acquaintances, despite these individuals not being qualified and not fulfilling their contractual obligations.

The letter alleges that Rowena Santos, regional councillor for Brampton’s Ward 1 and 5, enabled Brown’s corrupt activity and also engaged in cronyism.

“In the past few weeks senior staff informed us that $629,000 in contracts went to a firm that employed one of Brown’s closest political allies and a close friend of his main council enabler, Rowena Santos,” reads the letter.

“Other contracts were given to people directly tied to Brown or his chief of staff. Senior staff positions and other employment contracts went to glaringly unqualified individuals connected to Brown.”

After a vote to conduct a forensic investigation into the allegations, the city council meeting in which the investigation against Brown was to be discussed was shut down by Brown and supporting councillors four times in a row.

In a press conference outside Brampton city hall, councillor Gurpreet Dhillon said that there are currently five forensic audit investigations under away looking into not only mayor Brown, but also other councillors like Rowena Santos who may have given contracts to people close to them. 

He says that nearly $700,000 has been contributed to an initiative called “Brampton U,” which has close ties to Santos. Despite being more than two years old, nothing has come from the program.

Councillor Pat Fortini went further, saying that city employee was pressured under the threat of termination when handling reports regarding the ‘Brampton U’ program.

Councillors also took issue with Brown having city employees helping him run his campaign for the Conservative leadership out of an office in Vaughan, as reported by Rebel News. 

“We need the support of the public and the province to force Brown back to work so we can get to the truth about what’s been going on inside City Hall under his abusive leadership,” reads the letter.

“As we stated before, democracy in Brampton is under siege because of Patrick Brown. It’s time to expose the truth and help us protect the hardworking taxpayers of Brampton.”

Santos did not respond to a request for comment from True North by time of publication. Brown’s campaign, when asked to comment, did not address any questions directly but sent a City of Brampton statement signed by Brown, Santos and several other councillors taking aim at the “sad attempt” by their colleagues.

“This is another sad attempt by a group of councillors following their unprecedented and contrary motion which hides the unjust firing of the Integrity Commissioner and City Solicitor,” the statement said. Council continues to have important decisions to make. These decisions cannot be placed in legal limbo by the pre-assignment of a council seat contrary to the clear rules of the Ontario Municipal Act.”

James Topp to face court martial over vaccine mandate opposition

The Canadian military is gearing up to have Warrant Officer James Topp court martialed for speaking out against Covid vaccine mandates. 

According to Topp’s lawyer, Phillip Millar, the beleaguered soldier will have the opportunity to present his case before a military court. 

Initially the Canadian Armed Forces rejected Topp’s request for a court martial claiming it would pass internally through the chain of command instead. 

The decision comes less than a week after Topp arrived in Ottawa having marched across the country in protest of pandemic measures. 

“It’s hard to know what they’re doing, because I don’t think they really know what they’re doing. But now they’re saying it’s a court martial,” said Millar. 

As opposed to internal reprimands, court martials could have graver consequences for Topp depending on the outcome of the trial. One benefit to being court martialed is that Topp will be able to have his lawyer represent him.

Additionally, the court martial would have more public exposure than a summary trial by the chain of command. 

“It opens the door for us to call witnesses about the decision to charge him. It opens the door for us to call experts on whether or not there was any science behind the mandate,” said Millar. 

Topp is facing two counts related to prejudice of good order and discipline. The charges are related to an incident where Topp spoke at a freedom rally while wearing his military uniform. Topp is a reservist and military rules explicitly prohibit wearing the uniform to advocate political positions. 

While marching to Ottawa, Topp met with numerous Conservative MPs and was joined by Conservative leadership contenders Pierre Poilievre and Roman Baber. 

“I think that he is advocating freedom of choice. People should have the freedom to make their own decisions with their own bodies and that’s why, I think, he’s walked across the country and that’s why I thought I would give him a greeting and give him a hearing and see if he has any thoughts to share with me,” said Poilievre.

Advisory panel admits Bill C-11 would regulate political content online

The Expert Advisory Group on Online Safety, appointed by Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez, says that “misleading political communications” should be federally regulated. The group claims that unregulated political discussion and disinformation “erodes the foundations of democracy.”

Minister Rodriguez has previously said on several occasions that Bill C-11 would not regulate user-generated content. His claims, however, have been contradicted by the CRTC. 

“We made it very clear in the Online Streaming Act that this does not apply to what individual Canadians and creators post online,” said Rodriguez. “No users, no online creators will be regulated. Only the companies themselves will have new responsibilities.”

“[Section] 4.2 allows the CRTC to prescribe by regulation user uploaded content subject to very explicit criteria. That is also in the Act,” CRTC chair Ian Scott told the heritage committee in June 2022. 

Section 4.2 of the bill allows the CRTC to issue regulations on social media companies that affect the reach of content – favouring some content over others.  

The comments were made repeatedly at  several meetings of the Expert Advisory Group on Online Safety between April 9 and June 3. The committee was appointed in March 2022 to propose methods of regulating online content deemed harmful by the advisory group. 

Amongst other things, harmful content would include “propaganda, false advertising and misleading political communications”stated the report from the group. 

The heritage department issued both a Technical Paper and Discussion Paper that proposed to appoint a “Digital Safety Commissioner” who would have the power to take anonymous complaints on harmful content, conduct private hearings, impose fines and issue orders to block certain websites. 

Regulated content would include written posts on Facebook, private messages on Twitter, video games, listings on Amazon and even Airbnb listings, group members said in one session. “Many experts mentioned there is justification to look more widely at some interactive services like Airbnb and gaming platforms.”

“Many experts supported the notion that private communications should be included under the scope of the legislative framework,” wrote staff on the advisory panel. “Private messaging services should also be regulated.”

The Expert Advisory Group highlighted that regulation must apply to content regardless of whether or not it is legal. Illegal hate speech, such as active calls for violence, has been regulated under the Criminal Code since 1970.

Grey zone content – speech that is lawful yet harmful – “poses unique challenges” wrote the advisory group. “Most harmful content online falls into this category,” adding “it is difficult to reconcile the issue of disinformation with the freedom of expression.”

Minister Rodriguez told reporters the advisory group’s advice would form the basis of a bill that would be tabled “as soon as possible.” “Every government’s first priority will always be the safety and the security of Canadians, said Rodriguez.

Bill C-11, known as the Online Streaming Act was tabled in early February 2022 and passed on June 21. The bill gives the CRTC more powers to regulate internet content. It is currently in second reading in the Senate, with debate resuming on September 20.

Canada could face prolonged recession beginning next year

Economists are predicting that should a recession arrive within the next year, Canada will fare worse than the United States. 

Canada’s situations is far more precarious due to how much its economy relies on residential investment according to Macquarie Group economist David Doyle. 

“When [Canada] has recessions, the lion’s share of the weakness in gross domestic product tends to come from residential investment,” said Doyle. 

According to Doyle, Canadians could see much higher unemployment and lackluster GDP performance meaning that a recession would be more drawn out. 

“We think the effect of the recession will be much more severe in terms of the drawdown on GDP growth, in terms of how high unemployment will rise. That will be much more severe in Canada than what we foresee in the United States,” said Doyle

“In the U.S., we’re looking to three to four quarters of softness or contraction in GDP. In Canada, it might be a quarter or two longer than that.”

Central banks are running out of levers to pull due to persistent inflation and are increasingly relying on rate hikes to deal with economic troubles. 

“We think that combination will tilt the North American economy, both the U.S. and Canada, into a recession in 2023,” said Doyle. 

In May, inflation spiked to 7.7% the biggest increase since 1983 with the price of gasoline shooting up an unprecedented 48% compared to the year prior.

Conservative leadership frontrunner Pierre Poilievre has used his campaign to single out the Bank of Canada and the Liberal government’s spendthrift policies for the current financial mess. 

Poilievre has pledged to audit the Bank of Canada and fire governor Tiff Macklem.

“When the Bank Governor surrendered his independence to print money for Trudeau, it inflated a housing bubble,” said Poilievre.

“If that bubble bursts, countless people will be underwater on their mortgages—facing bankruptcy. Another reason to fire Trudeau & his Governor.”

LEVY: The TDSB wants to “decolonize” student assessments

In yet another effort to completely dumb down standards for its students, the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) intends to “decolonize” assessment practices during the next school year.

A memo sent to staff by the interim associate director of student well-being and innovation, Andrew Gold, and centrally assigned principal. Denise De Paola, revealed the new practice to teachers.

In the memo – obtained by True North – the two claim that “decolonization” of student assessments, equity anti-oppression and anti-racism are “at the core” of student learning and achievement.

In the immortal words of education director Colleen Russell-Rawlins, a black activist who has spent considerable time this past year promoting segregated coaches and other special opportunities for black students only, exams are entirely passé.

Gold tells teachers that during the next school year, final exams “may be administered” but will be part of a collection of other forms of course-end evaluations.

“Final exams …(are) not meant to be the sole and/or predominant method of evaluation experienced by students,” he writes. 

Thep interim associate director suggests that “student engagement increases” through “authentic assessment” practices.

Gold asks educators with the board to use the “tenets of culturally responsive pedagogy and decolonization” to identify alternative ways to evaluate students beyond traditional exams.

The final 30% (of a final grade in any course), he says, should include evaluations of learning determined from “conversation, observation and product.”

He doesn’t define what product means, although I suspect it might include projects or essays.

Then again it may not. Maybe it will be an Instagram or Tik Tok post.

One does not have to be a rocket scientist to discern that Russell-Rawlins and her cabal of “de-colonialists” are using the tenets of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in this latest edict (and so many others) – even if the actual term is not used.

CRT, a Marxist theory, posits that black students are oppressed by whites, the oppressors. CRT insists that students of colour do not have a level playing field because white privilege and racism is embedded in all of our cultural institutions.

What Russell-Williams and the “de-colonialists” on her senior executive team are suggesting with this is that the board’s black students need special treatment to perform adequately.

The edict is as insulting to students of colour as it is to white students and those from other minorities.

Russell-Williams and the board’s woke trustees have already approved a policy that will remove all entry requirements for the board’s specialized arts schools, sports and other programs. All students will have to do is express an interest in attending, whether they have any real talent or not.

It is bordering on obscene, in my view, that the board’s education director and her staff have so little faith in the ability of their students to work hard and achieve that they have to remove all standards and all commitment to objective grading and assessment.

It is the antithesis of success.

This path reminds me of the union mentality I’ve observed in the public sector where everyone gets paid the same no matter how hard they work and how productive they are.

What impetus will TDSB students have to learn if they know there’s no exam at the end of term, only observation by teachers – which strikes me as yet another recipe for social promotion.

How will TDSB students ever survive at university where final exams are three hours long?

It seems Russell-Rawlins and her woke cabal are determined to graduate students who can’t add, subtract and divide, can’t write or absorb basic concepts but who live in a Tik Tok and Instagram world where they appear far more special than they really are.

Hopefully the pendulum will start to swing the other way as parents realize how their school boards are failing students.

Meanwhile, it’s time to consider homeschooling.

Conservative Leadership Series: Pierre Poilievre

Carleton member of parliament Pierre Poilievre joined True North’s Andrew Lawton for a wide-ranging discussion as part of our Conservative Leadership Series. In this interview, Poilievre discusses free speech and independent media, inflation and CBC funding, among other topics.

This interview was recorded last week, before Patrick Brown was disqualified from the Conservative leadership race and before James Topp arrived in Ottawa in Canada Day.

Lich crown prosecutor donated $17K to Liberals, attended Trudeau fundraiser

Official Elections Canada political financing records reveal that Moiz Karimjee from Ottawa donated over $17,000 to the Liberal Party of Canada since 2013. 

Karimjee is currently the lead Crown prosecutor in charge of the case against Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich.

Contribution data from Elections Canada reveals that Karimjee from Orleans – a suburb of the nation’s capital – donated a total of $17,176.24 to various Liberal Party of Canada efforts. The latest contribution listed by Karimjee was on Sept. 30, 2019 amounting to $250. 

On May 21, 2017, Karimjee also made a large contribution worth $1,500 to the Liberal Party of Canada. His extensive support continued regularly for nearly six years spanning 29 different contributions. 

Karimjee did in fact also donate to the Conservative Party of Canada on two occasions in 2010 amounting to $800.  

A Dec. 12, 2017 open fundraising event report by the Liberal Party of Canada also lists Karimjee as an attendee. The event took place at the National Gallery of Canada and had Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as a featured guest. 

The event was branded as a “donor appreciation” celebration for those who gave at least $1,500 annually to the Liberals. Among those in attendance also were SNC Lavalin lobbyist Bruce Hartley, Trudeau’s former principal secretary Gerald Butts and the prime minister’s chief of staff Katie Telford. 

“Justin Trudeau, Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, will deliver remarks at a Laurier Club donor appreciation reception in Ottawa on December 12, 2017,” a press release from the time stated. 

“The Liberal Party of Canada has committed to the strongest standards in federal politics for openness and transparency, and is challenging other parties to do the same.”

True North has reached out to Karimjee via email for clarification but did not receive a response in time for publication. 

On Tuesday, Karimjee appeared before an Ottawa court to argue that Lich had breached her bail conditions and deserves to be seen behind bars again after being photographed with fellow organizer Tom Marazzo at a Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedom’s award gala.

As a result of the hearing, the overseeing Justice of the Peace ordered that Lich will remain in jail until Friday afternoon while he makes a decision on her bail hearing. 

In a prior heated bail hearing that saw Lich released, Karimjee demanded that the overseeing judge stepped down from the trial. 

Does Poilievre pose a threat to the People’s Party and Bernier?

Conservative leadership candidate Pierre Poilievre has been running on a pledge to give more freedoms back to Canadians – a message similar to what the People’s Party of Canada (PPC) and Maxime Bernier have been pushing since the pandemic began.

Should Poilievre become the Conservative’s next leader, will he pose a threat to the PPC?

Bernier doesn’t think so. In an interview with True North’s Elie Cantin-Nantel, Bernier says the prospect of a Conservative Party led by Poilievre does not put the fate of the PPC at risk.

“Pierre Poilievre is a career politician, he was elected for the first time at 24 years-old, he never had a real boss. And also, he’s an opportunist politician,” Bernier said.

Patrick Brown disqualified from Conservative Leadership Race

Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown has been disqualified from the Conservative Leadership Race after the Conservative Party investigated Brown for membership sales irregularities.

In June, the party confirmed that it was investigating the Brampton Mayor on allegations that his campaign was reimbursing membership fees paid by individuals who agreed to join the party.

The allegations were detailed in a complaint filed by the campaign of leadership rival Pierre Poilievre.

In a statement released by the Chair of the Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC) Ian Brodie on Thursday, Brodie wrote “the Patrick Brown campaign did not satisfy concerns about their compliance with our Rules and Procedures and/or the Canada Elections Act.”

In his statement, Brodie claims the party did its “best to be fair” to the Brown campaign and confirmed that it would be sharing the details of its investigation with Elections Canada.

“Throughout the investigation into these allegations, the Chief Returning Officer and I have done our best to be fair to the Patrick Brown leadership campaign and provide them with the time they need to substantively refute these allegations,” wrote Brodie.

“The Party will be sharing the information it has gathered with Elections Canada, who is responsible for ensuring compliance with, and enforcement of, the Canada Elections Act.”

On Tuesday, the Brown campaign told True North that it was confident and saw a path to victory.

“Absolutely [Brown] sees a path to victory. Patrick sold 150,000 memberships, by far the most by any candidate in any previous Conservative leadership,” said spokesperson Chisholm Pothier.

However, in addition to being disqualified, recent developments suggest the Brampton Mayor’s campaign was losing momentum. 

In recent weeks, Brown lost his campaign co-chair Michelle Rempel Garner and his campaign manager, Sean Schnell. Further, two of the four Conservative MPs who endorsed Brown switched their support to Poilievre’s campaign.

The Brown campaign released a statement shortly after the decision accusing the LEOC of “disenfranchising thousands of Canadians.”

“This decision has disenfranchised over a hundred thousand Canadians from BC to Nova Scotia that chose to join the party, inspired by Brown’s vision for a multicultural and inclusive movement.”

Brown’s campaign alleges that there was a lack of transparency in the party’s decision to disqualify the Brampton mayor.

The campaign claims the party’s decision was “based on anonymous allegations” and that the campaign was “never provided with the full details or evidence” of the allegations.

“Simply put, there was no due process provided in this decision, and an unprecedented reverse onus was applied to our campaign.”

The Brown campaign is currently consulting its legal teams.

This is a developing news story. More to come. 

Related stories