fbpx
Monday, July 14, 2025

Majority in Ontario Oppose the Crux of Bill C-10

Source: pm.gc.ca

More than half the people in Ontario oppose the major aspect of Bill C-10 — the federal government’s ability to meddle in internet searches — according to a recent poll. 

When asked whether they support a federal government bill to promote and demote content in the results of search functions on social media sites like YouTube and Facebook, 62% of Ontario residents said they oppose this initiative. Of those, 41% said they strongly oppose the government having this power, while only 6% strongly support it.

Young Ontarian men and women, those aged 18 to 34, were most likely to oppose the new sweeping powers introduced in Bill C-10, according to the results of the survey commissioned by True North and conducted by One Research. 

Bill C-10 was a controversial bill proposed by the Trudeau Liberals to expand the mandate of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) and apply it to the internet. This would give the federal government sweeping new powers to regulate content online, including the ability to meddle in the search results for social media sites like Facebook and YouTube. 

This bill was rushed through the House of Commons, but failed to make its way through the Senate before summer recess. If there is an election this summer or fall, Bill C-10 will die and a future government would have to start from scratch to reintroduce this legislation. 

While this unpopular bill has been put to a halt, the Trudeau government has continued to push for more online regulation. Bill C-36, a bill which would give the Canadian Human Rights Commission the power to compel citizens to cease online communication or pay a monetary fine, was tabled last-minute prior to the House rising for the summer.

According to the poll, only 4% of young women in Ontario said they strongly support these proposed new powers, with 18% giving moderate support, 21% moderately opposing these powers and a staggering 45% strongly opposing them. 

When it comes to young men in Ontario, 5% say they strongly support the powers laid out in Bill C-10 and 18% moderately support it, while 28% say they moderately oppose them and 36% strongly oppose these new proposed powers. 

The strongest support for Bill C-10 came in the Toronto region, even though more than half of respondents (55%) opposed them. In Toronto, 9% of respondents said they strongly support the initiative and 25% moderately support it. Likewise, when divided by previous partisan support, 9% of those who previously supported Kathleen Wynne’s Ontario Liberal Party said they strongly support C-10 and 33% give moderate approval. 

Of those surveyed who voted for Doug Ford’s Conservatives in Ontario, 73% oppose granting the feds these new powers, while only 3% strongly support it. 

The survey was conducted from June 22 to 24, 2021, and 1,002 Ontarian adults were surveyed online using a representative panel. The results have been weighted for accuracy by age, gender, region and past provincial vote using the most recent census data from Statistics Canada. 

Majority in Ontario Oppose the Crux of Bill C-10 by True North on Scribd

Court finds Trudeau government unfairly denied grant to Christian university

A federal judge chastised the Trudeau government for unfairly denying a Christian university access to the Canada Summer Jobs program, according to the National Post.

In 2019, the Liberal government denied Redeemer University its application for $104,187 in funds from the program despite having participated in the initiative since 2006. 

The Trudeau government claimed that the University had not demonstrated “that measures have been implemented to provide a workplace free of harassment and discrimination.”

According to Redeemer’s policy at the time, students were being asked to avoid “sexual intimacies which occur outside of a heterosexual marriage.” However, the policy did not apply to the 11 positions Redeemer had hoped to fund through the program.

Although Redemer had submitted a 35-page Anti-Discrimination Policy, the Liberal government maintained its position and rejected the school’s application. 

Justice Richard Mosely accused the Liberal government of having no evidence to support its claim that the university discriminated based on sexual orientation and that the school was denied funding simply because of its Christian beliefs. 

“If the concern of (Service Canada) was that Redeemer discriminated based on sexual orientation, there was no contemporaneous evidence of that in the file,” wrote Justice Mosely.

The court also ruled that the federal government did not “make any overt attempt to consider Redeemer’s rights to freedom of religion, freedom of expression or freedom of association in considering its application.” 

Lawyers representing Redeemer called that judge’s decision against the Liberal government “punitive” and unprecedented. The federal government was also ordered to pay Redeemer’s legal fees as a result of the ruling. 

“I have never seen that in any court, let alone the federal court,” lawyer Albertos Polizogopoulos told the National Post.

Critics have accused the Liberal government of politicizing the Canada Summer Jobs Program. In 2019, it was revealed that grants awarded under the program were more biased towards Liberal ridings with Liberal constituencies receiving 24% more approvals than Conservative ridings.  

New firearms documentary Assaulted premieres Monday

A new True North documentary is set to disrupt the mainstream media narrative on firearms.

Assaulted: Justin Trudeau’s War on Gun Owners, a four-part documentary series on Canadian gun owners, premieres Monday.

In Assaulted, True North’s Andrew Lawton speaks to real Canadians across the country affected by the Trudeau government’s gun ban. 

“Gun owners in Canada make up a passionate and safe group that contributes billions to the Canadian economy – yet that apparently doesn’t protect them from being vilified by the government,” Assaulted host and executive producer Andrew Lawton said. 

“Their stories haven’t been told in the narrative surrounding firearms laws in Canada, until now.”

On May 1, 2020, the Trudeau government announced a ban on 1,500 kinds of rifles and firearms, immediately stopping the sale and transport of many commonly used guns.

Rather than sympathy and respect, Canadian gun owners have been treated with derision by the Trudeau government, such as when Public Safety Minister Bill Blair tried to link gun advocacy with political extremism.

While the Trudeau government has promised a buyback program for banned firearms, details are nowhere to be seen. For over a year, business owners have been left with unsellable inventory and gun owners have been saddled with now-prohibited firearms and no means of legally disposing of them.

In four episodes, this crowd-funded documentary will speak to the diverse range of Canadians that own firearms and learn just how poor gun control policies have hurt their livelihoods.

“The Trudeau government’s ridiculous gun ban has hurt law abiding gun-owners across Canada. Assaulted shows just how disastrous big government policies like gun control can be,“ said True North founder Candice Malcolm.

“Assaulted shows the other side of the story that the mainstream media ignores.”
Assaulted’s first two episodes premiere this week, starting Monday, with episodes three and four premiering next week.

Four Liberal donors appointed as judges in a single day

The Trudeau government has appointed multiple Liberal donors to judicial positions across Canada last week.

On Friday, Attorney General David Lametti announced a total of 13 new judicial appointments for provincial courts in five provinces.

First reported by Blacklock’s Reporter, among the new judges include at least four who have donated to the Liberal Party in the past.

According to Blacklock’s, new Quebec Superior Court judge Daniel Urbas has donated $9,351 to Liberal Party, including $1,200 to Lametti’s 2015 campaign.

Another Quebec-appointee, Louis Charette, has donated $6,232 to the Liberal Party going back to at least 2005.

“I am confident they will serve the people of Québec well as members of the Superior Court,” Lametti said in a statement.

Ontario lawyers Jill Presser and William Black donated $6,189 and $4,523, respectively, to the Liberal Party. Presser and Black were both appointed to the Ontario Superior Court.

This is not the first time important judicial assignments were given to Liberal donors. In November 2020, the Trudeau government appointed another lawyer who donated to Lametti’s riding association to the Quebec Superior Court.

In June, the House of Commons justice committee declined a motion by Conservative MP Michael Cooper to review the process which is used to appoint judges. Cooper argued that hearings should be held on Liberal appointees to the courts.

“There have been allegations substantiated about political interference directed by the Prime Minister’s Office with respect to the appointment of judges,” he said.

“[Canadians] deserve to know the judges that are appointed are the best qualified to serve.”

MALCOLM: Canadians deserve better than the brazenness of the mob

Watching video footage of angry radicals tearing down statues of both Queen Victoria, Canada’s founding monarch, and Queen Elizabeth II, our reigning monarch, outside the Manitoba Legislature is an overwhelming experience.

There are a few striking elements: the brazenness of the mob, destroying a piece of our shared history in broad daylight; the euphoria of the crowds cheering; and the complete absence of any authority or police to stop this madness.

Instead, police arrested a man who was reportedly trying to stop them and protect the public monument.

Not to fret, the CBC described the riot as “largely peaceful.” Much like how much of the media in the United States insisted that violent riots that destroyed inner cities across the country last summer were not violent.

“Fiery, but mostly peaceful protest,” read an infamous headline on CNN, where a reporter can be seen insisting the crowds were peaceful despite a large unconfined fire blazing behind him.

The reality is that riots are not protests, and property damage is not peaceful.

This Winnipeg mob, of course, doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Violent vigilante groups have been emboldened in recent weeks due to a misleading media narrative on residential schools.

For those who duck their heads and tune out much of the media narrative – and I salute you – here is just a rough overview of the attacks on core symbols of our country in the last few days:

Five Catholic churches on First Nations reserves in British Columbia were either burned down and vandalized.

Eleven more churches in Calgary were vandalized and dosed with red and orange paint in just a few hours on the eve of Canada Day.

A historic 114-year-old church was set ablaze and reduced to rubble in Morinville, Alberta. In response, the Mayor of Morinville announced that all Canada Day festivities were cancelled. Nothing says “violence doesn’t get you what you want” quite like caving to the vandals.

Dozens of cities and towns across Canada, likewise, gave in and cancelled their Canada Day festivities.

This campaign of violence and self-flagellation all centres upon Canada’s historical policy of residential schools, which existed in some form from 1834 up until 1970.

Three First Nations bands, so far, have come forth to say that they have located the graves of those who are believed to have perished while attending these schools. No doubt more bands will soon do the same. Canada’s history of residential schools deserves criticism and recompense. But details still matter.

Each band says that unmarked graves were discovered through “ground penetrating radar” and that these findings merely confirm what the community already knew. No band has yet released a full report.

A lot of media have nonetheless spun these revelations into evidence of genocide.

Many falsely reported the findings as “mass graves” (they were not, as one of the chiefs herself clarified). Many more exaggerated what ground penetrating radar can do (it doesn’t locate human remains, just grave shafts), and others jumped to enormous conclusions about the cause of death.

Alas, too many journalists in this country are now more interested in virtue-signalling and being on the woke side of history than to concern themselves with reporting the facts or finding the truth.

Regardless of the current moral panic being drummed up in the media, anger over a failed government policy commenced 150 years ago does not justify political violence and attacks on our national symbols. Canada deserves better.

FUREY: Are we witnessing a national unity moment?

Whenever there’s a renewed national conversation about First Nations people in Canada, one would hope that these conservations take us in a positive direction instead of a “us versus them” mentality.

Canadians have demonstrated that we can unite and push for more opportunities and successes for First Nations people.

Anthony Furey discusses in his latest video.

Xi Jinping pledges “reunification” with Taiwan

Chinese President Xi Jinping vowed to “smash” any attempts by Taiwan at formal independence and pledged to complete “reunification” with the democratic country.

“Solving the Taiwan question and realizing the complete reunification of the motherland are the unswerving historical tasks of the Chinese Communist Party and the common aspiration of all Chinese people,” Xi said during a ceremony commemorating the 100th birthday of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on Thursday.

“All sons and daughters of China, including compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, must work together and move forward in solidarity, resolutely smashing any ‘Taiwan independence’ plots.”

In response to Xi’s remarks, Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council says the CCP is a dictatorship that has trampled on people’s freedoms and should embrace democracy.

“Its historical decision-making errors and persistent harmful actions have caused serious threats to regional security,” it added.

“Our government’s determination to firmly defend the nation’s sovereignty and Taiwan’s democracy and freedom and to maintain peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait remains unchanged.”

While Taiwan considers itself an independent nation and has rejected the “one China principle,” the Chinese regime has increased efforts to assert its claim of Taiwan in recent months. In June, Beijing sent a record number of Chinese jets into the Taiwan air defence zone. 

Critics of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have called on the Canadian government to do more to support Taiwan.

A Politico report earlier this year suggested that the Liberals attempted to prevent an international award from being awarded to Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen.

Following the report’s publication, the government reversed course and Taiwan was awarded the Halifax International Security Forum’s John McCain Prize for Leadership in Public Service.

FUREY: The kids are still locked down

Even as restrictions begin to ease for adults, life isn’t getting any easier for children in Canada.

Despite the fact that COVID-19 hits kids less severely than adults, public officials continue to enforce strict lockdown measures in schools, playgrounds and more.

Anthony Furey discusses in his latest video.

Bill C-10 dies – for now – as Senate adjourns for summer without vote

The Liberal government’s internet regulation Bill C-10 has been put on hold after the Senate rose for the summer before voting on the controversial bill.

On Tuesday, the Senate decided to rise for the summer break, immediately halting all outstanding legislation which had not been passed.

If an election is called before Bill C-10 is reintroduced, the bill will die and a future government would have to introduce it again.

Bill C-10 passed its third reading in the House of Commons Tuesday morning by a vote of 196 to 112: only the Conservatives and independents Jody Wilson-Raybould and Derek Sloan opposed it.

If passed, Bill C-10 would have significant implications on internet freedom, as the bill gives the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) unprecedented power to regulate online publishers, including social media users.

Despite the Liberals’ efforts to push C-10 into law, the upper house refused to speed up the process. Both progressive and Conservative senators offered various criticisms of C-10, many saying they would not vote in favour.

On Tuesday, Senator Pamela Wallin pledged to stall C-10 until the summer recess could be called, saying the upper house is not obligated to pass government legislation without proper debate.

“The government has had six years to pass legislation it wants. It is not our job in the Senate to rubber stamp and give up our constitutional responsibilities just because they want fodder for an election- especially if it means killing free speech,” she said. 

Conservative Senator Leo Housakos told CBC that the Senate had no interest in rushing through a bill which, in his opinion, gives unlimited power to a government body to control the content Canadians can see online.

“The core problem with this bill is that it takes the regulatory tools designated for a small, fixed number of licensed TV and radio stations in the 1990s and attempts to apply it to the vast universe of the internet in the 2020s,” he said.

“In doing so, it gives the CRTC an unprecedented delegation of power with no clear framework or definitions as to how it will be used. This lack of clear limits on what can be regulated is a fundamental problem with this bill.”

NDP MP claims “racism” after receiving a happy Canada Day email

NDP MP Mumilaaq Qaqqaq claimed that an email from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) that wished her a happy Canada Day was a form of “genocide denial” and a “racist dogwhistle.” 

Qaqqaq made the statement on Twitter before going on a rant about how MLI should change its name. 

In the email referenced by Qaqqaq, the MLI writes that “there are growing calls by a vocal minority to stop celebrating Canada Day (and indeed, Canada more generally).” 

“We at MLI think this is wrongheaded; Canada is well worth celebrating, and the Institute makes every effort to show why every day,” the email states.

“We are a nation with a tradition of freedom that attracts people of all walks of life to come enjoy our society. We have, through stable and liberal political institutions, made our country one of the most successful in the world when it comes to economic, social and moral advances.” 

Qaqqag replied, “This is not ok. Is a “vocal minority” code for Indigenous people? You are wrong btw There are millions of people wearing orange and refusing to celebrate this year. We aren’t going away.”

According to a Leger poll commissioned by Postmedia, 77% of people stated that Canada Day should not be cancelled this year. 

Qaqqaq recently announced that she will not be pursuing re-election. In a farewell speech to the House of Commons, Qaqqaq claimed that she never “felt safe or protected” while in Parliament. 

Qaqqaq also claimed that security jogged after her and “nearly put their hands on” her as an MP because of her race.

As exclusively reported by True North, Qaqqaq also came under fire in April after she raised doubts about Liberal MP Yvonne Jones’ Indigenous identity. On Twitter, Qaqqaq claimed that Jones’ was “not an Inuk.”

Qaqqaq eventually apologized to Jones over the incident.

Related stories