fbpx
Friday, July 11, 2025

Trudeau’s press secretary found guilty of breaking ethics laws

Another person close to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been found guilty of breaking ethics laws. 

According to the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner’s office, Trudeau’s press secretary Alex Wellstead violated subsection 22(5) of the Conflict of Interest Act. 

The subsection requires government workers to “disclose a material change related to assets within 30 days after the change.” Material changes under this act could include acquiring assets worth more than $10,000, opening investment accounts or receiving gifts. 

Wellstead was fined a mere $250 by the Commissioner and records indicate that the penalty has already been paid. 

“In my annual submission I informed the Office of $265.03 in material changes. As this was not disclosed within 30 days, I was ordered to pay $250,” Wellstead told Global News

“I have since paid this amount for this administrative oversight.”

The prime minister is currently facing his third ethics violation while holding office over his involvement in the WE Charity scandal.

The Conservative opposition has urged the Liberal government to disclose documents relating to Trudeau’s and his family’s dealings with the charity. 

Both Trudeau’s mother Margaret Trudeau and his brother Sacha Trudeau have received upwards to half a million dollars from the organization for various speaking engagements. 

The Liberals have blocked any further investigations into the scandal since parliament resumed this fall. 

The federal government claims that a Conservative push to start a committee to delve into the Liberal’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic and by extension the WE Charity scandal will require a confidence vote on Wednesday afternoon. 

Government paid journalists $750 a day for media training

The Department of National Defense paid thousands for retired journalists to provide “media training” to staff. 

According to Blacklock’s Reporter, several former journalists were paid $750 a day to teach DND staffers basic communications skills.

“They were using media people to train officers going on overseas missions,” one former participant said.

“There were exercises on how to hold a scrum, how to answer questions, how to stay on message.” 

Among the journalists paid include two former CBC staff, one former Hill Times editor and a current contributor to Lawyer’s Daily.

The department’s budget for training sessions has radically increased in recent years. In 2017, DND paid $9,323 for training costs; by 2019 that number had increased to $24,145.

“Due to the sustained Canadian Armed Forces operational tempo and the associated Canadian Armed Forces commitment to provide timely, accurate and reliable information, demand for the Defence Public Affairs Learning Centre’s Designated Spokesperson Training program and support has increased,” the department wrote.

The Trudeau government has paid a number of journalists lucrative contracts in exchange for consulting services. In some cases, these contracts appear to be conflicts of interest.

In 2019, the public relations firm owned by CBC commentator Amanda Alvaro was paid $24,997 to provide “media coaching” to Women and Gender Equality Minister Maryam Monsef.

Alvaro also received $16,950 for a contract with the Department of Foreign Affairs. 

According to CBC’s Journalistic Standards and Practices, Alvaro’s financial ties should have been made clear to the audience during her appearances on air.

Another CBC pundit, University of Ottawa law professor Carissima Mathen, was paid $24,750 for “advisory services” for the privy council.

Carbon taxes fail to benefit the environment or taxpayers: report

A new report from the Fraser Institute suggests that carbon taxes around the world fail to benefit the environment or taxpayers.

According to the report Carbon Pricing in High-Income Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Countries, the biggest reason why carbon taxes are not efficient globally is because many countries simply use carbon taxes to raise revenue.

“On average, 74% of carbon tax revenues in high-income OECD countries go directly into general revenues for governments with no specific use, 12% are earmarked for environmental spending and only 14% are returned to taxpayers,” the report states.

Of the 14 highly-developed countries with a carbon tax, nine of those countries simply pocket the carbon tax revenue without any commitments. Only Japan commits 100% of all carbon tax revenues to environmental programs.

The Fraser Institute says that in order for carbon taxes to be economically feasible countries need to reduce other taxes on producers by an equivalent amount. Most countries, including Canada, have not done this — making a carbon tax as financially harmful as any other tax.

“To mitigate the effect, revenue raised by carbon pricing policies can be recycled back into the economy through reductions in other taxes, thus creating offsetting reductions in distortions elsewhere in the system,” writes the report.

“Research generally shows that using carbon tax revenues to cut capital taxes—corporate taxes or personal income rates on interest, dividends, or capital gains—produces the largest economic efficiency benefits, roughly offsetting the economic cost of the carbon tax.”

Rather than mitigate the financial impact of the carbon tax, the Trudeau government has continuously increased the carbon tax. The carbon tax is scheduled to increase from $30 per tonne today to $50 by 2022.

The Trudeau government has recently said it will push forward with a second carbon tax in the form of the Clean Fuel Standards as soon as possible.

The Clean Fuel Standards are a regulatory regime on energy producers that is estimated to cost between $150 and $180 per tonne of carbon emissions. The Canadian Energy Research Institute estimates that the new tax may cost the average household $1,395 per year. 

According to government timelines, the second carbon tax is expected to be introduced to Parliament this year, with the tax beginning late 2021.

Beijing accuses Canadian politicians of condoning anti-China comments

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is accusing Canada’s leaders of condoning anti-China comments. 

The accusation comes after China faced backlash for threats made by Chinese ambassador to Canada Cong Peiwu against Canadians currently in Hong Kong.

“If the Canadian side really cares about the stability and the prosperity in Hong Kong, and really cares about the good health and safety of those 300,000 Canadian passport-holders in Hong Kong, and the large number of Canadian companies operating in Hong Kong SAR, you should support those efforts to fight violent crimes,” said Cong last week. 

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian addressed the situation during a Monday press conference. 

“[Canadian politicians] did not verify, but also condoned the anti-China comments spreading across the nation and made groundless accusations against China,” said Zhao.  

Conservative Party leader Erin O’Toole responded to the ambassador’s threat by requesting an immediate apology from Cong, and asking for his credentials to be revoked should he fail to retract the remarks. 

“The Chinese Ambassador has decided to engage in belligerent rhetoric unbecoming of his office. To be clear, this was a threat to the 300,000 Canadians in Hong Kong. And a barely veiled one at that,” wrote O’Toole in an official statement on the matter. 

In his statement, O’Toole also called on the Trudeau government to expedite asylum for Hong Kongers seeking to flee the country and to place Magnitsky-style sanctions on Chinese officials involved in cracking down on the democratic rights of Hong Kong citizens.

On Monday, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland denounced the ambassador’s remarks but did not expel the diplomat.

FUREY: Ontario’s ridiculous Halloween restrictions

Halloween is not a government creation, but that won’t stop the Ontario government from attempting to regulate it.

Doug Ford’s recommendations against trick-or-treating have got to be the most ridiculous coronavirus precaution rule to date.

True North’s Anthony Furey says there is one positive thing about all of this – more and more people are starting to question the government’s advice and starting to speak out.

Commercial fishermen deny accusations of racism in Nova Scotia dispute

Indigenous and commercial fishermen are calling on the government to intervene in a dispute over off-season lobster fishing by a Mi’kmaw fishery. 

According to Nova Scotia coordinator of the Maritime Fishermen’s Union (MFU) Ruth Inniss, commercial fishermen have been painted in an unfair light

“We want to have dialogue. We need to have dialogue and that’s not happening. In my mind it’s the federal government that is painting us as racist and First Nations. That is not us. That is not on us. We want to be able to prosecute the fishery under the same rule of law,” said Inniss. 

Commercial fishermen were reacting to comments made by federal ministers and the mainstream media which have painted them as racists and as being anti-Indigenous. 

Yesterday, during a press conference on the dispute, Indigenous Services Minister Marc Miller called the events taking place in the province “disgusting, unacceptable and racist in nature.” 

In a similarly worded letter, Federal Fisheries Minister Bernadette Jordan condemned “acts of violence, racism and threats.” 

Tensions between non-Indigenous and Indigenous fishermen reached a climax last week after two mob incidents erupted in violence and a lobster holding facility was set on fire. The facility was not owned by the Sipeknek’katik First Nations but it did have dealings with First Nations fishermen.

Last Thursday, two Mi’kmaw lobster storehouses were surrounded by an angry mob calling on fishermen inside to relinquish their catches. Despite police arriving on scene, fires were set and property was damaged, including one vehicle. 

The government accused federal RCMP officers of not doing enough to calm the situation. 

“We are expecting the RCMP and police services to do their jobs and keep people safe,” said Prime Minister Justin Trudeau about the situation. 

“I think there’s been some concern that that hasn’t been done well enough and that’s certainly something we will be looking at very closely.”

Commercial fishermen claim that the fisheries are operating outside of the law, which requires fishing only to be done during regulated seasons. 

First Nations fishermen point to the 1999 Marshall ruling that effectively makes fishing for moderate livelihood and sustenance a treaty right. A right which opponents dispute citing another court ruling which gives the federal government power to regulate any Indigenous fisheries. 

“We need an opportunity to negotiate and discuss the issues. I can assure you the commercial industry feels they have not had an opportunity to have their voices heard at the table,” said former provincial fisheries minister Sterling Belliveau. 

“Whatever Marshall started needs to happen within the seasons. It’s as simple as that. Once you get outside of those seasons, you are going to have this conflict.”

Sipekne’katik First Nation Chief Mike Sack has vowed to defend Mi’kmaw treaty rights and continue the practice. Sack also accused the federal Liberals of not doing enough to remedy the tensions.

Presidential Politics and Another Civil War

With just two weeks until the American presidential election, True North’s Andrew Lawton caught up with Republican strategist and commentator Dennis Lennox to discuss Trump’s midwest plan, the road to victory in the Electoral College, and the grim scenario of what might happen after the election is over.

Watch the latest episode of The Andrew Lawton Show.

Rosemary Barton gets her own CBC show after Wendy Mesley cancellation

CBC political correspondent Rosemary Barton will be hosting her own weekly program on CBC News beginning on November 1, 2020. 

“Rosemary Barton Live” will broadcast on Sunday mornings and hopes to “deliver a weekly dose of compelling conversations and need-to-know political news and issues affecting Canadians.” 

The announcement of Barton’s new show comes less than a month after CBC confirmed to True North that “The Weekly with Wendy Mesley” will not be returning to the airwaves. 

“The Weekly will not be returning this fall and we are talking with Wendy as to what’s next for her at the CBC,” CBC Head of Public Affairs Chuck Thompson told True North on September 21.

Mesley was suspended from her position after allegedly saying the “N-word” while referencing a title of a book during an editorial meeting in June. 

“My whole career I’ve been asking the tough questions to people in power. With this opportunity to also provide Canadians a platform to speak for themselves in real time about the issues that are important to them, I hope to inspire and engage meaningful conversations in homes across the country,” said Barton about her new show. 

The show is set to air each Sunday from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. ET.

During the 2019 federal election, Barton was one of several journalists handpicked to moderate the federal leadership debate.

Around that time, Barton was also named in a lawsuit launched by the CBC against the Conservative Party of Canada. 

The public broadcaster alleged that the Conservatives’ use of CBC footage violated the “moral rights” of Barton and CBC reporter John Paul Tasker. 

Disproportionate number of older men in rural areas dying by suicide

A disproportionate amount of men 45-years or older living in rural areas are dying by suicide, a new study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal reveals. 

Researchers found that out of over 2,700 firearm-related deaths from 2002 to 2016, 68% of all deaths were as a result of suicide. 

“Even though violent injuries receive most attention, most health care practitioners that work in this field know the vast majority of deaths are actually secondary to suicide. When we speak to our rural colleagues, they tell us this is a day-to-day practice,” said study co-author and trauma surgeon Dr. David Gomez. 

According to Dr. Gomez, gun-related suicides in rural communities also outnumber those in urban areas like Toronto, where gun-related assaults take precedence.  

“The difference is staggering. This is a problem that’s happening in rural populations all across Ontario,” said Dr. David Gomez. 

A lack of access to mental health and social resources could be behind the trends. 

“The basket of services in rural and northern Ontario is not comprehensive. Residents of these regions have limited availability and access to primary health care, specialists, hospitals and community services and supports,” claims the Canadian Mental Health Association. 

“For individuals living with mental illness, there are additional barriers to accessing primary health care and psychiatrists beyond the limitations of being in an underserviced area. Information from the field indicates that family physicians are increasingly screening out individuals living with mental illness and/or addictions who have complex health needs. Even for those individuals who have regular access to a primary health care provider, there is limited access to psychiatric assessments.”

Even younger men in rural communities are reporting that life-saving mental health services have been difficult to access. 

22-year-old Sawyer Kemp told Global News that organizations have been slow to process those suffering with mental health issues and have had to deal with a “lack of empathy” from those who are supposed to help them. 

“The moment I turned 18 was when I filed my release forms and it very much became ‘you’re on your own,” said Kemp, who has struggled with suicidal thoughts.

“I reached out to several places. They said ‘we’ll put you on a wait list. You’ll hear from us within a few months.’ That was a year ago.”

Rural communities in Canada have also had to struggle with slow police response times and disproportionate crime rates.

According to Statistics Canada data from 2017, the crime rate in rural communities was 38% higher than in urban communities.  

“Higher crime rates in rural areas were mainly observed in the Prairie provinces,” said the report, Police-Reported Crime in Rural and Urban Areas in the Canadian Provinces, 2017.

Queen’s University to rename Sir John A Macdonald Hall

Queen’s University is stripping the name of Canada’s first prime minister from its law school building. 

On Monday, the Queen’s board of trustees agreed to rename Sir John A Macdonald Hall after a lengthy consultation on the matter. 

“Our recommendation is based on the terrible harm Sir John A. Macdonald’s actions, from a position of the highest possible leadership, had on generations of people,” said a 65-page report calling for the removal of Macdonald’s name.

According to Queen’s law school dean Mark Walters, the decision is not meant to “condemn Macdonald’s character or to dismiss his contributions.” 

“Removing Macdonald’s name from the law school building may be seen as one small way of honouring the underlying values that animate the constitution that Macdonald helped to frame,” said Walters. 

The decision from Queen’s follows on the heels of recent calls by anti-racism activists to have historical place names changed over purported racist and colonial histories. 

In August, activists toppled and decapitated a Sir John A Macdonald statue in Montreal. 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau spoke out against the actions calling them “acts of vandalism” that are “not advancing the path towards greater justice and equality.” 

Related stories