fbpx
Saturday, July 12, 2025

Canadian Constitution Foundation wraps up case against B.C. vax pass

The lawfulness of B.C.’s vaccine passport regime is now in a judge’s hands after a constitutional rights organization concluded its case in B.C. Supreme Court this week.

“I think that this would be the first case – if we win – with a successful challenge to the COVID regime, like a really successful judgment,” said Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) lawyer Christine Van Geyn in a video update from Vancouver. “So, I am really optimistic.”

The CCF  launched its legal challenge last September, representing three individuals unable to obtain medical exemptions from the province’s proof-of-vaccination program. These clients include a teenage girl and a woman (who later became pregnant) who suffered injuries following their first COVID shots, as well as a woman with numerous overlapping disabilities who chose not to be vaccinated due to medical concerns.

“You’d think that it would be pretty clear-cut and simple for these three people to get medical exemptions from the vaccine passport policy in British Columbia,” said Van Geyn in an earlier update. “But it isn’t.”

“While at first the B.C. government said no medical exemptions at all would be accommodated, they did eventually cave and say ‘yes,’ they would provide us a process for obtaining medical exemptions. But in practice, they really aren’t obtainable even for these three people with really compelling stories.”

Despite the challenge’s specific focus – as opposed, for example, to a wholesale challenge of the vaccine passport system – Van Geyn explained that the CCF selected cases with a good chance of success and that “the rights at play in this case are in really sharp contrast.”

She added that the CCF was indeed opposed to the vaccine passport policy “in principle, in its entirety.”

“Also remember that the outcome – if we are successful – is that the entire regime gets struck down,” Van Geyn said. “The government will have an opportunity to re-enact the vaccine passport policy in a constitutionally compliant manner, but a victory in striking down the whole regime will make the government take serious pause in how they would proceed.”

The B.C. government went ahead with its vaccine passports on Sep. 13 under the direction of provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry, with Premier John Horgan saying that “(v)accines are our ticket to putting this pandemic behind us.” 

At the time, B.C. already had a vaccination rate of 75%, with Henry having stated in Jan. 2021 – eight months earlier – that a target threshold for herd immunity was around 70%.

Although B.C. lifted the passports on Apr. 8 – the last province to do so – the CCF said that its case remained relevant both because its clients deserved to be told their rights had been violated and because the province has threatened to bring back COVID measures in the fall.

“And so, it’s too late to give our clients the seven months of their lives back where they weren’t allowed to do all these things everyone else was allowed to do,” explained CCF lawyer Geoffrey Trotter.

“But what we are seeking – and what the government lawyer conceded is available – is a declaration that the government did breach our clients’ constitutional rights in the past up until April 8, and for the court to describe in its reasons for judgment that these exemption provisions were too narrow.”

Trotter said he expects a decision in the summer from Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson.

The CCF is also one of several organizations continuing to pursue legal action against the Trudeau government for its invocation of the Emergencies Act in February. The charity invites donations for that challenge here.

Trudeau appoints another Liberal Party donor as judge

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has appointed another Liberal Party donor to be a judge, naming Edmonton lawyer Bob Aloneissi to the Court of Queen’s Bench yesterday.

According to Blacklock’s Reporter, the Department of Justice made no mention of Aloneissi’s history with the ruling party. 

“As the son of Lebanese immigrants he has never forgotten his humble roots,” wrote the department. “His experience of working at his family’s inner city grocery store allowed him to appreciate many different cultures.”

Records show Aloneissi donated a total of $2,489 to the Liberals since 2006. He has not donated to any other parties. 

Last year, Liberals in the Commons justice committee shut down a Conservative motion to look into how lawyers who have a history with the party were being appointed to be judges. 

“This raises questions about whether certain candidates for appointments were given preferential treatment,” said Conservative MP Michael Cooper. 

“There have been allegations substantiated about political interference directed by the Prime Minister’s Office with respect to the appointment of judges. [Canadians] deserve to know the judges that are appointed are the best qualified to serve.”

Past records reveal that political aides with the party discussed getting advice from the Prime Minister’s Office while vetting judicial appointments. 

“Need to talk about what the Prime Minister’s Office requires us to do prior to a judicial appointment,” one email said. “I think we need to be more cautious considering what is happening.”

The Conservative motion called for the committee to “review judicial appointments and the process utilized by this government.” The motion was eventually dismissed by the Liberal-controlled committee. 

Last July, the Liberals appointed four Liberal Party donors to judicial positions in a single day. 

Legacy media obsess over skin colour at Conservative rallies

It’s Fake News Friday on the Candice Malcolm Show! Candice looks at the latest developing fake news story line in the legacy media, which is that Pierre Poilievre must be racist because he appeals to too many “white people.”

Rather than critiquing conservatives on substance, lazy journalists would much rather simply hurl insults because apparently having “white people” at your rally is a bad thing.

One substantive critique of Poilievre did come from the CBC – where “experts say” that contrary to Poilievre’s critique of government borrowing and printing of money, the real cause of inflation has little to do with government.“

Government spending is one of many factors pushing prices up — but it’s a relatively modest one,” said one left-wing economist defending Trudeau. “It really doesn’t matter what Canada’s government spends,” said another. You can’t make this stuff up.

Another CBC article goes even further in defending the Trudeau government, telling us that the “pick-up truck tax doesn’t exist” – this despite the tax being listed in a government report released by Trudeau’s Environment Minister.

The CBC may not understand basic math, economics, civics or how laws are passed, but they do understand where their bread is buttered: they exist for the sole purpose of defending Justin Trudeau.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE CANDICE MALCOLM SHOW

Roman Baber goes after Trudeau for demonizing “truly peaceful” Freedom Convoy

Conservative Party leadership candidate and Independent Ontario MPP Roman Baber has slammed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for demonizing Freedom Convoy protesters on Parliament Hill last February. 

Baber made the comments during an appearance on CBC News’s Power & Politics earlier this week. In the segment, Baber also said that Trudeau’s invocation of the Emergencies Act was groundless. 

“There was absolutely no necessity in the declaration of an emergency or riot police against bystanders on the Hill. That was unacceptable. No one regretfully actually discussed the issue at dispute which are the mandates. You shouldn’t force someone to choose between their ability to put food on the table and potentially making healthcare choices that they didn’t want to make,” said Baber. 

Baber also went after Trudeau for not meeting with convoy organizers who were calling for an end to COVID-19 mandates across Canada. 

“The Prime Minister did not have courage to even meet with them, and on February 18 when the government cracked down on protesters we did not see any rioting, any violence any guns or any resistance. The government tried to demonize the protesters, but on February 18, I think Canadians saw this was a truly peaceful movement,” said Baber.  

Baber was an early supporter of the Freedom Convoy. On Jan. 26, he tweeted that he supported “truckers and their legal right to peaceful protest. They’re not just standing up for their ability to earn a living. They’re standing up to Justin Trudeau and for our democracy.” 

As the convoy barrelled towards Ottawa, Trudeau called the demonstrators a “fringe minority with unacceptable views.” 

“The small fringe minority of people who are on their way to Ottawa, who are holding unacceptable views that they are expressing, do not represent the views of Canadians,” said Trudeau. 

During the interview Baber also blasted cancel culture and censorship for quashing people’s ability to have a frank discussion about the pandemic. 

“I’m of the view that it’s the censorship, the cancel culture and the inability to have a frank discussion that led to the pandemic response of the last couple years,” said Baber. 

Scott Aitchison says building consensus will grow the Conservative Party of Canada

Conservative member of parliament Scott Aitchison is seeking the Conservative Party of Canada’s leadership on a platform that’s heavy on policy and emphasizes the importance of building consensus within the party and the country. Aitchison joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to discuss his campaign. In this wide-ranging interview, Lawton and Aitchison discuss carbon taxes, housing affordability, supply management, and the convoy.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

Trudeau-appointed senator says there was a movement to stop Emergencies Act

A senator appointed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said there was a movement underway – including Liberals – to bring an end to the Trudeau government’s implementation of the Emergencies Act in February, and that the government was aware of that movement on the day it pulled the plug.

Manitoba senator Marilou McPhedran made the comments last week during the closing minutes of a government panel discussion on the 40th anniversary of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“Just to point out that the day on which the declaration was ended by the government, there was already a movement among a significant number of senators and MPs, including some Liberals, to come up with the requisite signatures to begin the process of ending the declaration, and we didn’t end up having to do that,” she said.

“The government was well aware that we were fairly far along in creating that joint letter that was required under this particular section, and instead there was the decision just to suspend.”

Immediately after those remarks, McPhedran concluded the discussion, saying that after 40 years with the Charter, “many of the interpretations that seemed to make sense no longer make sense for Canadian society, as it is now.”

“And so, leaving here today, well, I’m hoping that where we have consensus is the need not only for awareness raising, but actually for much deeper, stronger civics education, charter-based education, not only in our schools, not only in our higher education institutions, but throughout our society. Because if we don’t know our rights, we cannot live our rights.”

True North reached out to McPhedran for clarification about the movement but received no response by time of publication. Trudeau appointed McPhedran to the Senate in 2016 as an independent, after expelling Liberal senators from his caucus in 2014. The move left Trudeau free to appoint senators, but also to call them independent of the Liberal Party.

The Trudeau government invoked the never-before-used Emergencies Act on Feb. 14, saying the legislation’s powers were required to deal with ongoing protests against pandemic restrictions, including the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa.

“There’s a high level of frustration that this situation has gone on as long as it has,” said Trudeau. “Those people have gone from protesting and disagreeing with those (COVID-19) measures, to limiting and blocking the freedoms of their fellow citizens.”

Trudeau refused to revoke the act even after a joint force of municipal, provincial and federal police cracked down on freedom protesters between Feb. 17 and 20. Instead, the Liberal government used NDP support to extend its emergency powers in a parliamentary vote on Feb. 21 – an extension that could have kept them going until mid-March, before they were required to be reviewed.

When the vote was to be confirmed in the upper house, however, senators expressed open frustration with being expected to rubber stamp the Trudeau government’s decision without access to the information that had led to it.

“This is a serious step that we’re contemplating here today,” said Conservative senator Elizabeth Marshall. “What exactly happened that the government decided to invoke the act?…Because it seemed like for three or four weeks, there was nothing, they were just tolerating it.”

Mounting opposition to the government’s decisions both to implement and prolong the Emergencies Act concluded with Trudeau revoking it on Feb. 23.

“The situation is no longer an emergency. Therefore, the federal government will be ending the use of the Emergencies Act,” said Trudeau.

“We are confident that existing laws and by-laws will be sufficient to keep people safe.”

A review committee on the use of the act has been launched, as required by law. Last week, 15 civil rights groups called for the inquiry to be independent and transparent.

“It should not be marred by partisan fights,” petitioners wrote. “We are concerned about the use of state and police powers to suppress constitutional rights.”

True North also reached out to Conservative and Opposition Senate leader Don Plett and will update this story as new information becomes available.

Poilievre promises to withhold funding from big cities that block home building

Conservative leadership candidate Pierre Poilievre announced on Thursday that if elected Prime Minister, he would make federal infrastructure funding for municipalities contingent on building homes for Canadians. 

A backgrounder on the policy reveals that a Poilievre government would target “severely unaffordable” big cities with a population of over 500,000 – like Toronto and Vancouver – by requiring them to increase their homebuilding by 15% annually. 

Cities that fail to reach their target would have some of their funding from the $2.2 billion Canada Community-Building Fund and GST rebate program cut. 

“Municipal governments with more than 500,000 people which also have ‘severely unaffordable’ housing, will need to increase dwelling completions by 15% annually or lose up to 15% of their Community Building Fund allocation and GST rebate. The penalty will be equal to the amount by which the municipality misses the target,” the backgrounder described.

Municipalities that have a population of less than 500,000 will not see any changes to their funding, and any amounts withheld from big cities will be redistributed to localities that speed up housing developments within the same province. 

Poilievre would also create a penalty for “NIMBYism and gatekeeping” through a system that would allow residents and entrepreneurs to file complaints with the federal government (NIMBY is an acronym for “not in my back yard,” which refers to opposition to local land use developments, often through strict regulations).

“When complaints are well-founded, the federal government will withhold infrastructure dollars from the offending big city politicians until they remove the blockage and home building begin,” the plan outlines. 

The $10 billion promised in Budget 2022 by the Liberal government will remain intact, but under Poilievre’s program half of the funding would be shifted away from municipalities and distributed through a Building Bonus towards localities that “remove gatekeepers to boost homebuilding.” 

“Municipalities will get $10,000 per home on all growth in their home building, paid out only after the units are built and occupied,” the statement claimed. “To be clear, the $10,000 is not the cost of building or servicing the house. It is a reward for municipalities getting out of the way so that private builders can supply more to homebuyers.”

Requirements will also be in place for municipalities that want infrastructure funding for major transit projects to pre-approve high-density housing on all lands around the proposed sites. 

“That will guarantee that low-income people and youth who cannot afford cars can live and work near transit,” the plan outlines. 

Additionally, if elected Poilievre would sell off 15% of the federal government’s 37,000 office buildings to companies under the condition that the spaces are transformed into affordable housing units. 

Poilievre also pledged to introduce measures to prevent further printing of money to fund government deficits.

Economists bracing for recession and four more interest rate hikes

Economists are warning Canadians that further interest rate hikes and a recession could be coming very soon.

A new survey by Finder which polled the country’s leading economists found that most agree that the Canadian economy is heading for a recession and that people should brace themselves for its impact. 

Of those surveyed, a majority said that it would likely arrive within the first six months of 2023, while a quarter said it could take a year before it begins – coming in early 2024. 

New COVID-19 variants, interest rate hikes and inflation were some of the primary reasons behind their concerns. 

“Once everyone gets their fun out of their system (this summer), the crash will not be far behind, especially in the face of a subvariant that will place pressures on businesses and the health-care system again,” said senior lecturer of economics at Concordia university Moshe Lander. 

Statistics Canada recently reported that inflation had reached 6.7% in March – the highest it has been since January 1991. 

Economists expect that the Bank of Canada will engage in “aggressive” rate hikes in the year ahead with a predicted four rate increases this year. 

Additionally the outcome of the Ukraine-Russia war could be a determining factor as to when the recession will exactly take place. 

“(It) largely depends on how prolonged the supply-side issues will be and the escalation for the Russia-Ukraine war,” said economist Murshed Chowdhury. 

Canada’s expected GDP growth also shrank by 15% compared to last year, new International Monetary Fund projections show. 

The country is expected to grow its GDP by only 3.9% whereas in 2021 GDP projections sat at 4.6%. 

“Multilateral efforts to respond to the humanitarian crisis, prevent further economic fragmentation, maintain global liquidity, manage debt distress, tackle climate change, and end the pandemic are essential,” wrote the IMF. 

Proposed ‘pick-up truck tax’ the latest in Trudeau’s war against the working class

Buried deep in a Trudeau government report released last month was a proposal to slap a new tax on pick-up trucks – by far the most popular vehicles in Canada. The recommendation attached to Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault’s climate change report called for a tax of anywhere between $1,000 and $4,000.

On today’s episode of the Candice Malcolm Show, Candice is joined by the researcher who found this buried tax proposal and exposed it – Kris Sims of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF).

Remarkably, after Sims broke the story, Guilbeault went on the attack and called her factual news report “disinformation” and “fake news.” This is the same minister who first drafted Bills C-10 and C-36 that seek to censor and ban so-called disinformation.

The Trudeau government’s loyal CBC stenographer Aaron Wherry was quick to repeat Guilbeault’s talking points in an article that accuses Sims and the CTF of criticizing a “Truck Tax that doesn’t exist.”

Candice and Kris talk about the bizarre world of federal politics where Trudeau government officials deny facts that are published in their own reports, where journalists hold government critics – rather than government officials – to account, the growing cultural divide between the laptop class and the working class, and the brewing culture war over pick-up trucks. 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE CANDICE MALCOLM SHOW

Long-time Ontario MPP Toby Barrett not running in 2022 election

Twenty-seven-year Ontario Progressive Conservative (PC) MPP Toby Barrett has announced he will not run in the upcoming 2022 provincial election.

Initially elected in 1995, Barrett has won a total of seven consecutive elections during his tenure. His riding of Haldimand-Norfolk has been renamed twice in that time, going from Norfolk to Haldimand-Norfolk-Brant in 1999, to its current name in 2007.

Barrett said he leaves provincial politics “(k)nowing that my capable staff and I, over those 27 years, have helped a very large number of people.”

Barrett was elected during former Ontario premier Mike Harris’s “Common Sense Revolution,” which promoted fiscal responsibility and tax reductions –  something Barrett said he still believes in.

“Being a fiscal conservative, regardless of which party was in power, I consistently fought red tape, objected to waste, foolish spending and borrowing that jacked up Ontario deficits and debt,” he said.

Barrett has described himself as a riding man, involved in the affairs and issues his constituents face and bringing those concerns to the Ontario legislature.

“The people that I have had the privilege of representing have always come first . . . regardless of their ideology or political affiliation. What remains uppermost in importance is that we continue to fight for our small town and rural way of life in a democratic society where freedom prevails and justice rules.”

During the 2022 Freedom Convoy, Barrett voiced his support for the truckers, saying he was heartened to see Canadians expressing their concerns peacefully on highway overpasses in contrast to those who blockaded Highway 6 in Mar 2020.

During his tenure, Barrett criticized former Liberal premier Dalton McGuinty’s government for the Tobacco Tax act, which affected his riding’s tobacco farming industry. Barrett argued that the tax, which the government was not properly enforcing, led to the creation of illegal smoke shops that would sell contraband cigarettes for lower prices. 

Barrett also touts accomplishments outside of his riding. 

“I have also consistently been at odds with decision makers on tobacco farmer policy, the 16-year Caledonia debacle and, more recently, my opposition to a city of 40,000 people in the Nanticoke Industrial Park,” he said.

The Ontario PC Party has announced that Mayor of Haldimand County Ken Hewitt will become their candidate for Haldimand-Norfolk in the 2022 general election.

“I am honoured to join Doug Ford and the Ontario PC team in this next step of my career as your candidate for Haldimand-Norfolk, a community I have had the privilege of serving for the last twelve years,” said Hewitt. 

Ontario’s general election is set to take place Jun. 2.

Related stories