fbpx
Thursday, August 14, 2025

“Malicious” cyberattacks on Canadian coronavirus research detected

Canada’s cybersecurity agency is investigating attacks on Canadian coronavirus research facilities.

The head of the Communications Security Establishment’s Cyber Centre (CSE) Scott Jones told the House of Commons industry, science and technology committee on Wednesday that they are aware of “suspicious” and possibly “malicious” cyber activity targeting research organizations. 

“We’ve seen some compromises in research organizations that we’ve been helping to mitigate and we’re still continuing to look through what’s the root cause of those,” Jones told the committee. 

“Yes, we’ve seen activity coming from organizations where they’ve seen malicious activity, or at least suspicious [activity], and we’re working with them to determine whether or not it was malicious, where it came from and who, and was a success or not.”

Only a week prior to Jones’ revelation, the CSE alongside the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) issued a warning that such institutions would be vulnerable to cyberespionage. 

“With regards to the specific threats, the (CSE’s) Cyber Centre has assessed that the COVID-19 pandemic presents an elevated level of risk to the cybersecurity of Canadian health organizations involved in the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic,” said CSE’s acting director-general of public affairs Christopher Williams.

“(CSIS) sees an increased risk of foreign interference and espionage due to the extraordinary effort of our businesses and research centres … (CSIS’) focus is on protecting Canadian intellectual property from these threats — and jobs and economic interests with it.”

This month, the US detected similar breaches in its own coronavirus research organizations. In response to the attacks, the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency accused the People’s Republic of China of conducting cyberespionage. 

“The United States condemns attempts by cyber actors and non-traditional collectors affiliated with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to steal U.S. intellectual property and data related to COVID-19 research,” said US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. 

“The potential theft of this information jeopardizes the delivery of secure, effective and efficient treatment options.”

Canada has recently partnered up with organizations being directed by the Chinese government to work towards a vaccine. 

Prim Minister Justin Trudeau announced earlier this week that researchers will begin human testing on Canadians in the coming weeks. 

Woman barred from travelling to her mother’s funeral challenging Newfoundland travel ban

A woman who was barred from travelling to Newfoundland to attend her mother’s funeral is taking the province to court over their extreme public health measures.

On Wednesday, Nova Scotia resident Kim Taylor and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) filed a claim in the Newfoundland & Labrador Supreme Court, arguing that the travel ban enacted by the province to slow the spread of coronavirus violates mobility rights protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Taylor, who was raised in Newfoundland but now lives in Nova Scotia, had applied for an exemption to the travel ban after learning her mother had died but was denied.

According to the CCLA, Taylor’s request was ultimately granted after she went public with her grievance, but not until after the funeral had already occurred.

“Ms. Taylor applied for an exemption from the Chief Medical Officer of Health and had a plan to self-isolate for fourteen days once in the province. Despite these plans, her initial application to enter the province was denied,” the CCLA said in a statement.

“Ms. Taylor sought reconsideration of the decision and, after speaking with the media and announcing plans to launch a legal challenge, her exemption was ultimately granted – but the damage was already done.”

In early May, Newfoundland & Labrador passed Bill 38, banning everyone except residents and essential workers from entering the province. The bill also empowers police to arrest and deport non-residents immediately after arrest.

The CCLA is arguing that Bill 38 violates mobility rights set out in the charter. The group also claims that this particular travel ban is not within provincial jurisdiction.

Taylor says that the goal of this legal challenge is to ensure no one has to go through the same trauma she experienced.

“The exemption ‘process’ is unfair, inconsistent and not timely,” she said.

“The purpose of bringing this challenge forward is to save others from this unfairness – especially in emotional times like grieving the loss of a loved one.”

The stark difference between Trudeau’s and Trump’s response to the WHO

There’s no question the World Health Organization failed in its initial handling of the coronavirus. They put their allegiance to the Communist Chinese regime ahead of the health and safety of people around the world.

Yet the Trudeau government refuses to be critical of the organization. Instead, Trudeau and other public officials have defended the WHO.

The difference between Trudeau’s and Trump’s response to the WHO’s handling of the coronavirus couldn’t be more different.

True North’s Leo Knight discusses.

MacKay calls for limiting trade with China and Huawei 5G ban in new UK report

Conservative leadership candidate Peter MacKay was cited in a new study coming out of the UK which calls on Canada and its Five Eyes allies to break away from dependence on Chinese goods and materials. 

In the report, MacKay accuses the Chinese government of “suppressing critical data” and “sanctioning Chinese whistleblowers” in its coronavirus response. 

“Canada and its allies must hold the Chinese government to account. We must diversify trade away from non-democratic, authoritarian states that do not respect the rule of law or basic human rights,” writes MacKay. 

“Rather than rely on China for critical goods, Canada’s strategic interests require us to shift towards partners that align and conform with our rules-based system, the values of freedom and human rights, and that pose no threat to our national security and that of our allies in NATO, the G7, Five Eyes, and beyond.”

The 52-page report titled Breaking the China Supply Chain: How the Five Eyes can Decouple from Strategic Dependency was written by the Henry Jackson Society and says Canada, alongside the US, the UK, Australia and New Zealand are “strategically dependent” on China. 

These countries rely on China for as many as 831 different categories of goods, 260 of which are necessary components in communications and infrastructure. 

According to one of the authors of the report Samuel Armstrong, Canada is among the worst in terms of dependence on China for medicines and vitamins. Canada is also heavily dependent on China for cellular and computer technology. 

“The biggest one is phones and computers: 87% of your laptops and 78% of your cell phones are made in China. The modern economy relies on these,” Armstrong told the Globe and Mail.

The study found that Canada relies on China for as much as 96% of its supply of anthraquinone which is an ingredient found in cancer and anti-malarial medications. 

“If it was not already apparent, the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn attention to the dangers that dependency poses,” claims the report. 

In a section titled “Foreign influence and disinformation,” MacKay accuses the federal government of not properly addressing Chinese interference in Canada. 

“This clear threat to Canada’s national security has not been properly addressed or fully acknowledged, despite ample evidence over the past several years,” said MacKay. 

“China’s actions during the Covid-19 pandemic should also demonstrate to the Canadian government that it must ban all Huawei 5G technology from its communications infrastructure in order to mitigate any potential vulnerabilities that Chinese intelligence might seek to exploit.”

“The five powers have found it difficult to source the necessary volumes of medical equipment, either because China has commandeered such products for its own requirements or because the five powers have been forced to compete for limited supplies.”

Recently, the Canadian government has partnered with Chinese state-directed researchers to develop a coronavirus vaccine. 

According to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, clinical trials of the Chinese vaccine will begin to be performed on Canadians within the coming weeks despite warnings that such a partnership could endanger the safety of Canada’s citizens. 

Government directs public sector workers to avoid mentioning China when talking about the coronavirus

The federal government has been advising its employees to avoid any reference to China when discussing the coronavirus, according to Blacklock’s Reporter. 

Documents by the Treasury Board and The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS), both advise federal public sector workers to avoid any reference to the virus’ country of origin as to avoid “stigma” and “micro-aggressions.” 

“Don’t blame any age group or people from a specific country, ethnicity or race for the spread of Covid-19. Show compassion for all victims around the world and go easy on the others,” wrote the Mental Health And COVID-19 For Public Servants: Balance Family Life which was published by the Treasury Board. 

According to the CCOHS, public sector employees are encouraged to spy out “social stigma and micro-aggression” while at work. 

“Groups that may be experiencing stigma during the COVID-19 pandemic including those that have traveled, persons of Asian descent, emergency or health care professionals and other essential workers,” wrote the CCOHS’ guidebook titled Preventing Stigma.

“Micro-aggressions are everyday verbal, non-verbal and environmental snubs or insults that communicate hostile, derogatory or negative messages. These messages target persons based on the group the other person perceives them to belong to.”

Since the virus originally broke out in Wuhan, China, and was subsequently covered up by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the communist regime has sought to cast shade over its origins and insist that any criticism of their government’s handling equates to racism. 

The CCP’s tactic has caught on in Canada. In April, a CBC article echoed CCP talking points when slandering an exposé report by the Epoch Times. 

The CBC charged the publication, which is owned and operated by people of Chinese descent, of “advancing a conspiracy theory” and being “racist and inflammatory.” 

Epoch Times Canadian Editions publisher Cindy Gu called the allegations by the CBC “deliberately misleading.”

“The CBC headline focuses on a small part of our eight-pages-long special edition, a commentary article that discusses the history of top CCP officials talking about developing bioweapons. But this opinion article did not state that the Wuhan lab was developing bioweapons, contrary to the claim in the headline,” wrote Gu in a statement posted online.

In an exclusive True North report, Macdonald-Laurier Institute foreign policy specialist Shuvaloy Majumdar accused the CCP of conflating “credible critiques with charges of racism.” 

“We’ve seen them conflate credible critiques with charges of racism and it’s silly to do that and they’re growing sharper and more immature in how they’re responding to it,” Majumdar told True North.

FUREY: Why are we still in lockdown?

The original rationale for the lockdown was to not overwhelm the hospitals. That’s been accomplished – so why are we still in lockdown?

The lockdown has resulted in a damaged economy that will take months, if not years, to fix. The onus is on public officials to reopen the economy now.

True North’s Anthony Furey isn’t calling on everything to return to normal, but we can reopen the economy safely and responsibly. It’s up to the politicians to act.

Joe Biden can expect a lawsuit if he cancels Keystone XL, says Business Council of Alberta chairman

The current chairman of the Business Council of Alberta says Joe Biden’s threat to cancel the Keystone XL Pipeline would be met with a “multibillion-dollar lawsuit” if he were to actually follow through with the plan if elected president. 

Hal Kvisle, who is also an oil and gas producer at ARC Resources Ltd and the former CEO of TC Energy, told Daily Commercial News that Biden’s rhetoric was “all grandstanding.” 

“This is all grandstanding and it doesn’t look good on the politicians,” said Kvisle. 

“TC would have a multibillion-dollar lawsuit against the U.S. government if they kill the project that’s already been approved.”

The $8 billion project was approved by President Trump in 2017 and has been under construction ever since.

More recently, Premier of Alberta Jason Kenney promised that his government would invest $1.1 billion to help the project and pledged several billion more in the form of loan guarantees. 

On Monday, Biden’s campaign announced that he would rescind the project’s permit if elected president in the upcoming 2020 US election. 

“Biden strongly opposed the Keystone pipeline in the last administration, stood alongside President Obama and Secretary [John] Kerry to reject it in 2015, and will proudly stand in the Roosevelt Room again as President and stop it for good by rescinding the Keystone XL pipeline permit. Stopping Keystone was the right decision then and it’s still the right decision now,” said a statement by Biden’s policy director Stef Feldman. 

In response to Biden’s declaration, Kenney told the former US vice president that he would have to explain himself to Americans if he followed through on the decision, citing the positive economic impact the project would bring to both the US and Canada. 

“As we hopefully begin to emerge from this pandemic, the public both in the United States and Canada will be increasingly focused on jobs and the economy, and that is why this project needs to proceed,” said Kenney. 

“The recent attack on the North American energy industry by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) dictatorships was an effort to undermine North American energy independence, which is important both to our livelihoods but also to our national security.”

Israelis dubbed “thieves and murderers” at virtual Toronto al-Quds Day rally

Presenters at this year’s annual al-Quds Day online rally have come under fire once again from Jewish human rights group B’nai Brith after the organization accused them of sharing “hateful, anti-Semitic content.” 

Normally held on the grounds of Queen’s Park, the rally was moved online after coronavirus restrictions placed on public gatherings put a halt to large-scale events in the province.

In a statement released online, B’nai Brith said that the organizer’s mantra of “Judaism yes, Zionism no,” did not prevent the use of “anti-Semitic tropes during the rally” which prompted them to file a complaint with Toronto Police. 

“The hateful, anti-Semitic content of this event demonstrates exactly why it should never again be allowed on Toronto’s streets,” said Michael Mostyn, Chief Executive Officer of B’nai Brith Canada in the statement. “Even after the COVID-19 restrictions pass, we expect the City of Toronto to follow the lead of world cities like Berlin in permanently banning physical al-Quds marches.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_pbjse8Tx8

Al-Quds Day is typically held on the last Friday of Ramadan to express support for the Palestinians and oppose Zionism and Israel. It was initiated by the Islamic Republic of Iran following the 1979 revolution in opposition to Jerusalem Day, an Israeli national holiday commemorating the reunification of Jerusalem. 

The rally has become known for controversial messaging over the years with the flags of the terror organization Hezbollah being flown and speakers often describing Israel as being a “cancer” and accusing it of war crimes.

According to B’nai Brith, in  2013 and 2016, speakers called for Israelis to be shot, a featured speaker at the 2018 rally said he was praying for the “eradication” of Israelis and last year a cleric brandished an ominous sign referring to a massacre of Jews.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63e6kU_y5H8

Appease and Thank You

SUBSCRIBE TO THE ANDREW LAWTON SHOW

Throughout the coronavirus pandemic, Canada’s approach to domestic and foreign policy has been appeasement – of China, of the World Health Organization, and of the public health bureaucracy, even when all three have proven themselves to be unreliable. True North’s Andrew Lawton explains.

Also, are food delivery apps harming the restaurant business, and how a law-abiding gun owner became a good Samaritan during last month’s Nova Scotia shootings.

Watch the latest episode of The Andrew Lawton Show!

Toronto doctor says partnering on a vaccine with China puts Canadians in danger

A Toronto-area frontline doctor has warned Canadians that the federal government’s partnership with Chinese researchers puts Canadians in unnecessary danger due to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) tendency towards obscuring the truth. 

Recently the National Research Council (NRC) announced that Canadian researchers will be partnering with the Chinese based CanSino Biologics and in extension the People’s Liberation Army to develop a vaccine for the coronavirus.

President of Concerned Ontario Doctors Dr. Kulvinder Gill spoke out against the deal, saying that partnering with China is “the most counterproductive and dangerous thing [the federal government] could do.” 

“The role of our governments is to build trust through transparency and accountability. If the Trudeau government wants Canadians to trust and buy into a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, partnering with the Chinese Communist Party’s military is […] the most counterproductive and dangerous thing it could do,” Gill told Thinkpol. 

“[Canada] must abandon this illogical and dangerous endeavour, and instead fund vaccine trials with our allied nations who understand the critical importance of trust, ethics, safety, transparency and collaboration.”

Gill also pointed to the CCP’s involvement in covering up the severity of the coronavirus pandemic during the early stages of the pandemic.  

“The Five Eyes intelligence alliance, consisting of Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand, has raised significant concerns regarding China’s handling of the novel coronavirus calling it an ‘assault on international transparency’ with the disappearance of Chinese scientists and whistleblowers, censorship of scientific data, and fatal denial of human-to-human transmission via the World Health Organization,” said Gill.

Critics have accused the Liberal government of being too friendly to the communist regime, despite clear evidence that their actions endangered the safety of people around the world. 

Recent reports have shed light on the fact that while China hid information from the international community, it was buying up the world’s supply of personal protective equipment (PPE).

According to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, clinical trials of the Chinese vaccine will begin to be performed on humans within the coming weeks in Canada.

The first phase of the trials will include 30 to 100 healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 55.

Related stories