fbpx
Thursday, September 4, 2025

MALCOLM: Canada’s borders are wide open

Canada’s crisis of illegal immigration has reached new heights, and yet, you wouldn’t know about it from watching the evening news, listening to the radio or reading most newspapers in Canada.

News reports on illegal border crossers and dubious asylum claimants have all but disappeared in the media, despite new record-breaking numbers.

What was once a border crisis is now the new normal in Canada.

Last year was the worst year on record for asylum claims. In 2019, Canada received 63,830 asylum applications from people who entered the country illegally or under false pretenses.

This represents a 16% jump from 2018 when 55,040 claims were filed, and 27% more than in 2017 when Canada received 50,390 refugee applications.

This represents a 400% annual increase in asylum claims since Justin Trudeau became prime minister. In fact, more asylum seekers submitted refugee applications from inside Canada in 2019 than in the final four years of Stephen Harper’s government.

Between 2012 and 2015, a total of 60,335 asylum claims were submitted, including as few as 10,365 annual claims in 2013. Under Trudeau, between 2016 and 2019, Canada has received 193,125 asylum claims.

So what happened?

In late 2015, the Trudeau government began dismantling the previous government’s reforms that had been carefully designed to discourage bogus asylum claimants and remove incentives for illegal immigrants to stay in Canada once their claim was rejected.

Trudeau alleged that it was cruel to not provide illegal immigrants with free healthcare — even those with pending deportation orders who were rejected by an immigration judge. The Trudeau government scrapped a system that fast-tracked immigration hearings for claimants coming from safe countries and Trudeau let it be known, through social media, interviews and photo-ops, that Canada would welcome those seeking asylum.

There was legitimate confusion, however, about Canada’s new refugee rules. Many reasonably interpreted Trudeau’s virtue-signalling to mean that Canada’s immigration policy changed to allow all self-declared refugees.

But it had not. Canada maintains strict rules, based on international definitions, about who qualifies as a refugee. An asylum seeker must convince a judge they faced a well-founded fear of persecution in their country of origin. Asylum seekers are also required to submit a refugee application in the first safe country they reach — so those coming through the United States, in theory, should be rejected.

Because of this disconnect between Canada’s strict immigration rules and the Trudeau government’s loose messaging, Canada now faces another looming crisis.

As reported by Blacklock’s Reporter, an independent investigative news organization based in Ottawa, there are currently 52,109 illegal immigrants in Canada with outstanding deportation orders.

But don’t hold your breath waiting for the Trudeau government to deport these bogus asylum seekers. Canada only managed to deport 648 illegal immigrants last year, and only 495 the year before.

Instead, the more likely scenario for these rejected asylum claimants is to turn to Canada’s bleeding-heart court system.

Those with deportation orders can appeal the decision to the Immigration and Refugee Board. If that fails, they can appeal that decision to a federal judge. The current wait time for an appeal is two years, and the backlog of cases is 65,000.

According to government documents obtained by Blacklock’s, “the most common way for a removal order to be quashed is by being granted permanent resident status.”

In other words, even illegal border crossers with bogus asylum claims who were rejected by a judge and issued a deportation order will likely inevitably be permitted to stay in Canada.

Trudeau has eliminated the meaningful checks that once protected the integrity of our immigration system, and as a result, Canada’s borders are wide open. But don’t count on his friends in the mainstream media to tell you about it.

KNIGHT: Liberals talk but won’t get to the root of the gun problem in our cities

On Friday night just after 10 p.m., gunshots rang out in a waterfront Toronto condo. The gunfire left three dead and at least one more wounded. Police say they aren’t looking for any suspects in the incident suggesting that there were at least two guns involved and both shooters are down. 

The shooting took place at an Airbnb where a party was being hosted. Who brings a gun to a party in a flashy condo in Toronto?

Well, bad guys. Gang bangers.

At least two of them had handguns. The police haven’t yet said, but I would bet any amount of money that both guns were illegally obtained. 

But it’s not just Toronto, although Toronto is off to a banner year with nine homicides already this year. 

Last week there was a wild shootout at a gas station in suburban Vancouver. Multiple bullet casings and a pool of blood was visible to the public in the dinner hour of a Sunday evening. 

It was the second shooting in as many weeks in Burnaby. 

Meanwhile in Calgary, there have been several shootings including two homicides in the first month of the year. Last year there were nearly 90 shootings in Calgary double the number of shootings in 2018. 

A city councillor has called for a task force to look at the problem. Meanwhile back in Toronto, Mayor John Tory, released a statement saying the violence was “unacceptable.” 

“These latest gun murders will not stop my determination to work with our police and all governments to combat gun violence in our city,” Tory said.  Uh-huh. Bark, bark, woof, woof. 

How about parking the platitudes and start talking about solutions? Tory’s only proposed solution is to ban handguns in the city of Toronto. It’s impossible to explain just how stupid that is.  But stupid it is.

The wizards in the Liberal government, who are blessed with about the same amount of common sense as the Toronto Mayor, have set aside $600 million for a gun buy-back program.  Got Grandpa’s old squirrel gun? Here’s $100. These people have lost whatever common sense they were born with.

I don’t know why this is so hard for liberal politicians to understand. The guns used on the streets are illegal. They are primarily smuggled into this country over land crossings and illegal crossings such as Akwesasne Reserve which straddles the border between Ontario and New York state. 

But the Mohawks won’t let police on their reserve. It’s also where the majority of contraband cigarettes come into the country not to mention illicit opioids and a host of other illicit things. 

The First Nations group profit handsomely from the trade and the federal government, largely due to political correctness, seems powerless to do anything about it. 

At issue here is organized crime and the pernicious hold it has on this country and the reluctance for anyone in a position of leadership to talk about it. 

It’s an expensive battle to fight, but $600 million given to law enforcement to combat organized crime is much better spent than on some sort of squishy gun buy-back Liberal program.

Trade deficit with China hit record $50 billion in 2019

Canada’s trade deficit with China reached a record of $50 billion according to data presented to MPs on Thursday.

Trade data from January to November 2019 suggests that last year Canada’s trade deficit with China was at least $2 billion higher than in 2018.

According to Blacklock’s Reporter, Canada has had a trade deficit with China since 1992. Between 2014 and 2016 the annual trade deficit doubled.

In the newly-created House of Commons Committee on Canada-China Relations, assistant deputy foreign minister Steve Verheul told MPs that the trade deficit increased as China purchased less natural resources from Canada.

“From January to November 2019 our exports to China fell by some 14.7% compared to 2018 driven by a drop in canola seed, wood pulp and nickel shipments,” he said.

“I should point out part of this is clearly due to the economic slowdown in China, as well as the deteriorating relationship.” 

While the Chinese economy has slowed down, China actively tried to stop Canadian exports throughout 2019.

Last year China halted imports of many Canadian goods, most notably canola and meat products, citing health reasons that industry experts have called “preposterous.”

Limits on Canadian products and disrespectful remarks from Chinese officials throughout 2019 have largely been seen as revenge for Canada’s arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou on an American warrant in December 2018.

Last week Meng’s lawyers made their final arguments against extradition to the United States in a Vancouver courthouse.

New “independent” senator was Liberal donor and critic of Stephen Harper

One of the two “independent senators” appointed by Justin Trudeau last has contributed thousands of dollars to left-wing political parties and was a vocal critic of Stephen Harper’s former government.

University of Saskatchewan law professor W. Brent Cotter was appointed last week to the Senate on the recommendation of the Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a release.

While the PMO says the selection process aims to ensure senators are “independent” and “reflect Canada’s diversity,” Cotter appears to be a long-time supporter of left-wing parties – in particular the Liberals.

Cotter donated to six riding associations – three Liberal and three NDP – in Saskatchewan, Alberta and Nova Scotia in 2015, according to Elections Canada donor records. Five of these contributions were registered the month before that year’s federal election.

The records reveal $400 to the Saskatoon—University Federal NDP Riding Association and $250 to the Calgary Centre Federal Liberal Association. Both of these campaigns were endorsed by Leadnow’s Anyone But Harper initiative, which directed people to vote strategically for the most electable non-Conservative candidate in 30 targeted ridings across Canada.

Cotter also gave $400 to the Liberal association in Saskatoon—University that year.

In 2011, Cotter gave $250 to the Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar NDP association, as well as to the Green Party of Canada.

Cotter says these contributions were to support individual candidates, rather than the parties, specifically.

“I would be happy to provide my thinking on the support I have provided to individual candidates in federal elections. But for your information, the donations were tied to my wish to support the individual candidates,” Cotter said in an email. “I do not identify myself as a Liberal or New Democrat or a member of any other party but I am someone who supports progressive public interest goals.”

Cotter fought against the previous Conservative government’s 2012 budget by signing an open letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper and members of parliament expressing “grave concern” about the budget’s streamlining of environmental measures.

The letter, signed by dozens of lawyers, called the budget an “attack on Canadian environmental law and policy” because of its easing of energy and resource regulations.

Cotter was part of a team of seven legal academics who called on the International Commission of Jurists to “conduct the studies and/or investigations it deems necessary” on the Harper government in 2014 after Harper and then-attorney general Peter MacKay said Beverley McLachlin, at the time Canada’s chief justice, acted inappropriately when she called Harper about a case before the court.

The letter accused Harper of conduct that “may seriously undermine judicial independence in Canada.” Cotter also signed another open letter alongside numerous lawyers and law professors to condemn “the unprecedented and baseless insinuation by the Prime Minister of Canada that the Chief Justice engaged in improper conduct.”

In 2015, Cotter openly criticized Harper’s appointment of a conservative judge, Russ Brown, to the Supreme Court of Canada, suggesting the appointment was based on “political orientation” rather than qualifications.

SHEPHERD: The renewed effort to get Bill C-16 modified or repealed

Back in 2017, Bill C-16 was enacted into law, adding the terms “gender identity” and “gender expression” to the Canadian Human Rights Act and Criminal Code.

But even years later, there are many women who are fighting to get this bill modified or repealed on the basis that it nullifies female-designated spaces: any biological male who self-identifies as a woman becomes entitled to enter female changing rooms, washrooms, prisons, and shelters.

Many citizen activists have contacted political officials to voice their concerns, but are our MPs willing to listen to them and re-open the controversial discussion around Bill C-16?

True North’s Lindsay Shepherd discusses.

Fan of True North? Support independent media in Canada: http://www.tnc.news/donate/

Liberal MP clueless about coronavirus and public health precautions

A Liberal MP told CTV Power Play that she didn’t know the government’s view on how Canadians can protect themselves from the coronavirus.

MP for the Nova Scotia riding of Cumberland-Colchester Lenore Zann made the comments when drilled by the show’s anchor on the virus. She also suggested Canadians that they should equip themselves with masks and gloves to avoid infection. 

Zann’s advice was not in line with recommendations made by the World Health Organization (WHO) earlier this week when it declared that the virus constituted a global health emergency. 

According to the WHO, it is likely that the virus will spread internationally and precautions should be taken by the public. No mention of masks was made. 

“Countries should place particular emphasis on reducing human infection, prevention of secondary transmission and international spread, and contributing to the international response though multi-sectoral communication and collaboration and active participation in increasing knowledge on the virus and the disease, as well as advancing research,” claimed the WHO. 


As of January 31, the coronavirus has infected over 9,826 people worldwide and has killed 249. 

Earlier this week, a fourth case of the virus was detected in London, Ontario in a woman who had travelled to the Wuhan region, where the virus is believed to have originated. 

The Canadian government is attempting to repatriate vulnerable citizens and the families of diplomats currently in the affected region. 

Foreign Affairs Minister François-Philippe Champagne announced that he was currently in discussions with his Chinese counterparts to help facilitate the evacuation of the Canadians. 

“Minister Champagne expressed his solidarity with the people of China suffering from the outbreak and offered Canada’s assistance. He commended the Chinese government’s fact-based response to this difficult situation,” said a statement by the minister’s office. 

“He also asked for the collaboration of the Chinese government in helping those Canadian citizens who want to depart the region to which State Councillor and Foreign Minister Wang [Yi] responded positively.”

Veterans never saw the $105 million promised to them by Trudeau in 2019

Veterans did not see a penny of the $105 million promised to them by Justin Trudeau last year. 

The sum remained untouched, despite being earmarked for Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC). 

Since 2018, the Liberal government has failed to deliver on $327 million worth of funds promised to help veterans, according to Global News

Trudeau has shut down veterans’ calls for more funding in the past and has fought veterans in court.

In 2018, during a town hall meeting, Trudeau was questioned by former corporal Brock Blaszczyk on why he continued to fight veterans groups in court while also re-integrating former ISIS fighters and awarding Omar Khadr several million dollars in an out-of-court settlement. 

In response to the question, the prime minister told the former corporal that some veterans were asking too much of the government.

“Why are we still fighting against certain veterans’ groups in court? Because they are asking for more than we are able to give right now,” Trudeau told Blaszczyk, who lost his leg to a roadside bomb while serving in Afghanistan.  

According to VAC, the department failed to meet a majority of basic service standards in the 2017-2018 year. 15 out of 24 service areas are behind on targets, including the rehabilitation program, disability benefits, and long-term care.

One key area of mismanagement by the Liberal government is a growing backlog of veterans waiting to qualify for disability benefits. 

As of November 2019, up to 40,000 veterans were still waiting for a decision on their application. Among those waiting for a decision from the government, over one-third had been in the queue for over four months. 

Liberals ran deficit five times larger than during same period in 2018

The Liberal government ran a whopping $11.8 billion deficit over a period of seven months last year towering over a $2.1 billion deficit during the same period in 2018. 

The total annual deficit for the 2019-2020 fiscal year has so far exceeded prior predictions by several billion.

Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced the federal government’s dismal financial situation during a fiscal update at the tail end of 2019. 

As part of the announcement, the Liberals revealed that the government expected to run a deficit of $26.6 billion for that year and also projected that in 2020 they would run an even higher $28.1 billion deficit. 


The year’s deficit was much higher than the expected $19.8 billion the Liberals earlier predicted. 

Conservative opposition finance critic Pierre Poilievre warned Canadians that the Liberals were setting the country up for failure.

“Justin Trudeau is setting the stage for a made-in-Canada recession,” wrote Poilievre in a statement.

“The debt-to-GDP ratio is rising, the deficit is $7 billion higher than Liberals promised only months ago and there is no date for a balanced budget.” 


Prior to being first elected in 2015, Justin Trudeau promised Canadians that he would balance the budget by 2019 if he were elected as prime minister. 

“I am looking straight at Canadians and being honest,” said Trudeau during a debate. 

“We said we are committed to balanced budgets. And we are. We will balance that budget in 2019.”

According to the Fraser Institute, Trudeau has hit a record in per-person spending among all of Canada’s prime ministers even exceeding those who had to face war or recession. 

The report found that Trudeau’s spending was $9,066 per Canadian which outdid Harper’s prior record in 2009 of $8,811 shortly after the 2008 financial crisis. 

MORGAN: Canadians want jobs, not a UN Security Council seat

BY: GWYN MORGAN

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader who has been a Director of five global corporations.

In 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a stunning decision with profound impact on the future development of our country. For more than a century, Aboriginal title had been limited to the immediate environs around settlements. The court ruling vastly expanded it to “tracts of land that were regularly used for hunting, fishing or otherwise exploiting resources … at the time of assertion of European sovereignty.” In the case of British Columbia that included nearly the entire province.

The court then defined the rights conveyed: “Aboriginal title means that governments and others seeking to use the land must obtain the consent of the Aboriginal title holders.” The lone exception allowed was when “after consulting and attempting to accommodate, proceeding without consent is backed by a compelling and substantial objective.” Having established this seemingly helpful exception, the court then added words that guarantee endless litigation: “the level of consultation and accommodation required varies with the strength of the Aboriginal group’s claim to the land.” But how could that possibly be decided outside the courts? Nowhere have those words done more damage than to two major pipeline projects that were to carry Alberta oil through B.C. to tidewater.

In 2010, Enbridge filed regulatory application for the Northern Gateway pipeline to the port at Kitimat. After four arduous years of hearings, environmental reviews and stakeholder consultation, the Harper cabinet approved the project. But in 2016, that approval was struck down after a court appeal by Aboriginal bands claiming insufficient consultation. Enbridge launched a new round of consultation, only to see Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stymie the project by creating the Great Bear Rainforest reserve. The bands behind the court appeal were pleased but not the nine bands along the route, which lost employment and financial benefits. They filed a lawsuit claiming the Great Bear Rainforest prohibition against development on their traditional lands shouldn’t have been implemented without their consent. After six years and multiple Aboriginal litigations, a pipeline that could have been on-stream today was dead.

Next came the Trans Mountain project, the lone remaining hope for beleaguered Alberta oil producers. Kinder Morgan filed regulatory application in 2013 and then consulted with 130 Indigenous communities. The federal cabinet approved the project in 2016 after conducting its own direct consultation with 117 Indigenous communities. But in 2018, an appeal court struck down the approval citing insufficient environmental review and First Nations consultation. The project was reapproved in mid-2019 after yet another round of consultation. But First Nations have filed yet another appeal citing … you guessed it, “insufficient consultation.”

Six years after that precipitous Supreme Court decision, Alberta oil continues to be sold to gleeful American buyers at huge captive-market discounts. A Fraser Institute study found the discount amounted to $20.6 billion in 2018 alone. And the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers estimates annual industry capital investment declined by $40 billion. Then there’s the human toll. Had those projects moved forward as planned, some 100,000 workers would still have jobs.

This melodrama of endless litigation must not be allowed to continue. But what is the Trudeau government doing to improve the process of gaining Aboriginal consent? Absolutely nothing. In fact, it has compounded the problem by adopting UNDRIP, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. UNDRIP requires “free, prior and informed consent” regarding “legislative or administrative measures that may affect Indigenous peoples, including approval of any project affecting their lands or territories and other resources.”

Our prime minister seems to think the UN is the home of the wise and right. The credibility of that fairy tale was soundly demolished last December when the UN Committee on Racial Discrimination released a directive calling for three major Canadian infrastructure projects to be “immediately” shut down, including the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion and the Coastal GasLink pipeline.

The committee’s directive came as an unwelcome surprise to the 20 First Nations who had signed benefit agreements with Coastal. Demonstrating the farcical thoroughness of UN work, the chair of the committee stated he didn’t know most First Nations supported the project because “the role of the committee does not involve investigative work.”

I’m sure none of this will deter the prime minister’s ego-driven campaign for a seat on the UN Security Council. Besides making the already fraught Aboriginal consent issue even worse by adopting UNDRIP, he courted popularity with the UN’s notoriously anti-Israel membership by voting in favour of a motion condemning that country as an “occupying power.” Many observers believe his decision to send our troops on a high-risk and dysfunctional UN mission to Mali was another tactic to gain support for his Security Council membership.

Canadians should be outraged that their prime minister and his government hampers the country’s ability to carry out nationally important projects, betrays long-standing international allies and risks the lives of our troops to secure a powerless seat on a dysfunctional international organization.

FUREY: CPC Leadership Candidates are following the liberal narrative of the day

Are the candidates for the Conservative Leadership Race actually going to lead?

Or are they just going to follow the liberal narrative of the day and follow what they think other people want them to say?

True North’s Anthony Furey hopes to see some proactive leadership.

True North is your go-to news source for the Conservative Leadership Race! Help our efforts by making a tax-deductible donation: http://www.tnc.news/donate/

Related stories