fbpx
Thursday, July 17, 2025

BONOKOSKI: Why does no one want to join the Canadian Armed Forces?

The Canadian Armed Forces—its reputation severely harmed by sexual  misconduct charges and racism allegations, even in its highest ranks—is now on a recruitment blitz to replenish its dwindling troops.

It’s a difficult if not impossible exercise, but its success is vital.

An opinion poll conducted on behalf of the Defence Department earlier this year found most Canadians reluctant to consider a military career.

“Asked whether they would consider joining the CAF, young men were more likely than young women to say they would, but overall, less than half of any group typically indicated they would,” reads a summary report.

“Men and women alike were deterred by the idea of having to leave their families and/or move around frequently, requiring them to uproot their families.”

The situation is so dire, in fact, that the force’s commander, Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Wayne Eyre, is publicly calling on the country to rally behind its military as it faces an unprecedented personnel crisis that he says is threatening its ability to protect and defend Canada.

“We’re here to defend our way of life, now and into the future,” Eyre said. “So we need a whole-of-society effort to help us bring the Armed Forces back to where it needs to be for the dangerous world ahead.”

The extraordinary appeal comes as Eyre and his senior staff struggle to fill around 10,000 empty positions at a time when Canada’s military is facing a growing number of threats and requests for help at home and abroad.

Earlier this month, the defence chief issued an order setting a new direction for the military after years of high-tempo deployments and operations, making recruitment and retention of personnel its top priority.

About one in 10 positions within the Armed Forces sits empty after years of lagging recruitment rates and there is a growing shortage of non-commissioned officers and other mid-level leaders.

“We need to rebuild the Armed Forces, we need to get the numbers back up,” Eyre said in an interview with the Canadian Press. “And we’ve got to do it with a sense of urgency and priority because it is affecting our ability to respond around the world.”

The Canadian military is dealing with unique challenges, many of them self-inflicted. There’s the reputational problem that began after reports of sexual misconduct involving senior leaders and then concerns about the presence of right-wing extremists in the ranks.

Not all the difficulties, however,  are self-inflicted. Some are due to the nature of military service. Most Canadian Armed Forces bases and wings are located in rural communities, which are not exactly magnets for potential recruits when the majority of the country’s population lives in cities.

“Let’s face it: Petawawa is a little bit different than downtown Toronto or even Ottawa,” Eyre said. “But to create the operational output required, we have to push people to Cold Lake, Bagotville and the coasts.

“So cracking that code — how do we incentivize movement to those locations — this is the big challenge.”

It could also be said that the military is a tough and demanding life, which again are not magnets for the sensitivities and work ethic of the typical millennial.

A new dress code dramatically eases rules around how troops can look and dress. Despite some outside criticism, the move has been embraced by many Armed Forces members as long overdue.

“The walls have not come tumbling down and we didn’t lose operational effectiveness overnight,” Eyre said of the new gender-inclusive dress code, which also for the first time allows long hair, fingernail polish and face tattoos while in uniform.

“I’m more concerned about: Can they fight? Are they fit? Do they follow orders?”

French ambassador slams Canada’s underfunded military

France’s ambassador to Canada slammed Canada’s underfunded military as Canada’s geopolitical enemies ramp up their militaristic ambitions. 

In an interview with the National Post, Amb. Michel Miraillet ridiculed Canada for its lack of investment in the military, as well as a withdrawal from international peacekeeping duties. 

Miraillet remarked that Canada’s lack of vigilance results from overreliance on the safety granted by sharing a land border with the United States, the most powerful military in the world and a close ally of Canada. 

“It’s always difficult for a country that by its nature is highly protected, with a big guy below who is a big pain in the neck but at the end of the day, well, it works,” said Miraillet.

The French ambassador alluded to Canada’s military being third-rate and only being able to sustain itself with the help of the American military.

“You’re very French, you’re riding a first-class carriage with a third-class ticket…. If you want to remain in the first-class seat, you need to train and expand and to go somewhere.”

As part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), member countries are urged to spend at least 2% of their GDP on the nation’s defence. 

As of 2021, Canada ranked 25th out of 29 NATO countries in military spending as a share of GDP, contributing just 1.36%, down from 2020’s 1.44%.

For comparison, the ninth place France spent 1.93% of their GDP on military spending, the United States spent 3.57%, and the first place Greece spent 3.59%.

Despite a 2014 commitment to bring Canada’s military spending up to 2%, the Trudeau government has been unable to follow through on the pledge.

Miraillet recalled the past when Canada had a more active role in United Nations peacekeeping missions, as in 1993, over 3,300 Canadian troops were deployed, while only 54 Canadians are deployed in peacekeeping roles this year.

“At the end of the day, I have the feeling that in military terms, this country is less present than it was 10 or 15 years ago,” said Miraillet. “Canada was far more present in the past in Africa than it is now…. There is a need to have more Canada on the ground, not only in Africa but also in Asia.”

In June 2022, NATO’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg reiterated a similar message, chiding Canada for falling far from the NATO recommendation.

“I expect all allies to meet the guidelines that we have set,” he said. “So of course, this is a message to all allies, including Canada,” said Stoltenberg.

New Brunswick fourth province to oppose Liberals’ gun grab scheme

New Brunswick has joined three other provinces in opposing the Trudeau Liberals’ request to use provincial police resources to buy back banned firearms from law-abiding citizens. 

At the 2022 Federal, Provincial and Territorial Ministers Responsible for Justice and Public Safety meeting, New Brunswick, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba called on the federal government to stop its plan to use provincial RCMP as confiscation agents.

New Brunswick’s provincial RCMP resources are spread thin as is, the province’s Public Safety Minister Kris Austin said in a news release. 

 “We have made it clear to the Government of Canada that we cannot condone any use of those limited resources, at all, in their planned buyback program,” Austin said.

In May 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced he was banning more than 1,500 models of firearms, including guns explicitly used for sport shooting and hunting. The Parliamentary Budget Officer said the program will cost $750 million. Those costs could balloon to $1 billion once administrative fees are taken into account.

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino then wrote to the provinces and requested the help through their police. The government of Alberta was the first to say ‘no.’

In late September, Alberta Minister of Justice Tyler Shandro announced he would obstruct the gun grab by any means necessary. He also said he wrote to the RCMP and said the confiscation scheme is not a provincial priority, and as such, it is an inappropriate use of RCMP resources.

Two days later, Saskatchewan Chief Firearms Officer Bob Freberg revealed the province wrote to the RCMP saying “no provincially funded resources of any type,” including the RCMP, will be used for Medicino’s buybacks.

Following these announcements, Manitoba Justice Minister Kelvin Goertzen said he told Mendicino the program cannot erode finite police resources which are needed to investigate violent crime.

“We will be bringing these concerns, along with the shared concern of Saskatchewan and Alberta, directly to the federal government next month in meetings of Ministers of Justice and Ministers of Public Safety,” Goertzen said in a statement on Facebook.

And last week, the Yukon legislature passed a motion saying local RCMP resources shouldn’t be used for the federal government’s gun buyback program.

The motion was brought forward by Yukon Party Justice Critic Brad Cathers and passed with the support of the Yukon Party and the Yukon NDP MLAs. All Yukon Liberal MLAs, who formed a minority government, voted against the motion.

Following the federal-provincial meeting, the four provinces also called on the federal government to direct all communications related to the federal firearms confiscation program through appropriate channels.

“Two years ago, the federal government said that using police resources would be ‘expensive and inefficient,’” Shandro said in a statement. “Now the federal government has resorted to using police resources to seize firearms from Canadians. Make no mistake, the federal firearms confiscation program will cost us billions and will not improve public safety. Alberta’s government is not legally obligated to provide resources and will not do so.”

Mendicino has already accused the Alberta government of acting in a “reckless” manner for opposing his costly program.

Earlier this month, Conservative MPs on the House Public Safety committee grilled the minister over the Trudeau government’s plan to target law-abiding gun owners with Bill C-21, which includes the gun buyback program, as well as other firearm control measures.

In response to questioning from a Conservative MP about whether Mendicino has a “plan B” for provinces that won’t participate in the program, the minister acknowledged he has no other options and said he’s still focused on “plan A.”

Vancouver left-wing mayor loses re-election bid to law and order candidate

Running on a platform that included plans to hire 100 more police officers, Ken Sim was elected the new mayor of Vancouver on Saturday beating out incumbent mayor and former NDP MP Kennedy Stewart. 

Sim’s election came after a heated race that largely centred on public safety and homelessness, with Sim declaring the city “in crisis”. Having received 49% of the vote, Sim will be the city’s first Chinese mayor.

“The path to get here was incredibly long – 135 years after the first Chinese head tax was paid just for the right to come here and work on building a railway, Vancouver has elected its first Chinese mayor,” said Sim.

“The history of this moment isn’t lost on me. But the honour really goes to those whose shoulders I stand on.”

Prior to winning the mayoral seat, Sim received the endorsement of the Vancouver Police Union. Throughout the campaign, Sim took shots at Stewart and his government for kowtowing to protestors and moving to defund the Vancouver Police Department in 2020 – a plan which ultimately failed after the provincial government ordered that the funds be restored. 

To deal with the spike in crime and random assaults, Sim has pledged to boost the number of active police officers by 100, to require officers to wear body cameras and to reintroduce police liaisons to schools. 

“100 new police officers and 100 new mental health workers is (my) commitment, 25 counsellors is the Kennedy Stewart commitment,” said Sim on Sept. 21. “Vancouver needs leadership that recognizes the fact that our City is in crisis.”

Stewart wasn’t the only incumbent mayor who took a beating at the polls. In Surrey, councillor Brenda Locke defeated Doug McCallum for mayor. Meanwhile, Langley incumbent mayor Val van den Broek was also defeated by councillor Nathan Pachal. 

“I heard clearly that community safety is the top issue for Langley City followed closely by affordable housing and addressing homelessness. So I look forward to working with our new council. We have a mix of incumbents and new faces, about 50-50,” said Pachal.

Other notable results include the defeat of controversial Victoria city councillor Ben Isitt, who made headlines for wanting to pass off the funding of local Remembrance Day celebrations to Veterans Affairs Canada and trying to cut funding for Christmas decorations. 

On the school board front, Chilliwack saw long-time trustee and critic of gender ideology in schools, Barry Neufeld, lose his seat. 
Meanwhile, the newly-established municipal electoral organization ParentsVoiceBC elected three school trustees – two in Nechako Lakes and one in Chilliwack.

Ontario reviews teaching standards over Oakville teacher with prosthetic breasts

The Ontario College of Teachers, which licenses and regulates the province’s educators, says it’s reviewing professional standards amid a controversy involving a transgender Oakville teacher who wears enormous  prosthetic breasts to class.

Amid the outrage over the teacher’s conduct, Ontario’s education minister Stephen Lecce told the media that he had requested that the College review its professional standards.

“In this province, in our schools, we celebrate our differences and we also believe that there must be the highest standards of professionalism in front of our kids,” said Lecce.

“And on that basis, I’ve asked the Ontario College of Teachers to review and to consider strengthening those provisions with respect to professional conduct which we think would be in the interest of all kids in Ontario,” he added.

Last week, the College told the National Post it is reviewing its professional standards in compliance with the provincial directive.  

“The College has been reviewing its professional standards in response to Minister Lecce’s request. We will provide our response to the Minister when it is ready,” college spokesperson Andrew Fifield told the outlet.

“Per the Minister’s request, we are reviewing the supports and guidance the College provides to members with respect to teacher professionalism.”

The College expects to share the results of their review with Lecce this month, but told the National Post that it is unable to comment on specific teachers, schools or school boards.

It should be noted that while the regulatory body is not in charge of school boards, it does have ethical standards for teachers to follow and can suspend or revoke teaching licenses.

The Halton District School Board, which oversees the Oakville school, does have a dress code banning the wearing of “clothing that exposes or makes visible genitals and nipples”. 

However, the board has said the policy only applies to students and not teachers.

The school declined the National Post’s request for new information on the matter, and referred the outlet to the board.

In a written statement to the outlet, Halton school board spokesperson Heather Francey said “the (board) has received significant attention online and in the news over the past few weeks.”

She added that the board “continues to handle this matter in a way that stays true to our values and commitment to Human Rights, respects the privacy and dignity of our students and staff, and with the safety and well-being of students and staff as our highest priority.”

“While we understand the desire for information by the public, we will not and cannot publicly discuss any matter that identifies our staff directly or indirectly. We trust the public will understand the parameters that guide us.”

The National Post says Lecce’s office did not return their questions in time for publication and they were unable to get a hold of the teacher.

In addition to online criticism and memes, protests against the teacher were organized in Oakville and several petitions were started. 

Rebel News personality David Menzies made headlines this week after he showed up to deliver his outlet’s petition at a Halton school board meeting – dressed up as the Oakville teacher.

LEVY: More details emerge about busty Oakville teacher

The transgender high school teacher who caused an international sensation by sporting outlandish mammoth breasts and tight tops to her shop class is not an employee with the Halton school board, True North has learned.

Two inside sources say Kayla Lemieux is actually a long-time teacher with the Hamilton Wentworth District School Board (HWDSB) who went on leave last year.

A source told Truth North that Lemieux was a 16-year teacher at the HWDSB and most recently taught at Ancaster High School.

Kerry went on “general leave” during the winter/spring semester of this year and that was the last he (at the time) was seen in the Hamilton board, the source added.

Until he popped up at Oakville Trafalgar High school, that is.

On Sept. 17, True North reported that pictures of the teacher, who now goes by Kayla Lemieux, had gone viral on social media.

The teacher was photographed in her shop class wearing a busty prosthetic under tight shirts – showing fake nipples – together with biking shorts and blond hair (likely a wig).

She is demonstrating wood-cutting on a saw while the fake breasts hang dangerously close and her hair dangles. She is not wearing any protective equipment.

Since then the board’s recently appointed director, Curtis Ennis, who came from the Toronto District School Board (TDSB), and the trustees have done virtually nothing to manage the issue, no doubt hoping it will go away – while newspapers around the world have picked up the story and the pictures.

Catherine Kronas, who is running for trustee with the HWDSB, said Halton became the “laughing stock of the world” over its handling of this matter. She vows to ensure Hamilton doesn’t make the same mistake.

At the end of September education minister Stephen Lecce finally indicated that the Ontario College of Teachers is reviewing professional standards in the wake of this teacher’s obscene choice of dress.

The source said Lemieux was always pretty secretive and didn’t seem to have a wife or children.

Asked whether Lemieux is still an employee with the HWDSB, media spokesman Shawn McKillop said it is a human resource matter that is “currently being investigated” and for this reason, no information can be provided.

He indicated the staff contact list on the Ancaster High website is “outdated” and has since been removed.

But another source provided a contact card from the HWDSB which lists her as Kerry located at Ancaster High.

The Ancaster school itself also has her listed as Kerry with her email address.

Lemieux was listed as Kayla on the Oakville Trafalgar website but when the story broke in mid-September, all staff names were removed.

The first source said Ennis is a nice person but takes the “path of least resistance” when it comes to matters like this.

“If there is no oversight this is going to continue to happen,” the source said.

Meanwhile a memo went out from the Halton school board in the middle of last week, giving a long list of instructions as to what costumes students should and shouldn’t wear for Hallowe’en.

It warns students and their parents that costumes mimicking the attire of an ethnic, religious, racial or gender group are “inappropriate and unacceptable.”

No doubt to run interference about Lemieux’s outrageous dress, the memo states that “this includes dressing in clothing of the opposite gender that is demeaning.”

Board officials say that pretending to be a member of a group for “fun” is “evidence of cultural appropriation” and sends the message that cultural attire is a “costume” that can be worn for “entertainment purposes.”

The memo also advises that costumes which intend to “incite fear and anxiety for others” are not acceptable and “special sensitivity needs to be exercised around oppression of the group.”

(Oh my if only the politically incorrect comedienne Joan Rivers were still alive. She’d have a heyday).

The first source says, quite rightly, it is foolish (and nonsensical) to think that Lemieux can dress like she does with impunity but students have rules around costumes they can wear, together with a dress code.

Kronas adds that the board needs to ensure there is a dress code in place (for teachers) to protect children from being forced to be in a classroom with a teacher outfitted like that.

“It is inappropriate for a teacher to come dressed to school like that. Period,” she said. “Parents are outraged that their childrens’ well-being was dismissed and their concerns ignored in this matter…this is a clear example of wokeness gone too far.”

Yukon legislature urges territory to ignore Trudeau’s gun grab

The Yukon legislature passed a motion on Wednesday urging the territorial government to ignore the Trudeau government’s gun buy-back program.

Although controlled by the governing Liberals with a minority in the legislative assembly, the legislature passed a motion without government support urging the Yukon government to not enforce the Trudeau government’s firearm buy-back program.

The motion brought forward by Yukon Party justice critic Brad Cathers passed in an 11-8 vote with the official opposition Yukon Party and NDP MLAs voting for the motion. The Yukon Liberals all voted against the motion.

Cathers says the territorial RCMP should not be focusing on confiscating the firearms from law-abiding citizens who may use them to hunt and sustain their way of life. The program would divert the territorial RCMP’s policing resources away from tasks like maintaining public safety.

“The National Police Federation, which is the union representing RCMP members, has made it clear that the Trudeau government’s Order in Council prohibiting various firearms and the ‘buy-back’ program will divert police resources away from dealing with organized crime,” Cathers said.

“RCMP members said the federal Liberal government’s firearms measures actually divert important personnel and resources from where they are needed most.”

Yukon joins Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba in defying the Trudeau government’s gun confiscation plan.

However, the Yukon’s show of defiance towards the federal government isn’t nearly as concrete as the other provinces, as the Yukon’s governing Liberals did not support the motion.

The Yukon Party hopes that the Yukon Liberals will respect the wishes of the legislative assembly and defy the federal government’s gun confiscation program.

“We are happy the motion passed, and hope the territorial government will respect the will of the Yukon Legislative Assembly,” said Cathers.

Alberta’s new premier Danielle Smith voiced her support for the vote asserting that policing priorities and private property rights are the province’s responsibility. 

“Yukon voted (including their NDP party) to join Saskatchewan, Manitoba, & Alberta in their opposition to @JustinTrudeau’s intrusion into provincial jurisdiction,” said the premier.

“Policing priorities & private property rights are the mandate of the provinces, not Ottawa.”

The Alberta Roundup | Danielle Smith triggers Rachel Notley on Day 1

The rivalry between Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Rachel Notley is heating up less than one week after Smith was sworn in as Alberta’s 19th premier.

On this week’s episode of The Alberta Roundup, Rachel Emmanuel discusses Notley’s demand that Smith apologize for her comments on unvaccinated discrimination.

Also on the show, Alberta government lawyers told the Emergencies Act Commission that Alberta did not need the Emergencies Act to deal with the Coutts border blockade.

The divide between former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney and Smith was amplified this week when reports emerged that Kenney refused to accept Smith’s invitation for a meeting.

All of that and more on The Alberta Roundup with Rachel Emmanuel.

Ontario top doctor threatens return of mask mandates

Ontarians may be forced into wearing masks again this winter if they don’t start doing it voluntarily, according to the provinces top doctor.

Ontario medical officer of health Dr. Kieran Moore said rising Covid case-numbers and lacklustre booster uptake could trigger a turn of the province’s mask mandate.

Moore pointed to the lacklustre uptake of Covid-19 booster shots among Ontario’s elderly population in particular.

“Sixteen percent is absolutely not acceptable to me,” said Moore, alluding to the percentage of Ontarians 70 years old and older who have received their fourth dose of the Covid-19 vaccine. 

The Doug Ford government dropped its mask mandate March 21, with most remaining Covid measures being dropped in June.

Moore is recommending the Ontarians not only get vaccinated and update their immunity with booster shots, also that they voluntarily wear a mask indoors so that the government doesn’t have to impose a mandatory mask mandate.

“If there is any significant impact on our health system where we can’t care for Ontarians appropriately, I will absolutely have the conversation with government (around) whether we have to mandate masking for a set period of time,” said Moore.

The Ontario government took drastic measures in its attempt to limit the spread of Covid-19, implementing a mandatory mask mandate, shutting down “non-essential” businesses, imposing customer limits of retailers, and attempting to implement a curfew in which the Ford government backtracked on.

While in the past Moore has suggested that Ontarians need to learn to live with the virus, Moore now says an annual Covid-19 booster shot may be needed for protection against Covid during winter months.

“It may be that every winter that we’ll need an annual booster to protect us through those dark days of winter, where we’re indoors more often,” said Moore.

While the mandates may be justified by Ontario’s testing positivity rate of 13.5%, the total number of tests conducted has plummeted from nearly 440,000 tests in the week of December 26 2021 to January 1 2022 to just over 66,000 from October 2 to October 8.

BONOKOSKI: Canada needs a post-pandemic inquiry – now

It was Winston Churchill who warned the world that those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

What did we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic? That it was a killer virus that infected the entire planet? That it took two-and-a-half years of our lives (and counting) that were filled with lockdowns, death and disruptions?

That it had us masking ourselves like bandits? That we had to standby helplessly while our loved ones died alone?

That it was inhospitably contagious with a number of sinister variants?

But what else?

There are thousands of other things, of course, but none has been archived into workable documents, and no definitive narrative written.

It is overall a mystery which doctors, scientists and health authorities would rather forget but do so at their (and our) peril.

It needs an autopsy.

To understand what worked and what failed — and to settle some debates — a truly comprehensive review would start with the state of pandemic preparedness in early 2020.

It would then move on to consider all the public health issues that came to the fore in the weeks and months that followed: border controls, contact tracing, masking, public health restrictions on businesses and individuals, data collection, the procurement of personal protective equipment, rapid tests and vaccines, long-term care, federal-provincial coordination and the use of vaccine mandates. 

But a proper study would look beyond the public health response to consider the unprecedented fiscal response, largely led by the federal government. The most recent official tally says the Liberal government threw $352 billion as supports for individuals, businesses and provincial governments.

A proper study also would have to explore how the government’s pandemic response intersected with race and wealth to expose and exacerbate inequality.

Given the stakes, it’s surprising that no royal commission or national study has been announced already. But later this fall, the House of Commons will consider at least one proposal — this one from a Liberal backbencher — to launch a review.

“I can understand that reviews like this can be politicized and every expenditure can be politicized. And that’s really not my goal here,” Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith told the CBC late last week.

“The goal is, let’s learn the lessons for better and worse in order to inform our efforts going forward, so we are on the absolute best footing going forward to prevent future pandemics and to prepare for future pandemics.”

The bill Erskine-Smith has tabled would compel the health minister to create an advisory committee that would pursue a potentially broad study of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.

That committee would review the actions of the Public Health Agency of Canada and the federal department of health.

It also would look at the responses of provincial and municipal governments and “analyze the health, economic and social factors relevant to the impact of the pandemic in Canada.”

COVID-19 has been, first and foremost, a health crisis with deadly consequences. But it also has tested public policy in many ways that were relatively novel. And while it was tempting at times to say political differences had been put aside during the pandemic, nearly every aspect of the public policy response eventually was second-guessed and criticized by one side or another.

All this needs to be straightened out.

A template has to be developed, and put into layman’s language, that will guide authorities when the next pandemic hits. And there will be a next one, with climate change being blamed for easing its path.

In addition to striking that advisory committee, Erskine-Smith’s bill would give the health minister two years to draft a pandemic preparedness plan and would compel him to select an official at the Public Health Agency of Canada to serve as a “national pandemic prevention and preparedness coordinator.”

The official pandemic plan would have to be tabled in Parliament and then updated at least once every three years.

Winston Churchill was spot on.

Surely there were lessons learned from the past two-and-a-half years.

If not, we are doomed to see it all repeated.

Related stories