fbpx
Thursday, July 17, 2025

Recap of Day 2 of the Public Order Emergency Commission hearings

On Day 2 of the Public Order Emergency Commission hearings, Ottawa residents testified about “phantom honking” and living in a scene from “The Purge” as city councillors accused truckers of committing “microaggressions” toward Ottawa residents.

Zexi Li, a 22 year-old Ottawa resident and federal government employee testified that living in Ottawa during the Freedom Convoy was “something like living in ‘The Purge’,” making reference to the horror movie series in which a fictional United States enters a 12-hour state of lawlessness in which rape and murder are legal.

“I just remember feeling like it was such a surreal sight. It almost felt like you were in something like ‘The Purge’,” Li said. “Though I didn’t often see direct acts of violence, there was a certain chaos on the streets, and that feeling of chaos gradually increased as things progressed.”

Under cross-examination from Freedom Convoy lawyer Brendan Miller, Li was challenged on her comments.

Li responded by saying, “I would not say that the protests or occupation provided a Purge-like opportunity.” She followed up by saying the opportunity was there for a Purge-type scenario and that the people “illegally occupying our streets felt like they could do anything they wanted.”

Miller also asked Li about her interactions with the protesters, including an interaction in which Li allegedly told truckers to “go back to where the f*** you came from.” Li confirmed that she “may have” said those words.

Prior to admitting that she had confronted the protesters by cursing at them, Li told Commission counsel that protesters targeted her when she “chose not to engage with them.”

“The worst thing was that when I chose not to engage with the protesters they would blast their horns at me with a smile and then cheer in unison. They would take joy in my flinching and recoiling from the noise,” Li said.

The only violence described in Li’s testimony today were alleged actions from people living in Li’s apartment building throwing eggs at the truckers from their balconies.

“Egg throwing started to occur from my building,” Li said. This was described by Li as her neighbours’ “little act of retaliation” toward the peaceful truckers.

Li was the lead plaintiff in a successful injunction application to get protesting truckers to stop honking horns late at night near the beginning of the Ottawa protests.


Testifying alongside Li was Victoria De La Ronde, also a resident of downtown Ottawa and a former federal government employee.

Under questioning from Commission counsel, De La Ronde claimed that due to the honking from protesters in February, she still hears “phantom honking” and is “triggered by the sound of horns.”

The next two witnesses that testified were Nathalie Carrier representing the Vanier business improvement area and Kevin McHale representing the Sparks Street business improvement area.

McHale testified that many businesses operating in downtown Ottawa during the protests voluntarily closed their doors so as not to be fined by the City of Ottawa for not following public health guidelines.

Carrier testified that UberEats had stopped operating in downtown Ottawa during the protest.

In response, Twitter users began sharing pictures of UberEats receipts taken from the time of the convoy protests in downtown Ottawa.


The final two witnesses of the day were Ottawa city councillors Mathieu Fleury and Catherine McKenney.

Fleury described the actions of the protesters towards Ottawa residents as “microaggressions” and described the trucks involved in the protest as “weapons.” 

“For us, having the physical truck on the street created a big weapon,” Fleury claimed.

“There were a number of microaggressions…particularly in residential communities.” 

When asked by Convoy lawyer Miller to define the word ‘microaggression’, Fleury refused to define the term in English despite using the term in English multiple times throughout his testimony.

Fleury claimed that as a francophone, he would only be able to describe the “nuance” of the word “microaggressions” in French.

McKenney, who is running for mayor and uses they/them pronouns, was unable to provide any evidence of particular acts of violence that had occurred during the protests and claims only to have heard about them.

This contradicts a public statement issued by McKenney during the protests that Ottawa residents were facing “unprecedented violence” and that residents had been “terrorized.”

What happens now?

The commission hearings resume on Monday, October 17 at 9:30am ET.

Ottawa mayor Jim Watson, along with members of his staff, are expected to testify next week. Representatives from the Ottawa Police Service and the Ontario Provincial Police are also expected to testify next week.

True North will continue to bring you daily coverage of the Public Order Emergency Commission hearings. 

Port Moody councillor’s book recommends man-boy relationship as a “family structure”

Port Moody incumbent city council candidate Hunter Madsen co-authored a controversial book about the gay community that mused about the ancient Greek practice of sexual relationships between older men and boys aged “sixteen or so” as ideal and a form of “family structure.” 

The renowned book titled After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the ‘90s was published in 1989 by Madsen, who was then an advertising executive, alongside neuropsychologist Marshall Kirk. 

While Madsen and Kirk don’t encourage pederasty in the book, explicitly stating that the “authors grant nothing of the sort” when it comes to ethically approving of pederasty, several troubling sections ambiguously gloss over the abuse adult-child sexual relations result in without unequivocally denouncing it.

In a section titled Back to Plato: A Modest Proposal to Resurrect the “Traditional Gay Family”, Madsen and Kirk outline the “ancient Greek model” of a “explicitly sexual love” between “an attractive boy – of, say, sixteen or so” known in Greek as an eromenos (beloved) and an “older, presumably more mature and established, man” known as an erastes (adult lover.)  

The authors make sure to add that “for nutritional reasons, (puberty) occurred much later in those days than it does now.” 

“Something like this, suitably updated (that is, without the wife and kids), is what we tentatively recommend as a new ideal for gay men – a family structure of their own,” writes Madsen and Kirk.

True North reached out to Madsen for comment and an opportunity to clarify his views on the subject but did not receive a response by the time this article was published.  It is unclear whether or not he continues to hold these same controversial views since they were published in his book. Madsen is currently running to be re-elected to council. Voters are set to go to the polls on Oct. 15. 

Madsen has also used the pseudonym “Erastes Pill” (referencing the adult male in the relationship described above) in publications before, including an essay co-authored with Kirk titled “The Overhauling of Straight America.”  

One section of the book preceding the chapter on ancient attitudes towards homosexuality, includes a set of rules “for relations with straights.” 

“If I’m a Pederast or a Sadomasochist, I’ll Keep It Under Wraps, and Out of Gay Pride Marches,” wrote the authors.  

Earlier in the book, Madsen and Kirk discuss pedophilia further, stating that allowing pedophilia activism into gay pride marches was an “unalloyed disaster” from a public relations perspective and go on to demand that pedophilia advocates “please keep a low profile.” 

“We’re not judging you, but others do, and very harshly; please keep a low profile. You offend the public more than other gays,” write Madsen and Kirk.  

Madsen and Kirk cynically explain that it “is irrelevant whether pederasty is good or bad” while stating they “grant nothing of the sort” when it comes to approval, for them the issue of its advocacy is a public relations one that’s harmful for how people view the LGBT community.

Fake News Friday | Journalists attack Danielle Smith on first day as Premier

After Danielle Smith vowed to protect the rights of unvaccinated Albertans, journalists, politicians and academics slammed her as a “toddler”, and as “racist”.

On this week’s episode of Fake News Friday, Andrew Lawton and Harrison Faulkner dive into the very best of fake news in Canada this week.

CTV News published a story earlier this week quoting a UN Climate official who said that the war in Ukraine is a “blessing” for climate. The Toronto District School Board is cancelling Halloween this year. It’s very important not to trigger anyone with the word “Halloween” given how awful it is.

Also on the show, woke American ice cream company Ben and Jerry’s decided that they wanted to meddle in local Canadian democracy by imploring Canadians to reject the “far-right” in upcoming school board elections.

Tune in to Fake News Friday now!

Canadian Armed Forces ramps up discharges of unvaccinated soldiers

The head of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) will be moving full steam ahead with his plan to purge the military of soldiers who made a personal health decision and refused to be vaccinated against Covid-19.

While the new vaccination policy by Chief of the Defence Staff. Gen. Wayne Eyre no longer makes the Covid-19 shot mandatory for all members, those who refused to be vaccinated when it was mandatory will continue to be discharged. 

A total of 300 soldiers have been subject to an “unsuitable for further service” release from the military while 100 have voluntarily left the Canadian Armed Forces. 

As exclusively reported by True North in Nov. 2021, the release faced by unvaccinated CAF members applies to those who “either wholly or chiefly because of factors within his control, develops personal weakness or behaviour or has domestic or other personal problems that seriously impair his usefulness to or impose an excessive administrative burden on the Canadian Forces.”

The release will be a permanent stain on the record of the unvaccinated CAF members bearing serious career consequences. 

“Additionally, a Canadian Armed Forces member’s unvaccinated status may have additional consequential career implications, including loss of opportunities contributing to promotion, which are outside of Canadian Armed Forces control,” a Department of National Defence spokesperson explained to True North last year. 

CAF’s treatment of unvaccinated soldiers led to admonishment from the Conservatives with MP Cheryl Gallant blasting Liberal Defence Minister Anita Anand for treating the soldiers worse than convicted serial killer and rapist former CAF colonel Russell Williams. 

“Morale is at an all time low with Canadian Forces short thousands of members, yet even those who’ve had the first COVID inoculation suffered serious adverse reactions and had cardiologists recommend foregoing subsequent injections are sent packing without earned pensions and benefits,” said Gallant. 

“Even Russell Williams was afforded his pension, so why are soldiers who’ve served honourably for decades being treated worse than a convicted serial rapist and murderer when it comes to refusing a new vaccine?”

According to Eyre, the refusal of soldiers to be vaccinated raised concerns about their suitability for the military. 

Some positions will still require CAF members to attest Covid-19 vaccination status depending on specific circumstances and roles.

Canadians paying $31 billion in surcharges on federal debt

Canadians are paying over $31 billion in surcharges and interest payments on federal debt, a new report by the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) shows. 

The PBO’s Economic and Fiscal Outlook for October found that the cost of debt servicing is expected to balloon to $47.6 billion as a result of “higher interest rates and the additional accumulation of federal debt.” 

“Given high levels of household indebtedness and elevated levels of house prices in Canada households could pull back their spending to a greater extent and residential investment could decline more than anticipated,” the report says. 

Canada’s federal debt reached $1.3 trillion this year following several massive pandemic budgets tabled by the Liberal government. 

According to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation federal director Franco Terrazzano, the PBO projections don’t necessarily show the entire picture.

“PBO projections assume no more spending than what has already been announced. But we know the last budget didn’t contain all the Liberals’ election spending announcements (never mind the NDPs’). Freeland said after her last budget: ‘We will do more things over the next three budgets’,” Terrazzano told True North. 

“Taxpayers are paying more to cover interest on the government’s credit card. Interest charges will cost Canadians $257 billion by the end of 2027. That’s a cost of $6,400 per Canadian.”

Although Ottawa has pledged to lower Canada’s $113.8 billion deficit by 90% over the next five years, Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux called the plan unrealistic during a June 7 testimony before the Senate’s finance committee. 

“I personally do not believe it’s credible that there will be that level of spending restraint,” explained Giroux. 

“That would probably be fiscal tightening or expenditure restraint more severe than what we had seen under the Conservatives in the early 2000s.” 

A recent report by the Fraser Institute found that 40% of federal deficits incurred during the pandemic “had nothing to do” with providing Canadians relief from Covid-19. 

“Canadians may be surprised to learn that a significant percentage of Ottawa’s huge spending increases during COVID, which produced large deficits and much more debt, had nothing to do with the pandemic,” Fraser Institute senior fellow Livio Di Matteo said in a press release.

“As a result of Ottawa’s massive spending increase during the pandemic, the federal government will have a larger footprint in the Canadian economy now and for many years to come.”

Terrazzano said that with higher interest charges, the government will likely continue to go over budget. 

“Over five years, the government will spend $34 billion over budget,” explained Terrazzano.

“The Trudeau government doesn’t exactly have a good track record on deficits. Trudeau said he would initially run a few “modest” deficits and balance the budget in 2019. He missed that by $20 billion even before the pandemic.”

LEVY: Novotel shelter finally closing, but two others are getting extended

It took close to two years, considerable media coverage and many emails to the mayor’s office but the controversial Novotel shelter is finally closing at the end of the year.

The 254-room hotel on The Esplanade – one of three Silver Hotel group properties rented out by the organization – was fraught with controversy from the moment it opened with no advance warning to the surrounding neighbourhood in late February 2021.

Two others – the Strathcona Hotel and Hotel Victoria – are within 800 metres of the Novotel. Their leases will be extended until April 2023.

The Novotel shelter – which permitted residents to take hard drugs on-site – wreaked havoc on the surrounding neighbourhood.

Monthly reports were sent to Mayor John Tory’s office detailing vandalism, aggressive behaviour by the shelter’s residents (many addicted to hard drugs), constant screaming, arson, public urination and defecation, dog fights in the back alley, weapons possession, the presence of EMS vehicles day and night and the appearance of drug dealers who preyed on the shelter’s residents.

Store windows were repeatedly broken and petty theft was rampant. 

Police struggled to keep up with the increased crime and many of the shelter’s neighbours became wary of venturing out at night.

Politicians ignored the concern as did the bureaucrats. An 86-page report with a 1,200-name petition, photos and anecdotes was also completely ignored.

In the spring, Toronto police made one of its largest drug busts involving $28.5-miilion worth of crystal meth and coke in the condo directly beside the Novotel shelter.

The shelter operator, Homes First, had no curfew and appeared to struggle to manage its population of largely drug-addicted and mentally ill residents.

The lease with the Silver Hotel Group indicated that the contract was to last 10 months only until Dec. 2021 at a cost of $8.1-million if all 254 rooms were used. 

Each room was to be rented at $100 per day not including $30 per day per client for meals and snacks.

The lease was extended twice and when all was said and done, this temporary stopgap measure is likely to cost taxpayers close to $20-million.

But that’s not all.

The city’s contract with Silver Hotel Group says once Homes First and the residents move at the end of the year, the city has agreed to pay the costs of deep cleaning and restoring the hotel. 

Those costs could be astronomical considering the pictures that have surfaced showing how rooms have been ransacked and ruined.

In June the city’s Auditor General released an audit of the hotel shelter program which showed negligent city officials paid out $15-million extra for charges not covered by the hotel leases, for vacant rooms and various “facility surcharges” on meals.

I’m betting the city will never recover the money.

The Downtown Concerned Citizens Organization (DCCO) which formed after three hotel shelters were thrust on an unsuspecting community, issued a statement indicating they are “relieved” with the impending closure of the Novotel.

They say the homeless hotel caused a “war zone of crime and carnage” on The Esplanade.

The Rupa Subramanya Show | How will the Emergencies Act hearings unfold? (Ft. Eva Chipiuk)

As the six-week-long public hearings for the invocation of the Emergencies Act start this week with dozens of witnesses such as Tamara Lich, Chris Barber, and officials like Justin Trudeau, there is a lot to unpack.

Will this be a fair process? Will the government be held to account?

On the show today, Rupa is joined by Eva Chipiuk of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. She is the co-legal counsel with Keith Wilson for the Peckford Travel Ban Challenge, Tamara Lich and the Freedom Convoy. Chipiuk –who will be on the front lines – tells us how these hearings are expected to go.

What will happen if the government is found guilty of not meeting the threshold for invoking the Act?

Tune into The Rupa Subramanya Show on True North!

Alberta gov says Emergencies Act wasn’t necessary as inquiry kicks off

Source: X

Lawyers representing the Alberta government said in their opening remarks before the Public Order Emergency Commission on Thursday that the Emergencies Act was unnecessary.

The investigation kicked off this week and will seek to determine whether the Trudeau Liberals met the legal threshold required to invoke the Act to end the month-long Freedom Convoy in the nation’s capital. 

Government of Alberta lawyer Mandy England argued before Commissioner Paul Rouleau that the province believes it’s important to show how Alberta dealt with the Coutts border blockade before the emergency powers were triggered.

“None of the powers that were created under the federal Emergencies Act were necessary, nor were any of them used,” she said.

England says Alberta believes the federal government failed in its duty to consult with the provinces. Trudeau’s decision to trigger the law was made before Trudeau’s call to premiers on the morning of February 14, she said. 

Justice Minister Tyler Shandro said Wednesday that the province will demonstrate the Coutts border blockade was “effectively dealt with” prior to the federal government’s decision to invoke the Emergencies Act.

“The decision to invoke the act violated the constitutionally guaranteed rights of Albertans and gave the federal government the ability to seize property without due process of law.”

Shandro also said Alberta has the legislative tools necessary to deal with blockades. 

“The unnecessary invocation of the Emergencies Act has set a dangerous precedent and it is incumbent upon Alberta to challenge the violation of the rights of Albertans and all Canadians,” he said.

His comments follow Alberta’s move to intervene in legal challenges initiated against the federal government by the Canadian Constitution Foundation and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association earlier this year. 

The Public Order Emergency Commission will hear from more than 60 witnesses, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and other Liberal ministers. Public Safety Minister Marco Medicino, who falsely claimed that the Ottawa police had asked the government to invoke emergency powers, will also testify. 

Ratio’d | Defending the unvaccinated is racist

Did you know that defending the unvaccinated is actually racist? Danielle Smith learned that the hard way on Tuesday after saying that the unvaccinated are the “most discriminated against group” she has ever seen in her lifetime. Establishment figures like the Mayor of Calgary and former party leaders said it was “racist” and displayed “white privilege” to say such a thing. Who knew that segregation was so fashionable?

Also on the show, students at Trent University have created a new student lounge on campus to fight back against oppression and racism. It’s called the “Freedom Lounge” and white students aren’t allowed in. What better way to fight racism than with more racism.

Tune in to the latest episode of Ratio’d with Harrison Faulkner.

Recap of Day 1 of the Public Order Emergency Commission hearings

On Day 1 of the Public Order Emergency Commission hearings, lawyers representing various parties given standing by the Commission made their introductory remarks to Commissioner Paul Rouleau.

Rouleau began the day with his own introductory remarks outlining how public commissions work and to describe to the viewing public what they can expect to see over the next month and a half. 

Rouleau described the Commission’s process as an exercise in “fact-finding”.

“Uncovering the truth is an important goal. When difficult events occur that affect the lives of Canadians, the public has a right to know what has happened,” Rouleau said. 

Rouleau also prefaced the day’s proceedings by outlining what public commissions cannot do such as determining whether individuals have committed crimes.

Public commissions “do not make findings of legal liability, they do not determine whether individuals have committed crimes. While inquiries seek to uncover the truth, they are not trials,” Rouleau said. 

Rouleau described the Commission’s mandate as emanating from “the public’s legitimate right to know why the government proclaimed an emergency and whether the actions it took were appropriate.”

In describing the mandate given to the commission by the federal cabinet, the Commissioner described that mandate in five sections: 1) To examine first the evolution and goals of the convoy movement and border protests and their leadership organization and participants. 2) The impact of foreign and domestic funding. 3) The impact, role and sources of misinformation and disinformation. 4) The economic impact of blockades. 5) The efforts of police and other responders prior to and after the declaration.

Rouleau said that it is the mandate given to them by parliament “that drives our work.”

Lawyers representing parties given standing by the commission were then called on to make their opening arguments. 

Introductions began with the co-lead counsel representing the Government of Canada, Robert MacKinnnon. “The evidence will show that the invocation of the Emergencies Act was a reasonable, and necessary decision given the escalating, volatile and urgent circumstances across the country,” MacKinnon said.

“The government witnesses will outline the deliberate, step-by-step process in which careful consideration was given to all the available options which led to the declaration of a public order emergency as a matter of last resort.”

Lawyers representing the governments of Saskatchewan and Alberta both introduced their arguments and made it clear that the provincial governments of Alberta and Saskatchewan opposed the federal government’s decision to invoke the Emergencies Act.

“It is important for the Government of Alberta to share with Canadians the facts as to how Alberta was able to handle the international border blockades prior to the invocation of the federal Emergencies Act” Mandy England, co-lead counsel representing the Government of Alberta said. 

Brendan Miller, counsel to Freedom Corp., an organization representing the protesters in Ottawa slammed the government’s decision in his opening remarks.

“There was no justification whatsoever to invoke the Emergencies Act,” Miller said. “There was no reasonable or probable grounds to invoke the Emergencies Act and the government exceeded their jurisdiction both constitutionally and legislatively in doing so.”

Sujit Choudhry, co-counsel for the Canadian Constitution Foundation also took aim the government’s decision saying “the emergency proclamation severely restricted the rights to freedom of expression, assembly and association.”

“The Emergencies Act is the successor to the discredited War Measures act which was abused during the FLQ crisis in Quebec.”

Allan Honner, litigation director at the Democracy Fund, also challenged the federal government’s grounding to invoke the act. 

“From our perspective, the government did not meet the requisite legal grounds to invoke a Public Order Emergency,” Honner said. “(T)he extraordinary measures that the government invoked were therefore inappropriate and indeed, outside their jurisdiction.” 

After opening remarks were presented, counsel representing the commission submitted three “overview reports” as evidence. The first was an overview of the Covid-19 pandemic in Canada and public health restrictions implemented by different levels of government across Canada. The second was an overview of prior protests leading up to the pandemic and legal challenges of public health measures and the final overview report was a “timeline of certain key events leading up to the invocation of the Emergencies Act.” 

Witness testimony is scheduled to begin tomorrow morning at 9:30 am ET. Members of the Ottawa City Council are expected to testify.

True North will continue to bring you daily coverage of the ongoing Public Order Emergency Commision hearings.

Related stories