Teck Resources pulls application from Frontier oil sands mine

0

Teck Resources Ltd pulled its application for the proposed Frontier oil sands mine on Sunday evening.

The federal government was expected to make a decision on whether or not to approve the $20.6-billion project next week.

Had the project moved forward, the Teck Frontier mine would employ 7,000 people during its construction and 2,500 during its expected 40-year lifespan. Teck expects that the government would earn $70 billion in tax revenue from the mine during its lifetime.

In a letter to the government, Teck CEO and President Don Lindsay said investors and customers increasingly want jurisdictions to have a framework in place that accommodates resource development and climate change.

Lindsay says that “does not yet exist here today” and that the growing debate around the issue has placed the project and Teck “squarely at the nexus of much broader issues that need to be resolved.”

Senior officials with Teck called Indigenous leaders in Wood Buffalo to inform them of the decision on Sunday. Teck officials told them it wasn’t the right time to move forward on the project.

In response to Teck’s decision, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney said, “This decision is clearly the result of federal regulatory uncertainty and the current lawless opposition to resource development.”

In a call with analysts on Friday, Teck CEO Don Lindsay said that without improvements in the Canadian energy sector, Teck may have to sell their stake in Frontier and the existing Fort Hills mine, exiting Alberta’s oil sands if Frontier mine was not approved by the federal government.

“We would look at doing something to realize that value, whether it’s a spinoff or some sort of transaction,” Lindsay said about Fort Hills.

“If we did that, then probably Frontier would go with it,” he added.

Liberal MPs have been urging Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to reject the proposal despite approval of all 14 First Nations communities in the area where the mine would’ve been built. 

MALCOLM: Scheer spoke the truth, and it clearly struck a nerve with Trudeau

0

Canada is still being held hostage by a small and radical group of far-left protesters. Still.

We’ve entered the third week of this national temper tantrum, and our country’s leaders are further from a solution now then they were while Trudeau was off gallivanting around the world in vain pursuit of a seat at the United Nations security council.

Politicians in Ottawa held an emergency debate session in the House of Commons on Tuesday, where interim Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer delivered one of the better speeches of his career.

He called Trudeau’s handling of this whole ordeal, “the weakest response to a national crisis in history.” Fact check: true.

Trudeau wrongly conflates these anti-development activists with legitimate First Nations concerns. He doesn’t see this as an assault on the rule of law and the Canadian economy, but instead as an issue of reconciliation and a time for a healing session.

Scheer condemned Trudeau for not clearly denouncing the illegal actions of the masked protesters and for failing to present any kind of an action plan to end the blockades and get our country moving again.

“Will our country be one of the rule of law, or will our country be one of the rule of the mob?” Scheer asked. “Will we let our entire economy be held hostage by a small group, trampling over our legal system?” He rightly described the protesters as “a small group of radical activists, many of whom have little to no connection to First Nations communities.”

Scheer was on fire. In fact, had this Andrew Scheer been running in the last election, he would be Prime Minister right now.

Scheer spoke the truth, and it clearly struck a nerve with Justin Trudeau. So much so, that when Trudeau called a meeting of party leaders to discuss a strategy for dealing with the protesters, he refused to invite Scheer into the meeting.

Just last weekend, Trudeau was filmed bowing and laughing it up with Iran’s foreign minister Javad Zarif at a closed door meeting in Europe. Zarif runs the military of what Canada considers a terrorist state, and just one month ago, his government blew a commercial airliner out of the sky, murdering 176 souls aboard, including scores of Canadians.

Trudeau is perfectly willing to meet with someone who can rightly be called a wicked Islamist terrorist, but, apparently, he’s unwilling to meet with the Leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition.

On Wednesday, a new national poll vindicated Scheer’s position on the issue. A clear majority of Canadians — 61% — disagree with the protesters and see the blockades as unjustified. More than half of the country wants the police to arrest the protesters and end the disruptions.

Scheer speaks for many Canadians, and yet, Trudeau refuses to listen.

Instead of defending our democracy, enforcing our laws, and heeding to the majority of Canadians who want this dealt with now, the Trudeau government has retreated. They ordered the RCMP in British Columbia to stand down, abandon the court order to arrest the protesters and remove police presence from the original protests in the Wet’suwet’en territory.

And so, here we are, closing in on twenty days of these blockades. Via Rail announced 1000 temporary layoffs and CN Rail announced another 450. The Maritimes and parts of Quebec are at risk of running out of propane and have already begun rationing supplies.

Meanwhile, emboldened protesters are flexing their power and taking their theatrics to the next level. A group of environmentalists showed up at the home of B.C. Premier John Horgan, himself a left-wing environmentalist who opposes most pipelines, to block his driveway and attempt a “citizens’ arrest.”

The radical far-left is winning. Canada is falling apart. And Trudeau doesn’t seem to have a clue on how to fix it.

FUREY: Don’t believe what Trudeau says — politicians can give orders to the police

0

The illegal blockades situation will only escalate because politicians refuse to do anything about it.

Trudeau says “Canada doesn’t tell police what to do,” but that’s simply not true.

True North’s Anthony Furey explains in his latest video.

Fan of True North? We’re not getting government handouts like the mainstream media. We depend on Canadians like you. Support True North: http://www.tnc.news/donate/

Teck Resources considering exit from Alberta oil sands if Frontier mine not approved

0

Teck Resources Ltd. said they could withdraw from the Albertan oil sands completely as the federal government may not approve their $20.6 billion Frontier oil sands mine. 

In a call with analysts on Friday, Teck CEO Don Lindsay said that without improvements in the Canadian energy sector, Teck may have to sell their stake in Frontier and the existing Fort Hills mine.

“We would look at doing something to realize that value, whether it’s a spinoff or some sort of transaction,” Lindsay said about Fort Hills.

“If we did that, then probably Frontier would go with it,” he added.

The Trudeau cabinet has until the end of the month to approve the Teck Frontier oil sands mine.

On Friday, Teck Resources Ltd. took a $900-million writedown on its Fort Hills oil mine due to the low price of Canadian oil. Teck also said they will be forced to take a $1.1-billion writedown on the proposed Frontier mine is not approved by the end of the month.

Teck’s shares fell by 15.5% on the Toronto Stock Exchange Friday.

If approved, the Teck Frontier mine would employ 7,000 people during its construction and 2,500 during its expected 40-year lifespan. Teck expects that the government would earn $70 billion in tax revenue from the mine during its lifetime.

The Frontier mine has been under regulatory review since 2011, with a joint review panel giving the project their approval in July 2019.

Liberal MPs have been trying to pressure cabinet to withhold approval for the project, saying that if Frontier is approved Canada will not be able to meet its 2050 carbon emissions target.

In February, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney wrote to Trudeau to warn him that cancelling the Frontier mine may be the “boiling point” for Western alienation.

“There is quite simply, no reason specific to this project that would justify denying federal cabinet approval for the Frontier project,” wrote Kenney.

“[A rejection] of our most important industry could raise roiling Western alienation to a boiling point.”

The Trudeau government has not indicated if it will approve the Frontier mine. Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson has said Alberta’s current efforts to fight climate change will be considered in their decision.

FUREY: Marilyn Gladu says MacKay, O’Toole can’t grow Conservative Party

0

Conservative Leadership Candidate Marilyn Gladu isn’t bothered by the fact she doesn’t bring the same strong political background to the race as fellow candidates Peter MacKay and Erin O’Toole, both longer serving MPs who were cabinet ministers in the Stephen Harper government.

In fact, Gladu sees the two candidates as facing a serious liability.

Check out True North’s Anthony Furey’s latest at the Toronto Sun!

Sign spotted at teachers’ protest saying Ontario PC MPP should have been aborted

0

As first reported by Brian Lilley, a sign was spotted at the teachers’ protest at the Ontario PC Policy Conference which consisted of a picture of Ontario PC MPP Sam Oosterhoff and the phrase “a problem an abortion could have solved.”

Oosterhoff currently serves as Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Education and is known for his pro-life beliefs.

Within metres of the man holding the sign were protesters holding Catholic school flags.

This isn’t the first time protesters targeted the Niagara West MPP. In late January teachers protested outside of Oosterhoff’s constituency office in Beamsville.

Ontario teachers have been engaging in rotating strikes since mid-January after months of negotiations between the union and the government of Ontario failed to reach an agreement.

In January, Toronto and Peel school boards announced they will not be providing report cards this winter for students in grades one to eight, and some school boards have been forced to postpone Grade 9 standardized tests. 

Education Minister Stephen Lecce says that the teachers’ unions’ demands would cost the taxpayer $7 billion.

On Friday, the Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association announced they will end rotating strikes and enter into mediation with the government. 

Ontario public school teachers are among the highest-paid teachers in the world, with the average high school teacher earning $92,000 a year.

BC’s movement for more free birth control: sound public policy, or thinly-veiled anti-natalism?

0

A handful of organizations and individuals in British Columbia are advocating for free universal contraception for all “women and people with uteruses” in the province (their words, not mine). The free birth control advocacy organization AccessBC was endorsed by the City of Victoria, as well as numerous unions and university student societies.

These activists were hoping free contraception would be included in BC’s 2020 budget, but when the budget was released earlier this week, it ultimately did not include any such plan, despite Premier John Horgan previously indicating he was open to the idea. 

At this point, that decision was for the best, as many of the arguments employed by the birth control advocates are questionable.

Recently, two members of the UBC Medicine Political Advocacy Committee – a committee currently lobbying the provincial government for free birth control – published an opinion piece in the CBC laying out their case for provincially-funded contraception.

The CBC piece starts with the story of a 15-year old girl at a clinic who is crestfallen upon learning that the IUD she wants will cost her $385, as she won’t be able to afford it. Apparently, no one explained to her that a non-hormonal IUD will cost her about $80 and be just as effective, or that there is a youth clinic near her that could offer other methods for free or lower cost. 

The CBC piece goes on: “Currently in our province, about 40 per cent of pregnancies are unintended. Nationally, unplanned pregnancies cost our collective health-care systems $320 million annually based on medical costs associated with pregnancy, labour and delivery and abortion.” 

They argue that universal contraception would cost the country $157 million per year, which is far less costly than the $320 million associated with unplanned pregnancies. 

But wait a second: “unplanned pregnancy” is not synonymous with “unwanted child.” It does not seem methodologically sound to lump together the costs of abortion with the costs of labour and delivery for parents who chose to raise and love their child.

Perhaps the organizations and individuals behind the push for universal contraception are willing to overlook that element because ultimately, they are anti-family and anti-reproduction. They act as if 40% of children are a “cost burden” that should have been avoided. (Moreover, the national figure of unplanned pregnancies is 61%). If a couple found out they were pregnant before the father got the promotion he wanted; or before they moved into a bigger apartment; or right after a mother had launched a new project she was working on, does that mean the unplanned pregnancy is now a societal cost burden that should have never happened?

The province of British Columbia already provides free contraception to low-income and indigenous people. There are youth clinics around the province offering free services for those generally between the ages of 12-24. 

Aside from ensuring that every community in BC has access to these types of clinics and ensuring those who qualify for free contraception are aware of it – which are worthy public policy goals – I don’t see the validity from those urgently claiming that the province is not doing enough for “people with uteruses.” 

AccessBC members repeat that they want to remove financial barriers and ensure no one has to choose between paying for contraception or paying for rent. But considering that contraception is already free for low-income individuals, it’s hard not to see the anti-natalist strain in the free birth control movement: they are stigmatizing pregnancy, treating children as a financial blotch on the province, and pushing the “progressive” idea that the only way to achieve their notion of gender equality is for women to abstain from childrearing.  

KNIGHT: Canada needs a real leader

0

After two weeks of ongoing blockades and rail disruption, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told Canadians that “the barricades must come down now.”

The only problem is Trudeau didn’t explain how he was going to end the illegal blockades.

True North’s Leo Knight wishes Canada had a real leader.

Fan of Leo’s? Support independent media in Canada: http://www.tnc.news/donate/

Supreme Court to decide whether two Via Rail terrorists get retrial

0

The Supreme Court of Canada will be deciding whether to offer a retrial to two men convicted of plotting a terrorist attack on Via Rail passenger trains. 

In 2015, Raed Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier were convicted of several terrorism charges for their al-Qaeda-affiliated attack plan.

The pair were granted a retrial by the Ontario Court of Appeal in August of 2019 after the court ruled that a legal error was made by the original trial judge. 

“The trial judge’s error here took one of the three options, the exclusion of unsworn jurors while using rotating triers, away from Jaser,” wrote the three justices involved in the decision to offer a retrial. 

The two terrorists were arrested in 2013 after a year-long investigation into their terrorist activities. 

Jaser and Esseghaier were both charged with two counts of participating in terrorist activity and conspiracy to commit murder for the benefit of a criminal organization. Additionally, Essaghaier was charged with conspiracy to derail a Via Rail train.

Investigators at the time stated that the two had already decided on a train route and were believed to be receiving assistance from al-Qaeda.  

“Had this plot been carried out, it would have resulted in innocent people being killed or seriously injured,” said RCMP Assistant Commissioner James Malizia.

Since being granted the appeal, the two terrorists have requested to receive a retrial without a jury. 

The Public Prosecution Service of Canada took the appeal court’s decision to the Supreme Court and if it is upheld, crown prosecutors intend to prosecute the two again for terrorism offences. 

BC Premier John Horgan says cancelling LNG pipeline is “not an option”

0

BC Premier John Horgan has said that cancelling the province’s LNG pipeline project is “not an option.” 

The pipeline, which has passed through all proper regulatory hurdles, is at the centre of a national crisis. All across Canada, activists have blockaded railways, threatening to cripple Canada’s economy.

The nationwide protests were sparked by five hereditary Wet’suwet’en chiefs who oppose the pipeline.

Horgan told the chiefs that he is open to meet and discuss the issues at hand but he would not budge on the pipeline’s construction.

“I have no shortage of other [First] Nations, first of all, within B.C. that have exciting opportunities. And they want to work with the province, and the federal government, and their local communities to find the prosperity that we all want for ourselves and our neighbours,” said Horgan.

Despite the small number of chiefs who oppose the project, First Nations groups along the pipeline’s route overwhelmingly support it, including 20 elected First Nations bands who want to see its construction completed. 

In the last week, protesters blockaded the BC Legislature, prompting an investigation by Victoria Police into alleged assaults on government staff trying to get into the building.

Horgan’s own home was blockaded after Extinction Rebellion radicals tried to “arrest” the premier. 

By the time the protesters arrived, Horgan had already left his residence but was prompted to return due to concerns over his wife’s safety. 

In response, the police arrested three activists from the group.