fbpx
Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Canada risks losing food security as government refuses to help farmers

As Canadian farmers continue to struggle during the coronavirus pandemic, industry leaders warn that Canada may permanently lose food security.

Chair of the Grain Farmers of Ontario Markus Haerle says that without support from the federal government, many farmers will not survive the downturn in grain markets caused by the coronavirus.

“We are at a real breaking point. The federal government continues to ask farmers to bear all of the risk associated with securing Canada’s food system and takes no action to partner with us in this risk,” he said.

“Our farmer-members will lose money on every acre of corn, with no way to regain those losses, while our U.S. counterparts will be able to survive these losses thanks to support from their government.”

Haerle fears that if Canadian farmers do not survive the pandemic, Canadians will have no choice but to depend on other countries to supply their food.

Without Canadian farmers, consumers will be more dependent on the United States and China

Haerle’s concerns have been echoed by academics. Dr. Sylvain Charlebois of Dalhousie University recently warned that up to 15% of all Canadian farms may not survive in 2020.

Despite unprecedented government spending to prop-up many industries, very little assistance has been given to farmers.

In an interview with True North, Haerle said that farmers are not looking for a handout. Grain Farmers of Ontario’s recent campaign asks the government to alter existing programs to assist farmers hit by the pandemic.

In a recent report, the University of Calgary’s Dr. Kerri Holland warned that failure to assist farmers may lead to a failure of Canada’s entire food supply chain.

“As the foundation of the food supply chain, Canadian farmers are key to its stability. As many farms were experiencing severe economic hardship prior to the pandemic, the challenges of market uncertainty and increased production costs put these operations at greater financial risk,” she wrote. 

“Canada is still in the early stages of crisis management but government support of Canadian agriculture has so far been largely inadequate in alleviating the financial impact on farmers.”

Dr. Holland notes that as Canada’s supply chain is so concentrated, it would not take much to cause serious food shortages.

Canada risked a meat shortage in April when Cargill, which processes one-third of Canada’s beef supply, shut down due to coronavirus.

The J.K. Rowling controversy, explained

The trans activists and leftist media figures have a new target: ultra-successful Harry Potter series author J.K Rowling.

Rowling has gone against the politically correct orthodoxy by stating that biological sex is real, and that an emphasis on gender neutrality erases womanhood. She is now being predictably slandered as a “transphobe.”

How did this controversy begin, and what did Rowling actually say? True North’s Lindsay Shepherd explains.

MALCOLM: An immigration pause would serve all Canadians

According to a new poll, 76% of Canadians want a total moratorium on immigration until the economy improves and the threat of coronavirus passes.

The scientific survey, conducted by Toronto-based research firm ONE between June 3-6, shows a clear majority of Canadians across all demographics support an immigration pause. This holds true across all regions, ages, gender, education, income levels and political party preference.

Not surprisingly, 89% of Canadians who voted Conservative in the last election support the pause, as do 87% of Bloc voters.

What is a little more surprising is that 67% of Canadians who cast their vote for Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party support the idea of shutting down immigration into Canada for the time being.

Perhaps the PM should think twice before he degrades and name-calls those with whom he disagrees on immigration — including two-thirds of his own party’s supporters.

Contrary to elite opinion on immigration — that all immigration is good and more immigration is always better — now is the ideal time to stop and reflect on our immigration system and ways we can improve outcomes for newcomers and Canadians alike.

Canada no doubt has one of the most successful immigration records in the world. For over 150 years, Canada has grown its population and economy, in part, by attracting hard-working and entrepreneurial newcomers to Canada while also fostering a sense of nationhood and unity among a very diverse population.

As global attitudes changed, so too did our immigration policies, first welcoming immigrants from the British Isles and workers from China, then opening our immigration system up to all Europeans and, soon, to people from all over the world. Canada hasn’t always been perfect, but we’ve been quick to adapt to changes and to apologize for past injustices.

When we look back at Canada’s historic annual immigration intake levels, however, we’ve never had a constant upward intake or large sustained levels of immigration.

What we see in the data is peaks and valleys. Canada would open its doors for a few years allowing millions of newcomers to immigrate. This would be followed by a period of significantly lower levels, allowing for newcomers to integrate and settle into Canadian life.

For instance, from 1919 to 1930, Canada admitted an average of 123,000 new immigrants per year. In the following decade, after the stock market collapsed and during the Second World War, our immigration average plummeted to 14,000 per year.

Again, in 1957 Canada welcomed 282,000 new immigrants, but by 1961 our levels fell to 72,000.

This trend remained until 1990, when Canada upped its levels to 200,000 or more new immigrants per year and began continual, large-scale immigration without any breaks or reductions.

Given today’s global circumstances of a public health pandemic and severe economic crisis, now is the perfect opportunity to revert back to our successful historic immigration model, listen to the majority of Canadians, and take another pause.

This will serve multiple purposes. First, it will allow our economy time to recover and prioritize new jobs to out-of-work Canadians, helping to reduce our historic high 13.7% unemployment rate.

Second, it will allow time for a safe coronavirus vaccine to be developed and the health threat to pass. And third, an immigration pause will allow the 2.8 million people who have arrived in the past decade to better integrate.

This would give refugee case workers, language schools and community organizations more time and resources to focus on helping recent newcomers, and give Canadians the opportunity to properly welcome our new neighbours and help them settle into the Canadian family.

It’s time for our leaders to listen to the people and do what’s best for our country. An immigration pause would serve all Canadians, especially recent newcomers.

FUREY: Kudos to those cops who are striking a balance

You probably haven’t heard that much about Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best on the news and across social media.

Maybe that’s because she appears to be everything we need right now – a calm and level-headed officer, who is very much open to reform but also speaks out against violent looting and is not willing to throw her entire department under the bus. And those sorts of moderate voices sadly aren’t being amplified right now.

Read Anthony Furey’s latest in the Toronto Sun!

KNIGHT: The RCMP is not systemically racist

Justin Trudeau says all institutions in Canada are systemically racist. This appears to be another knee-jerk reaction to the latest headlines.

The RCMP may have many faults, but there is simply not enough information and evidence to suggest the RCMP and other police forces are systemically racist.

Former police officer and True North fellow Leo Knight shares his experiences working in the RCMP.

Is Canada systemically racist?

Abacus Data conducted a survey for City News which found that almost two-thirds of Canadians believe systemic racism exists in the country.

But what do they mean when they say systemic or institutional racism?

True North’s Sam Eskenasi examines the data and whether or not Canada is a systemically or institutionally racist country.

Crime network laundering “hundreds of millions” through BC, Ontario

BC’s Cullen Commission heard that organized crime groups are laundering “hundreds of millions” of funds through operations based in BC and Ontario.

The Cullen Commission is officially known as the Commission of Inquiry into Money Laundering in BC and is chaired by BC Supreme Court Justice Austin Cullen.

Director-General of Criminal Intelligence Service Canada and RCMP Chief Superintendent Rob Gilchrist told the Commission that 14 criminal syndicates have been assessed as “high-level” threats to Canada, 10 of which are connected to BC. 

“This network represents several service providers, nationally and internationally, that conduct self-laundering and third-party money laundering,” said Gilchrist. 

“Organized crime groups out of BC are often supplying drugs into other provinces. In many ways, BC is a gateway.”

In 2019, authorities found that several of the criminal groups in BC were linked to international drug traffickers and underground banking operations in mainland China. 

A prior testimony to the Commission by Saint Mary’s University professor of criminology Stephen Schneider called the province of BC a “cottage industry” for crime organizations seeking to launder their dirty money. 

“We can’t just think of these stereotypical drug dealers with bags full of cash. We also have to think of more sophisticated corporate entities that are engaged in unethical and criminal activity,” said Schneider. 

“One of your most crucial goals in money laundering is to create the guise of legitimacy and what better way to do that than in the legitimate economy.”

The Cullen Commission was established by Premier John Horgan in May 2019 soon after reports suggested that billions of dollars worth of money earned through criminal enterprises was being laundered in the province. 

Canada Pension Plan touts climate leadership while investing millions in Chinese coal

While touting itself as a leader against climate change, the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) has invested millions in Chinese coal. 

According to Blacklock’s Reporter, the CPP Investment Board holds $1 million worth of stock in the Chinese coal distributor Jiangsu Guoxin Corp. Ltd. The Board also has $3 million worth of shares invested in China Coal Energy Co. Ltd. as well as $42 million in the state-owned coal mining company China Shenhua Energy Co. Ltd. 

CPP CEO Mark Machin reiterated the Board’s commitment to fighting climate change before the House of Commons finance committee on Thursday. 

“Climate change and the gradual transition to the low-carbon environment will continue to influence the world we live in,” Machin told the committee. 

“Every single major investment we make must take into account climate change risks and make sure we understand those risks.”

When confronted by Blacklock’s on the Board’s investments in Chinese coal, representatives of the CPP would not comment.

“It’s a decline to comment from us,” said spokesperson Darryl Konynenbelt.

This is not the first large-scale investment in Chinese companies the CPP has been scrutinized for. 

The latest filings by the Board show that the CPP is one of the largest stakeholders in Tencent Holdings Ltd. 

Tencent, the company that produces the popular Chinese messaging app WeChat, has been accused of aiding the Chinese government in political censorship and surveillance.

The CPP owns approximately $3 billion worth of shares in the company, despite its alleged complicity in human rights abuses perpetrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). 

At the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, the Chinese government used the messaging app to prevent the truth about the virus from spreading. As of January, WeChat was found to be actively blocking criticism of the and clamping down on whistleblowers seeking to share information.

FUREY: Cancel culture needs to be cancelled

In the last few days, the woke mob has been out in full force. So many people have fallen victim to cancel culture.

Nobody should lose their livelihood just because someone disagreed with something they’ve said.

True North’s Anthony Furey warns if the woke mob continues to get their way, we won’t be able to trust one another with our opinions.

Foreign Affairs Minister scurries off to NYC for desperate final Security Council push

Liberal Foreign Affairs Minister François-Philippe Champagne is heading to New York City to secure Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s coveted UN Security Council seat.

The minister will be joining Canada’s ambassador to the UN Marc-André Blanchard. Blanchard was sent by Trudeau to court other diplomats stationed in the US in May. 

During an interview with the Canadian Press, Blanchard hit back at recent criticisms of Canada’s push, including those by climate alarmist Greta Thunberg. Blanchard said that Canada has a strong case for being a leader in climate change and other issues. 

In a letter released this week co-signed by Thunberg and several UN ambassadors of small island nations, Trudeau is accused of failing to meet international climate obligations. 

“For the young generation who will inherit the consequences of these decisions, it is critical that those who claim to be leading on climate action are held to account for decisions they are making back at home,” claims the letter.

The letter goes on to blast Trudeau for subsidizing Canada’s energy sector and not doing enough to curb carbon emissions. 

The prime minister himself has been involved in the campaign to secure one of two revolving seats on the Council. Canada is currently competing against Ireland and Norway for the positions. 

A part of Trudeau’s campaign involved touring through Africa to sway favour with UN members in the continent. 

The prime minister courted Senegalese President Macky Sall despite the country’s abhorrent human rights record.

While Trudeau was in Senegal, Sall came to the defence of his government’s criminalization of homosexuality, claiming that it was not homophobic. 

“The laws of our country obey rules that are the condensation of our cultural and civilizing values. This has nothing to do with homophobia. Whoever has the sexual orientation of their choice is not the target of exclusion,” said Sall.

Even while Canada was struggling with the coronavirus pandemic, Trudeau took the matter into his own hands and personally called 28 different world leaders to plead for support at the UN. 

Related stories