National Arts Centre denies segregation after announcing show with “all-Black identifying audience”

Ottawa’s National Arts Centre (NAC) says it does not engage in racial segregation after receiving backlash over its announcement of its first “Black Out night” featuring a performance with “an all-Black identifying audience.” 

The NAC is facing a flurry of online accusations that the performing arts venue is engaging in racial segregation, reverse racism and general wokism.

In a news release, the NAC says “Black Out nights” are “an open invitation to Black Audiences to come and experience performances with their community.” It adds that “the evenings will provide a dedicated space for Black theatergoers to witness a show that reflects the vivid kaleidoscope that is the Black experience.” 

The first “Black Out night” is scheduled for Friday, Feb. 17 for a performance of a play by Aleshea Harris called Is God Is. The NAC says that evening’s show “will welcome an all-Black identifying audience.” 

A screenshot from the third-party ticket sales website used by the NAC shared by Canadian journalist Jonathan Kay shows a notice saying the Feb. 17 show is “exclusively for Black audiences.” Kay was the first journalist to report on the dedicated performance.

However, the notice on Ticketmaster has since been changed to say the performance is “for Black-identifying audiences”, removing the word “exclusively” and adding the word “identifying.”

Screenshot from ticketmaster.ca

An NAC spokesperson confirmed to True North that the change to the notice was made, saying “the copy on Ticketmaster (which is on a third-party platform) was not aligned with our notice for ticket buyers and was asked to have it changed accordingly.”

The spokesperson also said that “there are no racially segregated shows at the NAC.” 

“Of the nine performances of Is God Is, we have dedicated one performance to those who self-identify as Black and their guests. No one will be turned away at the door; there will be no checkpoints for Black Out Night ticket holders and no questions will be asked about anyone’s identity or race,” she added.

The spokesperson also defended the NAC’s new “Black Out nights”, saying they serve as “a way to strengthen relationships with historically underserved audiences.” The first “Black Out” show took place in New York city in 2019 for a performance of Jeremy O’Harris’ Slave Play on Broadway. The concept has since been adopted by venues in other cities, including in Toronto, London U.K., and now Ottawa.

The NAC received backlash on social media, including from Canadian author and psychologist Dr. Jordan Peterson and British rapper and podcaster Zuby.

Meanwhile, some Twitter users have been writing critical comments in the replies of recent Tweets from the NAC – multiple of which have been hidden. 

The NAC will hold another dedicated evening for black audiences on May 5, and says it plans to host further dedicated shows in the future. 

LEVY: Trustees defend parent who raised concerns about sexual issues in schools

At a Waterloo Region District School Board (WRDSB) meeting earlier this week, the board’s non-woke trustees expressed concern with the vitriolic and defensive letter posted last Friday evening.

The anonymous and unsigned open letter was a response to a scathing but entirely accurate speech by concerned parent David Todor a week earlier addressing the board’s obsession with gender identity and sexual orientation.

Trustee Cindy Watson said in her 22 years on the board she’s never seen a parent responded to in this way.

“I was completely shocked,” she said, adding she certainly wasn’t consulted about the appropriateness of the letter.

Watson said she felt the letter was “excessive” and it was “heavy-handed” to use social media to counter parental concerns.

She said it can be a “very intimidating” experience to speak at board meetings and she hopes it never happens again.

Trustee Mike Ramsay called out education director Jeewan Chanicka for issuing the “disrespectful” letter without coming back to the board for approval – adding that certain board members may have signed off on the letter in secret.

“I think the parent was attacked in everything but name,” he said.

The subsequent responses from Chanicka and his sycophant trustees proved to me that most of those on the board are part of a cult that has nothing to do with teaching students academics.

When Chanicka was asked to justify the release of the letter, he claimed it was done openly to the entire community because there were some concerns expressed by the speaker (Todor) about the board’s lack of transparency (an immature response in my view).

He asked the staff who participated in crafting the letter to identify themselves and seven masked bureaucrats stood up.

In response to the appropriateness of sexual orientation and gender identity being requested of kids as young as nine, Chanicka countered by referring to the protection under the Human Rights Code and Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as he and the board regularly does, in my view, to silence opposition.

He was unrepentant about releasing the open letter claiming the board referred Todor’s concerns to staff to address.

I watched the meeting at which Todor spoke and the referral was to deal with him directly. There was no mention of a boardwide response, no matter how much Chanicka or his high-priced executive officer tried to sugarcoat it this week.

They knew an open letter would be controversial and was in my view yet another quid pro quo from Chanicka who, the more I observe, the more childish I find him.

He appears out of his depth and accountable to no one.

To handle criticism, Chanicka has hired Eusis Dougan-McKenzie, who works out of Toronto to run interference for the education director.

At this week’s board meeting, Dougan-McKenzie claimed when Todor asked questions about surveys that wanted to know about his daughter’s sexual orientation and gender identity, this was a “veiled attack” against the 2SLGBTQIA community.

“People use certain coded language to attack the trans community and make their lives unsafe,” she said.

This from a woman who constantly calls those who criticize her on Twitter “racist.”

Much of the problem is that the socialist trustees rush to support Chanicka, no matter how offensive or off-side he is.

One is former chairman Scott Piatkowski, the subject of a $1.7-million defamation suit and two judicial reviews for his behaviour last term.

“I thought some of the delegate’s remarks were unfair, inaccurate and offensive even referring to child abuse,” he said, muffled behind his N95 mask as were his fellow NDP-aligned trustees.

He added that he thought it was “entirely appropriate” to release the open letter and it was being “widely discussed” in the media. He added that the letter was helpful and entirely accurate.

Of course he did. This is the same chairman who cancelled former 20-year teacher Carolyn Burjoski a year ago, four minutes into a similar presentation about the age-appropriateness of certain WRDSB library books.

While Burjoski was muzzled, Piatkowski proceeded to do the rounds of the media making outrageous claims about the teacher, including his view that she is transphobic (thus the reason for lawsuits).

Watson, Ramsay and new trustee Bill Cody were so upset with the open letter they issued a letter of their own to the media.

They suggested that now parents are being “judged and labeled” for raising “legitimate concerns” about their childrens’ education.

“Will a WRDSB open letter dissuade parents from coming forward in the future?” they wrote. 

“If the WRDSB is really committed to serving everyone, that must also include parents who have the courage to disagree with them.”

The Daily Brief | Trudeau faces protests, dodges media questions, in Hamilton

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was met with a swarm of angry protesters as he convened in Hamilton with his cabinet for a retreat. But despite all the attention, the prime minister declined to answer questions from True North.

Plus, more than 35,000 union workers at the Canada Revenue Agency want more money, and if they don’t get what they want, they’re threatening to strike during the CRA’s busiest time of the year.

And Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault is accused of spreading misinformation on Twitter.

These stories and more on The Daily Brief with Anthony Furey and Andrew Lawton!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAILY BRIEF

Bank of Canada hikes rate for eighth time

0

The Bank of Canada hiked interest rates yet again on Wednesday, the eighth such move since the central bank began its recent series of increases last year.

The rise to 4.5% marked a quarter-percent growth in the “policy interest rate,” a rate which the Bank uses as a primary tool to control inflation in Canada.

The Bank also signalled that this may be the last such rate increase, as they hope to now pause the recent trend.

Combined with lower energy prices and improving supply chains around the world, the Bank expects the new policy rate of 4.5% to help Canadians deal with rising prices.

The Bank said the move was done to lower the Consumer Price Index (CPI), a catalogue representing everyday prices that impact typical consumers in Canada.

“The effects of higher interest rates […] are expected to bring CPI inflation down to around 3% in the middle of this year,” the Bank of Canada announcement said.

Earlier this month, True North reported that food prices had risen 11% year-over-year.

In an Ipsos Public Affairs poll published today by Global News, 1-in-5 Canadians said they were completely out of money. The respondents said they could not pay higher prices for necessities.

The Bank of Canada’s interest rate hike is expected to combat the struggle of Canadians by lowering the CPI, or in other words, lowering the prices of typical consumer goods.

WATCH: Trudeau swarmed by protesters in Hamilton

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau came face-to-face with hundreds of protesters on Tuesday night in Hamilton, Ontario when his security team escorted him across the street from the restaurant he and members of his cabinet had gathered at for dinner. 

The federal cabinet is currently in Hamilton for a multi-day retreat.

A large group of protesters quickly assembled outside the Bread Bar, a downtown Hamilton restaurant, when they became aware that Trudeau and his cabinet were all inside.

Many of the protesters were carrying Canadian flags, with some carrying the profanity-laden “F*** Trudeau” flag. A small group even brought out an inflatable sheep wearing a mask, which read, “99.8% survival rate”.

Just before 9pmET on Tuesday, Trudeau and his security detail walked out the front entrance of the restaurant and cross the street towards the Sheraton hotel.

Protesters rushed the prime minister and began hurling insults and obscenities.

True North was on the ground to capture the scene.

Protesters can be heard calling the Prime Minister a “tyrant” and a “traitor”.

Trudeau and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc were spotted by True North cameras on Tuesday, walking underneath Jackson Square mall on their way to the Bread Bar restaurant.

Trudeau and LeBlanc refused to answer True North’s questions relating to the heightened political tensions in Canada.

One year ago this week, truckers began their convoy across the country in protest of vaccine mandates placed on cross-border truckers. The protest would evolve into what is now known as The Freedom Convoy – a month-long protest that would place the Canadian people and the pandemic policies of the government on the front pages of the world’s newspapers.

After almost a month of entrenched, prolonged protest in downtown Ottawa, Trudeau made the controversial decision to invoke the never-before-used Emergencies Act to quash the Convoy.

OP-ED: A father and son offer differing views on residential schools

When I read a recent opinion piece by Doug Cuthand, the indigenous affairs columnist for the Regina Leader-Post, I couldn’t help but reflect on what I knew about his late father, Reverend Canon Stan Cuthand.

The younger, off-reserve born, Cuthand argued that the “The legacy of the residential schools is a recurring nightmare in Indian Country” because “Parents refused to let go of their children” so they could attend an Indian residential school (IRS) because “These so-called schools were dangerous places for our children. Neglect, overcrowding and a lousy diet all combined to weaken the children’s immunity…. The loneliness, memories of violence, sexual abuse and the lateral violence from bullying all exist within our communities and it had its genesis in the boarding schools…. Their poor education has left many illiterate and unable to compete in a modern world.”

I have never met Doug, but his father, Stan, was my friend when we were both teaching at the University of Manitoba during the 1970s. He also gave my wife communion in our home when her Anglican fellow parishioners said she couldn’t attend service unless she paid the church tithe we couldn’t afford due to a mountain of debts and a newborn child.

The senior Cuthand, born on the Little Pine Indian Reserve in 1918, began teaching the Cree language and other indigenous subjects in our new department of native studies in 1975, eventually becoming its head. Before that, he was a full-time priest, a vocation he pursued on- and off-reserve in Alberta and Saskatchewan for 25 years beginning in 1944. Before all that, his primary school education was received in the band’s day school followed by high school attendance in Prince Albert where he resided in boarding houses.

Though Father Cuthand was never a student at an IRS, he was resident chaplain of Saskatchewan’s La Ronge and Gordon Residential Schools, and of St. Paul’s School on the Blood Reserve, in the 1960s.

These are some of his first-hand recollections of life in these schools.

The schools weren’t terrible places at all,” he recalled. “They were certainly not prisons, although the principals were a little strict.”

Reverend Cuthand recalls one incident of sexual abuse of a student, at the Gordon Reserve IRS, where one of the staff members was later convicted and sent to prison for several years. “Most of the kids had no complaints about sexual abuse; if they did, they would have told me. However, they did get homesick and some tried to run away. There was also plenty of food; raisins, fish, potatoes, bread with lard, stew.

As for mandatory IRS attendance, Father Cuthand recalled that the only children who were “forced” to attend were orphans or children from destitute families. “The idea that all children were forced into the schools is an exaggeration,” he explained. “The idea of the separation of students [from parents] came from England. Practically all the [upper class] English were brought up in residential schools. In Canada, the main idea at the time was to civilize and educate the children; and that couldn’t be done if the kids were at home on the trapline.”

Reverend Cuthand said he enjoyed his time on the Blood Reserve in southwest Alberta. “It was an exciting place to live …. The Bloods were rich and very traditional. The school was a fine place with some very good teachers.” The parents were involved in the school, with some parents living there as staff members. “[Blood] Senator Gladstone sent his kids there, and many of the students from St. Paul’s went on to university.” 

Cuthand remembered that his school was particularly committed to recognizing indigenous culture. “One principal had tepees set up on the front lawn.”

That principal, Archdeacon Samuel H. Middleton, with the support of the tribal leadership, was a resourceful school promoter starting in the 1920s. Cuthand recalled the archdeacon, who spoke Blackfoot, changing the Sunday School curriculum to make it more relevant to native culture. “The school was well respected by the Bloods,” Mr. Cuthand said.

It’s instructive to compare these differing descriptions — those of the father who lived in residential schools with the son who only knows about them second or even third hand.

Hymie Rubenstein is editor of The REAL Indigenous Issues newsletter and a retired professor of anthropology, The University of Manitoba

“Red tape” week to award government for big failures, successes

The Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) is recognizing their “Red Tape Awareness Week” starting January 30 by awarding the biggest yearly failures and successes of government regulation.

“Everyone is affected by regulations,” said media relations officer Dariya Baiguzhiyeva in an email to True North. “Many of them are necessary […]. Some of them, however, simply add burdens for small businesses or citizens to comply with, like forcing a rural business in a B.C. town at the end of a street to build a sidewalk extension to nowhere.”

Baiguzhiyeva said the annual “red tape” event is designed to put a spotlight on such issues. CFIB aims to minimize the time, money and stress Canadians spend dealing with counterproductive regulations in the country.

This year, the CFIB introduced a new event to the program.

“We are putting a spotlight on red tape in the healthcare sector with our Patients before Paperwork report,” said Vice-President of Legislative Affairs of Ontario Ryan Mallough. 

“The report […] will break down how many hours physicians lose to unnecessary paperwork each year, and how many patient visits could be generated with a concerted effort to cut through that red tape.”

In September, True North reported that nearly six million Canadians did not have a family doctor.

“Red tape” doesn’t end in the doctor’s office, though.

On Tuesday, the CFIB will bring back its “paperweight award.” The token is awarded to the government body that created the most disruptive burden on Canadians and small business operators this year.

The most recent winner was the government of British Columbia in 2020, for the province’s “employer health tax.” The program required business owners to estimate quarterly tax deductibles, and at the end of the year charged interest fees to owners who had not made the right calculation, according to the CFIB.

Federal govt claims nearly a quarter of Canadians exhibit conspiracy thinking

A poll conducted by the Privy Council Office claimed that nearly a quarter of Canadians exhibited high levels of conspiratorial thinking.

The survey also said only 42% of Canadians trusted federal institutions to be truthful, while the remainder had doubts about the information related to them by Ottawa.

Instead, most Canadians placed their trust in social media and close friends or relatives over the government. 

As first reported by Blacklock’s Reporter, an internal survey titled Misinformation and Disinformation asked audiences a number of questions related to the topics. 

Statistics show that 35% of respondents were “high social media trusting” while, while 23% were found to be “non-trusting” altogether and “exhibit relatively high conspiratorial thinking” according to government researchers. 

Analysts told the government that over-regulation would not fix the problem. 

“Relying solely on traditional top-down approaches that aim to regulate content are insufficient at limiting the immediate dangers of misinformation,” the study claimed. 

“Innovative policy-making tools such as behavioural science can help provide immediate and long term solutions to misinformation.”

The Privy Council commissioned Impact Canada to conduct the research which included 1,872 Canadians. 

There have been several recent high profile cases of government officials or bodies spreading misinformation to Canadians.

On Tuesday, Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault was forced to delete a tweet after claiming the California Lunar New Year shooting was an anti-Asian racist attack despite the fact that the shooter himself was of Asian descent. 

“Sadly, hatred towards Asian people overshadowed the celebrations, and this barbaric act is proof that we must remain vigilant against racism. Hoping that the victims and families will be courageous in this time of grief,” tweeted Guilbeault.

Crown corporation CBC has also been cited on numerous occasions in recent months for misleading Canadians. The most recent incident occurred when the state broadcaster’s Saskatchewan arm reported a misleading story about a Catholic church fund for residential school victims.

The Andrew Lawton Show | The WEF agenda is alive and well in Canada

The World Economic Forum’s 2023 annual meeting in Davos just wrapped up, with thousands of political, business and media elites descending on the Swiss alps to talk about “transitioning” away from oil and gas, eliminating carbon emissions, and adopting aggressive environmental policies – while all the limos and private jets lingered nearby. True North was in Davos covering the official programme and what was taking place on the sidelines.

In this special edition of The Andrew Lawton Show, Andrew shares some footage from Davos and tackles the bigger picture issues that emerged during the conference.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

Guilbeault criticized for misinformation about California shooting in deleted tweet

Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault is in hot water after removing a tweet in which he labelled the California Lunar New Year shooting as an anti-Asian racist attack before information on the shooter was made available by police authorities. 

In the now-deleted tweet and Facebook post, Guilbeault blamed the attack on “hatred towards Asian people.” 

“Sadly, hatred towards Asian people overshadowed the celebrations, and this barbaric act is proof that we must remain vigilant against racism. Hoping that the victims and families will be courageous in this time of grief,” said Guilbeault. 

Guilbeault’s tweet prompted immediate backlash on social media after it became apparent that the minister’s framing was not accurate and based on presumption. 

The shooter was identified as 72-year-old Huu Can Tran, who is of Vietnamese origin. His motive is currently under investigation. 

In his former role as Minister of Canadian Heritage, Guilbeault was tasked with drafting legislation to combat misinformation and hate speech. 

On Sunday morning, Tran, who targeted a dance studio in Monterey Park died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The suspect also traveled to another nearby venue in Alhambra to attack more people but bystanders wrestled his firearm away from him. 

The bloody massacre left ten dead and nearly a dozen injured. 

Guilbeault is not the only senior member of the Liberal government to spread false claims about racially charged incidents. In 2018, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made public statements about a Toronto girl who claimed an Asian man cut her hijab with scissors while walking to school. 

“My heart goes out to Khawlah Noman following this morning’s cowardly attack on her in Toronto,” Trudeau tweeted at the time. 

“Canada is an open and welcoming country and incidents like this cannot be tolerated.”

Upon police investigation the story was determined to be a hoax. Trudeau did not release any subsequent comments on the matter. 

The tweet prompted protesters to demand an apology from the prime minister for demonizing the Asian community. 

“(Trudeau’s) behaviour has hurt everyone, not just Asians. By not apologizing, it just stirs up racial tensions and hate between communities,” said protester Bob Peng.